Questões de Concurso
Para sefaz-rj
Foram encontradas 1.677 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351457
Inglês
Texto associado
Why Is Spain Really Taking Lionel Messi to Tax Court?
By Jonathan Mahler Sep 27, 2013
So Spain has decided to haul Lionel Messi into court for tax evasion, which strikes me as completely insane on pretty much every level.
You may remember the story from a few months back: The greatest soccer player in the world and his father were accused of setting up
a bunch of shell companies in Belize and Uruguay to avoid paying taxes on royalties and other licensing income.
Messi - who makes an estimated $41 million a year, about half from sponsors - reached a settlement with Spain’s tax authorities earlier
this summer, agreeing to pay the amount he apparently owed, plus interest. The matter was settled, or so it seemed. Messi could go
back to dazzling the world with his athleticism and creativity.
Only it turns out that Spain wasn’t quite done with Messi. His adopted country - Messi is Argentine but became a Spanish citizen in 2005
- is now considering pressing criminal charges against him.
Cracking down on tax-evading footballers has become something of a trend in Europe, where players and clubs have been known to
launder money through “image-rights companies” often set up in tax havens. When you need money - and Europe needs money - go to
the people who have it, or something like that. Over the summer, dozens of Italian soccer clubs were raided as part of an investigation
into a tax-fraud conspiracy. A number of English Premier League clubs were forced last year to pay millions of pounds in back taxes.
No one likes a tax cheat, and there’s little doubt that widespread tax fraud has helped eat away at the social safety net in Spain and
elsewhere, depriving schools, hospitals and other institutions of badly needed funds. But Europe is not going to find the answers to its
financial problems in the pockets of some professional soccer players and clubs.
Messi’s defense, delivered by his father, seems credible enough to me. “He is a footballer and that’s it,” Messi’s father Jorge said of his
soccer-prodigy son. “If there was an error, it was by our financial adviser. He created the company. My mistake was to have trusted the
adviser.” Even if Messi is legally responsible for the intricate tax dodge he is accused of having participated in, it’s pretty hard to believe
that he knew much about it.
More to the point, Lionel Messi is probably Spain’s most valuable global asset. What could possibly motivate the Spanish government to
want to tarnish his reputation, especially after he’s paid off his alleged debt? After four years of Great-Depression level unemployment,
have anxiety and despair curdled into vindictiveness?
Here’s another explanation: Maybe this whole case has less to do with money than it does with history. Maybe it’s no coincidence that
the target of the Spanish government’s weird wrath happens to play for FC Barcelona, which is, after all, "mes que un club." It's a symbol
of Catalan nationalism - and a bitter, longtime rival of Spain’s establishment team, Real Madrid.
Too conspiratorial? Prove it, Spain. Release Cristiano Ronaldo’s tax return.
(Adapted form http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-27/why-is-spain-really-taking-lionel-messi-to-tax-court-.html)
By Jonathan Mahler Sep 27, 2013
So Spain has decided to haul Lionel Messi into court for tax evasion, which strikes me as completely insane on pretty much every level.
You may remember the story from a few months back: The greatest soccer player in the world and his father were accused of setting up
a bunch of shell companies in Belize and Uruguay to avoid paying taxes on royalties and other licensing income.
Messi - who makes an estimated $41 million a year, about half from sponsors - reached a settlement with Spain’s tax authorities earlier
this summer, agreeing to pay the amount he apparently owed, plus interest. The matter was settled, or so it seemed. Messi could go
back to dazzling the world with his athleticism and creativity.
Only it turns out that Spain wasn’t quite done with Messi. His adopted country - Messi is Argentine but became a Spanish citizen in 2005
- is now considering pressing criminal charges against him.
Cracking down on tax-evading footballers has become something of a trend in Europe, where players and clubs have been known to
launder money through “image-rights companies” often set up in tax havens. When you need money - and Europe needs money - go to
the people who have it, or something like that. Over the summer, dozens of Italian soccer clubs were raided as part of an investigation
into a tax-fraud conspiracy. A number of English Premier League clubs were forced last year to pay millions of pounds in back taxes.
No one likes a tax cheat, and there’s little doubt that widespread tax fraud has helped eat away at the social safety net in Spain and
elsewhere, depriving schools, hospitals and other institutions of badly needed funds. But Europe is not going to find the answers to its
financial problems in the pockets of some professional soccer players and clubs.
