Questões de Concurso
Comentadas para tce-sp
Foram encontradas 965 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223740
Noções de Informática
Para criar formulários no Microsoft Word 2010, é necessário disponibilizar uma nova guia de opções com ferramentas para inserir e gerenciar os controles de formulário. Essa opção pode ser disponibilizada clicando-se no menu Arquivo, em seguida em Opções, depois em Personalizar Faixa de Opções e na área Guias Principais deve ser marcada a opção
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223739
Inglês
Texto associado
As questões de números 36 a 40 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
House G.O.P. Leaders Agree to Extension of Payroll Tax Cut
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 22, 2011
WASHINGTON - Under a deal reached between House and Senate leaders, the House will now approve as early as Friday the
two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate last Saturday, and the Senate will
appoint members of a House-Senate conference committee to negotiate legislation to extend both benefits through 2012.
House Republicans - who rejected an almost identical deal on Tuesday - collapsed under the political rubble that has
accumulated over the week, much of it from their own party, worried that the blockade would do serious damage to their appeal to
voters.
The House speaker, John A. Boehner, announced the decision over the phone to members on Thursday, and did not permit the
usual back and forth that is common on such calls, enraging many of them.
After his conversation with lawmakers, the speaker conceded to reporters that it might not have been "politically the smartest
thing in the world" for House Republicans to put themselves between a tax cut and the 160 million American workers who would benefit
from it, and to allow President Obama and Congressional Democrats to seize the momentum on the issue.
The agreement ended a partisan fight that threatened to keep Congress and Mr. Obama in town through Christmas and was
just the latest of the bitter struggles over fiscal policy involving House conservatives, the president and the Democratic-controlled
Senate.
Under the deal, the employee's share of the Social Security payroll tax will stay at the current level, 4.2 percent of wages,
through Feb. 29. In the absence of Congressional action, it would revert to the usual 6.2 percent next month. The government will also
continue paying unemployment insurance benefits under current policy through February. Without Congressional action, many of the
long-term unemployed would begin losing benefits next month.
In addition, under the agreement, Medicare will continue paying doctors at current rates for two months, averting a 27 percent
cut that would otherwise occur on Jan. 1.
The new deal makes minor adjustments to make it easier for small businesses to cope with the tax changes and prevents
manipulation of an employee's pay should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months.
Mr. Obama, who has reaped political benefits from the standoff, welcomed the outcome.
"This is good news, just in time for the holidays," he said in a statement. "This is the right thing [VERB 1] to strengthen our
families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will [VERB 2] a real difference in people's lives."
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html?_r=1&nl=
todays hea dlines & emc=tha2&pagewanted=all)
House G.O.P. Leaders Agree to Extension of Payroll Tax Cut
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 22, 2011
WASHINGTON - Under a deal reached between House and Senate leaders, the House will now approve as early as Friday the
two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate last Saturday, and the Senate will
appoint members of a House-Senate conference committee to negotiate legislation to extend both benefits through 2012.
House Republicans - who rejected an almost identical deal on Tuesday - collapsed under the political rubble that has
accumulated over the week, much of it from their own party, worried that the blockade would do serious damage to their appeal to
voters.
The House speaker, John A. Boehner, announced the decision over the phone to members on Thursday, and did not permit the
usual back and forth that is common on such calls, enraging many of them.
After his conversation with lawmakers, the speaker conceded to reporters that it might not have been "politically the smartest
thing in the world" for House Republicans to put themselves between a tax cut and the 160 million American workers who would benefit
from it, and to allow President Obama and Congressional Democrats to seize the momentum on the issue.
The agreement ended a partisan fight that threatened to keep Congress and Mr. Obama in town through Christmas and was
just the latest of the bitter struggles over fiscal policy involving House conservatives, the president and the Democratic-controlled
Senate.
Under the deal, the employee's share of the Social Security payroll tax will stay at the current level, 4.2 percent of wages,
through Feb. 29. In the absence of Congressional action, it would revert to the usual 6.2 percent next month. The government will also
continue paying unemployment insurance benefits under current policy through February. Without Congressional action, many of the
long-term unemployed would begin losing benefits next month.
In addition, under the agreement, Medicare will continue paying doctors at current rates for two months, averting a 27 percent
cut that would otherwise occur on Jan. 1.
The new deal makes minor adjustments to make it easier for small businesses to cope with the tax changes and prevents
manipulation of an employee's pay should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months.
Mr. Obama, who has reaped political benefits from the standoff, welcomed the outcome.
"This is good news, just in time for the holidays," he said in a statement. "This is the right thing [VERB 1] to strengthen our
families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will [VERB 2] a real difference in people's lives."
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html?_r=1&nl=
todays hea dlines & emc=tha2&pagewanted=all)
The correct verb forms of VERB 1 and VERB 2 in the last paragraph are
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223738
Inglês
Texto associado
As questões de números 36 a 40 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
House G.O.P. Leaders Agree to Extension of Payroll Tax Cut
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 22, 2011
WASHINGTON - Under a deal reached between House and Senate leaders, the House will now approve as early as Friday the
two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate last Saturday, and the Senate will
appoint members of a House-Senate conference committee to negotiate legislation to extend both benefits through 2012.
House Republicans - who rejected an almost identical deal on Tuesday - collapsed under the political rubble that has
accumulated over the week, much of it from their own party, worried that the blockade would do serious damage to their appeal to
voters.
The House speaker, John A. Boehner, announced the decision over the phone to members on Thursday, and did not permit the
usual back and forth that is common on such calls, enraging many of them.
After his conversation with lawmakers, the speaker conceded to reporters that it might not have been "politically the smartest
thing in the world" for House Republicans to put themselves between a tax cut and the 160 million American workers who would benefit
from it, and to allow President Obama and Congressional Democrats to seize the momentum on the issue.
The agreement ended a partisan fight that threatened to keep Congress and Mr. Obama in town through Christmas and was
just the latest of the bitter struggles over fiscal policy involving House conservatives, the president and the Democratic-controlled
Senate.
Under the deal, the employee's share of the Social Security payroll tax will stay at the current level, 4.2 percent of wages,
through Feb. 29. In the absence of Congressional action, it would revert to the usual 6.2 percent next month. The government will also
continue paying unemployment insurance benefits under current policy through February. Without Congressional action, many of the
long-term unemployed would begin losing benefits next month.
In addition, under the agreement, Medicare will continue paying doctors at current rates for two months, averting a 27 percent
cut that would otherwise occur on Jan. 1.
The new deal makes minor adjustments to make it easier for small businesses to cope with the tax changes and prevents
manipulation of an employee's pay should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months.
Mr. Obama, who has reaped political benefits from the standoff, welcomed the outcome.
"This is good news, just in time for the holidays," he said in a statement. "This is the right thing [VERB 1] to strengthen our
families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will [VERB 2] a real difference in people's lives."
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html?_r=1&nl=
todays hea dlines & emc=tha2&pagewanted=all)
House G.O.P. Leaders Agree to Extension of Payroll Tax Cut
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 22, 2011
WASHINGTON - Under a deal reached between House and Senate leaders, the House will now approve as early as Friday the
two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate last Saturday, and the Senate will
appoint members of a House-Senate conference committee to negotiate legislation to extend both benefits through 2012.
House Republicans - who rejected an almost identical deal on Tuesday - collapsed under the political rubble that has
accumulated over the week, much of it from their own party, worried that the blockade would do serious damage to their appeal to
voters.
The House speaker, John A. Boehner, announced the decision over the phone to members on Thursday, and did not permit the
usual back and forth that is common on such calls, enraging many of them.
