Questões de Concurso Comentadas para if-pe

Foram encontradas 987 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q810001 Inglês

TEXT 1  

WHY MILLENIALS WILL SAVE US ALL  

By Joel Stein

I am about to do what old people have done throughout history: call those younger than me lazy, entitled, selfish and shallow. But I have studies! I have statistics! I have quotes from respected academics! Unlike my parents, my grandparents and my great-grandparents, I have proof.

Here’s the code, hard data: the incident of narcissistic personality disorder in nearly three times as high for people in their 20s as for the generation that’s now 65 or older, according to the National Institutes of Health; 58% more college students scored higher on a narcissism scale in 2009 than in 1982. Millennials got so many participation trophies growing up that a recent study showed that 40% believe they should be promoted every two years, regardless of performance. They are fame obsessed: three times as many middle school girls want to grow up to be a personal assistant to a famous person as want to be a senator, according to a 2007 survey; four time as many would pick the assistant job over CEO of a major corporation. They’re so convinced of their own greatness that the National Study of Youth and Religion found the guiding morality of 60% of millennials in any situation as that they’ll just be able to feel what’s right. Their development is stunted: more people ages 18 to 29 live with their parents than with a spouse, according to the 2012 Clarck University Poll of Emerging Adults. And they are lazy. In 1992, the non-profit Families and Work Institute reported that 80% of people under 23 wanted to one day have a job with greater responsibility; 10 years later, only 60% did.

Millennials consist, depending on whom you ask, of people born from 1980 to 2000. To put it more simply for them, since they grew up not having to do a lot of math in their heads, thanks to computers, the group is made up mostly of teens and 20-somethings. At 80 million strong, they are the biggest age grouping in American history. Each country’s millennials are different, but because of globalization, social media, the export of Western culture and the speed of change, millennials worldwide are more similar to one another than to old generations within their nations. Even in China, where family history is more important than any individual, the internet, urbanization and the onechild policy have created a generation as overconfident and self-involved as the Western one. And these aren’t just rich-kid problems: poor millennials have even higher rates of narcissism, materialism and technology addiction in their ghetto-fabulous lives.

They are the most threatening and exciting generation since the baby boomers brought about social revolution, not because they’re trying to take over the Establishment but because they’re growing up without one. The Industrial Revolution made individuals far more powerful - they could move to a city, start a business, read and form organizations. The information revolution has further empowered individuals by handing them the technology to compete against huge organizations: hackers vs. corporations, bloggers vs. newspapers, terrorists vs. Nation-states, YouTube directors vs. studios, app-makers vs. entire industries. Millennials don’t need us. That’s why we’re scared of them.

In the U.S, millennials are the children of baby boomers, who are also known as the Me Generation, who then produced the Me Me Me Generation, whose selfishness technology has only exarcebated. Whereas in the 1950s families displayed a wedding photo, a school photo and maybe a military photo in their homes, the average middle-class American family today walks amid 85 pictures of themselves and their pets. Millennials have come of age in the era of the quantified self, recording their daily steps on FitBit, their whereabouts every hour of every day on PlaceMe and their genetic data on 23 and Me. They have less civic engagement and lower political participation than any previous group. This is a generation that would have made Walt Whitman wonder if maybe they should try singing a song of someone else.

They got this way partly because in the 1970s, people wanted to improve kids’ chances of success by instilling self-esteem. It turns out that self-esteem is great for getting a job or hooking up at a bar but not so great for keeping a job or a relationship. “It was an honest mistake,” says Roy Baumeister, a psychology professor at Florida State University and the editor of Self-Esteem: The puzzle of Low Self-Regard. “The early findings showed that, indeed, kids with high self-esteem did better in school and were less likely to be in various kinds of trouble. It’s just that we’ve learned latter that self-esteem is a result, not a cause.” The problem is that when people try to boost self-esteem, they accidentally boost narcissism instead. “Just tell your kids you love them. It’s a better message,” says Jean Twenge, a psychology professor at San Diego State University, who wrote Generation Me and The Narcissism Epidemic. “When they’re little it seems cute to tell them they’re special or a princess or a rock star or whatever their T-shirt says. When they’re 14 it’s no longer cute.” All that self-esteem leads them to be disappointed when the world refuses to affirm how great they know they are. “This generation has the highest likelihood of having unmet expectations with respect to their careers and the lowest levels of satisfaction with their careers at the stage that they’re at,” says Sean Lyons, co-editor of Managing the New Workforce: International Perspectives on the Millennial Generation. “It is sort of a crisis of unmet expectations.”

What millennials are most famous for, besides narcissism is its effect: entitlement. If you want to sell seminars to middle managers, make them about how to deal with young employees who email the CEO directly and beg off projects they find boring. English teacher David McCullough Jr.’s address last year to Wellesley High School’s graduating class, a 12-minute reality check titled “You Are Not Special,” has nearly 2 million hits on YouTube. “Climb the mountain so you can see the world, not so the world can see you,” McCullough told the graduates. He says nearly all the response to the video has been positive, especially from millennials themselves; the video has 57 likes for every dislike. Though they’re cocky about their place in the world, millennials are also stunted, having prolonged a life stage between teenager and adult that this magazine once called twixters and will now use once again in an attempt to get that term to catch on. The idea of the teenager started in the 1920s; in 1910, only a tiny percentage of kids went to high school, so most people’s social interactions were with adults in their families or in the workplace. Now that cell phones allow kids to socialize at every hour – they send and receive an average of 88 texts a day, according to Pew – they’re living under the constant influence of their friends. “Peer pressure is anti-intellectual. It is anti-historical. It is anti-eloquence,” says Mark Bauerlein, an English professor at Emory, who wrote The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (or, Don’t Trust Anyone Under 30). “Never before in history have people been able to grow up and reach age 23 so dominated by peers. To develop intellectually you’ve got to relate to older people, older things: 17-year-olds never grow up if they’re just hanging around other 17-year-olds.” Of all the objections to Obamacare, not a lot of people argued against parents’ need to cover their kids’ health insurance until they’re 26.