Messi’s defense, delivered by his father, seems credible enough to me. “He is a footballer and that’s it,” Messi’s father Jorge said of his
soccer-prodigy son. “If there was an error, it was by our financial adviser. He created the company. My mistake was to have trusted the
adviser.” Even if Messi is legally responsible for the intricate tax dodge he is accused of having participated in, it’s pretty hard to believe
that he knew much about it.
More to the point, Lionel Messi is probably Spain’s most valuable global asset. What could possibly motivate the Spanish government to
want to tarnish his reputation, especially after he’s paid off his alleged debt? After four years of Great-Depression level unemployment,
have anxiety and despair curdled into vindictiveness?
Here’s another explanation: Maybe this whole case has less to do with money than it does with history. Maybe it’s no coincidence that
the target of the Spanish government’s weird wrath happens to play for FC Barcelona, which is, after all, "mes que un club." It's a symbol
of Catalan nationalism - and a bitter, longtime rival of Spain’s establishment team, Real Madrid.
Too conspiratorial? Prove it, Spain. Release Cristiano Ronaldo’s tax return.
(Adapted form http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-27/why-is-spain-really-taking-lionel-messi-to-tax-court-.html)
O autor do texto
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351456
Inglês
Texto associado
Why Is Spain Really Taking Lionel Messi to Tax Court?
By Jonathan Mahler Sep 27, 2013
So Spain has decided to haul Lionel Messi into court for tax evasion, which strikes me as completely insane on pretty much every level.
You may remember the story from a few months back: The greatest soccer player in the world and his father were accused of setting up
a bunch of shell companies in Belize and Uruguay to avoid paying taxes on royalties and other licensing income.
Messi - who makes an estimated $41 million a year, about half from sponsors - reached a settlement with Spain’s tax authorities earlier
this summer, agreeing to pay the amount he apparently owed, plus interest. The matter was settled, or so it seemed. Messi could go
back to dazzling the world with his athleticism and creativity.
Only it turns out that Spain wasn’t quite done with Messi. His adopted country - Messi is Argentine but became a Spanish citizen in 2005
- is now considering pressing criminal charges against him.
Cracking down on tax-evading footballers has become something of a trend in Europe, where players and clubs have been known to
launder money through “image-rights companies” often set up in tax havens. When you need money - and Europe needs money - go to
the people who have it, or something like that. Over the summer, dozens of Italian soccer clubs were raided as part of an investigation
into a tax-fraud conspiracy. A number of English Premier League clubs were forced last year to pay millions of pounds in back taxes.
No one likes a tax cheat, and there’s little doubt that widespread tax fraud has helped eat away at the social safety net in Spain and
elsewhere, depriving schools, hospitals and other institutions of badly needed funds. But Europe is not going to find the answers to its
financial problems in the pockets of some professional soccer players and clubs.
Messi’s defense, delivered by his father, seems credible enough to me. “He is a footballer and that’s it,” Messi’s father Jorge said of his
soccer-prodigy son. “If there was an error, it was by our financial adviser. He created the company. My mistake was to have trusted the
adviser.” Even if Messi is legally responsible for the intricate tax dodge he is accused of having participated in, it’s pretty hard to believe
that he knew much about it.
More to the point, Lionel Messi is probably Spain’s most valuable global asset. What could possibly motivate the Spanish government to
want to tarnish his reputation, especially after he’s paid off his alleged debt? After four years of Great-Depression level unemployment,
have anxiety and despair curdled into vindictiveness?
Here’s another explanation: Maybe this whole case has less to do with money than it does with history. Maybe it’s no coincidence that
the target of the Spanish government’s weird wrath happens to play for FC Barcelona, which is, after all, "mes que un club." It's a symbol
of Catalan nationalism - and a bitter, longtime rival of Spain’s establishment team, Real Madrid.
Too conspiratorial? Prove it, Spain. Release Cristiano Ronaldo’s tax return.
(Adapted form http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-27/why-is-spain-really-taking-lionel-messi-to-tax-court-.html)
By Jonathan Mahler Sep 27, 2013
So Spain has decided to haul Lionel Messi into court for tax evasion, which strikes me as completely insane on pretty much every level.
You may remember the story from a few months back: The greatest soccer player in the world and his father were accused of setting up
a bunch of shell companies in Belize and Uruguay to avoid paying taxes on royalties and other licensing income.