After his conversation with lawmakers, the speaker conceded to reporters that it might not have been "politically the smartest
thing in the world" for House Republicans to put themselves between a tax cut and the 160 million American workers who would benefit
from it, and to allow President Obama and Congressional Democrats to seize the momentum on the issue.
The agreement ended a partisan fight that threatened to keep Congress and Mr. Obama in town through Christmas and was
just the latest of the bitter struggles over fiscal policy involving House conservatives, the president and the Democratic-controlled
Senate.
Under the deal, the employee's share of the Social Security payroll tax will stay at the current level, 4.2 percent of wages,
through Feb. 29. In the absence of Congressional action, it would revert to the usual 6.2 percent next month. The government will also
continue paying unemployment insurance benefits under current policy through February. Without Congressional action, many of the
long-term unemployed would begin losing benefits next month.
In addition, under the agreement, Medicare will continue paying doctors at current rates for two months, averting a 27 percent
cut that would otherwise occur on Jan. 1.
The new deal makes minor adjustments to make it easier for small businesses to cope with the tax changes and prevents
manipulation of an employee's pay should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months.
Mr. Obama, who has reaped political benefits from the standoff, welcomed the outcome.
"This is good news, just in time for the holidays," he said in a statement. "This is the right thing [VERB 1] to strengthen our
families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will [VERB 2] a real difference in people's lives."
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html?_r=1&nl=
todays hea dlines & emc=tha2&pagewanted=all)
A melhor tradução para should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months é
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223737
Inglês
Texto associado
As questões de números 36 a 40 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
House G.O.P. Leaders Agree to Extension of Payroll Tax Cut
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 22, 2011
WASHINGTON - Under a deal reached between House and Senate leaders, the House will now approve as early as Friday the
two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate last Saturday, and the Senate will
appoint members of a House-Senate conference committee to negotiate legislation to extend both benefits through 2012.
House Republicans - who rejected an almost identical deal on Tuesday - collapsed under the political rubble that has
accumulated over the week, much of it from their own party, worried that the blockade would do serious damage to their appeal to
voters.
The House speaker, John A. Boehner, announced the decision over the phone to members on Thursday, and did not permit the
usual back and forth that is common on such calls, enraging many of them.
After his conversation with lawmakers, the speaker conceded to reporters that it might not have been "politically the smartest
thing in the world" for House Republicans to put themselves between a tax cut and the 160 million American workers who would benefit
from it, and to allow President Obama and Congressional Democrats to seize the momentum on the issue.
The agreement ended a partisan fight that threatened to keep Congress and Mr. Obama in town through Christmas and was
just the latest of the bitter struggles over fiscal policy involving House conservatives, the president and the Democratic-controlled
Senate.
Under the deal, the employee's share of the Social Security payroll tax will stay at the current level, 4.2 percent of wages,
through Feb. 29. In the absence of Congressional action, it would revert to the usual 6.2 percent next month. The government will also
continue paying unemployment insurance benefits under current policy through February. Without Congressional action, many of the
long-term unemployed would begin losing benefits next month.
In addition, under the agreement, Medicare will continue paying doctors at current rates for two months, averting a 27 percent
cut that would otherwise occur on Jan. 1.
The new deal makes minor adjustments to make it easier for small businesses to cope with the tax changes and prevents
manipulation of an employee's pay should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months.
Mr. Obama, who has reaped political benefits from the standoff, welcomed the outcome.
"This is good news, just in time for the holidays," he said in a statement. "This is the right thing [VERB 1] to strengthen our
families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will [VERB 2] a real difference in people's lives."
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html?_r=1&nl=
todays hea dlines & emc=tha2&pagewanted=all)
House G.O.P. Leaders Agree to Extension of Payroll Tax Cut
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 22, 2011
WASHINGTON - Under a deal reached between House and Senate leaders, the House will now approve as early as Friday the
two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate last Saturday, and the Senate will
appoint members of a House-Senate conference committee to negotiate legislation to extend both benefits through 2012.
House Republicans - who rejected an almost identical deal on Tuesday - collapsed under the political rubble that has
accumulated over the week, much of it from their own party, worried that the blockade would do serious damage to their appeal to
voters.
The House speaker, John A. Boehner, announced the decision over the phone to members on Thursday, and did not permit the
usual back and forth that is common on such calls, enraging many of them.
After his conversation with lawmakers, the speaker conceded to reporters that it might not have been "politically the smartest
thing in the world" for House Republicans to put themselves between a tax cut and the 160 million American workers who would benefit
from it, and to allow President Obama and Congressional Democrats to seize the momentum on the issue.
The agreement ended a partisan fight that threatened to keep Congress and Mr. Obama in town through Christmas and was
just the latest of the bitter struggles over fiscal policy involving House conservatives, the president and the Democratic-controlled
Senate.
Under the deal, the employee's share of the Social Security payroll tax will stay at the current level, 4.2 percent of wages,
through Feb. 29. In the absence of Congressional action, it would revert to the usual 6.2 percent next month. The government will also
continue paying unemployment insurance benefits under current policy through February. Without Congressional action, many of the
long-term unemployed would begin losing benefits next month.
In addition, under the agreement, Medicare will continue paying doctors at current rates for two months, averting a 27 percent
cut that would otherwise occur on Jan. 1.
The new deal makes minor adjustments to make it easier for small businesses to cope with the tax changes and prevents
manipulation of an employee's pay should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months.
Mr. Obama, who has reaped political benefits from the standoff, welcomed the outcome.
"This is good news, just in time for the holidays," he said in a statement. "This is the right thing [VERB 1] to strengthen our
families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will [VERB 2] a real difference in people's lives."
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html?_r=1&nl=
todays hea dlines & emc=tha2&pagewanted=all)
Infere-se do texto que
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223736
Inglês
Texto associado
As questões de números 36 a 40 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
House G.O.P. Leaders Agree to Extension of Payroll Tax Cut
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 22, 2011
WASHINGTON - Under a deal reached between House and Senate leaders, the House will now approve as early as Friday the
two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate last Saturday, and the Senate will
appoint members of a House-Senate conference committee to negotiate legislation to extend both benefits through 2012.
House Republicans - who rejected an almost identical deal on Tuesday - collapsed under the political rubble that has
accumulated over the week, much of it from their own party, worried that the blockade would do serious damage to their appeal to
voters.
The House speaker, John A. Boehner, announced the decision over the phone to members on Thursday, and did not permit the
usual back and forth that is common on such calls, enraging many of them.
After his conversation with lawmakers, the speaker conceded to reporters that it might not have been "politically the smartest
thing in the world" for House Republicans to put themselves between a tax cut and the 160 million American workers who would benefit
from it, and to allow President Obama and Congressional Democrats to seize the momentum on the issue.
The agreement ended a partisan fight that threatened to keep Congress and Mr. Obama in town through Christmas and was
just the latest of the bitter struggles over fiscal policy involving House conservatives, the president and the Democratic-controlled
Senate.
Under the deal, the employee's share of the Social Security payroll tax will stay at the current level, 4.2 percent of wages,
through Feb. 29. In the absence of Congressional action, it would revert to the usual 6.2 percent next month. The government will also
continue paying unemployment insurance benefits under current policy through February. Without Congressional action, many of the
long-term unemployed would begin losing benefits next month.
In addition, under the agreement, Medicare will continue paying doctors at current rates for two months, averting a 27 percent
cut that would otherwise occur on Jan. 1.
The new deal makes minor adjustments to make it easier for small businesses to cope with the tax changes and prevents
manipulation of an employee's pay should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months.
Mr. Obama, who has reaped political benefits from the standoff, welcomed the outcome.
"This is good news, just in time for the holidays," he said in a statement. "This is the right thing [VERB 1] to strengthen our
families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will [VERB 2] a real difference in people's lives."
