Questões de Concurso Comentadas para fgv

Foram encontradas 51.835 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q2972320 Geografia

De acordo com o último censo demográfico, o município do Mato Grosso do Sul que possui menor percentual de domicílios atendidos por energia elétrica é:

Alternativas
Q2972315 Geografia

Em comparação com outros estados do Brasil, o Mato Grosso do Sul, em maior extensão territorial, ocupa o:

Alternativas
Q2972313 Geografia

No tocante aos recursos naturais, o Estado do Mato Grosso do Sul possui a maior reserva brasileira de:

Alternativas
Q2972310 Geografia

Em relação à área total do Estado do Mato Grosso do Sul, o Pantanal representa, aproximadamente:

Alternativas
Q2972309 Geografia

Analise as afirmativas a seguir:


I. A população sul-mato-grossense espera uma redução na taxa de crescimento demográfico.

II. Vem ocorrendo, no Estado do Mato Grosso do Sul, um declínio do número de filhos por mulheres.

III. A diminuição da taxa de mortalidade, que vem ocorrendo nos últimos anos no Mato Grosso do Sul, resulta em ganhos na esperança de vida.


Assinale:

Alternativas
Q2972308 Direito Administrativo

Com a Reforma Administrativa de 1998, a “Nova Administração Pública” introduz, pela emenda 19/98, o princípio da:

Alternativas
Q2972259 Direito Constitucional

Com base no artigo 37 da Constituição Federal, analise as afirmativas a seguir:


I. A lei reservará percentual dos cargos e empregos públicos para as pessoas portadoras de deficiência e definirá os critérios de sua admissão.

II. É garantido ao servidor público civil o direito à livre associação sindical.

III. Os acréscimos pecuniários percebidos por servidor público não serão computados nem acumulados para fins de concessão de acréscimos ulteriores.


Assinale:

Alternativas
Q2972246 Raciocínio Lógico

Uma urna contém quatro bolas de cores diferentes. Sacam-se, com reposição, quatro bolas dessa urna. Qual é a probabilidade de que sejam sacadas, em qualquer ordem, duas bolas de uma cor e duas de outra cor?

Alternativas
Q2972243 Matemática

Se X, Y e Z são conjuntos, X (Y Z) = (X Y) Z:

Alternativas
Q2972242 Inglês

Google as well as Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL among

others are gearing up to keep a much closer eye on all of us,

so that within five years these and other firms will routinely

track our movements, friends, interests, purchases and

5 correspondence – then make money by helping marketers

take advantage of the information.

These companies' brash plans are pushing us toward a

thorny choice that will determine the future of computing.

Google and other Web-oriented, information-service giants are

10 determined to build a breathtaking array of services based on

your personal information, and they're betting you'll be willing

to share it with them in order for you to reap the benefits. But

if we cooperate and let them in on the details of our lives, we'll

lose much of our privacy, and possibly a lot more.

15 A privacy backlash, however, would stifle these potentially

revolutionary services before they get off the ground – and

leave the computer industry's biggest plans for growth in

tatters. That may be just what some people want. The U.S.

Congress is considering four bills that would make it illegal to

20 collect and share information online or through cell phones

about people without clearer warning and permission. These

sorts of restrictions are already in effect throughout much of

Europe, thanks in part to European Union directives on privacy

and electronic communications passed in 2002 and 2003.

25 The good news is that there's no reason to choose

between technology and privacy. New technologies are

emerging that can doctor our data so that companies know

just enough about us to ply us with customized services, while

preventing them from getting a clear picture of our private

lives. The question is again one of trust: in this case, whether

people will come to trust the companies that are trying to build

these new technologies.

(abridged from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April 3, 2006)

The main point in paragraph 4 is

Alternativas
Q2972238 Inglês

Google as well as Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL among

others are gearing up to keep a much closer eye on all of us,

so that within five years these and other firms will routinely

track our movements, friends, interests, purchases and

5 correspondence – then make money by helping marketers

take advantage of the information.

These companies' brash plans are pushing us toward a

thorny choice that will determine the future of computing.

