Questões de Concurso Para sead-ap

Foram encontradas 1.931 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q2016699 Inglês
Critical Literacy

    Critical literacies are not new among scholars and researchers in literacy education. However, due to different theoretical bases, there is no unique definition of “critical literacy”. In their broadest sense, critical literacies refer to the ability to read texts going beyond their superficial meaning. That is, it implies approaching texts in a reflective way to understand working ideologies such as power, inequality, and injustice. In the realm of critical literacy, text is understood as a “vehicle through which individuals communicate with one another using the codes and conventions of society” (Robinson & Robinson, 2003, p. 3). Texts, in this sense, can be either songs, novels, poems, conversations, pictures, movies, and so on. […]

    Hence, the critical literacies approach is generally contrasted with functional literacy. The former views literacy as a social practice, while the latter views literacy as the mastery of linguistic skills. In addition, Manning (1999) developed a framework to distinguish critical literacies from functional literacy by establishing the difference between their respective ideology purpose, literacy curriculum, and instruction. On the one hand, the main objective of functional literacy is to produce skilled workers for the marketplace. Consequently, the curriculum is restrictive and the instruction is individualistic and competitive. On the other hand, for critical literacies, texts are not neutral but marked by power messages, dominating interests, and hidden agendas. In order to deconstruct these texts and unveil their ideological messages and power relationships, the curriculum is to employ materials from the everyday world as text and analytic tools.

    Critical scholars have overtly supported the idea that there is not a single procedure for incorporating critical literacies into the classroom, given that the particularities of the context where the foreign language is taught differ from one another. Thus, an approach to critical literacies “needs to be continually redefined in practice” (Comber, 2001, p. 274).


Adapted from: Jiménez, M.C. G. and Gutiérrez, C.P. “Engaging English as a Foreign Language Students in Critical Literacy Practices: The Case of a Teacher at a Private University” available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script= sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902019000100091&lng=en&nrm=iso
The phrase “On the one hand” (2nd paragraph) indicates that the text will offer a(n)
Alternativas
Q2016698 Inglês
Critical Literacy

    Critical literacies are not new among scholars and researchers in literacy education. However, due to different theoretical bases, there is no unique definition of “critical literacy”. In their broadest sense, critical literacies refer to the ability to read texts going beyond their superficial meaning. That is, it implies approaching texts in a reflective way to understand working ideologies such as power, inequality, and injustice. In the realm of critical literacy, text is understood as a “vehicle through which individuals communicate with one another using the codes and conventions of society” (Robinson & Robinson, 2003, p. 3). Texts, in this sense, can be either songs, novels, poems, conversations, pictures, movies, and so on. […]

    Hence, the critical literacies approach is generally contrasted with functional literacy. The former views literacy as a social practice, while the latter views literacy as the mastery of linguistic skills. In addition, Manning (1999) developed a framework to distinguish critical literacies from functional literacy by establishing the difference between their respective ideology purpose, literacy curriculum, and instruction. On the one hand, the main objective of functional literacy is to produce skilled workers for the marketplace. Consequently, the curriculum is restrictive and the instruction is individualistic and competitive. On the other hand, for critical literacies, texts are not neutral but marked by power messages, dominating interests, and hidden agendas. In order to deconstruct these texts and unveil their ideological messages and power relationships, the curriculum is to employ materials from the everyday world as text and analytic tools.

    Critical scholars have overtly supported the idea that there is not a single procedure for incorporating critical literacies into the classroom, given that the particularities of the context where the foreign language is taught differ from one another. Thus, an approach to critical literacies “needs to be continually redefined in practice” (Comber, 2001, p. 274).