Messi - who makes an estimated $41 million a year, about half from sponsors - reached a settlement with Spain’s tax authorities earlier
this summer, agreeing to pay the amount he apparently owed, plus interest. The matter was settled, or so it seemed. Messi could go
back to dazzling the world with his athleticism and creativity.
Only it turns out that Spain wasn’t quite done with Messi. His adopted country - Messi is Argentine but became a Spanish citizen in 2005
- is now considering pressing criminal charges against him.
Cracking down on tax-evading footballers has become something of a trend in Europe, where players and clubs have been known to
launder money through “image-rights companies” often set up in tax havens. When you need money - and Europe needs money - go to
the people who have it, or something like that. Over the summer, dozens of Italian soccer clubs were raided as part of an investigation
into a tax-fraud conspiracy. A number of English Premier League clubs were forced last year to pay millions of pounds in back taxes.
No one likes a tax cheat, and there’s little doubt that widespread tax fraud has helped eat away at the social safety net in Spain and
elsewhere, depriving schools, hospitals and other institutions of badly needed funds. But Europe is not going to find the answers to its
financial problems in the pockets of some professional soccer players and clubs.
Messi’s defense, delivered by his father, seems credible enough to me. “He is a footballer and that’s it,” Messi’s father Jorge said of his
soccer-prodigy son. “If there was an error, it was by our financial adviser. He created the company. My mistake was to have trusted the
adviser.” Even if Messi is legally responsible for the intricate tax dodge he is accused of having participated in, it’s pretty hard to believe
that he knew much about it.
More to the point, Lionel Messi is probably Spain’s most valuable global asset. What could possibly motivate the Spanish government to
want to tarnish his reputation, especially after he’s paid off his alleged debt? After four years of Great-Depression level unemployment,
have anxiety and despair curdled into vindictiveness?
Here’s another explanation: Maybe this whole case has less to do with money than it does with history. Maybe it’s no coincidence that
the target of the Spanish government’s weird wrath happens to play for FC Barcelona, which is, after all, "mes que un club." It's a symbol
of Catalan nationalism - and a bitter, longtime rival of Spain’s establishment team, Real Madrid.
Too conspiratorial? Prove it, Spain. Release Cristiano Ronaldo’s tax return.
(Adapted form http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-27/why-is-spain-really-taking-lionel-messi-to-tax-court-.html)
Segundo o texto,
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351455
Inglês
Texto associado
Why Is Spain Really Taking Lionel Messi to Tax Court?
By Jonathan Mahler Sep 27, 2013
So Spain has decided to haul Lionel Messi into court for tax evasion, which strikes me as completely insane on pretty much every level.
You may remember the story from a few months back: The greatest soccer player in the world and his father were accused of setting up
a bunch of shell companies in Belize and Uruguay to avoid paying taxes on royalties and other licensing income.
Messi - who makes an estimated $41 million a year, about half from sponsors - reached a settlement with Spain’s tax authorities earlier
this summer, agreeing to pay the amount he apparently owed, plus interest. The matter was settled, or so it seemed. Messi could go
back to dazzling the world with his athleticism and creativity.
Only it turns out that Spain wasn’t quite done with Messi. His adopted country - Messi is Argentine but became a Spanish citizen in 2005
- is now considering pressing criminal charges against him.
Cracking down on tax-evading footballers has become something of a trend in Europe, where players and clubs have been known to
launder money through “image-rights companies” often set up in tax havens. When you need money - and Europe needs money - go to
the people who have it, or something like that. Over the summer, dozens of Italian soccer clubs were raided as part of an investigation
into a tax-fraud conspiracy. A number of English Premier League clubs were forced last year to pay millions of pounds in back taxes.
No one likes a tax cheat, and there’s little doubt that widespread tax fraud has helped eat away at the social safety net in Spain and
elsewhere, depriving schools, hospitals and other institutions of badly needed funds. But Europe is not going to find the answers to its
financial problems in the pockets of some professional soccer players and clubs.
Messi’s defense, delivered by his father, seems credible enough to me. “He is a footballer and that’s it,” Messi’s father Jorge said of his
soccer-prodigy son. “If there was an error, it was by our financial adviser. He created the company. My mistake was to have trusted the
adviser.” Even if Messi is legally responsible for the intricate tax dodge he is accused of having participated in, it’s pretty hard to believe
that he knew much about it.