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html?_r=1&nl=
todays hea dlines & emc=tha2&pagewanted=all)
House G.O.P. Leaders Agree to Extension of Payroll Tax Cut
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 22, 2011
WASHINGTON - Under a deal reached between House and Senate leaders, the House will now approve as early as Friday the
two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate last Saturday, and the Senate will
appoint members of a House-Senate conference committee to negotiate legislation to extend both benefits through 2012.
House Republicans - who rejected an almost identical deal on Tuesday - collapsed under the political rubble that has
accumulated over the week, much of it from their own party, worried that the blockade would do serious damage to their appeal to
voters.
The House speaker, John A. Boehner, announced the decision over the phone to members on Thursday, and did not permit the
usual back and forth that is common on such calls, enraging many of them.
After his conversation with lawmakers, the speaker conceded to reporters that it might not have been "politically the smartest
thing in the world" for House Republicans to put themselves between a tax cut and the 160 million American workers who would benefit
from it, and to allow President Obama and Congressional Democrats to seize the momentum on the issue.
The agreement ended a partisan fight that threatened to keep Congress and Mr. Obama in town through Christmas and was
just the latest of the bitter struggles over fiscal policy involving House conservatives, the president and the Democratic-controlled
Senate.
Under the deal, the employee's share of the Social Security payroll tax will stay at the current level, 4.2 percent of wages,
through Feb. 29. In the absence of Congressional action, it would revert to the usual 6.2 percent next month. The government will also
continue paying unemployment insurance benefits under current policy through February. Without Congressional action, many of the
long-term unemployed would begin losing benefits next month.
In addition, under the agreement, Medicare will continue paying doctors at current rates for two months, averting a 27 percent
cut that would otherwise occur on Jan. 1.
The new deal makes minor adjustments to make it easier for small businesses to cope with the tax changes and prevents
manipulation of an employee's pay should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months.
Mr. Obama, who has reaped political benefits from the standoff, welcomed the outcome.
"This is good news, just in time for the holidays," he said in a statement. "This is the right thing [VERB 1] to strengthen our
families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will [VERB 2] a real difference in people's lives."
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html?_r=1&nl=
todays hea dlines & emc=tha2&pagewanted=all)
Segundo o texto,
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223735
Inglês
Texto associado
As questões de números 36 a 40 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
House G.O.P. Leaders Agree to Extension of Payroll Tax Cut
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 22, 2011
WASHINGTON - Under a deal reached between House and Senate leaders, the House will now approve as early as Friday the
two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate last Saturday, and the Senate will
appoint members of a House-Senate conference committee to negotiate legislation to extend both benefits through 2012.
House Republicans - who rejected an almost identical deal on Tuesday - collapsed under the political rubble that has
accumulated over the week, much of it from their own party, worried that the blockade would do serious damage to their appeal to
voters.
The House speaker, John A. Boehner, announced the decision over the phone to members on Thursday, and did not permit the
usual back and forth that is common on such calls, enraging many of them.
After his conversation with lawmakers, the speaker conceded to reporters that it might not have been "politically the smartest
thing in the world" for House Republicans to put themselves between a tax cut and the 160 million American workers who would benefit
from it, and to allow President Obama and Congressional Democrats to seize the momentum on the issue.
The agreement ended a partisan fight that threatened to keep Congress and Mr. Obama in town through Christmas and was
just the latest of the bitter struggles over fiscal policy involving House conservatives, the president and the Democratic-controlled
Senate.
Under the deal, the employee's share of the Social Security payroll tax will stay at the current level, 4.2 percent of wages,
through Feb. 29. In the absence of Congressional action, it would revert to the usual 6.2 percent next month. The government will also
continue paying unemployment insurance benefits under current policy through February. Without Congressional action, many of the
long-term unemployed would begin losing benefits next month.
In addition, under the agreement, Medicare will continue paying doctors at current rates for two months, averting a 27 percent
cut that would otherwise occur on Jan. 1.
The new deal makes minor adjustments to make it easier for small businesses to cope with the tax changes and prevents
manipulation of an employee's pay should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months.
Mr. Obama, who has reaped political benefits from the standoff, welcomed the outcome.
"This is good news, just in time for the holidays," he said in a statement. "This is the right thing [VERB 1] to strengthen our
families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will [VERB 2] a real difference in people's lives."
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html?_r=1&nl=
todays hea dlines & emc=tha2&pagewanted=all)
House G.O.P. Leaders Agree to Extension of Payroll Tax Cut
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 22, 2011
WASHINGTON - Under a deal reached between House and Senate leaders, the House will now approve as early as Friday the
two-month extension of a payroll tax holiday and unemployment benefits approved by the Senate last Saturday, and the Senate will
appoint members of a House-Senate conference committee to negotiate legislation to extend both benefits through 2012.
House Republicans - who rejected an almost identical deal on Tuesday - collapsed under the political rubble that has
accumulated over the week, much of it from their own party, worried that the blockade would do serious damage to their appeal to
voters.
The House speaker, John A. Boehner, announced the decision over the phone to members on Thursday, and did not permit the
usual back and forth that is common on such calls, enraging many of them.
After his conversation with lawmakers, the speaker conceded to reporters that it might not have been "politically the smartest
thing in the world" for House Republicans to put themselves between a tax cut and the 160 million American workers who would benefit
from it, and to allow President Obama and Congressional Democrats to seize the momentum on the issue.
The agreement ended a partisan fight that threatened to keep Congress and Mr. Obama in town through Christmas and was
just the latest of the bitter struggles over fiscal policy involving House conservatives, the president and the Democratic-controlled
Senate.
Under the deal, the employee's share of the Social Security payroll tax will stay at the current level, 4.2 percent of wages,
through Feb. 29. In the absence of Congressional action, it would revert to the usual 6.2 percent next month. The government will also
continue paying unemployment insurance benefits under current policy through February. Without Congressional action, many of the
long-term unemployed would begin losing benefits next month.
In addition, under the agreement, Medicare will continue paying doctors at current rates for two months, averting a 27 percent
cut that would otherwise occur on Jan. 1.
The new deal makes minor adjustments to make it easier for small businesses to cope with the tax changes and prevents
manipulation of an employee's pay should the tax cut extension fail to go beyond two months.
Mr. Obama, who has reaped political benefits from the standoff, welcomed the outcome.
"This is good news, just in time for the holidays," he said in a statement. "This is the right thing [VERB 1] to strengthen our
families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will [VERB 2] a real difference in people's lives."
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/us/politics/senate-republican-leader-suggests-a-payroll-tax-deal.html?_r=1&nl=
todays hea dlines & emc=tha2&pagewanted=all)
A extensão de que trata o texto
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223734
Inglês
Texto associado
As questões de números 31 a 35 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
Making Performance Budgeting Work: New IMF Book
October 04, 2007
Member countries will find valuable advice on how to reform their budgeting practices to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of public expenditure in a major new work on performance budgeting produced by the Fiscal Affairs Department. The book,
Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results (500pp), came off the presses of the top UK publisher Palgrave Macmillan in
September.
Edited by FAD staff member Marc Robinson, the book contains a comprehensive treatment of contemporary performance
budgeting practice and theory. In a series of thematic chapters and case studies, the book discusses:
- The key forms of performance budgeting which [TO IMPLEMENT] around the world - how they differ, and what they have in
common points.
- Lessons from the experience of governments around the world - ranging from OECD nations to developing, middle-income
and transition countries - about what forms of performance budgeting work, under what circumstances, and with what
implementation strategies.
- How successful performance budgeting can improve aggregate fiscal discipline.
- The information requirements of performance budgeting, and
- The links between performance budgeting and other budgeting and public management reforms.