Adapted from: Jiménez, M.C. G. and Gutiérrez, C.P. “Engaging English as a Foreign Language Students in Critical Literacy Practices: The Case of a Teacher at a Private University” available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script= sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902019000100091&lng=en&nrm=iso
The verb phrase in “where the foreign language is taught” (3rd paragraph) is in the
Alternativas
Q2016697 Inglês
Critical Literacy

    Critical literacies are not new among scholars and researchers in literacy education. However, due to different theoretical bases, there is no unique definition of “critical literacy”. In their broadest sense, critical literacies refer to the ability to read texts going beyond their superficial meaning. That is, it implies approaching texts in a reflective way to understand working ideologies such as power, inequality, and injustice. In the realm of critical literacy, text is understood as a “vehicle through which individuals communicate with one another using the codes and conventions of society” (Robinson & Robinson, 2003, p. 3). Texts, in this sense, can be either songs, novels, poems, conversations, pictures, movies, and so on. […]

    Hence, the critical literacies approach is generally contrasted with functional literacy. The former views literacy as a social practice, while the latter views literacy as the mastery of linguistic skills. In addition, Manning (1999) developed a framework to distinguish critical literacies from functional literacy by establishing the difference between their respective ideology purpose, literacy curriculum, and instruction. On the one hand, the main objective of functional literacy is to produce skilled workers for the marketplace. Consequently, the curriculum is restrictive and the instruction is individualistic and competitive. On the other hand, for critical literacies, texts are not neutral but marked by power messages, dominating interests, and hidden agendas. In order to deconstruct these texts and unveil their ideological messages and power relationships, the curriculum is to employ materials from the everyday world as text and analytic tools.

    Critical scholars have overtly supported the idea that there is not a single procedure for incorporating critical literacies into the classroom, given that the particularities of the context where the foreign language is taught differ from one another. Thus, an approach to critical literacies “needs to be continually redefined in practice” (Comber, 2001, p. 274).


Adapted from: Jiménez, M.C. G. and Gutiérrez, C.P. “Engaging English as a Foreign Language Students in Critical Literacy Practices: The Case of a Teacher at a Private University” available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script= sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902019000100091&lng=en&nrm=iso
“Hence” (2nd paragraph) can be replaced without change of meaning by
Alternativas
Q2016696 Inglês
Critical Literacy

    Critical literacies are not new among scholars and researchers in literacy education. However, due to different theoretical bases, there is no unique definition of “critical literacy”. In their broadest sense, critical literacies refer to the ability to read texts going beyond their superficial meaning. That is, it implies approaching texts in a reflective way to understand working ideologies such as power, inequality, and injustice. In the realm of critical literacy, text is understood as a “vehicle through which individuals communicate with one another using the codes and conventions of society” (Robinson & Robinson, 2003, p. 3). Texts, in this sense, can be either songs, novels, poems, conversations, pictures, movies, and so on. […]

    Hence, the critical literacies approach is generally contrasted with functional literacy. The former views literacy as a social practice, while the latter views literacy as the mastery of linguistic skills. In addition, Manning (1999) developed a framework to distinguish critical literacies from functional literacy by establishing the difference between their respective ideology purpose, literacy curriculum, and instruction. On the one hand, the main objective of functional literacy is to produce skilled workers for the marketplace. Consequently, the curriculum is restrictive and the instruction is individualistic and competitive. On the other hand, for critical literacies, texts are not neutral but marked by power messages, dominating interests, and hidden agendas. In order to deconstruct these texts and unveil their ideological messages and power relationships, the curriculum is to employ materials from the everyday world as text and analytic tools.

    Critical scholars have overtly supported the idea that there is not a single procedure for incorporating critical literacies into the classroom, given that the particularities of the context where the foreign language is taught differ from one another. Thus, an approach to critical literacies “needs to be continually redefined in practice” (Comber, 2001, p. 274).


Adapted from: Jiménez, M.C. G. and Gutiérrez, C.P. “Engaging English as a Foreign Language Students in Critical Literacy Practices: The Case of a Teacher at a Private University” available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script= sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902019000100091&lng=en&nrm=iso
In the second paragraph, when the authors argue that “Critical scholars have overtly supported the idea”, they mean that the idea has been
Alternativas
Q2016695 Inglês
Critical Literacy

    Critical literacies are not new among scholars and researchers in literacy education. However, due to different theoretical bases, there is no unique definition of “critical literacy”. In their broadest sense, critical literacies refer to the ability to read texts going beyond their superficial meaning. That is, it implies approaching texts in a reflective way to understand working ideologies such as power, inequality, and injustice. In the realm of critical literacy, text is understood as a “vehicle through which individuals communicate with one another using the codes and conventions of society” (Robinson & Robinson, 2003, p. 3). Texts, in this sense, can be either songs, novels, poems, conversations, pictures, movies, and so on. […]