More to the point, Lionel Messi is probably Spain’s most valuable global asset. What could possibly motivate the Spanish government to
want to tarnish his reputation, especially after he’s paid off his alleged debt? After four years of Great-Depression level unemployment,
have anxiety and despair curdled into vindictiveness?
Here’s another explanation: Maybe this whole case has less to do with money than it does with history. Maybe it’s no coincidence that
the target of the Spanish government’s weird wrath happens to play for FC Barcelona, which is, after all, "mes que un club." It's a symbol
of Catalan nationalism - and a bitter, longtime rival of Spain’s establishment team, Real Madrid.
Too conspiratorial? Prove it, Spain. Release Cristiano Ronaldo’s tax return.
(Adapted form http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-27/why-is-spain-really-taking-lionel-messi-to-tax-court-.html)
By Jonathan Mahler Sep 27, 2013
So Spain has decided to haul Lionel Messi into court for tax evasion, which strikes me as completely insane on pretty much every level.
You may remember the story from a few months back: The greatest soccer player in the world and his father were accused of setting up
a bunch of shell companies in Belize and Uruguay to avoid paying taxes on royalties and other licensing income.
Messi - who makes an estimated $41 million a year, about half from sponsors - reached a settlement with Spain’s tax authorities earlier
this summer, agreeing to pay the amount he apparently owed, plus interest. The matter was settled, or so it seemed. Messi could go
back to dazzling the world with his athleticism and creativity.
Only it turns out that Spain wasn’t quite done with Messi. His adopted country - Messi is Argentine but became a Spanish citizen in 2005
- is now considering pressing criminal charges against him.
Cracking down on tax-evading footballers has become something of a trend in Europe, where players and clubs have been known to
launder money through “image-rights companies” often set up in tax havens. When you need money - and Europe needs money - go to
the people who have it, or something like that. Over the summer, dozens of Italian soccer clubs were raided as part of an investigation
into a tax-fraud conspiracy. A number of English Premier League clubs were forced last year to pay millions of pounds in back taxes.
No one likes a tax cheat, and there’s little doubt that widespread tax fraud has helped eat away at the social safety net in Spain and
elsewhere, depriving schools, hospitals and other institutions of badly needed funds. But Europe is not going to find the answers to its
financial problems in the pockets of some professional soccer players and clubs.
Messi’s defense, delivered by his father, seems credible enough to me. “He is a footballer and that’s it,” Messi’s father Jorge said of his
soccer-prodigy son. “If there was an error, it was by our financial adviser. He created the company. My mistake was to have trusted the
adviser.” Even if Messi is legally responsible for the intricate tax dodge he is accused of having participated in, it’s pretty hard to believe
that he knew much about it.
More to the point, Lionel Messi is probably Spain’s most valuable global asset. What could possibly motivate the Spanish government to
want to tarnish his reputation, especially after he’s paid off his alleged debt? After four years of Great-Depression level unemployment,
have anxiety and despair curdled into vindictiveness?
Here’s another explanation: Maybe this whole case has less to do with money than it does with history. Maybe it’s no coincidence that
the target of the Spanish government’s weird wrath happens to play for FC Barcelona, which is, after all, "mes que un club." It's a symbol
of Catalan nationalism - and a bitter, longtime rival of Spain’s establishment team, Real Madrid.
Too conspiratorial? Prove it, Spain. Release Cristiano Ronaldo’s tax return.
(Adapted form http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-27/why-is-spain-really-taking-lionel-messi-to-tax-court-.html)
A synonym for badly, as it is used in the text, is
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351454
Inglês
Texto associado
Why Is Spain Really Taking Lionel Messi to Tax Court?
By Jonathan Mahler Sep 27, 2013
So Spain has decided to haul Lionel Messi into court for tax evasion, which strikes me as completely insane on pretty much every level.
You may remember the story from a few months back: The greatest soccer player in the world and his father were accused of setting up
a bunch of shell companies in Belize and Uruguay to avoid paying taxes on royalties and other licensing income.
Messi - who makes an estimated $41 million a year, about half from sponsors - reached a settlement with Spain’s tax authorities earlier
this summer, agreeing to pay the amount he apparently owed, plus interest. The matter was settled, or so it seemed. Messi could go
back to dazzling the world with his athleticism and creativity.
Only it turns out that Spain wasn’t quite done with Messi. His adopted country - Messi is Argentine but became a Spanish citizen in 2005
- is now considering pressing criminal charges against him.