Millennials are interacting all day but almost entirely through a screen. You’ve seen them at bars, sitting next to one another and texting. They might look calm, but they’re deeply anxious about missing out on something better. Seventy percent of them check their phones every hour, and many experience phantom pocket-vibration syndrome. “They’re doing a behavior to reduce their anxiety,” says Larry Rosen, a psychology professor at California State University at Dominguez Hills and the author of iDisorder. That constant search of a hit of dopamine (“Someone liked my status update!”) reduces creativity. From 1966, when the Torrance Tests of Creativity Thinking were first administered, through the mid-1980s, creativity scores in children increased. Then they dropped, falling sharply in 1998. Scores on tests of empathy similarly fell sharply, starting in 2000, likely because of both a lack to face-to-face time and higher degrees of narcissism. Not do only millennials lack the kind of empathy that allows them to feel concerned for others, but they also have trouble even intellectually understanding others’ points of view.

So, yes, we have all that data about narcissism and laziness and entitlement. But a generation’s greatness isn’t determined by data; it’s determined by how they react to the challenges that befall them. And, just as important, by how we react to them. Whether you think millennials are the new greatest generation of optimistic entrepreneurs or a group of 80 million people about to implode in a dwarf star of tears when their expectations are unmet depends largely on how you view change. Me, I choose to believe in the children. God knows they do.

Source: Time. Available at http://time.com/247/millennials-the-me-me-me-generation/ Accessed on October 24, 2016.  

TEXT 1 is a/an
Alternativas
Q810000 Inglês

TEXT 1  

WHY MILLENIALS WILL SAVE US ALL  

By Joel Stein

I am about to do what old people have done throughout history: call those younger than me lazy, entitled, selfish and shallow. But I have studies! I have statistics! I have quotes from respected academics! Unlike my parents, my grandparents and my great-grandparents, I have proof.

Here’s the code, hard data: the incident of narcissistic personality disorder in nearly three times as high for people in their 20s as for the generation that’s now 65 or older, according to the National Institutes of Health; 58% more college students scored higher on a narcissism scale in 2009 than in 1982. Millennials got so many participation trophies growing up that a recent study showed that 40% believe they should be promoted every two years, regardless of performance. They are fame obsessed: three times as many middle school girls want to grow up to be a personal assistant to a famous person as want to be a senator, according to a 2007 survey; four time as many would pick the assistant job over CEO of a major corporation. They’re so convinced of their own greatness that the National Study of Youth and Religion found the guiding morality of 60% of millennials in any situation as that they’ll just be able to feel what’s right. Their development is stunted: more people ages 18 to 29 live with their parents than with a spouse, according to the 2012 Clarck University Poll of Emerging Adults. And they are lazy. In 1992, the non-profit Families and Work Institute reported that 80% of people under 23 wanted to one day have a job with greater responsibility; 10 years later, only 60% did.

Millennials consist, depending on whom you ask, of people born from 1980 to 2000. To put it more simply for them, since they grew up not having to do a lot of math in their heads, thanks to computers, the group is made up mostly of teens and 20-somethings. At 80 million strong, they are the biggest age grouping in American history. Each country’s millennials are different, but because of globalization, social media, the export of Western culture and the speed of change, millennials worldwide are more similar to one another than to old generations within their nations. Even in China, where family history is more important than any individual, the internet, urbanization and the onechild policy have created a generation as overconfident and self-involved as the Western one. And these aren’t just rich-kid problems: poor millennials have even higher rates of narcissism, materialism and technology addiction in their ghetto-fabulous lives.

They are the most threatening and exciting generation since the baby boomers brought about social revolution, not because they’re trying to take over the Establishment but because they’re growing up without one. The Industrial Revolution made individuals far more powerful - they could move to a city, start a business, read and form organizations. The information revolution has further empowered individuals by handing them the technology to compete against huge organizations: hackers vs. corporations, bloggers vs. newspapers, terrorists vs. Nation-states, YouTube directors vs. studios, app-makers vs. entire industries. Millennials don’t need us. That’s why we’re scared of them.

In the U.S, millennials are the children of baby boomers, who are also known as the Me Generation, who then produced the Me Me Me Generation, whose selfishness technology has only exarcebated. Whereas in the 1950s families displayed a wedding photo, a school photo and maybe a military photo in their homes, the average middle-class American family today walks amid 85 pictures of themselves and their pets. Millennials have come of age in the era of the quantified self, recording their daily steps on FitBit, their whereabouts every hour of every day on PlaceMe and their genetic data on 23 and Me. They have less civic engagement and lower political participation than any previous group. This is a generation that would have made Walt Whitman wonder if maybe they should try singing a song of someone else.