Google and other Web-oriented, information-service giants are

10 determined to build a breathtaking array of services based on

your personal information, and they're betting you'll be willing

to share it with them in order for you to reap the benefits. But

if we cooperate and let them in on the details of our lives, we'll

lose much of our privacy, and possibly a lot more.

15 A privacy backlash, however, would stifle these potentially

revolutionary services before they get off the ground – and

leave the computer industry's biggest plans for growth in

tatters. That may be just what some people want. The U.S.

Congress is considering four bills that would make it illegal to

20 collect and share information online or through cell phones

about people without clearer warning and permission. These

sorts of restrictions are already in effect throughout much of

Europe, thanks in part to European Union directives on privacy

and electronic communications passed in 2002 and 2003.

25 The good news is that there's no reason to choose

between technology and privacy. New technologies are

emerging that can doctor our data so that companies know

just enough about us to ply us with customized services, while

preventing them from getting a clear picture of our private

lives. The question is again one of trust: in this case, whether

people will come to trust the companies that are trying to build

these new technologies.

(abridged from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April 3, 2006)

According to lines 18 to 24,

Alternativas
Q2972236 Inglês

Google as well as Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL among

others are gearing up to keep a much closer eye on all of us,

so that within five years these and other firms will routinely

track our movements, friends, interests, purchases and

5 correspondence – then make money by helping marketers

take advantage of the information.

These companies' brash plans are pushing us toward a

thorny choice that will determine the future of computing.

Google and other Web-oriented, information-service giants are

10 determined to build a breathtaking array of services based on

your personal information, and they're betting you'll be willing

to share it with them in order for you to reap the benefits. But

if we cooperate and let them in on the details of our lives, we'll

lose much of our privacy, and possibly a lot more.

15 A privacy backlash, however, would stifle these potentially

revolutionary services before they get off the ground – and

leave the computer industry's biggest plans for growth in

tatters. That may be just what some people want. The U.S.

Congress is considering four bills that would make it illegal to

20 collect and share information online or through cell phones

about people without clearer warning and permission. These

sorts of restrictions are already in effect throughout much of

Europe, thanks in part to European Union directives on privacy

and electronic communications passed in 2002 and 2003.

25 The good news is that there's no reason to choose

between technology and privacy. New technologies are

emerging that can doctor our data so that companies know

just enough about us to ply us with customized services, while

preventing them from getting a clear picture of our private

lives. The question is again one of trust: in this case, whether

people will come to trust the companies that are trying to build

these new technologies.

(abridged from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April 3, 2006)

Complete the following passage with the right prepositions in the right order:


Some 25 million surveillance cameras are already _____ place _____ stores and public spaces in the U.S. alone, and new ones are coming online _____ the rate of 2 million a year. _____ fact it's difficult to walk down the street without being photographed _____ several different angles.

(adapted from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April3, 2006)

Alternativas
Q2972235 Inglês

Google as well as Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL among

others are gearing up to keep a much closer eye on all of us,

so that within five years these and other firms will routinely

track our movements, friends, interests, purchases and

5 correspondence – then make money by helping marketers

take advantage of the information.

These companies' brash plans are pushing us toward a

thorny choice that will determine the future of computing.

Google and other Web-oriented, information-service giants are

10 determined to build a breathtaking array of services based on

your personal information, and they're betting you'll be willing

to share it with them in order for you to reap the benefits. But

if we cooperate and let them in on the details of our lives, we'll

lose much of our privacy, and possibly a lot more.

15 A privacy backlash, however, would stifle these potentially

revolutionary services before they get off the ground – and

leave the computer industry's biggest plans for growth in

tatters. That may be just what some people want. The U.S.

Congress is considering four bills that would make it illegal to

20 collect and share information online or through cell phones

about people without clearer warning and permission. These

sorts of restrictions are already in effect throughout much of

Europe, thanks in part to European Union directives on privacy

and electronic communications passed in 2002 and 2003.

25 The good news is that there's no reason to choose

between technology and privacy. New technologies are

emerging that can doctor our data so that companies know

just enough about us to ply us with customized services, while

preventing them from getting a clear picture of our private

lives. The question is again one of trust: in this case, whether

people will come to trust the companies that are trying to build

these new technologies.