Many of the contributors to this work are leaders in performance budgeting implementation in their countries. Others are
respected academics and technical experts from the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations. Countries
covered in the case studies include the UK, USA, Australia, France, Chile, Spain, Russia, Colombia and Ethiopia.
One major focus of the book is performance budgeting as a tool for improved expenditure prioritization - that is, for helping to
shift limited public resources to the services of greatest social benefit. A key finding is that this type of performance budgeting will only
work if the budget process is fundamentally changed so that top politicians and bureaucrats systematically consider expenditure
priorities when formulating the budget. This means more than just considering the priorities for new spending. It requires also having
mechanisms to systematically review existing spending programs to identify what is ineffective and low priority and can, therefore, be
cut. This is what countries such as Chile and the United Kingdom have successfully done, and the United States is currently attempting
to achieve with its Program Assessment Rating Tool instrument. Conversely, it is a mistake to believe that merely changing the budget
classification and developing performance indicators will in itself improve the allocation of resources in the budget.
(Adapted from http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/10/making-performa.html)
Making Performance Budgeting Work: New IMF Book
October 04, 2007
Member countries will find valuable advice on how to reform their budgeting practices to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of public expenditure in a major new work on performance budgeting produced by the Fiscal Affairs Department. The book,
Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results (500pp), came off the presses of the top UK publisher Palgrave Macmillan in
September.
Edited by FAD staff member Marc Robinson, the book contains a comprehensive treatment of contemporary performance
budgeting practice and theory. In a series of thematic chapters and case studies, the book discusses:
- The key forms of performance budgeting which [TO IMPLEMENT] around the world - how they differ, and what they have in
common points.
- Lessons from the experience of governments around the world - ranging from OECD nations to developing, middle-income
and transition countries - about what forms of performance budgeting work, under what circumstances, and with what
implementation strategies.
- How successful performance budgeting can improve aggregate fiscal discipline.
- The information requirements of performance budgeting, and
- The links between performance budgeting and other budgeting and public management reforms.
Many of the contributors to this work are leaders in performance budgeting implementation in their countries. Others are
respected academics and technical experts from the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations. Countries
covered in the case studies include the UK, USA, Australia, France, Chile, Spain, Russia, Colombia and Ethiopia.
One major focus of the book is performance budgeting as a tool for improved expenditure prioritization - that is, for helping to
shift limited public resources to the services of greatest social benefit. A key finding is that this type of performance budgeting will only
work if the budget process is fundamentally changed so that top politicians and bureaucrats systematically consider expenditure
priorities when formulating the budget. This means more than just considering the priorities for new spending. It requires also having
mechanisms to systematically review existing spending programs to identify what is ineffective and low priority and can, therefore, be
cut. This is what countries such as Chile and the United Kingdom have successfully done, and the United States is currently attempting
to achieve with its Program Assessment Rating Tool instrument. Conversely, it is a mistake to believe that merely changing the budget
classification and developing performance indicators will in itself improve the allocation of resources in the budget.
(Adapted from http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/10/making-performa.html)
According to the text,
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223733
Inglês
Texto associado
As questões de números 31 a 35 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
Making Performance Budgeting Work: New IMF Book
October 04, 2007
Member countries will find valuable advice on how to reform their budgeting practices to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of public expenditure in a major new work on performance budgeting produced by the Fiscal Affairs Department. The book,
Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results (500pp), came off the presses of the top UK publisher Palgrave Macmillan in
September.
Edited by FAD staff member Marc Robinson, the book contains a comprehensive treatment of contemporary performance
budgeting practice and theory. In a series of thematic chapters and case studies, the book discusses:
- The key forms of performance budgeting which [TO IMPLEMENT] around the world - how they differ, and what they have in
common points.
- Lessons from the experience of governments around the world - ranging from OECD nations to developing, middle-income
and transition countries - about what forms of performance budgeting work, under what circumstances, and with what
implementation strategies.
- How successful performance budgeting can improve aggregate fiscal discipline.
- The information requirements of performance budgeting, and
- The links between performance budgeting and other budgeting and public management reforms.
Many of the contributors to this work are leaders in performance budgeting implementation in their countries. Others are
respected academics and technical experts from the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations. Countries
covered in the case studies include the UK, USA, Australia, France, Chile, Spain, Russia, Colombia and Ethiopia.
One major focus of the book is performance budgeting as a tool for improved expenditure prioritization - that is, for helping to
shift limited public resources to the services of greatest social benefit. A key finding is that this type of performance budgeting will only
work if the budget process is fundamentally changed so that top politicians and bureaucrats systematically consider expenditure
priorities when formulating the budget. This means more than just considering the priorities for new spending. It requires also having
mechanisms to systematically review existing spending programs to identify what is ineffective and low priority and can, therefore, be
cut. This is what countries such as Chile and the United Kingdom have successfully done, and the United States is currently attempting
to achieve with its Program Assessment Rating Tool instrument. Conversely, it is a mistake to believe that merely changing the budget
classification and developing performance indicators will in itself improve the allocation of resources in the budget.
(Adapted from http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/10/making-performa.html)
Making Performance Budgeting Work: New IMF Book
October 04, 2007
Member countries will find valuable advice on how to reform their budgeting practices to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of public expenditure in a major new work on performance budgeting produced by the Fiscal Affairs Department. The book,
Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results (500pp), came off the presses of the top UK publisher Palgrave Macmillan in
September.
Edited by FAD staff member Marc Robinson, the book contains a comprehensive treatment of contemporary performance
budgeting practice and theory. In a series of thematic chapters and case studies, the book discusses:
- The key forms of performance budgeting which [TO IMPLEMENT] around the world - how they differ, and what they have in
common points.
- Lessons from the experience of governments around the world - ranging from OECD nations to developing, middle-income
and transition countries - about what forms of performance budgeting work, under what circumstances, and with what
implementation strategies.
- How successful performance budgeting can improve aggregate fiscal discipline.
- The information requirements of performance budgeting, and
- The links between performance budgeting and other budgeting and public management reforms.
Many of the contributors to this work are leaders in performance budgeting implementation in their countries. Others are
respected academics and technical experts from the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations. Countries
covered in the case studies include the UK, USA, Australia, France, Chile, Spain, Russia, Colombia and Ethiopia.
One major focus of the book is performance budgeting as a tool for improved expenditure prioritization - that is, for helping to
shift limited public resources to the services of greatest social benefit. A key finding is that this type of performance budgeting will only
work if the budget process is fundamentally changed so that top politicians and bureaucrats systematically consider expenditure
priorities when formulating the budget. This means more than just considering the priorities for new spending. It requires also having
mechanisms to systematically review existing spending programs to identify what is ineffective and low priority and can, therefore, be
cut. This is what countries such as Chile and the United Kingdom have successfully done, and the United States is currently attempting
to achieve with its Program Assessment Rating Tool instrument. Conversely, it is a mistake to believe that merely changing the budget
classification and developing performance indicators will in itself improve the allocation of resources in the budget.
(Adapted from http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/10/making-performa.html)
Observe que work foi empregado, no texto, com dois sentidos diferentes:
I. Making Performance Budgeting Work
II. ... is a major new work...
Leia as sentenças abaixo:
- This work is protected under copyright laws and reproduction is strictly prohibited.
- Institutions such as the rule of law will rarely work if they are simply copied from abroad.
- Theory of the Firm builds models to help explain how markets work.
- His new book is called " Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge's View."
- She wanted it to be the definitive work on the subject of voting and women's rights around the world.
A alternativa que representa a ordem correta em que os sentidos aparecem no conjunto das sentenças é
I. Making Performance Budgeting Work
II. ... is a major new work...
Leia as sentenças abaixo:
- This work is protected under copyright laws and reproduction is strictly prohibited.