They got this way partly because in the 1970s, people wanted to improve kids’ chances of success by instilling self-esteem. It turns out that self-esteem is great for getting a job or hooking up at a bar but not so great for keeping a job or a relationship. “It was an honest mistake,” says Roy Baumeister, a psychology professor at Florida State University and the editor of Self-Esteem: The puzzle of Low Self-Regard. “The early findings showed that, indeed, kids with high self-esteem did better in school and were less likely to be in various kinds of trouble. It’s just that we’ve learned latter that self-esteem is a result, not a cause.” The problem is that when people try to boost self-esteem, they accidentally boost narcissism instead. “Just tell your kids you love them. It’s a better message,” says Jean Twenge, a psychology professor at San Diego State University, who wrote Generation Me and The Narcissism Epidemic. “When they’re little it seems cute to tell them they’re special or a princess or a rock star or whatever their T-shirt says. When they’re 14 it’s no longer cute.” All that self-esteem leads them to be disappointed when the world refuses to affirm how great they know they are. “This generation has the highest likelihood of having unmet expectations with respect to their careers and the lowest levels of satisfaction with their careers at the stage that they’re at,” says Sean Lyons, co-editor of Managing the New Workforce: International Perspectives on the Millennial Generation. “It is sort of a crisis of unmet expectations.”

What millennials are most famous for, besides narcissism is its effect: entitlement. If you want to sell seminars to middle managers, make them about how to deal with young employees who email the CEO directly and beg off projects they find boring. English teacher David McCullough Jr.’s address last year to Wellesley High School’s graduating class, a 12-minute reality check titled “You Are Not Special,” has nearly 2 million hits on YouTube. “Climb the mountain so you can see the world, not so the world can see you,” McCullough told the graduates. He says nearly all the response to the video has been positive, especially from millennials themselves; the video has 57 likes for every dislike. Though they’re cocky about their place in the world, millennials are also stunted, having prolonged a life stage between teenager and adult that this magazine once called twixters and will now use once again in an attempt to get that term to catch on. The idea of the teenager started in the 1920s; in 1910, only a tiny percentage of kids went to high school, so most people’s social interactions were with adults in their families or in the workplace. Now that cell phones allow kids to socialize at every hour – they send and receive an average of 88 texts a day, according to Pew – they’re living under the constant influence of their friends. “Peer pressure is anti-intellectual. It is anti-historical. It is anti-eloquence,” says Mark Bauerlein, an English professor at Emory, who wrote The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (or, Don’t Trust Anyone Under 30). “Never before in history have people been able to grow up and reach age 23 so dominated by peers. To develop intellectually you’ve got to relate to older people, older things: 17-year-olds never grow up if they’re just hanging around other 17-year-olds.” Of all the objections to Obamacare, not a lot of people argued against parents’ need to cover their kids’ health insurance until they’re 26.

Millennials are interacting all day but almost entirely through a screen. You’ve seen them at bars, sitting next to one another and texting. They might look calm, but they’re deeply anxious about missing out on something better. Seventy percent of them check their phones every hour, and many experience phantom pocket-vibration syndrome. “They’re doing a behavior to reduce their anxiety,” says Larry Rosen, a psychology professor at California State University at Dominguez Hills and the author of iDisorder. That constant search of a hit of dopamine (“Someone liked my status update!”) reduces creativity. From 1966, when the Torrance Tests of Creativity Thinking were first administered, through the mid-1980s, creativity scores in children increased. Then they dropped, falling sharply in 1998. Scores on tests of empathy similarly fell sharply, starting in 2000, likely because of both a lack to face-to-face time and higher degrees of narcissism. Not do only millennials lack the kind of empathy that allows them to feel concerned for others, but they also have trouble even intellectually understanding others’ points of view.

So, yes, we have all that data about narcissism and laziness and entitlement. But a generation’s greatness isn’t determined by data; it’s determined by how they react to the challenges that befall them. And, just as important, by how we react to them. Whether you think millennials are the new greatest generation of optimistic entrepreneurs or a group of 80 million people about to implode in a dwarf star of tears when their expectations are unmet depends largely on how you view change. Me, I choose to believe in the children. God knows they do.

Source: Time. Available at http://time.com/247/millennials-the-me-me-me-generation/ Accessed on October 24, 2016.  

According to the author, Millennials are:
Alternativas
Q809999 Inglês

TEXT 1  

WHY MILLENIALS WILL SAVE US ALL  

By Joel Stein

I am about to do what old people have done throughout history: call those younger than me lazy, entitled, selfish and shallow. But I have studies! I have statistics! I have quotes from respected academics! Unlike my parents, my grandparents and my great-grandparents, I have proof.

Here’s the code, hard data: the incident of narcissistic personality disorder in nearly three times as high for people in their 20s as for the generation that’s now 65 or older, according to the National Institutes of Health; 58% more college students scored higher on a narcissism scale in 2009 than in 1982. Millennials got so many participation trophies growing up that a recent study showed that 40% believe they should be promoted every two years, regardless of performance. They are fame obsessed: three times as many middle school girls want to grow up to be a personal assistant to a famous person as want to be a senator, according to a 2007 survey; four time as many would pick the assistant job over CEO of a major corporation. They’re so convinced of their own greatness that the National Study of Youth and Religion found the guiding morality of 60% of millennials in any situation as that they’ll just be able to feel what’s right. Their development is stunted: more people ages 18 to 29 live with their parents than with a spouse, according to the 2012 Clarck University Poll of Emerging Adults. And they are lazy. In 1992, the non-profit Families and Work Institute reported that 80% of people under 23 wanted to one day have a job with greater responsibility; 10 years later, only 60% did.