(abridged from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April 3, 2006)

From paragraph 3 we infer that

Alternativas
Q2972234 Inglês

Google as well as Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL among

others are gearing up to keep a much closer eye on all of us,

so that within five years these and other firms will routinely

track our movements, friends, interests, purchases and

5 correspondence – then make money by helping marketers

take advantage of the information.

These companies' brash plans are pushing us toward a

thorny choice that will determine the future of computing.

Google and other Web-oriented, information-service giants are

10 determined to build a breathtaking array of services based on

your personal information, and they're betting you'll be willing

to share it with them in order for you to reap the benefits. But

if we cooperate and let them in on the details of our lives, we'll

lose much of our privacy, and possibly a lot more.

15 A privacy backlash, however, would stifle these potentially

revolutionary services before they get off the ground – and

leave the computer industry's biggest plans for growth in

tatters. That may be just what some people want. The U.S.

Congress is considering four bills that would make it illegal to

20 collect and share information online or through cell phones

about people without clearer warning and permission. These

sorts of restrictions are already in effect throughout much of

Europe, thanks in part to European Union directives on privacy

and electronic communications passed in 2002 and 2003.

25 The good news is that there's no reason to choose

between technology and privacy. New technologies are

emerging that can doctor our data so that companies know

just enough about us to ply us with customized services, while

preventing them from getting a clear picture of our private

lives. The question is again one of trust: in this case, whether

people will come to trust the companies that are trying to build

these new technologies.

(abridged from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April 3, 2006)

Mark the one item which contains the best passive alternative for we'll lose much of our privacy (lines 13-14):

Alternativas
Q2972233 Inglês

Google as well as Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL among

others are gearing up to keep a much closer eye on all of us,

so that within five years these and other firms will routinely

track our movements, friends, interests, purchases and

5 correspondence – then make money by helping marketers

take advantage of the information.

These companies' brash plans are pushing us toward a

thorny choice that will determine the future of computing.

Google and other Web-oriented, information-service giants are

10 determined to build a breathtaking array of services based on

your personal information, and they're betting you'll be willing

to share it with them in order for you to reap the benefits. But

if we cooperate and let them in on the details of our lives, we'll

lose much of our privacy, and possibly a lot more.

15 A privacy backlash, however, would stifle these potentially

revolutionary services before they get off the ground – and

leave the computer industry's biggest plans for growth in

tatters. That may be just what some people want. The U.S.

Congress is considering four bills that would make it illegal to

20 collect and share information online or through cell phones

about people without clearer warning and permission. These

sorts of restrictions are already in effect throughout much of

Europe, thanks in part to European Union directives on privacy

and electronic communications passed in 2002 and 2003.

25 The good news is that there's no reason to choose

between technology and privacy. New technologies are

emerging that can doctor our data so that companies know

just enough about us to ply us with customized services, while

preventing them from getting a clear picture of our private

lives. The question is again one of trust: in this case, whether

people will come to trust the companies that are trying to build

these new technologies.

(abridged from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April 3, 2006)

In the text, to reap (line12) may be replaced without loss of meaning by

Alternativas
Q2972231 Inglês

Google as well as Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL among

others are gearing up to keep a much closer eye on all of us,

so that within five years these and other firms will routinely

track our movements, friends, interests, purchases and

5 correspondence – then make money by helping marketers

take advantage of the information.

These companies' brash plans are pushing us toward a

thorny choice that will determine the future of computing.

Google and other Web-oriented, information-service giants are

10 determined to build a breathtaking array of services based on

your personal information, and they're betting you'll be willing

to share it with them in order for you to reap the benefits. But

if we cooperate and let them in on the details of our lives, we'll

lose much of our privacy, and possibly a lot more.

15 A privacy backlash, however, would stifle these potentially

revolutionary services before they get off the ground – and

leave the computer industry's biggest plans for growth in

tatters. That may be just what some people want. The U.S.

Congress is considering four bills that would make it illegal to

20 collect and share information online or through cell phones

about people without clearer warning and permission. These

sorts of restrictions are already in effect throughout much of

Europe, thanks in part to European Union directives on privacy

and electronic communications passed in 2002 and 2003.