    Hence, the critical literacies approach is generally contrasted with functional literacy. The former views literacy as a social practice, while the latter views literacy as the mastery of linguistic skills. In addition, Manning (1999) developed a framework to distinguish critical literacies from functional literacy by establishing the difference between their respective ideology purpose, literacy curriculum, and instruction. On the one hand, the main objective of functional literacy is to produce skilled workers for the marketplace. Consequently, the curriculum is restrictive and the instruction is individualistic and competitive. On the other hand, for critical literacies, texts are not neutral but marked by power messages, dominating interests, and hidden agendas. In order to deconstruct these texts and unveil their ideological messages and power relationships, the curriculum is to employ materials from the everyday world as text and analytic tools.

    Critical scholars have overtly supported the idea that there is not a single procedure for incorporating critical literacies into the classroom, given that the particularities of the context where the foreign language is taught differ from one another. Thus, an approach to critical literacies “needs to be continually redefined in practice” (Comber, 2001, p. 274).


Adapted from: Jiménez, M.C. G. and Gutiérrez, C.P. “Engaging English as a Foreign Language Students in Critical Literacy Practices: The Case of a Teacher at a Private University” available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script= sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902019000100091&lng=en&nrm=iso
The phrase “the latter” in “the latter views literacy as the mastery of linguistic skills” (2nd paragraph) refers to
Alternativas
Q2016694 Inglês
Critical Literacy

    Critical literacies are not new among scholars and researchers in literacy education. However, due to different theoretical bases, there is no unique definition of “critical literacy”. In their broadest sense, critical literacies refer to the ability to read texts going beyond their superficial meaning. That is, it implies approaching texts in a reflective way to understand working ideologies such as power, inequality, and injustice. In the realm of critical literacy, text is understood as a “vehicle through which individuals communicate with one another using the codes and conventions of society” (Robinson & Robinson, 2003, p. 3). Texts, in this sense, can be either songs, novels, poems, conversations, pictures, movies, and so on. […]

    Hence, the critical literacies approach is generally contrasted with functional literacy. The former views literacy as a social practice, while the latter views literacy as the mastery of linguistic skills. In addition, Manning (1999) developed a framework to distinguish critical literacies from functional literacy by establishing the difference between their respective ideology purpose, literacy curriculum, and instruction. On the one hand, the main objective of functional literacy is to produce skilled workers for the marketplace. Consequently, the curriculum is restrictive and the instruction is individualistic and competitive. On the other hand, for critical literacies, texts are not neutral but marked by power messages, dominating interests, and hidden agendas. In order to deconstruct these texts and unveil their ideological messages and power relationships, the curriculum is to employ materials from the everyday world as text and analytic tools.

    Critical scholars have overtly supported the idea that there is not a single procedure for incorporating critical literacies into the classroom, given that the particularities of the context where the foreign language is taught differ from one another. Thus, an approach to critical literacies “needs to be continually redefined in practice” (Comber, 2001, p. 274).


Adapted from: Jiménez, M.C. G. and Gutiérrez, C.P. “Engaging English as a Foreign Language Students in Critical Literacy Practices: The Case of a Teacher at a Private University” available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script= sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902019000100091&lng=en&nrm=iso
The phrase “That is” in “That is, it implies approaching texts in a reflective way” (1st paragraph) can be replaced without change of meaning by
Alternativas
Q2016693 Inglês
Critical Literacy

    Critical literacies are not new among scholars and researchers in literacy education. However, due to different theoretical bases, there is no unique definition of “critical literacy”. In their broadest sense, critical literacies refer to the ability to read texts going beyond their superficial meaning. That is, it implies approaching texts in a reflective way to understand working ideologies such as power, inequality, and injustice. In the realm of critical literacy, text is understood as a “vehicle through which individuals communicate with one another using the codes and conventions of society” (Robinson & Robinson, 2003, p. 3). Texts, in this sense, can be either songs, novels, poems, conversations, pictures, movies, and so on. […]