- Institutions such as the rule of law will rarely work if they are simply copied from abroad.
- Theory of the Firm builds models to help explain how markets work.
- His new book is called " Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge's View."
- She wanted it to be the definitive work on the subject of voting and women's rights around the world.
A alternativa que representa a ordem correta em que os sentidos aparecem no conjunto das sentenças é
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223732
Inglês
Texto associado
As questões de números 31 a 35 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
Making Performance Budgeting Work: New IMF Book
October 04, 2007
Member countries will find valuable advice on how to reform their budgeting practices to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of public expenditure in a major new work on performance budgeting produced by the Fiscal Affairs Department. The book,
Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results (500pp), came off the presses of the top UK publisher Palgrave Macmillan in
September.
Edited by FAD staff member Marc Robinson, the book contains a comprehensive treatment of contemporary performance
budgeting practice and theory. In a series of thematic chapters and case studies, the book discusses:
- The key forms of performance budgeting which [TO IMPLEMENT] around the world - how they differ, and what they have in
common points.
- Lessons from the experience of governments around the world - ranging from OECD nations to developing, middle-income
and transition countries - about what forms of performance budgeting work, under what circumstances, and with what
implementation strategies.
- How successful performance budgeting can improve aggregate fiscal discipline.
- The information requirements of performance budgeting, and
- The links between performance budgeting and other budgeting and public management reforms.
Many of the contributors to this work are leaders in performance budgeting implementation in their countries. Others are
respected academics and technical experts from the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations. Countries
covered in the case studies include the UK, USA, Australia, France, Chile, Spain, Russia, Colombia and Ethiopia.
One major focus of the book is performance budgeting as a tool for improved expenditure prioritization - that is, for helping to
shift limited public resources to the services of greatest social benefit. A key finding is that this type of performance budgeting will only
work if the budget process is fundamentally changed so that top politicians and bureaucrats systematically consider expenditure
priorities when formulating the budget. This means more than just considering the priorities for new spending. It requires also having
mechanisms to systematically review existing spending programs to identify what is ineffective and low priority and can, therefore, be
cut. This is what countries such as Chile and the United Kingdom have successfully done, and the United States is currently attempting
to achieve with its Program Assessment Rating Tool instrument. Conversely, it is a mistake to believe that merely changing the budget
classification and developing performance indicators will in itself improve the allocation of resources in the budget.
(Adapted from http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/10/making-performa.html)
Making Performance Budgeting Work: New IMF Book
October 04, 2007
Member countries will find valuable advice on how to reform their budgeting practices to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of public expenditure in a major new work on performance budgeting produced by the Fiscal Affairs Department. The book,
Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results (500pp), came off the presses of the top UK publisher Palgrave Macmillan in
September.
Edited by FAD staff member Marc Robinson, the book contains a comprehensive treatment of contemporary performance
budgeting practice and theory. In a series of thematic chapters and case studies, the book discusses:
- The key forms of performance budgeting which [TO IMPLEMENT] around the world - how they differ, and what they have in
common points.
- Lessons from the experience of governments around the world - ranging from OECD nations to developing, middle-income
and transition countries - about what forms of performance budgeting work, under what circumstances, and with what
implementation strategies.
- How successful performance budgeting can improve aggregate fiscal discipline.
- The information requirements of performance budgeting, and
- The links between performance budgeting and other budgeting and public management reforms.
Many of the contributors to this work are leaders in performance budgeting implementation in their countries. Others are
respected academics and technical experts from the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations. Countries
covered in the case studies include the UK, USA, Australia, France, Chile, Spain, Russia, Colombia and Ethiopia.
One major focus of the book is performance budgeting as a tool for improved expenditure prioritization - that is, for helping to
shift limited public resources to the services of greatest social benefit. A key finding is that this type of performance budgeting will only
work if the budget process is fundamentally changed so that top politicians and bureaucrats systematically consider expenditure
priorities when formulating the budget. This means more than just considering the priorities for new spending. It requires also having
mechanisms to systematically review existing spending programs to identify what is ineffective and low priority and can, therefore, be
cut. This is what countries such as Chile and the United Kingdom have successfully done, and the United States is currently attempting
to achieve with its Program Assessment Rating Tool instrument. Conversely, it is a mistake to believe that merely changing the budget
classification and developing performance indicators will in itself improve the allocation of resources in the budget.
(Adapted from http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/10/making-performa.html)
O livro em questão
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223731
Inglês
Texto associado
As questões de números 31 a 35 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
Making Performance Budgeting Work: New IMF Book
October 04, 2007
Member countries will find valuable advice on how to reform their budgeting practices to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of public expenditure in a major new work on performance budgeting produced by the Fiscal Affairs Department. The book,
Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results (500pp), came off the presses of the top UK publisher Palgrave Macmillan in
September.
Edited by FAD staff member Marc Robinson, the book contains a comprehensive treatment of contemporary performance
budgeting practice and theory. In a series of thematic chapters and case studies, the book discusses:
- The key forms of performance budgeting which [TO IMPLEMENT] around the world - how they differ, and what they have in
common points.
- Lessons from the experience of governments around the world - ranging from OECD nations to developing, middle-income
and transition countries - about what forms of performance budgeting work, under what circumstances, and with what
implementation strategies.
- How successful performance budgeting can improve aggregate fiscal discipline.
- The information requirements of performance budgeting, and
- The links between performance budgeting and other budgeting and public management reforms.
Many of the contributors to this work are leaders in performance budgeting implementation in their countries. Others are
respected academics and technical experts from the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations. Countries
covered in the case studies include the UK, USA, Australia, France, Chile, Spain, Russia, Colombia and Ethiopia.
One major focus of the book is performance budgeting as a tool for improved expenditure prioritization - that is, for helping to
shift limited public resources to the services of greatest social benefit. A key finding is that this type of performance budgeting will only
work if the budget process is fundamentally changed so that top politicians and bureaucrats systematically consider expenditure
priorities when formulating the budget. This means more than just considering the priorities for new spending. It requires also having
mechanisms to systematically review existing spending programs to identify what is ineffective and low priority and can, therefore, be
cut. This is what countries such as Chile and the United Kingdom have successfully done, and the United States is currently attempting
to achieve with its Program Assessment Rating Tool instrument. Conversely, it is a mistake to believe that merely changing the budget
classification and developing performance indicators will in itself improve the allocation of resources in the budget.
(Adapted from http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/10/making-performa.html)
Making Performance Budgeting Work: New IMF Book
October 04, 2007
Member countries will find valuable advice on how to reform their budgeting practices to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of public expenditure in a major new work on performance budgeting produced by the Fiscal Affairs Department. The book,
Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results (500pp), came off the presses of the top UK publisher Palgrave Macmillan in
September.
Edited by FAD staff member Marc Robinson, the book contains a comprehensive treatment of contemporary performance
budgeting practice and theory. In a series of thematic chapters and case studies, the book discusses:
- The key forms of performance budgeting which [TO IMPLEMENT] around the world - how they differ, and what they have in
common points.
- Lessons from the experience of governments around the world - ranging from OECD nations to developing, middle-income
and transition countries - about what forms of performance budgeting work, under what circumstances, and with what
implementation strategies.
- How successful performance budgeting can improve aggregate fiscal discipline.
- The information requirements of performance budgeting, and
- The links between performance budgeting and other budgeting and public management reforms.
Many of the contributors to this work are leaders in performance budgeting implementation in their countries. Others are
respected academics and technical experts from the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations. Countries
covered in the case studies include the UK, USA, Australia, France, Chile, Spain, Russia, Colombia and Ethiopia.