Millennials consist, depending on whom you ask, of people born from 1980 to 2000. To put it more simply for them, since they grew up not having to do a lot of math in their heads, thanks to computers, the group is made up mostly of teens and 20-somethings. At 80 million strong, they are the biggest age grouping in American history. Each country’s millennials are different, but because of globalization, social media, the export of Western culture and the speed of change, millennials worldwide are more similar to one another than to old generations within their nations. Even in China, where family history is more important than any individual, the internet, urbanization and the onechild policy have created a generation as overconfident and self-involved as the Western one. And these aren’t just rich-kid problems: poor millennials have even higher rates of narcissism, materialism and technology addiction in their ghetto-fabulous lives.

They are the most threatening and exciting generation since the baby boomers brought about social revolution, not because they’re trying to take over the Establishment but because they’re growing up without one. The Industrial Revolution made individuals far more powerful - they could move to a city, start a business, read and form organizations. The information revolution has further empowered individuals by handing them the technology to compete against huge organizations: hackers vs. corporations, bloggers vs. newspapers, terrorists vs. Nation-states, YouTube directors vs. studios, app-makers vs. entire industries. Millennials don’t need us. That’s why we’re scared of them.

In the U.S, millennials are the children of baby boomers, who are also known as the Me Generation, who then produced the Me Me Me Generation, whose selfishness technology has only exarcebated. Whereas in the 1950s families displayed a wedding photo, a school photo and maybe a military photo in their homes, the average middle-class American family today walks amid 85 pictures of themselves and their pets. Millennials have come of age in the era of the quantified self, recording their daily steps on FitBit, their whereabouts every hour of every day on PlaceMe and their genetic data on 23 and Me. They have less civic engagement and lower political participation than any previous group. This is a generation that would have made Walt Whitman wonder if maybe they should try singing a song of someone else.

They got this way partly because in the 1970s, people wanted to improve kids’ chances of success by instilling self-esteem. It turns out that self-esteem is great for getting a job or hooking up at a bar but not so great for keeping a job or a relationship. “It was an honest mistake,” says Roy Baumeister, a psychology professor at Florida State University and the editor of Self-Esteem: The puzzle of Low Self-Regard. “The early findings showed that, indeed, kids with high self-esteem did better in school and were less likely to be in various kinds of trouble. It’s just that we’ve learned latter that self-esteem is a result, not a cause.” The problem is that when people try to boost self-esteem, they accidentally boost narcissism instead. “Just tell your kids you love them. It’s a better message,” says Jean Twenge, a psychology professor at San Diego State University, who wrote Generation Me and The Narcissism Epidemic. “When they’re little it seems cute to tell them they’re special or a princess or a rock star or whatever their T-shirt says. When they’re 14 it’s no longer cute.” All that self-esteem leads them to be disappointed when the world refuses to affirm how great they know they are. “This generation has the highest likelihood of having unmet expectations with respect to their careers and the lowest levels of satisfaction with their careers at the stage that they’re at,” says Sean Lyons, co-editor of Managing the New Workforce: International Perspectives on the Millennial Generation. “It is sort of a crisis of unmet expectations.”

What millennials are most famous for, besides narcissism is its effect: entitlement. If you want to sell seminars to middle managers, make them about how to deal with young employees who email the CEO directly and beg off projects they find boring. English teacher David McCullough Jr.’s address last year to Wellesley High School’s graduating class, a 12-minute reality check titled “You Are Not Special,” has nearly 2 million hits on YouTube. “Climb the mountain so you can see the world, not so the world can see you,” McCullough told the graduates. He says nearly all the response to the video has been positive, especially from millennials themselves; the video has 57 likes for every dislike. Though they’re cocky about their place in the world, millennials are also stunted, having prolonged a life stage between teenager and adult that this magazine once called twixters and will now use once again in an attempt to get that term to catch on. The idea of the teenager started in the 1920s; in 1910, only a tiny percentage of kids went to high school, so most people’s social interactions were with adults in their families or in the workplace. Now that cell phones allow kids to socialize at every hour – they send and receive an average of 88 texts a day, according to Pew – they’re living under the constant influence of their friends. “Peer pressure is anti-intellectual. It is anti-historical. It is anti-eloquence,” says Mark Bauerlein, an English professor at Emory, who wrote The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (or, Don’t Trust Anyone Under 30). “Never before in history have people been able to grow up and reach age 23 so dominated by peers. To develop intellectually you’ve got to relate to older people, older things: 17-year-olds never grow up if they’re just hanging around other 17-year-olds.” Of all the objections to Obamacare, not a lot of people argued against parents’ need to cover their kids’ health insurance until they’re 26.

Millennials are interacting all day but almost entirely through a screen. You’ve seen them at bars, sitting next to one another and texting. They might look calm, but they’re deeply anxious about missing out on something better. Seventy percent of them check their phones every hour, and many experience phantom pocket-vibration syndrome. “They’re doing a behavior to reduce their anxiety,” says Larry Rosen, a psychology professor at California State University at Dominguez Hills and the author of iDisorder. That constant search of a hit of dopamine (“Someone liked my status update!”) reduces creativity. From 1966, when the Torrance Tests of Creativity Thinking were first administered, through the mid-1980s, creativity scores in children increased. Then they dropped, falling sharply in 1998. Scores on tests of empathy similarly fell sharply, starting in 2000, likely because of both a lack to face-to-face time and higher degrees of narcissism. Not do only millennials lack the kind of empathy that allows them to feel concerned for others, but they also have trouble even intellectually understanding others’ points of view.