    Hence, the critical literacies approach is generally contrasted with functional literacy. The former views literacy as a social practice, while the latter views literacy as the mastery of linguistic skills. In addition, Manning (1999) developed a framework to distinguish critical literacies from functional literacy by establishing the difference between their respective ideology purpose, literacy curriculum, and instruction. On the one hand, the main objective of functional literacy is to produce skilled workers for the marketplace. Consequently, the curriculum is restrictive and the instruction is individualistic and competitive. On the other hand, for critical literacies, texts are not neutral but marked by power messages, dominating interests, and hidden agendas. In order to deconstruct these texts and unveil their ideological messages and power relationships, the curriculum is to employ materials from the everyday world as text and analytic tools.

    Critical scholars have overtly supported the idea that there is not a single procedure for incorporating critical literacies into the classroom, given that the particularities of the context where the foreign language is taught differ from one another. Thus, an approach to critical literacies “needs to be continually redefined in practice” (Comber, 2001, p. 274).


Adapted from: Jiménez, M.C. G. and Gutiérrez, C.P. “Engaging English as a Foreign Language Students in Critical Literacy Practices: The Case of a Teacher at a Private University” available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script= sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902019000100091&lng=en&nrm=iso
The text suggests that if teachers opt for critical literacy activities, they should
Alternativas
Q2016692 Inglês
Critical Literacy

    Critical literacies are not new among scholars and researchers in literacy education. However, due to different theoretical bases, there is no unique definition of “critical literacy”. In their broadest sense, critical literacies refer to the ability to read texts going beyond their superficial meaning. That is, it implies approaching texts in a reflective way to understand working ideologies such as power, inequality, and injustice. In the realm of critical literacy, text is understood as a “vehicle through which individuals communicate with one another using the codes and conventions of society” (Robinson & Robinson, 2003, p. 3). Texts, in this sense, can be either songs, novels, poems, conversations, pictures, movies, and so on. […]

    Hence, the critical literacies approach is generally contrasted with functional literacy. The former views literacy as a social practice, while the latter views literacy as the mastery of linguistic skills. In addition, Manning (1999) developed a framework to distinguish critical literacies from functional literacy by establishing the difference between their respective ideology purpose, literacy curriculum, and instruction. On the one hand, the main objective of functional literacy is to produce skilled workers for the marketplace. Consequently, the curriculum is restrictive and the instruction is individualistic and competitive. On the other hand, for critical literacies, texts are not neutral but marked by power messages, dominating interests, and hidden agendas. In order to deconstruct these texts and unveil their ideological messages and power relationships, the curriculum is to employ materials from the everyday world as text and analytic tools.

    Critical scholars have overtly supported the idea that there is not a single procedure for incorporating critical literacies into the classroom, given that the particularities of the context where the foreign language is taught differ from one another. Thus, an approach to critical literacies “needs to be continually redefined in practice” (Comber, 2001, p. 274).


Adapted from: Jiménez, M.C. G. and Gutiérrez, C.P. “Engaging English as a Foreign Language Students in Critical Literacy Practices: The Case of a Teacher at a Private University” available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script= sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902019000100091&lng=en&nrm=iso
According to the authors, critical literacy encourages students to 
Alternativas
Q2016691 Inglês
Critical Literacy

    Critical literacies are not new among scholars and researchers in literacy education. However, due to different theoretical bases, there is no unique definition of “critical literacy”. In their broadest sense, critical literacies refer to the ability to read texts going beyond their superficial meaning. That is, it implies approaching texts in a reflective way to understand working ideologies such as power, inequality, and injustice. In the realm of critical literacy, text is understood as a “vehicle through which individuals communicate with one another using the codes and conventions of society” (Robinson & Robinson, 2003, p. 3). Texts, in this sense, can be either songs, novels, poems, conversations, pictures, movies, and so on. […]

    Hence, the critical literacies approach is generally contrasted with functional literacy. The former views literacy as a social practice, while the latter views literacy as the mastery of linguistic skills. In addition, Manning (1999) developed a framework to distinguish critical literacies from functional literacy by establishing the difference between their respective ideology purpose, literacy curriculum, and instruction. On the one hand, the main objective of functional literacy is to produce skilled workers for the marketplace. Consequently, the curriculum is restrictive and the instruction is individualistic and competitive. On the other hand, for critical literacies, texts are not neutral but marked by power messages, dominating interests, and hidden agendas. In order to deconstruct these texts and unveil their ideological messages and power relationships, the curriculum is to employ materials from the everyday world as text and analytic tools.