Cracking down on tax-evading footballers has become something of a trend in Europe, where players and clubs have been known to
launder money through “image-rights companies” often set up in tax havens. When you need money - and Europe needs money - go to
the people who have it, or something like that. Over the summer, dozens of Italian soccer clubs were raided as part of an investigation
into a tax-fraud conspiracy. A number of English Premier League clubs were forced last year to pay millions of pounds in back taxes.
No one likes a tax cheat, and there’s little doubt that widespread tax fraud has helped eat away at the social safety net in Spain and
elsewhere, depriving schools, hospitals and other institutions of badly needed funds. But Europe is not going to find the answers to its
financial problems in the pockets of some professional soccer players and clubs.
Messi’s defense, delivered by his father, seems credible enough to me. “He is a footballer and that’s it,” Messi’s father Jorge said of his
soccer-prodigy son. “If there was an error, it was by our financial adviser. He created the company. My mistake was to have trusted the
adviser.” Even if Messi is legally responsible for the intricate tax dodge he is accused of having participated in, it’s pretty hard to believe
that he knew much about it.
More to the point, Lionel Messi is probably Spain’s most valuable global asset. What could possibly motivate the Spanish government to
want to tarnish his reputation, especially after he’s paid off his alleged debt? After four years of Great-Depression level unemployment,
have anxiety and despair curdled into vindictiveness?
Here’s another explanation: Maybe this whole case has less to do with money than it does with history. Maybe it’s no coincidence that
the target of the Spanish government’s weird wrath happens to play for FC Barcelona, which is, after all, "mes que un club." It's a symbol
of Catalan nationalism - and a bitter, longtime rival of Spain’s establishment team, Real Madrid.
Too conspiratorial? Prove it, Spain. Release Cristiano Ronaldo’s tax return.
(Adapted form http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-27/why-is-spain-really-taking-lionel-messi-to-tax-court-.html)
By Jonathan Mahler Sep 27, 2013
So Spain has decided to haul Lionel Messi into court for tax evasion, which strikes me as completely insane on pretty much every level.
You may remember the story from a few months back: The greatest soccer player in the world and his father were accused of setting up
a bunch of shell companies in Belize and Uruguay to avoid paying taxes on royalties and other licensing income.
Messi - who makes an estimated $41 million a year, about half from sponsors - reached a settlement with Spain’s tax authorities earlier
this summer, agreeing to pay the amount he apparently owed, plus interest. The matter was settled, or so it seemed. Messi could go
back to dazzling the world with his athleticism and creativity.
Only it turns out that Spain wasn’t quite done with Messi. His adopted country - Messi is Argentine but became a Spanish citizen in 2005
- is now considering pressing criminal charges against him.
Cracking down on tax-evading footballers has become something of a trend in Europe, where players and clubs have been known to
launder money through “image-rights companies” often set up in tax havens. When you need money - and Europe needs money - go to
the people who have it, or something like that. Over the summer, dozens of Italian soccer clubs were raided as part of an investigation
into a tax-fraud conspiracy. A number of English Premier League clubs were forced last year to pay millions of pounds in back taxes.
No one likes a tax cheat, and there’s little doubt that widespread tax fraud has helped eat away at the social safety net in Spain and
elsewhere, depriving schools, hospitals and other institutions of badly needed funds. But Europe is not going to find the answers to its
financial problems in the pockets of some professional soccer players and clubs.
Messi’s defense, delivered by his father, seems credible enough to me. “He is a footballer and that’s it,” Messi’s father Jorge said of his
soccer-prodigy son. “If there was an error, it was by our financial adviser. He created the company. My mistake was to have trusted the
adviser.” Even if Messi is legally responsible for the intricate tax dodge he is accused of having participated in, it’s pretty hard to believe
that he knew much about it.
More to the point, Lionel Messi is probably Spain’s most valuable global asset. What could possibly motivate the Spanish government to
want to tarnish his reputation, especially after he’s paid off his alleged debt? After four years of Great-Depression level unemployment,
have anxiety and despair curdled into vindictiveness?
Here’s another explanation: Maybe this whole case has less to do with money than it does with history. Maybe it’s no coincidence that
the target of the Spanish government’s weird wrath happens to play for FC Barcelona, which is, after all, "mes que un club." It's a symbol
of Catalan nationalism - and a bitter, longtime rival of Spain’s establishment team, Real Madrid.
