Questões de Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension para Concurso
Foram encontradas 6.243 questões
According to Leffa, the ideal foreign language teacher needs to have certain characteristics.
The ideal foreign language teacher characteristics’ are:
SRID values must be in the range of 32-bit unsigned integers, with these restrictions:
- SRID 0 is a valid SRID but cannot be used with DROP SPATIAL REFERENCE SYSTEM.
- If the value is in a reserved SRID range, a warning occurs. Reserved ranges are [0, 32767] (reserved by EPSG), [60,000,000, 69,999,999] (reserved by EPSG), and [2,000,000,000, 2,147,483,647] (reserved by MySQL). EPSG stands for the European Petroleum Survey Group.
- Users should not drop SRSs with SRIDs in the reserved ranges. If system-installed SRSs are dropped, the SRS definitions may be recreated for MySQL upgrades.
Available at: <https://dev.mysql.com>. Access on: 6 Mar. 2021.
According to the presented excerpt from the documentation, mark the correct alternative.
ALTER TABLE changes the structure of a table. For example, you can add or delete columns, create or destroy indexes, change the type of existing columns, or rename columns or the table itself. You can also change characteristics such as the storage engine used for the table or the table comment. To use ALTER TABLE, you need ALTER, CREATE, and INSERT privileges for the table. Renaming a table requires ALTER and DROP on the old table, ALTER, CREATE, and INSERT on the new table. Following the table name, specify the alterations to be made. If none are given, ALTER TABLE does nothing.
Available at: . Accessed on: 6 Mar. 2021.
According to the text, what are all of the permissions necessary on the new table for the user to rename it?
Text 4 to answer questions 21 and 22.
1 -------Enterprise-class firewalls, such as those made by
----FORTINET, Cisco Systems and NetScreen Technologies,
----have long been marketplace commodities. Out of the box,
4 --they provide reliable, relatively easy-to-use security
----solutions. Buying some licenses from vendors can also
----provide 24/7 support and ongoing maintenance. In
7 --addition, commercial firewalls have configuration
----facilities, usually through graphical interfaces, and
----facilitated interaction with other security technologies such
10 --as SIEM, EDR, DRP, etc.
---------But commercial firewalls have a problem: many
----would say that they are expensive. That is why some IT
13 --teams consider the use of other options like open-source
----firewalls. iptables®, for example, is a freeware Linux tool
----developed by NetFilter that isn’t nearly as easy to use, but
16 --it’s quickly catching up in features and functionality.
---------iptables® firewall boasts many features normally
----found only in commercial firewalls, including packet
19 --defragmentation, rate limiting, integration of VPNs, scale
----up and scale down, packet content inspection and protocol
----state tracking.
22 -------So why don't we always use iptables® firewall instead
----of proprietary applications or devices? In addition to the
----support from manufacturers that the more traditional choice
25 --has, we can highlight iptables’® need for professional
----training, and also the need for hiring large support teams,
27--which could cost even more money in some scenarios.
Disponível em:<https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/opinion/Commercialfirewalls-vs-Open-source-firewalls>. Acesso em 20 mar. 2021, com adaptações.
Regarding the acquisition of security devices such as firewalls, and based on the text, it is correct to state that
Text 4 to answer questions 21 and 22.
1 -------Enterprise-class firewalls, such as those made by
----FORTINET, Cisco Systems and NetScreen Technologies,
----have long been marketplace commodities. Out of the box,
4 --they provide reliable, relatively easy-to-use security
----solutions. Buying some licenses from vendors can also
----provide 24/7 support and ongoing maintenance. In
7 --addition, commercial firewalls have configuration
----facilities, usually through graphical interfaces, and
----facilitated interaction with other security technologies such
10 --as SIEM, EDR, DRP, etc.
---------But commercial firewalls have a problem: many
----would say that they are expensive. That is why some IT
13 --teams consider the use of other options like open-source
----firewalls. iptables®, for example, is a freeware Linux tool
----developed by NetFilter that isn’t nearly as easy to use, but
16 --it’s quickly catching up in features and functionality.
---------iptables® firewall boasts many features normally
----found only in commercial firewalls, including packet
19 --defragmentation, rate limiting, integration of VPNs, scale
----up and scale down, packet content inspection and protocol
----state tracking.
22 -------So why don't we always use iptables® firewall instead
----of proprietary applications or devices? In addition to the
----support from manufacturers that the more traditional choice
25 --has, we can highlight iptables’® need for professional
----training, and also the need for hiring large support teams,
27--which could cost even more money in some scenarios.
Disponível em:<https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/opinion/Commercialfirewalls-vs-Open-source-firewalls>. Acesso em 20 mar. 2021, com adaptações.
According to the text and to the knowledge concerning firewall technology, mark the correct alternative.
Conheça nossos planos