Questões de Concurso Para sme - sp

Texto I 

"El lenguaje inclusivo no va en detrimento

de la rigurosidad académica"

“La resolución no obliga a la utilización del lenguaje inclusivo, sino que ampara institucionalmente a aquellos que quieran utilizarlo para la elaboración de sus trabajos”, explicó a PáginaI 12 Carolina Spataro, titular de la Subsecretaría de Políticas de Género de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales (Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA). Se refería a la decisión que tomó el consejo directivo de la facultad al reconocer y admitir al lenguaje inclusivo en cualquiera de sus modalidades como recurso válido en las producciones realizadas por estudiantes de grado y posgrado, es decir, en monografías, trabajos prácticos, tesis y otros textos académicos.

   La titular de la Subsecretaría de Políticas de Género sostuvo que "el proyecto registra un cambio en los modos de enunciación, y eso no va en detrimento de la rigurosidad y la exigencia académica. Y así como se ha ampliado la agenda de temas de investigación también se han ampliado los modos de enunciarlos, en sintonía con una transformación de época.”

   La inclusión de las nuevas modalidades lingüísticas “surgió de un interés y de una demanda por parte del estudiantado”, contó Spataro. “Se elaboró y se discutió en la Comisión de Género del Consejo Directivo de la facultad. De ahí se pensó esta propuesta que se elaboró conjuntamente con los tres claustros que componen el consejo y luego se aprobó por unanimidade,” detalló.

  La investigadora y doctora en Ciencias Sociales explicó que el proyecto “no aborda cuestiones relacionadas con tecnicismos porque hay todo un campo de estudios sobre los temas del lenguaje y qué significa el lenguaje inclusivo y cuáles son sus formas. Lo que busca es amparar y ampliar derechos para que estudiantes que quieran escribir sus trabajos académicos utilizando el lenguaje inclusivo en cualquiera de sus formas puedan hacerlo.”

Constanza Bonsignore, 2 de agosto de 2019. https://glotopolitica.com/

Text V

Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies

Some Final Remarks

    Planning language assessment from a structuralist view of language has been a fairly easy task, since it aims at testing the correct use of grammar and lexical structures. This has been a very comfortable way to evaluate students’ performance in many regular schools or language institutes due to the stability of standardized answers. From the perspective of the new literacy studies, the comfort of teaching and assessing objective and homogeneous linguistic contents is replaced by a wider spectrum of language teaching and assessing possibilities, whose key elements turn to be difference and critique. Typical activities based on this new approach would enable students to make and negotiate meanings in a much more flexible way, corroborating the novel notion of unstable, dynamic, collaborative and distributed knowledge.

    The inclusion of contents of such nature in language assessments may be, at a first glance, a very laborious process due to the fact we are simply not accustomed to that. Actually, we sometimes find ourselves deprived from the teaching skills necessary to apply a more critical teaching approach, a fact that is much the results of our positivist educational background.

    Nonetheless, since the emergent digital epistemology will require subject more capable of designing and redesigning meaning critically towards a great deal of representational modes, we need to reconsider our teaching approaches, go further and seek theories that take such issues into account. By redefining the notions of language and knowledge, we, thus, assume that the new literacy studies from the last decades may offer very good insights to the field of foreign language teaching.

    The re-conceptualization of language assessment according to the new literacies project presented in this paper does not intend to suggest prompt fixed answers, but it takes the risk of outlining possible activities, signaling certain changes regarding its characteristics and contents, as previously shared.

    The increasing importance of the new literacy and multiliteracies studies and their fruitful theoretical insight for the rethinking of pedagogical issues invite us to review our foreign language teaching practices in a different perspective. By sharing some of our local findings, we attempt to corroborate the collaborative and distributed knowledge discussed by the literacies theory itself and hope to be contributing to the new educational demands of the emerging epistemological basis.

From: DUBOC, A.P.M. Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies. Lenguaje 37 (1), 2009. pp. 159-178, p. 175-176.

Text V

Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies

Some Final Remarks

    Planning language assessment from a structuralist view of language has been a fairly easy task, since it aims at testing the correct use of grammar and lexical structures. This has been a very comfortable way to evaluate students’ performance in many regular schools or language institutes due to the stability of standardized answers. From the perspective of the new literacy studies, the comfort of teaching and assessing objective and homogeneous linguistic contents is replaced by a wider spectrum of language teaching and assessing possibilities, whose key elements turn to be difference and critique. Typical activities based on this new approach would enable students to make and negotiate meanings in a much more flexible way, corroborating the novel notion of unstable, dynamic, collaborative and distributed knowledge.

    The inclusion of contents of such nature in language assessments may be, at a first glance, a very laborious process due to the fact we are simply not accustomed to that. Actually, we sometimes find ourselves deprived from the teaching skills necessary to apply a more critical teaching approach, a fact that is much the results of our positivist educational background.

    Nonetheless, since the emergent digital epistemology will require subject more capable of designing and redesigning meaning critically towards a great deal of representational modes, we need to reconsider our teaching approaches, go further and seek theories that take such issues into account. By redefining the notions of language and knowledge, we, thus, assume that the new literacy studies from the last decades may offer very good insights to the field of foreign language teaching.

    The re-conceptualization of language assessment according to the new literacies project presented in this paper does not intend to suggest prompt fixed answers, but it takes the risk of outlining possible activities, signaling certain changes regarding its characteristics and contents, as previously shared.

    The increasing importance of the new literacy and multiliteracies studies and their fruitful theoretical insight for the rethinking of pedagogical issues invite us to review our foreign language teaching practices in a different perspective. By sharing some of our local findings, we attempt to corroborate the collaborative and distributed knowledge discussed by the literacies theory itself and hope to be contributing to the new educational demands of the emerging epistemological basis.

From: DUBOC, A.P.M. Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies. Lenguaje 37 (1), 2009. pp. 159-178, p. 175-176.