One major focus of the book is performance budgeting as a tool for improved expenditure prioritization - that is, for helping to
shift limited public resources to the services of greatest social benefit. A key finding is that this type of performance budgeting will only
work if the budget process is fundamentally changed so that top politicians and bureaucrats systematically consider expenditure
priorities when formulating the budget. This means more than just considering the priorities for new spending. It requires also having
mechanisms to systematically review existing spending programs to identify what is ineffective and low priority and can, therefore, be
cut. This is what countries such as Chile and the United Kingdom have successfully done, and the United States is currently attempting
to achieve with its Program Assessment Rating Tool instrument. Conversely, it is a mistake to believe that merely changing the budget
classification and developing performance indicators will in itself improve the allocation of resources in the budget.
(Adapted from http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/10/making-performa.html)
The correct form of [TO IMPLEMENT] is
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223730
Inglês
Texto associado
As questões de números 31 a 35 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
Making Performance Budgeting Work: New IMF Book
October 04, 2007
Member countries will find valuable advice on how to reform their budgeting practices to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of public expenditure in a major new work on performance budgeting produced by the Fiscal Affairs Department. The book,
Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results (500pp), came off the presses of the top UK publisher Palgrave Macmillan in
September.
Edited by FAD staff member Marc Robinson, the book contains a comprehensive treatment of contemporary performance
budgeting practice and theory. In a series of thematic chapters and case studies, the book discusses:
- The key forms of performance budgeting which [TO IMPLEMENT] around the world - how they differ, and what they have in
common points.
- Lessons from the experience of governments around the world - ranging from OECD nations to developing, middle-income
and transition countries - about what forms of performance budgeting work, under what circumstances, and with what
implementation strategies.
- How successful performance budgeting can improve aggregate fiscal discipline.
- The information requirements of performance budgeting, and
- The links between performance budgeting and other budgeting and public management reforms.
Many of the contributors to this work are leaders in performance budgeting implementation in their countries. Others are
respected academics and technical experts from the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations. Countries
covered in the case studies include the UK, USA, Australia, France, Chile, Spain, Russia, Colombia and Ethiopia.
One major focus of the book is performance budgeting as a tool for improved expenditure prioritization - that is, for helping to
shift limited public resources to the services of greatest social benefit. A key finding is that this type of performance budgeting will only
work if the budget process is fundamentally changed so that top politicians and bureaucrats systematically consider expenditure
priorities when formulating the budget. This means more than just considering the priorities for new spending. It requires also having
mechanisms to systematically review existing spending programs to identify what is ineffective and low priority and can, therefore, be
cut. This is what countries such as Chile and the United Kingdom have successfully done, and the United States is currently attempting
to achieve with its Program Assessment Rating Tool instrument. Conversely, it is a mistake to believe that merely changing the budget
classification and developing performance indicators will in itself improve the allocation of resources in the budget.
(Adapted from http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/10/making-performa.html)
Making Performance Budgeting Work: New IMF Book
October 04, 2007
Member countries will find valuable advice on how to reform their budgeting practices to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of public expenditure in a major new work on performance budgeting produced by the Fiscal Affairs Department. The book,
Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results (500pp), came off the presses of the top UK publisher Palgrave Macmillan in
September.
Edited by FAD staff member Marc Robinson, the book contains a comprehensive treatment of contemporary performance
budgeting practice and theory. In a series of thematic chapters and case studies, the book discusses:
- The key forms of performance budgeting which [TO IMPLEMENT] around the world - how they differ, and what they have in
common points.
- Lessons from the experience of governments around the world - ranging from OECD nations to developing, middle-income
and transition countries - about what forms of performance budgeting work, under what circumstances, and with what
implementation strategies.
- How successful performance budgeting can improve aggregate fiscal discipline.
- The information requirements of performance budgeting, and
- The links between performance budgeting and other budgeting and public management reforms.
Many of the contributors to this work are leaders in performance budgeting implementation in their countries. Others are
respected academics and technical experts from the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations. Countries
covered in the case studies include the UK, USA, Australia, France, Chile, Spain, Russia, Colombia and Ethiopia.
One major focus of the book is performance budgeting as a tool for improved expenditure prioritization - that is, for helping to
shift limited public resources to the services of greatest social benefit. A key finding is that this type of performance budgeting will only
work if the budget process is fundamentally changed so that top politicians and bureaucrats systematically consider expenditure
priorities when formulating the budget. This means more than just considering the priorities for new spending. It requires also having
mechanisms to systematically review existing spending programs to identify what is ineffective and low priority and can, therefore, be
cut. This is what countries such as Chile and the United Kingdom have successfully done, and the United States is currently attempting
to achieve with its Program Assessment Rating Tool instrument. Conversely, it is a mistake to believe that merely changing the budget
classification and developing performance indicators will in itself improve the allocation of resources in the budget.
(Adapted from http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/10/making-performa.html)
No texto, comprehensive significa
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223728
Raciocínio Lógico
Rafaela empilhou 125 peças brancas, todas com a forma de cubo de aresta 1 cm, de modo a formar um único cubo maior, de aresta 5 cm. Então, ela pintou todas as faces do cubo maior com tinta verde e, após a tinta secar, separou novamente as 125 peças. Ao examiná-las com cuidado, Rafaela percebeu que o número de peças que estavam com uma única face pintada de verde era igual a
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223726
Raciocínio Lógico
Um hospital possui 50 enfermeiros em seu corpo de funcionários. Em cada turno de trabalho desse hospital, é escalada uma equipe com 20 enfermeiros. A direção do hospital vai promover um curso para capacitar parte dos enfermeiros a operar um equipamento que foi recém adquirido pelo hospital. Para que, independentemente da equipe escalada, em todo turno de trabalho do hospital haja pelo menos um enfermeiro capacitado a operar o novo equipamento, deverão ser capacitados, no mínimo,
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223713
Português
Texto associado
As questões de números 7 a 14 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
Tememos o acaso. Ele irrompe de forma inesperada e imprevisível em nossa vida, expondo nossa impotência contra forças
desconhecidas que anulam tudo aquilo que trabalhosamente penamos para organizar e construir. Seu caráter aleatório e gratuito
rompe com as leis de causa e efeito com as quais procuramos lidar com a realidade, deixando-nos desarmados e atônitos frente à
emergência de algo que está além de nossa compreensão, que evidencia uma desordem contra a qual não temos recursos. O acaso
deixa à mostra a assustadora falta de sentido que jaz no fundo das coisas e que tentamos camuflar, revestindo-a com nossas
certezas e objetivos, com nossa apreensão lógica do mundo.
Procuramos estratégias para lidar com essa dimensão da realidade que nos inquieta e desestabiliza. Alguns, sem negar sua
existência, planejam suas vidas, torcendo para que ela não interfira de forma excessiva em seus projetos. Outros, mais infantis e
supersticiosos, tentam esconjurá-la, usando fórmulas mágicas. Os mais religiosos simplesmente não acreditam no acaso, pois creem
que tudo o que acontece em suas vidas decorre diretamente da vontade de um deus. Aquilo que alguns considerariam como a
manifestação do acaso, para eles são provações que esse deus lhes envia para testar-lhes sua fé e obediência.
São defesas necessárias para continuarmos a viver. Se a ideia de que estamos à mercê de acontecimentos incontroláveis que
podem transformar nossas vidas de modo radical e irreversível estivesse permanentemente presente em nossas mentes, o terror nos
paralisaria e nada mais faríamos a não ser pensar na iminência das catástrofes possíveis.