Too conspiratorial? Prove it, Spain. Release Cristiano Ronaldo’s tax return.
(Adapted form http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-27/why-is-spain-really-taking-lionel-messi-to-tax-court-.html)
Which of the following alternatives is the “odd man out”?
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351453
Inglês
2012 Federal Individual Income Tax Rates
These are the tax rates for the 2012 tax year, if your filing status is “single”.
De acordo com o que é explicado no texto a respeito da tabela progressiva, o valor correto que preenche a célula (?) é
These are the tax rates for the 2012 tax year, if your filing status is “single”.
De acordo com o que é explicado no texto a respeito da tabela progressiva, o valor correto que preenche a célula (?) é
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351452
Inglês
De acordo com o texto,
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351451
Inglês
Segundo o texto,
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351450
Inglês
A synonym for earn, as the verb is used in the text, is
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351449
Inglês
According to the context, the ADJECTIVE that adequately fills the blank is
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351448
Inglês
According to the context, the MODAL that adequately fills the blank is
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351447
Português
Está clara e correta, segundo a norma-padrão escrita, a seguinte frase:
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351446
Português
A redação que se apresenta de modo claro e em concordância com a modalidade escrita formal é:
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351445
Português
Texto associado
Com 1.445 verbetes listados sob "ironia" na MLA Bibliografy de uma única década, por que o mundo precisaria de um outro livro sobre ironia? E essa listagem conta apenas uma parte da história - a parte literária: esse tópico tem sido abordado por especialistas em áreas tão diversas quanto linguística e ciências políticas, sociologia e história, estética e religião, filosofia e retórica, psicologia e antropologia. A ironia tem sido sempre localizada e estudada em literatura, artes visuais, música, dança, teatro, exposições de museu, conversas e argumentação filosófica, e essa lista pode crescer muito mais. Mesmo concordando que a maioria desses 1.445 verbetes são de artigos sobre "ironia em..." algum texto ou obra de algum artista, a quantidade de energia gasta ao se tentar compreender como e por que as pessoas escolhem se expressar dessa maneira bizarra continua a me espantar. Parece haver uma fascinação com a ironia - que eu obviamente também sinto - quer ela seja considerada um tropo retórico, quer um modo de ver o mundo.
Obs.: tropo retórico = figura de linguagem
(HUTCHEON, Linda. A "cena" da ironia, em Teoria e política da ironia. Trad. Julio Jeha. UFMG: Belo Horizonte, 2000. p. 15)
Obs.: tropo retórico = figura de linguagem
(HUTCHEON, Linda. A "cena" da ironia, em Teoria e política da ironia. Trad. Julio Jeha. UFMG: Belo Horizonte, 2000. p. 15)
... por que as pessoas escolhem se expressar dessa maneira bizarra...
O segmento destacado acima está grafado em conformidade com a norma-padrão escrita, o que também ocorre com o destacado na alternativa:
O segmento destacado acima está grafado em conformidade com a norma-padrão escrita, o que também ocorre com o destacado na alternativa:
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351444
Português
Texto associado
Com 1.445 verbetes listados sob "ironia" na MLA Bibliografy de uma única década, por que o mundo precisaria de um outro livro sobre ironia? E essa listagem conta apenas uma parte da história - a parte literária: esse tópico tem sido abordado por especialistas em áreas tão diversas quanto linguística e ciências políticas, sociologia e história, estética e religião, filosofia e retórica, psicologia e antropologia. A ironia tem sido sempre localizada e estudada em literatura, artes visuais, música, dança, teatro, exposições de museu, conversas e argumentação filosófica, e essa lista pode crescer muito mais. Mesmo concordando que a maioria desses 1.445 verbetes são de artigos sobre "ironia em..." algum texto ou obra de algum artista, a quantidade de energia gasta ao se tentar compreender como e por que as pessoas escolhem se expressar dessa maneira bizarra continua a me espantar. Parece haver uma fascinação com a ironia - que eu obviamente também sinto - quer ela seja considerada um tropo retórico, quer um modo de ver o mundo.