So, yes, we have all that data about narcissism and laziness and entitlement. But a generation’s greatness isn’t determined by data; it’s determined by how they react to the challenges that befall them. And, just as important, by how we react to them. Whether you think millennials are the new greatest generation of optimistic entrepreneurs or a group of 80 million people about to implode in a dwarf star of tears when their expectations are unmet depends largely on how you view change. Me, I choose to believe in the children. God knows they do.

Source: Time. Available at http://time.com/247/millennials-the-me-me-me-generation/ Accessed on October 24, 2016.  

The main communicative purpose of TEXT 1 is to
Alternativas
Q773893 Redes de Computadores
A respeito do CSMA/CD (Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Colision Detected), assinale a alternativa CORRETA quanto ao conceito de transmissão utilizado na Ethernet TCP/IP.
Alternativas
Q773885 Eletrotécnica
Sobre o termo FALHA, dentro do Planejamento e Controle da Manutenção, definido conforme a NBR 5462/1994, é CORRETO afirmar que
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: IF-PE Órgão: IF-PE Prova: IF-PE - 2017 - IF-PE - Revisor de Texto |
Q773024 Português

Leia os TEXTO  para responder às questão. 

REVISÃO VAI ALÉM DA ORTOGRAFIA E FOCA OS PROPÓSITOS DO TEXTO

O objetivo do aluno ao fazer a revisão de texto é conseguir que ele comunique bem suas ideias e se ajuste ao gênero. Isso tem de ser feito tanto durante a produção como ao fim dela.

   Produzir textos é um processo que envolve diferentes etapas: planejar, escrever, revisar e reescrever. Esses comportamentos escritores são os conteúdos fundamentais da produção escrita. A revisão não consiste em corrigir apenas erros ortográficos e gramaticais, como se fazia antes, mas cuidar para que o texto cumpra sua finalidade comunicativa. “Deve-se olhar para a produção dos estudantes e identificar o que provoca estranhamento no leitor dentro dos usos sociais que ela terá”, explica Fernanda Liberali, Doutora em linguística pela PUC/SP.  

   Com a ajuda do professor, as turmas aprendem a analisar se ideias e recursos utilizados foram eficazes e de que forma o material pode ser melhorado. A sala de 3º ano de Ana Clara Bin, na Escola da Vila, em São Paulo, avançou muito com um trabalho sistemático de revisão. Por um semestre, todos se dedicaram a um projeto sobre a história das famílias, que culminou na publicação de um livro, distribuído também para os pais. Dentro desse contexto, Ana Clara propôs a leitura de contos em que escritores narram histórias da própria infância.

   Os estudantes se envolveram na reescrita de um dos contos, narrado em primeira pessoa. Eles tiveram de reescrevê-lo na perspectiva de um observador – ou seja, em terceira pessoa. A segunda missão foi ainda mais desafiadora: contar uma história da infância dos pais. Para isso, cada um entrevistou familiares, anotou as informações colhidas em forma de tópicos e colocou tudo no papel.

   Ana Clara leu os trabalhos e elegeu alguns pontos para discutir. “O mais comum era encontrar só o relato de um fato”, diz. “Recorremos, então, aos contos lidos para saber que informações e detalhes tornavam a história interessante e como organizá-los para dar emoção.” Cada um releu seu conto, realizou outra entrevista com o parente-personagem e produziu uma segunda versão.

   Tiveram início aí diferentes formas de revisão – análise coletiva de uma produção no quadro-negro, revisão individual com base em discussões com o grupo e revisões em duplas – realizadas dias depois para que houvesse distanciamento em relação ao trabalho. A primeira proposta foi a “revisão de ouvido”. Para realizá-la, Ana Clara leu em voz alta um dos contos para a turma, que identificou a omissão de palavras e informações. A professora selecionou alguns aspectos a enfocar na revisão: ortografia, gramática e pontuação. “Não é possível abordar de uma só vez todos os problemas que surgem”.

   Quando a classe de Ana Clara se dividiu em duplas, um de seus propósitos era que uns dessem sugestões aos outros. A pesquisadora argentina em didática Mirta Castedo é defensora desse tipo de proposta. Para ela, as situações de revisão em grupo desenvolvem a reflexão sobre o que foi produzido por meio justamente da troca de opiniões e críticas. “Revisar o que os colegas fazem é interessante, pois o aluno se coloca no lugar de leitor”. “Quando volta para a própria produção e faz a revisão, a criança tem mais condições de criar distanciamento dela e enxergar fragilidades.”

   Um escritor proficiente, no entanto, não faz a revisão só no fim do trabalho. Durante a escrita, é comum reler o trecho já produzido e verificar se ele está adequado aos objetivos e às ideias que tinha intenção de comunicar – só então planeja-se a continuação. E isso é feito por todo escritor profissional.

   A revisão em processo e a final são passos fundamentais para conseguir de fato uma boa escrita. Nesse sentido, a maneira como você escreve e revisa no quadro-negro, por exemplo, pode colaborar para que a criança o tome como modelo e se familiarize com o procedimento. Sobre o assunto, Mirta Castedo escreve em sua tese de doutorado: “Os bons escritores adultos (...) são pessoas que pensam sobre o que vão escrever, colocam em palavras e voltam sobre o já produzido para julgar sua adequação. Mas, acima de tudo, não realizam as três ações (planejar, escrever e revisar) de maneira sucessiva: vão e voltam de umas a outras, desenvolvendo um complexo processo de transformação de seus conhecimentos em um texto”.