Entretanto, tem um tipo de homem que age de forma diversa. Ao invés de fugir do acaso, ele o convoca constantemente. É o
viciado em jogos de azar. O jogador invoca e provoca o acaso, desafiando-o em suas apostas, numa tentativa de dominá-lo, de curvá-
lo, de vencê-lo. E também de aprisioná-lo. É como se, paradoxalmente, o jogador temesse tanto a presença do acaso nos demais
recantos da vida, que pretendesse prendê-lo, restringi-lo, confiná-lo à cena do jogo, acreditando que dessa forma o controla e anula
seu poder.
(Trecho de artigo de Sérgio Telles. O Estado de S. Paulo, 26 de novembro de 2011, D12, C2+música)
Tememos o acaso. Ele irrompe de forma inesperada e imprevisível em nossa vida, expondo nossa impotência contra forças
desconhecidas que anulam tudo aquilo que trabalhosamente penamos para organizar e construir. Seu caráter aleatório e gratuito
rompe com as leis de causa e efeito com as quais procuramos lidar com a realidade, deixando-nos desarmados e atônitos frente à
emergência de algo que está além de nossa compreensão, que evidencia uma desordem contra a qual não temos recursos. O acaso
deixa à mostra a assustadora falta de sentido que jaz no fundo das coisas e que tentamos camuflar, revestindo-a com nossas
certezas e objetivos, com nossa apreensão lógica do mundo.
Procuramos estratégias para lidar com essa dimensão da realidade que nos inquieta e desestabiliza. Alguns, sem negar sua
existência, planejam suas vidas, torcendo para que ela não interfira de forma excessiva em seus projetos. Outros, mais infantis e
supersticiosos, tentam esconjurá-la, usando fórmulas mágicas. Os mais religiosos simplesmente não acreditam no acaso, pois creem
que tudo o que acontece em suas vidas decorre diretamente da vontade de um deus. Aquilo que alguns considerariam como a
manifestação do acaso, para eles são provações que esse deus lhes envia para testar-lhes sua fé e obediência.
São defesas necessárias para continuarmos a viver. Se a ideia de que estamos à mercê de acontecimentos incontroláveis que
podem transformar nossas vidas de modo radical e irreversível estivesse permanentemente presente em nossas mentes, o terror nos
paralisaria e nada mais faríamos a não ser pensar na iminência das catástrofes possíveis.
Entretanto, tem um tipo de homem que age de forma diversa. Ao invés de fugir do acaso, ele o convoca constantemente. É o
viciado em jogos de azar. O jogador invoca e provoca o acaso, desafiando-o em suas apostas, numa tentativa de dominá-lo, de curvá-
lo, de vencê-lo. E também de aprisioná-lo. É como se, paradoxalmente, o jogador temesse tanto a presença do acaso nos demais
recantos da vida, que pretendesse prendê-lo, restringi-lo, confiná-lo à cena do jogo, acreditando que dessa forma o controla e anula
seu poder.
(Trecho de artigo de Sérgio Telles. O Estado de S. Paulo, 26 de novembro de 2011, D12, C2+música)
O período corretamente pontuado está em:
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223709
Português
Texto associado
As questões de números 7 a 14 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
Tememos o acaso. Ele irrompe de forma inesperada e imprevisível em nossa vida, expondo nossa impotência contra forças
desconhecidas que anulam tudo aquilo que trabalhosamente penamos para organizar e construir. Seu caráter aleatório e gratuito
rompe com as leis de causa e efeito com as quais procuramos lidar com a realidade, deixando-nos desarmados e atônitos frente à
emergência de algo que está além de nossa compreensão, que evidencia uma desordem contra a qual não temos recursos. O acaso
deixa à mostra a assustadora falta de sentido que jaz no fundo das coisas e que tentamos camuflar, revestindo-a com nossas
certezas e objetivos, com nossa apreensão lógica do mundo.
Procuramos estratégias para lidar com essa dimensão da realidade que nos inquieta e desestabiliza. Alguns, sem negar sua
existência, planejam suas vidas, torcendo para que ela não interfira de forma excessiva em seus projetos. Outros, mais infantis e
supersticiosos, tentam esconjurá-la, usando fórmulas mágicas. Os mais religiosos simplesmente não acreditam no acaso, pois creem
que tudo o que acontece em suas vidas decorre diretamente da vontade de um deus. Aquilo que alguns considerariam como a
manifestação do acaso, para eles são provações que esse deus lhes envia para testar-lhes sua fé e obediência.
São defesas necessárias para continuarmos a viver. Se a ideia de que estamos à mercê de acontecimentos incontroláveis que
podem transformar nossas vidas de modo radical e irreversível estivesse permanentemente presente em nossas mentes, o terror nos
paralisaria e nada mais faríamos a não ser pensar na iminência das catástrofes possíveis.
Entretanto, tem um tipo de homem que age de forma diversa. Ao invés de fugir do acaso, ele o convoca constantemente. É o
viciado em jogos de azar. O jogador invoca e provoca o acaso, desafiando-o em suas apostas, numa tentativa de dominá-lo, de curvá-
lo, de vencê-lo. E também de aprisioná-lo. É como se, paradoxalmente, o jogador temesse tanto a presença do acaso nos demais
recantos da vida, que pretendesse prendê-lo, restringi-lo, confiná-lo à cena do jogo, acreditando que dessa forma o controla e anula
seu poder.
(Trecho de artigo de Sérgio Telles. O Estado de S. Paulo, 26 de novembro de 2011, D12, C2+música)
Tememos o acaso. Ele irrompe de forma inesperada e imprevisível em nossa vida, expondo nossa impotência contra forças
desconhecidas que anulam tudo aquilo que trabalhosamente penamos para organizar e construir. Seu caráter aleatório e gratuito
rompe com as leis de causa e efeito com as quais procuramos lidar com a realidade, deixando-nos desarmados e atônitos frente à
emergência de algo que está além de nossa compreensão, que evidencia uma desordem contra a qual não temos recursos. O acaso
deixa à mostra a assustadora falta de sentido que jaz no fundo das coisas e que tentamos camuflar, revestindo-a com nossas
certezas e objetivos, com nossa apreensão lógica do mundo.
Procuramos estratégias para lidar com essa dimensão da realidade que nos inquieta e desestabiliza. Alguns, sem negar sua
existência, planejam suas vidas, torcendo para que ela não interfira de forma excessiva em seus projetos. Outros, mais infantis e
supersticiosos, tentam esconjurá-la, usando fórmulas mágicas. Os mais religiosos simplesmente não acreditam no acaso, pois creem
que tudo o que acontece em suas vidas decorre diretamente da vontade de um deus. Aquilo que alguns considerariam como a
manifestação do acaso, para eles são provações que esse deus lhes envia para testar-lhes sua fé e obediência.
São defesas necessárias para continuarmos a viver. Se a ideia de que estamos à mercê de acontecimentos incontroláveis que
podem transformar nossas vidas de modo radical e irreversível estivesse permanentemente presente em nossas mentes, o terror nos
paralisaria e nada mais faríamos a não ser pensar na iminência das catástrofes possíveis.
Entretanto, tem um tipo de homem que age de forma diversa. Ao invés de fugir do acaso, ele o convoca constantemente. É o
viciado em jogos de azar. O jogador invoca e provoca o acaso, desafiando-o em suas apostas, numa tentativa de dominá-lo, de curvá-
lo, de vencê-lo. E também de aprisioná-lo. É como se, paradoxalmente, o jogador temesse tanto a presença do acaso nos demais
recantos da vida, que pretendesse prendê-lo, restringi-lo, confiná-lo à cena do jogo, acreditando que dessa forma o controla e anula
seu poder.
