Questões de Concurso Público EMBRAPA 2025 para Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal
Foram encontradas 4 questões
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
EMBRAPA
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Automação e Mecanização
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal |
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Robótica e Sensoriamento |
Q3313381
Inglês
Texto associado
Many studies reveal the contributions of plant breeding
and agronomy to farm productivity and their role in reshaping
global diets. However, historical accounts also implicate these
sciences in the creation of new problems, from novel disease
vulnerabilities propagated through industrial monocrops to the
negative ecological and public health consequences of crops
dependent on chemical inputs and industrialized food systems
more generally.
Increasingly, historical analyses also highlight the
expertise variously usurped, overlooked, abandoned, or
suppressed in the pursuit of “modern” agricultural science.
Experiment stations and “improved” plants were instruments of
colonialism, means of controlling lands and lives of peoples
typically labeled as “primitive” and “backward” by imperial
authorities. In many cases, the assumptions of colonial improvers
persisted in the international development programs that have
sought since the mid-20th century to deliver “modern” science to
farming communities in the Global South.
Awareness of these issues has brought alternative domains
of crop science such as agroecology to the fore in recent decades,
as researchers reconcile the need for robust crop knowledge and
know-how with the imperatives of addressing social and
environmental injustice.
Helen Anne Curry; Ryan Nehring. The history of crop science and the future of food.
Internet: (adapted)
Judge the following items about the text above.
According to the text, the farming communities in the Global South are no longer under the assumptions typical of the “international development programs” created in the 20th century.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
EMBRAPA
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Automação e Mecanização
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal |
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Robótica e Sensoriamento |
Q3313382
Não definido
Texto associado
Many studies reveal the contributions of plant breeding
and agronomy to farm productivity and their role in reshaping
global diets. However, historical accounts also implicate these
sciences in the creation of new problems, from novel disease
vulnerabilities propagated through industrial monocrops to the
negative ecological and public health consequences of crops
dependent on chemical inputs and industrialized food systems
more generally.
Increasingly, historical analyses also highlight the
expertise variously usurped, overlooked, abandoned, or
suppressed in the pursuit of “modern” agricultural science.
Experiment stations and “improved” plants were instruments of
colonialism, means of controlling lands and lives of peoples
typically labeled as “primitive” and “backward” by imperial
authorities. In many cases, the assumptions of colonial improvers
persisted in the international development programs that have
sought since the mid-20th century to deliver “modern” science to
farming communities in the Global South.
Awareness of these issues has brought alternative domains
of crop science such as agroecology to the fore in recent decades,
as researchers reconcile the need for robust crop knowledge and
know-how with the imperatives of addressing social and
environmental injustice.
Helen Anne Curry; Ryan Nehring. The history of crop science and the future of food.
Internet: (adapted)
Judge the following items about the text above.
Even though the authors acknowledge the benefits brought to humanity by plant breeding and agronomy, they present a critical view about some aspects of this development, such as the effects of colonialism.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
EMBRAPA
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Automação e Mecanização
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal |
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Robótica e Sensoriamento |
Q3313383
Não definido
Texto associado
Many studies reveal the contributions of plant breeding
and agronomy to farm productivity and their role in reshaping
global diets. However, historical accounts also implicate these
sciences in the creation of new problems, from novel disease
vulnerabilities propagated through industrial monocrops to the
negative ecological and public health consequences of crops
dependent on chemical inputs and industrialized food systems
more generally.
Increasingly, historical analyses also highlight the
expertise variously usurped, overlooked, abandoned, or
suppressed in the pursuit of “modern” agricultural science.
Experiment stations and “improved” plants were instruments of
colonialism, means of controlling lands and lives of peoples
typically labeled as “primitive” and “backward” by imperial
authorities. In many cases, the assumptions of colonial improvers
persisted in the international development programs that have
sought since the mid-20th century to deliver “modern” science to
farming communities in the Global South.
Awareness of these issues has brought alternative domains
of crop science such as agroecology to the fore in recent decades,
as researchers reconcile the need for robust crop knowledge and
know-how with the imperatives of addressing social and
environmental injustice.
Helen Anne Curry; Ryan Nehring. The history of crop science and the future of food.
Internet: (adapted)
Judge the following items about the text above.
The presence of inverted commas (“) in “primitive” and “backward” indicate that the authors agree with the descriptions used by imperial authorities to define some specific peoples.
Ano: 2025
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
EMBRAPA
Provas:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Automação e Mecanização
|
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal |
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2025 - EMBRAPA - Pesquisador – Área: Engenharias – Subárea: Robótica e Sensoriamento |
Q3313389
Inglês
Texto associado
In the 20th century, we made tremendous advances in
discovering fundamental principles in different scientific
disciplines that created major breakthroughs in management and
technology for agricultural systems, mostly by empirical means.
However, as we enter the 21st century, agricultural research has
more difficult and complex problems to solve.
The environmental consciousness of the general public is
requiring us to modify farm management to protect water, air,
and soil quality, while staying economically profitable. At the
same time, market-based global competition in agricultural
products is challenging economic viability of the traditional
agricultural systems, and requires the development of new and
dynamic production systems. Fortunately, the new electronic
technologies can provide us a vast amount of real-time
information about crop conditions and near-term weather via
remote sensing by satellites or ground-based instruments and the
Internet, that can be utilized to develop a whole new level of
management. However, we need the means to capture and make
sense of this vast amount of site-specific data.
Our customers, the agricultural producers, are asking for a
quicker transfer of research results in an integrated usable form
for site-specific management. Such a request can only be met
with system models, because system models are indeed the
integration and quantification of current knowledge based on
fundamental principles and laws. Models enhance understanding
of data taken under certain conditions and help extrapolate their
applications to other conditions and locations.
Lajpat R. Ahuja; Liwang Ma; Terry A. Howell. Whole System Integration and Modeling — Essential to
Agricultural Science and Technology in the 21st Century. In: Lajpat R. Ahuja; Liwang Ma; Terry A. Howell
(eds.) Agricultural system models in field research and technology transfer.
Boca Raton, CRC Press LLC, 2002 (adapted).
Considering the text presented above, judge the following items.
The text focuses on showing how the advances made in the 20th century were essential to the development of the notion of agricultural systems.
Conheça nossos planos