GURGEL, Thaís. Revista Nova Escola. Escrever de verdade - produção de textoAdaptado. Disponível em http://acervo.novaescola.org.br/producao-de-texto/revisao-alem-ortografia.shtml - Acesso em 25 de outubro de 2016 

Quanto aos aspectos gramaticais ligados à pontuação, analise as proposições que seguem.
I. No trecho “Com a ajuda do professor, as turmas aprendem a analisar se ideias e recursos utilizados foram eficazes e de que forma o material pode ser melhorado.”(3º parágrafo), o uso da vírgula não se justifica, pois está separando o sujeito do verbo. II. O travessão utilizado em “Eles tiveram de reescrevê-lo na perspectiva de um observador – ou seja, em terceira pessoa.” (4º parágrafo), poderia perfeitamente ser substituído por uma vírgula. III. Em “A segunda missão foi ainda mais desafiadora: contar uma história da infância dos pais.” (4º parágrafo),. O uso dos dois pontos não se justifica. IV. No trecho “Cada um releu seu conto, realizou outra entrevista com o parente-personagem e produziu uma segunda versão.” (5º parágrafo), a utilização da vírgula se justifica por organizar orações coordenadas. V. Em “Um escritor proficiente, no entanto, não faz a revisão só no fim do trabalho.” (8º parágrafo), as vírgulas estão corretamente postas, pois separam expressão deslocada de sua posição original.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta as proposições CORRETAS.
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: IF-PE Órgão: IF-PE Prova: IF-PE - 2017 - IF-PE - Revisor de Texto |
Q773022 Português

Leia o TEXTO  para responder à questão. 


CUIDADO COM OS REVIZORES


   Todo escritor convive com um terror permanente: o do erro de revisão. O revisor é a pessoa mais importante na vida de quem escreve. Ele tem o poder de vida ou de morte profissional sobre o autor. A inclusão ou omissão de uma letra ou vírgula no que sai impresso pode decidir se o autor vai ser entendido ou não, admirado ou ridicularizado, consagrado ou processado. Todo texto tem, na verdade, dois autores: quem o escreveu e quem o revisou. Toda vez que manda um texto para ser publicado, o autor se coloca nas mãos do revisor, esperando que seu parceiro não falhe. Não há escritor que não empregue palavras como, por exemplo: “ônus” ou “carvalho” e depois fique metaforicamente de malas feitas, pronto para fugir do país se as palavras não saírem impressas como no original, por um lapso do revisor. Ou por sabotagem.
   Sim, porque a paranoia autoral não tem limites. Muitos autores acreditam firmemente que existe uma conspiração de revisores contra eles. Quando os revisores não deixam passar erros de composição (hoje em dia, de digitação), fazem pior: não corrigem os erros ortográficos e gramaticais do próprio autor, deixando-o entregue às consequências dos seus próprios pecados de concordância, das suas crases indevidas e pronomes fora do lugar. O que é uma ignomínia. Ou será ignomia? Enfim, não se faz.
   Pode-se imaginar o que uma conspiração organizada, internacional, de revisores significaria para a nossa civilização. Os revisores só não dominam o mundo porque ainda não se deram conta do poder que têm. Eles desestabilizariam qualquer regime com acentos indevidos e pontuações maliciosas, além de decretos oficiais ininteligíveis. Grandes jornais seriam levados à falência por difamações involuntárias, exércitos inteiros seriam imobilizados por manuais de instrução militar sutilmente alterados, gerações de estudantes seriam desencaminhadas por cartilhas ambíguas e fórmulas de química incompletas. E os efeitos de uma revisão subversiva na instrução médica são terríveis demais para contemplar.
   Existe um exemplo histórico do que a revisão desatenta – ou mal-intencionada – pode fazer. Uma das edições da Versão Autorizada da Bíblia publicada na Inglaterra por iniciativa do rei James I, no século XVII, ficou conhecida como a “Bíblia Má”, porque a injunção “Não cometerás adultério” saiu, por um erro de impressão, sem o “não”. Ninguém sabe se o volume de adultérios entre os cristãos de fala inglesa aumentou em decorrência dessa inesperada sanção bíblica até descobrirem o erro, ou se o impressor e o revisor foram atirados numa fogueira juntos, mas o fato prova que nem a palavra de Deus está livre do poder dos revisores.
   A mesma bíblia do rei James serve como um alerta (ou como o incentivo, dependendo de como se entender a história) para a possibilidade que o revisor tem de interferir no texto. O objetivo de James I era fazer uma versão definitiva da Bíblia em inglês, com aprovação real, para substituir todas as outras traduções da época, principalmente as que mostravam uma certa simpatia republicana nas entrelinhas como a Bíblia de Genebra, feita por calvinistas e adotada pelos puritanos ingleses, e que é a única Bíblia da História em que Adão e Eva vestem calções. Para isso, James reuniu um time dividido entre os que cuidariam do Velho e do Novo Testamento, das partes proféticas e das partes poéticas, etc. Especula-se que as traduções dos trechos poéticos teriam sido distribuídas entre os poetas praticantes da época, para revisarem e, se fosse o caso, melhorarem, desde que não traíssem o original. Entre os poetas em atividade na Inglaterra de James I estava William Shakespeare. O que explicaria o fato de o nome de Shakespeare aparecer no Salmo 46 – “shake” é a 46ª palavra do salmo a contar do começo, “speare” a 46ª a contar do fim. Na tarefa de revisor, e incerto sobre a sua permanência na História como sonetista ou dramaturgo, Shakespeare teria inserido seu nome clandestina e disfarçadamente numa obra que sem dúvida sobreviveria aos séculos. (Infelizmente, diz Anthony Burgess, em cujo livro “A mouthful of air” a encontrei, há pouca probabilidade de esta história ser verdadeira. De qualquer maneira, vale para ilustrar a tentação que todo revisor deve sentir de deixar sua marca, como grafite, na criação alheia.)
   Não posso me queixar dos revisores. Fora a vontade de reuni-los em algum lugar, fechar a porta e dizer “Vamos resolver de uma vez por todas a questão da colocação das vírgulas, mesmo que haja mortos”, acho que me têm tratado bem. Até me protegem. Costumo atirar os pronomes numa frase e deixá-los ficar onde caíram, certo de que o revisor os colocará no lugar adequado. Sempre deixo a crase ao arbítrio deles, que a usem se acharem que devem. E jamais uso a palavra “medra”, para livrá-los da tentação.