Obs.: tropo retórico = figura de linguagem
(HUTCHEON, Linda. A "cena" da ironia, em Teoria e política da ironia. Trad. Julio Jeha. UFMG: Belo Horizonte, 2000. p. 15)
Obs.: tropo retórico = figura de linguagem
(HUTCHEON, Linda. A "cena" da ironia, em Teoria e política da ironia. Trad. Julio Jeha. UFMG: Belo Horizonte, 2000. p. 15)
Análise do texto legitima o seguinte comentário:
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351443
Português
Texto associado
Com 1.445 verbetes listados sob "ironia" na MLA Bibliografy de uma única década, por que o mundo precisaria de um outro livro sobre ironia? E essa listagem conta apenas uma parte da história - a parte literária: esse tópico tem sido abordado por especialistas em áreas tão diversas quanto linguística e ciências políticas, sociologia e história, estética e religião, filosofia e retórica, psicologia e antropologia. A ironia tem sido sempre localizada e estudada em literatura, artes visuais, música, dança, teatro, exposições de museu, conversas e argumentação filosófica, e essa lista pode crescer muito mais. Mesmo concordando que a maioria desses 1.445 verbetes são de artigos sobre "ironia em..." algum texto ou obra de algum artista, a quantidade de energia gasta ao se tentar compreender como e por que as pessoas escolhem se expressar dessa maneira bizarra continua a me espantar. Parece haver uma fascinação com a ironia - que eu obviamente também sinto - quer ela seja considerada um tropo retórico, quer um modo de ver o mundo.
Obs.: tropo retórico = figura de linguagem
(HUTCHEON, Linda. A "cena" da ironia, em Teoria e política da ironia. Trad. Julio Jeha. UFMG: Belo Horizonte, 2000. p. 15)
Obs.: tropo retórico = figura de linguagem
(HUTCHEON, Linda. A "cena" da ironia, em Teoria e política da ironia. Trad. Julio Jeha. UFMG: Belo Horizonte, 2000. p. 15)
A alternativa que abriga uma ideia não expressa de maneira explícita, mas que está pressuposta no fragmento acima, é:
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351442
Português
Considere as assertivas que seguem, acerca de aspectos do excerto.
I. No segmento embargos opostos pela Espanha à navegação da Holanda (linhas 5 e 6), o acento indicativo da crase está corretamente empregado, mas seu uso seria indevido se, em lugar de a navegação, houvesse "aquele tipo de navegação".
II. A palavra então (linha 12) remete ao tempo em que se dão os fatos comentados pelo autor.
III. Na frase inicial do segundo parágrafo, a correlação entre as formas verbais empregadas evidencia que, em um cenário de ação prolongada, foi fixada uma outra ação, enquadrada em um espaço de tempo determinado.
IV. Em começaram a edificar (linha 3) o verbo auxiliar empresta um matiz semântico ao verbo principal, indicando a iminência da ação de edificar.
Está correto o que se afirma APENAS em
I. No segmento embargos opostos pela Espanha à navegação da Holanda (linhas 5 e 6), o acento indicativo da crase está corretamente empregado, mas seu uso seria indevido se, em lugar de a navegação, houvesse "aquele tipo de navegação".
II. A palavra então (linha 12) remete ao tempo em que se dão os fatos comentados pelo autor.
III. Na frase inicial do segundo parágrafo, a correlação entre as formas verbais empregadas evidencia que, em um cenário de ação prolongada, foi fixada uma outra ação, enquadrada em um espaço de tempo determinado.
IV. Em começaram a edificar (linha 3) o verbo auxiliar empresta um matiz semântico ao verbo principal, indicando a iminência da ação de edificar.
Está correto o que se afirma APENAS em
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351441
Português
Malgrado a guerra com a Espanha, as relações comerciais de Portugal com as Províncias Unidas contavam com a cumplicidade de autoridades e de homens de negócio lusitanos e com o contrabando capitaneado por testas de ferro estabelecidos em Lisboa, no Porto e em Viana, com o que se atenuaram os efeitos das medidas restritivas decretadas pela corte de Madri.
Considerada a frase acima, em seu contexto, é correto afirmar:
Considerada a frase acima, em seu contexto, é correto afirmar:
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351440
Português
Considerada a situação de uso, está adequadamente compreendido o seguinte segmento do texto:
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351439
Português
Observado o tratamento dado ao tema, é correta a seguinte afirmação sobre o que se tem no segundo parágrafo:
Ano: 2014
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
SEFAZ-RJ
Prova:
FCC - 2014 - SEFAZ-RJ - Auditor Fiscal da Receita Estadual - Prova 1 |
Q351438
Português
Compreende-se corretamente do primeiro parágrafo:
Conheça nossos planos