    Critical scholars have overtly supported the idea that there is not a single procedure for incorporating critical literacies into the classroom, given that the particularities of the context where the foreign language is taught differ from one another. Thus, an approach to critical literacies “needs to be continually redefined in practice” (Comber, 2001, p. 274).


Adapted from: Jiménez, M.C. G. and Gutiérrez, C.P. “Engaging English as a Foreign Language Students in Critical Literacy Practices: The Case of a Teacher at a Private University” available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script= sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902019000100091&lng=en&nrm=iso
Based on the text, mark the statements below as true (T) or false (F):
( ) The concept of critical literacy lacks precise definition.
( ) Functional and critical literacies have similar aims.
( ) Classroom practices based on critical literacy vary.
The statements are, respectively: 
Alternativas
Q2016260 Geografia
Globalização é, fundamentalmente, a integração mais estreita dos países que resultou da enorme redução dos custos de transportes e de comunicação e da destruição das barreiras artificiais à circulação de mercadorias, serviços, capitais, conhecimentos e, em menor escala, pessoas.
CAMPOS, L., CANAVEZES, S. Introdução à Globalização. Instituto Bento Jesus Caraça. CGTP. 2007
Sobre o processo de globalização, assinale a afirmativa correta.
Alternativas
Q2016259 Geografia
“A fronteira é uma invenção dos homens”.
As fronteiras delimitam os territórios e foram instrumentalizadas pelo poder político como linhas de ruptura, principalmente a partir da constituição dos Estados-nação na Europa Ocidental.
A partir da 2ª Guerra Mundial, as fronteiras sofreram significativas mudanças. Sobre essas mudanças, analise as afirmativas a seguir.
I. A ideia de fronteira e suas representações evoluiu a partir da intensificação dos fluxos eletrônicos. II. A “cortina de ferro”, a linha de ruptura que separou dois blocos, foi definida a partir de doutrinas econômicas e ideológicas opostas. III. O conceito de fronteira como linha de ruptura foi abalado à medida que se desenvolveu a construção da unidade europeia.
Está correto o que se afirma em
Alternativas
Q2016258 Geografia
Apesar das mudanças observadas na distribuição do poder mundial nos últimos anos, a posição da América Latina continua muito limitada. A integração dos países da América Latina, seu crescimento tecnológico e a melhoria na distribuição de renda constituem o caminho necessário para o fortalecimento regional, inclusive como estratégia geopolítica para sua integração ao espaço mundial.
Sobre as condições que dificultaram a integração dos países latino-americanos, assinale a afirmativa correta.
Alternativas
Q2016257 Geografia
No processo permanente de criação, quando uma empresa cria um novo produto ou uma tecnologia mais eficiente, inicia-se o processo de destruição da que está sendo usada. Assim, a economia industrial evolui por meio da “destruição criadora”: quando um conjunto de novas tecnologias encontra aplicação produtiva, as tradicionais deixam de criar produtos capazes de competir no mercado e acabam sendo abandonadas. Com base nesse conceito, é possível identificar, ao longo do tempo, os chamados ciclos da economia mundial, isto é, períodos dominados por determinada tecnologia.
MAGNOLI, Demétrio. Geografia para o Ensino Médio. Ed. Atual. São Paulo. 2012. (Adaptado)
Sobre os ciclos da economia capitalista, assinale a afirmativa incorreta.
Alternativas
Q2016256 Geografia
Com o fim da Guerra Fria, desaparece o “outro” que encarnava a negação do modo de vida americano e justificava a necessidade de uma postura nacional coesa e militante. Após a queda do muro de Berlim, a hegemonia norte-americana era evidente e anunciava-se “o fim da História”.
Sobre o quadro geopolítico atual, assinale a afirmativa correta.
Alternativas
Q2016255 Geografia
No Brasil, em 2020, os derivados de petróleo mantiveram a posição de liderança entre as fontes de energia, com uma participação de cerca de 33% na matriz energética, mas verificase, nos últimos anos, uma tendência declinante em sua participação percentual. 