VERÍSSIMO, Luís Fernando. Cuidado com os revizores. VIP Exame, mar. 1995, p. 36-37.
Em “Toda vez que manda um texto para ser publicado, o autor se coloca nas mãos do revisor, esperando que seu parceiro não falhe. Não há escritor que não empregue palavras como, por exemplo: “ônus” ou “carvalho” e depois fique metaforicamente de malas feitas, pronto para fugir do país se as palavras não saírem impressas como no original, por um lapso do revisor. Ou por sabotagem.” (1º parágrafo), o “lapso” ou “sabotagem” do revisor se daria por
Alternativas
Q771650 Sistemas Operacionais

Sobre o Oracle VirtualBox 5.0, analise as proposições a seguir.

I. O recurso de ‘redes exclusivas de hospedeiro’ é a forma padrão de permitir que a máquina virtual tenha acesso à Internet da máquina física.

II. É um software que permite rodar vários sistemas operacionais simultaneamente em um computador sem a necessidade de reiniciá-lo.

III. Possibilita criar snapshots de uma máquina virtual com o objetivo de recuperar um estado anterior desta, a critério do usuário.

IV. Permite a criação de máquinas virtuais instaladas com sistemas operacionais Linux, Windows, Mac OS, entre outros.

V. Permite que o usuário selecione a configuração da máquina virtual de modo a simular o comportamento de um Intel® Core™ i7 mesmo quando o computador real possui um Intel® Celeron®.