25 The good news is that there's no reason to choose

between technology and privacy. New technologies are

emerging that can doctor our data so that companies know

just enough about us to ply us with customized services, while

preventing them from getting a clear picture of our private

lives. The question is again one of trust: in this case, whether

people will come to trust the companies that are trying to build

these new technologies.

(abridged from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April 3, 2006)

From paragraph 2 we infer that all the following statements are correct, except

Alternativas
Q2972230 Inglês

Google as well as Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL among

others are gearing up to keep a much closer eye on all of us,

so that within five years these and other firms will routinely

track our movements, friends, interests, purchases and

5 correspondence – then make money by helping marketers

take advantage of the information.

These companies' brash plans are pushing us toward a

thorny choice that will determine the future of computing.

Google and other Web-oriented, information-service giants are

10 determined to build a breathtaking array of services based on

your personal information, and they're betting you'll be willing

to share it with them in order for you to reap the benefits. But

if we cooperate and let them in on the details of our lives, we'll

lose much of our privacy, and possibly a lot more.

15 A privacy backlash, however, would stifle these potentially

revolutionary services before they get off the ground – and

leave the computer industry's biggest plans for growth in

tatters. That may be just what some people want. The U.S.

Congress is considering four bills that would make it illegal to

20 collect and share information online or through cell phones

about people without clearer warning and permission. These

sorts of restrictions are already in effect throughout much of

Europe, thanks in part to European Union directives on privacy

and electronic communications passed in 2002 and 2003.

25 The good news is that there's no reason to choose

between technology and privacy. New technologies are

emerging that can doctor our data so that companies know

just enough about us to ply us with customized services, while

preventing them from getting a clear picture of our private

lives. The question is again one of trust: in this case, whether

people will come to trust the companies that are trying to build

these new technologies.

(abridged from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April 3, 2006)

In the text, breathtaking (line 10) means

Alternativas
Q2972229 Inglês

Google as well as Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL among

others are gearing up to keep a much closer eye on all of us,

so that within five years these and other firms will routinely

track our movements, friends, interests, purchases and

5 correspondence – then make money by helping marketers

take advantage of the information.

These companies' brash plans are pushing us toward a

thorny choice that will determine the future of computing.

Google and other Web-oriented, information-service giants are

10 determined to build a breathtaking array of services based on

your personal information, and they're betting you'll be willing

to share it with them in order for you to reap the benefits. But

if we cooperate and let them in on the details of our lives, we'll

lose much of our privacy, and possibly a lot more.

15 A privacy backlash, however, would stifle these potentially

revolutionary services before they get off the ground – and

leave the computer industry's biggest plans for growth in

tatters. That may be just what some people want. The U.S.

Congress is considering four bills that would make it illegal to

20 collect and share information online or through cell phones

about people without clearer warning and permission. These

sorts of restrictions are already in effect throughout much of

Europe, thanks in part to European Union directives on privacy

and electronic communications passed in 2002 and 2003.

25 The good news is that there's no reason to choose

between technology and privacy. New technologies are

emerging that can doctor our data so that companies know

just enough about us to ply us with customized services, while

preventing them from getting a clear picture of our private

lives. The question is again one of trust: in this case, whether

people will come to trust the companies that are trying to build

these new technologies.

(abridged from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April 3, 2006)

In the text, brash (line 7) means

Alternativas
Q2972228 Inglês

Google as well as Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL among

others are gearing up to keep a much closer eye on all of us,

so that within five years these and other firms will routinely

track our movements, friends, interests, purchases and

5 correspondence – then make money by helping marketers

take advantage of the information.

These companies' brash plans are pushing us toward a

thorny choice that will determine the future of computing.

Google and other Web-oriented, information-service giants are

10 determined to build a breathtaking array of services based on

your personal information, and they're betting you'll be willing

to share it with them in order for you to reap the benefits. But

if we cooperate and let them in on the details of our lives, we'll

lose much of our privacy, and possibly a lot more.

15 A privacy backlash, however, would stifle these potentially

revolutionary services before they get off the ground – and

leave the computer industry's biggest plans for growth in

tatters. That may be just what some people want. The U.S.