Matriz Energética Brasileira (2020) 
55_00.png (356×241)
Empresa de Pesquisa Energética - EPE – epe.gov.br. Acesso em 27/09/2022.
Assinale a opção que não apresenta uma razão para esse declínio.
Alternativas
Q2016254 Geografia
Os avanços científicos e tecnológicos provocaram radicais alterações nas economias de escala, reduzindo o peso das vantagens comparativas em relação ao uso da mão de obra e dos recursos naturais. Assim, os novos espaços industriais passaram a exigir uma estruturação territorial inovadora: os tecnopolos.
Sobre os tecnopolos, assinale a afirmativa incorreta.
Alternativas
Q2016253 Geografia
Com diferença de grau e intensidade, as cidades brasileiras apresentam problemas parecidos. O tamanho, o tipo de atividade, a região em que se inserem, podem marcar as diferenças, mas em todas elas podem ser identificados problemas comuns. A organização interna das nossas cidades revela um problema estrutural, cuja análise permite concluir que todos os fatores mutuamente se causam.
SANTOS, Milton. A urbanização brasileira. Ed. HUCITEC. São Paulo. 1995. (Adaptado)
Sobre os problemas das cidades brasileiras, assinale a afirmativa incorreta.
Alternativas
Q2016252 Geografia
Sobre a economia brasileira, analise as afirmativas a seguir e assinale V para a verdadeira e F para a falsa.
( ) Entre os anos 1950 e 1980, a economia brasileira cresceu a uma taxa média de 7% ao ano e consolidou a transição da economia tipicamente primário-exportadora para a urbanoindustrial. ( ) Desde os anos 1980, a economia brasileira vem apresentando um ciclo de baixo nível de crescimento, uma redução da taxa de investimento e a diminuição da presença do Estado como agente coordenador do desenvolvimento. ( ) Nos anos 1990, a economia brasileira ficou marcada pelas reformas neoliberais, com a abertura comercial e financeira, as privatizações, a desnacionalização do parque industrial e a reforma gerencial do Estado.
As afirmativas são, na ordem apresentada, respectivamente,
Alternativas
Q2016251 Geografia
Na escala real, o garimpo carrega um imensurável passivo socioambiental, com repercussão negativa e descrédito.
Imagem associada para resolução da questão

Sobre a região garimpeira do Lourenço (mapa e foto), analise as afirmativas a seguir.
I. Os planos de manejo das unidades de conservação de proteção integral mencionam o garimpo do Lourenço como uma ameaça à integridade dos ecossistemas e à biodiversidade. II. A existência de um conjunto de áreas protegidas no Norte do Amapá e na Guiana Francesa deslocou o garimpo do Lourenço para uma condição geopolítica muito delicada. III. O garimpo do Lourenço, situado entre as cabeceiras do rio Araguari e as do rio Oiapoque, pode ser criminalizado pela contaminação mercurial constatada nos rios dessas bacias.
Está correto o que se afirma em
Alternativas
Q2016250 Geografia
Sobre o processo de urbanização da Amazônia, analise as afirmativas a seguir.
I. surgiram Os centros urbanos multifuncionais que surgiram nas áreas de agricultura empresarial conectam-se às áreas dinâmicas do país graças aos recursos das comunicações modernas. II. Manaus consolidou sua vocação como polo industrial sob o amparo da regulação especial da Zona Franca, com destaque para as indústrias eletroeletrônica e mecânica. III. Macapá tornou-se referência para prover a população local e/ou regional devido à disponibilidade de bens de consumo duráveis e não duráveis e à infraestrutura de serviços de educação, saúde e segurança.
Está correto o que se afirma em
Alternativas
Respostas
581: A
582: C
583: B
584: E
585: E
586: A
587: B
588: B
589: D
590: D
591: E
592: D
593: C
594: B
595: D
596: B
597: B
598: A
599: B
600: E