Estão CORRETAS apenas as proposições 

Alternativas
Q771649 Sistemas Operacionais
Um professor de informática precisa que as máquinas do laboratório rodem uma distribuição Linux para realizar experimentos práticos de segurança com os seus estudantes. O docente forneceu ao técnico de laboratório um arquivo com a imagem deste sistema operacional. Sabendo que todos os computadores da sala estão instalados apenas com Windows 7, assinale a ÚNICA alternativa cujo software permite ao professor executar seus experimentos conforme desejado.
Alternativas
Q771647 Redes de Computadores
TEXTO 09
“Parte do princípio da dispersão de sinais luminosos em meio físico de vidro e um detector que converte esses sinais luminosos em sinal elétrico. Possui uma capacidade de transmissão que pode chegar a 50.000Gbps, porém as limitações relacionadas ao processo de conversão de sinais elétricos em ópticos promovem um limite prático atual que pode atingir no máximo 100Gbps”.
(LIMA FILHO, Eduardo Corrêa. Fundamentos de rede e cabeamento estruturado. São Paulo: Pearson Education do Brasil, 2014, p. 37). 
O autor do TEXTO 09 discorre sobre o princípio de funcionamento e a capacidade de transferência de dados de qual meio físico de transmissão?
Alternativas
Q771645 Sistemas Operacionais
Ocasionalmente, docentes e discentes do IFPE necessitam executar algum aplicativo desenvolvido para uma versão de sistema operacional diferente da instalada nas máquinas dos laboratórios. Sobre compatibilidade na execução de softwares em Ambientes Windows e Linux Ubuntu, analise as proposições a seguir.
I. O software-livre Wine permite que diversos programas nativos do Windows possam ser executados no Linux Ubuntu Desktop. II. Uma das soluções para executar programas nativos do Ubuntu Desktop sobre o Windows 7 é a criação de uma máquina virtual com Ubuntu no Oracle VirtualBox. III. Ao clicar com o botão direito do mouse no programa no qual deseja executar, o Windows 7 disponibiliza a opção ‘Solucionar problemas de compatibilidade’. IV. No Windows 7, é possível rodar um executável no modo compatibilidade do Windows Vista, basta em suas propriedades, na aba ‘Compatibilidade’, marcar a caixa ‘Executar este programa em modo de compatibilidade’ e escolher o modo do sistema operacional desejado. V. Qualquer aplicativo, seja ele 32-bit ou 64-bit, pode ser executado nativamente no Windows 7, independentemente se a versão instalada do sistema operacional é 32-bit ou 64-bit.
Estão CORRETAS as proposições 
Alternativas
Q771644 Redes de Computadores
Sobre as técnicas e princípios do RAID (Redundant Arrays of Independent Disks), é CORRETO afirmar que
Alternativas
Q771643 Redes de Computadores
A Internet fornece meios para garantir autenticação, confidencialidade e integridade das mensagens trocadas entre seus usuários. Para tal, protocolos de comunicação precisam ser respeitados. Sobre a segurança de rede na Internet é CORRETO afirmar que
Alternativas
Q771642 Arquitetura de Computadores
TEXTO 08
O UV400 da Kingston é impulsionado por uma controladora Marvell de quatro canais, proporcionando velocidades incríveis e melhor desempenho comparado com um disco rígido mecânico. Ele aumenta drasticamente a frequência de resposta do seu computador e é 10 vezes mais rápido do que um disco rígido de 7200 RPM. Mais robusto, confiável e durável do que um disco rígido, o UV400 é produzido com o uso de memória Flash. Para facilitar a instalação o UV400 está disponível em kits e em várias capacidades, de 120GB até 960GB.
(Kingston Technology. SSDNow Consumidor. Disponível em: . Acesso: 10 out. 2016.) 
O TEXTO 08 traz a descrição de um produto do site de seu fabricante. Assinale a alternativa que melhor descreve a tecnologia de armazenamento adotada pelo UV400.
Alternativas
Q771641 Arquitetura de Computadores
Um Técnico de Laboratório necessita assessorar estudantes em atividades de substituição de componentes de hardware dos notebooks de um laboratório. Esses notebooks possuem a seguinte configuração resumida: 6ª geração do Processador Intel® Core™ i3-6100U (Dual Core, 2.3 GHz, Cache de 3MB, com Intel® HD Graphics 520); Windows 8.1 de 64 bits - em Português (Brasil); Memória de 4 GB, DDR3L, 1600 MHz, (1 x 4GB), 01 slot disponível; Disco rígido SATA de 500GB (7200 RPM); Placa de vídeo integrada Intel® HD Graphics GT2. Para realização do exercício, estão disponíveis componentes de hardware distintos, nem todos são compatíveis com o computador em tela. Diante deste cenário, analise as proposições a seguir. I. O processador pode ser substituído por um Intel® Core™ i5-4460S (2,9 GHz com turbo expansível para até 3,4 GHz, 6MB de Cache). II. É possível adicionar um pente de memória RAM 8GB DDR4, 2133 MHz no slot vazio. III. É possível aumentar a memória cache de 3MB para 8GB adicionando ao slot vazio outro pente de memória de 4 GB, DDR3L, 1600 MHz. IV. É possível substituir o HD por um SATA de 2.5” com 1TB (5400 RPM). V. É necessário atualizar o sistema para o Windows 10 durante a aula e, só então, realizar a atividade proposta pelo professor. Assinale a alternativa que analisa corretamente as proposições.
Alternativas
Q771640 Redes de Computadores
O IFPE, assim como outras instituições públicas, disponibiliza contas de e-mail oficiais para seus docentes e servidores técnico-administrativos, sendo este importante canal de comunicação institucional. Analise as proposições a seguir sobre o uso de serviços de Webmail do Google (gmail). I. É adicionado um ponto de interrogação ao lado do nome do remetente quando o e-mail não é autenticado pelo gmail, ou seja, quando não se sabe se a mensagem foi realmente enviada pela pessoa que parece tê-la enviado. II. É possível enviar uma mensagem por um endereço de e-mail diferente do remetente original (atualmente logado), para tal, o usuário deve ser proprietário de ambas as contas. III. É possível configurar para que a opção ‘Responder a todos’ seja a configuração padrão, basta clicar em ‘Configurações’, na seção ‘Comportamento de resposta padrão’, selecione ‘Responder a todos’. IV. É necessário dividir anexos maiores do que 25MB em várias mensagens de e-mail, visto que o Google não fornece opção para anexar arquivos grandes. V. Por questão de segurança, arquivos executáveis, com extensão EXE, não podem ser enviados como anexo em e-mails. Está(ão) CORRETA(S) apenas a(s) proposição(ões)
Alternativas
Q771639 Redes de Computadores
Na confecção de um cabo de rede cross-over, uma das pontas do cabo é crimpada seguindo o padrão EIA568B e a outra ponta é crimpada seguindo o padrão EIA 568A. Assinale a alternativa que contém quais pares de fios são trocados de um padrão para o outro.
Alternativas
Q771638 Sistemas Operacionais
Utilizando o Oracle VirtualBox é possível uma máquina guest virtual acessar arquivos de uma máquina host. Para tal, é necessário instalar uma extensão do VirtualBox. Assinale a alternativa que contém o nome dessa extensão.
Alternativas
Q771637 Arquitetura de Computadores
Assinale a alternativa que contém a capacidade de armazenamento de um disco blu-ray singlelayer.
Alternativas
Q771636 Sistemas Operacionais
Sabe-se que o Sistema Operacional Linux pode utilizar diversos tipos de partição, porém, dentre as partições possíveis, em apenas uma ele não pode ser instalado. A razão principal dessa impossibilidade deve-se ao fato da referida partição
Alternativas
Respostas
321: A
322: B
323: E
324: A
325: E
326: C
327: D
328: E
329: E
330: A
331: A
332: E
333: B
334: C
335: B
336: E
337: D
338: A
339: D
340: C