Congress is considering four bills that would make it illegal to

20 collect and share information online or through cell phones

about people without clearer warning and permission. These

sorts of restrictions are already in effect throughout much of

Europe, thanks in part to European Union directives on privacy

and electronic communications passed in 2002 and 2003.

25 The good news is that there's no reason to choose

between technology and privacy. New technologies are

emerging that can doctor our data so that companies know

just enough about us to ply us with customized services, while

preventing them from getting a clear picture of our private

lives. The question is again one of trust: in this case, whether

people will come to trust the companies that are trying to build

these new technologies.

(abridged from Next Frontiers in Newsweek, April 3, 2006)

According to paragraph 1, Google, Yahoo and others

Alternativas
Q2972217 Português

Texto I


As Time Goes By


Conheci Rick Blaine em Paris, não faz muito. Ele tem uma

espelunca perto da Madeleine que pega todos os americanos

bêbados que o Harry’s Bar expulsa. Está com 70 anos, mas

não parece ter mais que 69. Os olhos empapuçados são os

5 mesmos mas o cabelo se foi e a barriga só parou de crescer

porque não havia mais lugar atrás do balcão. A princípio ele

negou que fosse Rick.

– Não conheço nenhum Rick.

– Está lá fora. Um letreiro enorme. Rick’s Café Americain.

10 – Está? Faz anos que não vou lá fora. O que você quer?

– Um bourbon. E alguma coisa para comer.

Escolhi um sanduíche de uma longa lista e Rick gritou o

pedido para um negrão na cozinha. Reconheci o negrão. Era o

pianista do café do Rick em Casablanca. Perguntei por que ele

15 não tocava mais piano.

– Sam? Porque só sabia uma música. A clientela não

agüentava mais. Ele também faz sempre o mesmo sanduíche.

Mas ninguém vem aqui pela comida.

Cantarolei um trecho de As Time Goes By. Perguntei:

20 – O que você faria se ela entrasse por aquela porta agora?

– Diria: "Um chazinho, vovó?" O passado não volta.

– Voltou uma vez. De todos os bares do mundo, ela tinha

que escolher logo o seu, em Casablanca, para entrar.

– Não volta mais.

25 Mas ele olhou, rápido, quando a porta se abriu de repente.

Era um americano que vinha pedir-lhe dinheiro para voltar aos

Estados Unidos. Estava fugindo de Mitterrand. Rick o ignorou.

Perguntou o que eu queria além do bourbon e do sanduíche

do Sam, que estava péssimo.

30 – Sempre quis saber o que aconteceu depois que ela

embarcou naquele avião com Victor Laszlo e você e o inspetor

Louis se afastaram, desaparecendo no nevoeiro.

– Passei quarenta anos no nevoeiro – respondeu ele.

Objetivamente, não estava disposto a contar muita coisa.

35 – Eu tenho uma tese.

Ele sorriu.

Mais uma...

– Você foi o primeiro a se desencantar com as grandes

causas. Você era o seu próprio território neutro. Victor Laszlo

40 era o cara engajado. Deve ter morrido cedo e levado alguns

outros idealistas como ele, pensando que estavam salvando o

mundo para a democracia e os bons sentimentos. Você nunca

teve ilusões sobre a humanidade. Era um cínico. Mas também

era um romântico. Podia ter-se livrado de Laszlo aos olhos

45 dela. Por quê?

– Você se lembra do rosto dela naquele instante?

Eu me lembrava. Mesmo através do nevoeiro, eu me

lembrava. Ele tinha razão. Por um rosto daqueles a gente

sacrifica até a falta de ideais.

50 A porta se abriu de novo e nós dois olhamos rápido. Mas

era apenas outro bêbado.

(Luis Fernando Veríssimo)

Em Você se lembra do rosto dela naquele instante? (L.46), obedeceu-se às regras de regência verbal.


Assinale a alternativa em que isso não tenha ocorrido.

Alternativas
Respostas
1101: A
1102: D
1103: B
1104: D
1105: E
1106: D
1107: E
1108: B
1109: C
1110: C
1111: C
1112: D
1113: D
1114: B
1115: A
1116: B
1117: B
1118: E
1119: C
1120: A