(Trecho de artigo de Sérgio Telles. O Estado de S. Paulo, 26 de novembro de 2011, D12, C2+música)
... rompe com as leis de causa e efeito com as quais procuramos lidar com a realidade ... (1º parágrafo)
Há relação de causa e efeito no desenvolvimento do texto entre as situações que aparecem em:
Há relação de causa e efeito no desenvolvimento do texto entre as situações que aparecem em:
Ano: 2012
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
TCE-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2012 - TCE-SP - Auxiliar de Fiscalização Financeira |
Q223704
Português
Texto associado
As questões de números 1 a 6 baseiam-se no texto seguinte.
Quando se tem em conta que 50% do território nacional é ocupado pelo bioma Amazônia e que 60% do potencial elétrico do
país ainda por aproveitar se localiza nessa área, pode-se intuir as dificuldades que enfrenta a expansão da hidreletricidade no Brasil.
De fato, a Amazônia é, de um lado, um bioma reconhecidamente sensível e de elevado interesse ambiental. De outro, constitui a
fronteira hidrelétrica, ainda que nem todo o potencial lá existente venha a ser desenvolvido.
As questões que se contrapõem são basicamente duas: 1) Pode o país abrir mão de preservar a Amazônia, de cuidar
soberanamente das suas fragilidades e de toda a riqueza de sua biodiversidade, e de deixar um legado de interesse para toda a
humanidade?; 2) Pode o país abrir mão de uma vantagem competitiva relevante representada pela hidreletricidade, sendo esta uma
opção energética limpa, renovável, barata e de elevado conteúdo nacional, o que significa baixa emissão de carbono, geração de
empregos e dinamismo econômico doméstico?
Sem dúvida, não podemos abrir mão de nenhum dos dois objetivos. Análise rasa baseada em uma ótica ultrapassada, na qual
projetos hidrelétricos provocam necessariamente impactos ambientais irrecuperáveis e não compensáveis, sugere que esse duplo
objetivo é inatingível. Mas isso não tem de ser assim. Projetos hidrelétricos, quando instalados em áreas habitadas, podem constituir-
se em vetores do desenvolvimento regional. Quando instalados em áreas não habitadas podem constituir-se em vetores de
preservação dos ambientes naturais.
Por óbvio, qualquer projeto hidrelétrico deve cuidar para que os impactos ambientais sejam mitigados e compensados.
Conciliar as duas questões básicas é possível. Demanda inovação, novas soluções construtivas, esquemas operativos diferenciados,
dentificação de áreas a serem preservadas, responsabilização dos atores envolvidos, vontade política e ampla discussão da
sociedade - são esforços que podem ser feitos na direção de conciliar os imperativos de se preservar a Amazônia e desenvolver seu
potencial elétrico.
Por fim, não é demais lembrar que renunciar a esse potencial significa decidir que a expansão do consumo de energia dos
brasileiros será atendida por outras fontes, não necessariamente mais competitivas ou de menor impacto ambiental.
(Maurício Tolmasquim. CartaCapital, 7 de setembro de 2011. p.61, com adaptações)
Quando se tem em conta que 50% do território nacional é ocupado pelo bioma Amazônia e que 60% do potencial elétrico do
país ainda por aproveitar se localiza nessa área, pode-se intuir as dificuldades que enfrenta a expansão da hidreletricidade no Brasil.
De fato, a Amazônia é, de um lado, um bioma reconhecidamente sensível e de elevado interesse ambiental. De outro, constitui a
fronteira hidrelétrica, ainda que nem todo o potencial lá existente venha a ser desenvolvido.
As questões que se contrapõem são basicamente duas: 1) Pode o país abrir mão de preservar a Amazônia, de cuidar
soberanamente das suas fragilidades e de toda a riqueza de sua biodiversidade, e de deixar um legado de interesse para toda a
humanidade?; 2) Pode o país abrir mão de uma vantagem competitiva relevante representada pela hidreletricidade, sendo esta uma
opção energética limpa, renovável, barata e de elevado conteúdo nacional, o que significa baixa emissão de carbono, geração de
empregos e dinamismo econômico doméstico?
Sem dúvida, não podemos abrir mão de nenhum dos dois objetivos. Análise rasa baseada em uma ótica ultrapassada, na qual
projetos hidrelétricos provocam necessariamente impactos ambientais irrecuperáveis e não compensáveis, sugere que esse duplo
objetivo é inatingível. Mas isso não tem de ser assim. Projetos hidrelétricos, quando instalados em áreas habitadas, podem constituir-
se em vetores do desenvolvimento regional. Quando instalados em áreas não habitadas podem constituir-se em vetores de
preservação dos ambientes naturais.
Por óbvio, qualquer projeto hidrelétrico deve cuidar para que os impactos ambientais sejam mitigados e compensados.
Conciliar as duas questões básicas é possível. Demanda inovação, novas soluções construtivas, esquemas operativos diferenciados,
dentificação de áreas a serem preservadas, responsabilização dos atores envolvidos, vontade política e ampla discussão da
sociedade - são esforços que podem ser feitos na direção de conciliar os imperativos de se preservar a Amazônia e desenvolver seu
potencial elétrico.
Por fim, não é demais lembrar que renunciar a esse potencial significa decidir que a expansão do consumo de energia dos
brasileiros será atendida por outras fontes, não necessariamente mais competitivas ou de menor impacto ambiental.
(Maurício Tolmasquim. CartaCapital, 7 de setembro de 2011. p.61, com adaptações)
... que a expansão do consumo de energia dos brasileiros será atendida por outras fontes ...
Transposta para a voz ativa, a forma verbal grifada acima passará a ser:
Transposta para a voz ativa, a forma verbal grifada acima passará a ser:
Q223155
Contabilidade Pública
Texto associado
Instruções: Para responder às questões de números 74 e 75, considere os dados apresentados, a seguir, referentes ao exercício financeiro de X1 de uma determinada prefeitura municipal, valores em R$ (1.000):
- A prefeitura recebeu depósitos cauções no valor de R$ (mil) 500,00 e doações em imóveis no valor de R$ (mil) 2.000,00.
Além disso, pagou restos a pagar processados no valor de R$ (mil) 7.000,00 e consignações no valor de R$ (mil) 1.000,00.
- A prefeitura recebeu depósitos cauções no valor de R$ (mil) 500,00 e doações em imóveis no valor de R$ (mil) 2.000,00.
Além disso, pagou restos a pagar processados no valor de R$ (mil) 7.000,00 e consignações no valor de R$ (mil) 1.000,00.
No exercício financeiro de X1, a prefeitura apresentou, em milhares de reais,
Q223154
Contabilidade Pública
Texto associado
Instruções: Para responder às questões de números 74 e 75, considere os dados apresentados, a seguir, referentes ao exercício financeiro de X1 de uma determinada prefeitura municipal, valores em R$ (1.000):
- A prefeitura recebeu depósitos cauções no valor de R$ (mil) 500,00 e doações em imóveis no valor de R$ (mil) 2.000,00.
Além disso, pagou restos a pagar processados no valor de R$ (mil) 7.000,00 e consignações no valor de R$ (mil) 1.000,00.
- A prefeitura recebeu depósitos cauções no valor de R$ (mil) 500,00 e doações em imóveis no valor de R$ (mil) 2.000,00.
Além disso, pagou restos a pagar processados no valor de R$ (mil) 7.000,00 e consignações no valor de R$ (mil) 1.000,00.
Com base nessas informações, em milhares de reais, no exercício de X1, o saldo do passivo financeiro teve uma variação
Q223153
Contabilidade Pública
A variação cambial da dívida fundada externa quando há a desvalorização da moeda brasileira, o real, representa uma
Q223152
Contabilidade Pública
São exemplos, respectivamente, de receita efetiva e despesa por mutação patrimonial, a receita
Conheça nossos planos