Questões de Concurso
Para sme - sp
Foram encontradas 1.032 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Text V
Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies
Some Final Remarks
Planning language assessment from a structuralist view of language has been a fairly easy task, since it aims at testing the correct use of grammar and lexical structures. This has been a very comfortable way to evaluate students’ performance in many regular schools or language institutes due to the stability of standardized answers. From the perspective of the new literacy studies, the comfort of teaching and assessing objective and homogeneous linguistic contents is replaced by a wider spectrum of language teaching and assessing possibilities, whose key elements turn to be difference and critique. Typical activities based on this new approach would enable students to make and negotiate meanings in a much more flexible way, corroborating the novel notion of unstable, dynamic, collaborative and distributed knowledge.
The inclusion of contents of such nature in language assessments may be, at a first glance, a very laborious process due to the fact we are simply not accustomed to that. Actually, we sometimes find ourselves deprived from the teaching skills necessary to apply a more critical teaching approach, a fact that is much the results of our positivist educational background.
Nonetheless, since the emergent digital epistemology will require subject more capable of designing and redesigning meaning critically towards a great deal of representational modes, we need to reconsider our teaching approaches, go further and seek theories that take such issues into account. By redefining the notions of language and knowledge, we, thus, assume that the new literacy studies from the last decades may offer very good insights to the field of foreign language teaching.
The re-conceptualization of language assessment according to the new literacies project presented in this paper does not intend to suggest prompt fixed answers, but it takes the risk of outlining possible activities, signaling certain changes regarding its characteristics and contents, as previously shared.
The increasing importance of the new literacy and multiliteracies studies and their fruitful theoretical insight for the rethinking of pedagogical issues invite us to review our foreign language teaching practices in a different perspective. By sharing some of our local findings, we attempt to corroborate the collaborative and distributed knowledge discussed by the literacies theory itself and hope to be contributing to the new educational demands of the emerging epistemological basis.
From: DUBOC, A.P.M. Language Assessment and the new Literacy Studies. Lenguaje
37 (1), 2009. pp. 159-178, p. 175-176.
( ) The new literacy studies have kept away from the homogeneous assessment provided by earlier approaches. ( ) Teachers can find it hard to engage in new literacy practices as they have not been educated in this direction. ( ) Instability and collaboration are essential to structuralist approaches to language teaching.
The statements are, respectively:
1. Punishment is replaced by the understanding of the reasons of certain performances in order to improve students' learning as well as the teacher's choices; 2. The act of evaluating is more collaborative, mediated, more public, and more horizontal; 3. Formal moments of assessment are most desirable rather than more informal ones, such as self-evaluation.
(translated from DUBOC 2016, pp.57-80.)
Text IV
Source: http://www.martybucella.com/fam37.html
This quotation is in line with the following goals for the teaching of English defined by the Municipal Secretariat of Education, São Paulo (2019), except:
Text IV
Source: http://www.martybucella.com/fam37.html
Text III
https://www.gocomics.com/search/full_results?category =comic&page=40&terms=baldo
Note: chulo means “cute”
Text III
https://www.gocomics.com/search/full_results?category =comic&page=40&terms=baldo
Note: chulo means “cute”
Text III
https://www.gocomics.com/search/full_results?category =comic&page=40&terms=baldo
Note: chulo means “cute”
1. Explain a word to the students drawing on the blackboard. Then ask them to copy the word and have them recite it out loud. 2. Ask students to look at pictures of two children and add to the speech bubbles what they think the characters might be saying to each other. 3. Create a mnemonic device in the students’ native language so that they memorize the grammar rules better. 4. Choose a video that shows how people in a specific country dress and behave and ask students to perform a parody of these characteristics. 5. Have students stand up and start by saying "Simon says, hands on head" while placing your hands on your head. The students who don’t imitate you correctly or are too slow should sit down and stay out of the game.
Choose the option that indicates the strategies in line with the parameters published by the Municipal Secretariat of Education, São Paulo (2019).
1. Literacy Cycle 2. Interdisciplinary Cycle 3. Authoring Cycle
( ) Recognize instructions that indicate body movements (EF01LI09; p. 75); ( ) Recognize the difference between layouts of texts from various media, according to the context (EF07LI06, p.85); ( ) Recognize words in English looking at images in games such as bingo and tic-tac-toe (EF04LI10, p.80); ( ) Recognize narrative elements such as characters, plot, time and space in a group work situation (EF03LI04; p.77); ( ) Recognize language variation as a manifestation of different ways of thinking and expressing the world (EF07LI25, p.87).
The item with the correct sequence is:
Adapted from: https://preply.com/en/blog/the-most-used-internet-abbreviationsfor-texting-and-tweeting/
If a person is in a hurry, the abbreviation that will be used will be
Text II
Hi, did two shifts tonite and am off to bed. But still fancy the film tomoz. Ur still ok for this right? How about meet up at I dunno 6 or something outside the Chinese take away.
Adapted from Carter, R. & Goddard, A. How to Analyse Texts. A toolkit for students
of English. London: Routledge, 2016, p. 154.
Text II
Hi, did two shifts tonite and am off to bed. But still fancy the film tomoz. Ur still ok for this right? How about meet up at I dunno 6 or something outside the Chinese take away.
Adapted from Carter, R. & Goddard, A. How to Analyse Texts. A toolkit for students
of English. London: Routledge, 2016, p. 154.
Text I
Nurturing Multimodalism
[…]
New learning collaborations call on the teacher as learner, and the learner as teacher. The teacher is a lifelong learner; this is simply more apparent in the Information Age. In instances of best practice, collaborative learning partnerships are forged between and among teachers for strategic, bottom-up, in-house professional development. This allows teachers to share in reflective, on-going, contextualized learning, tailored to their collective knowledge. This sharing also includes the learner as teacher. ELT typically employs learner-centered activities: these can include learners sharing their knowledge of strategic digital literacies with others in the classrooms.
The digital universe, so threatening to adult notions of socially sanctioned literacies, is intuitive to children, who have been socialized into it, and for whom digital literacies are exploratory play. Adults may find new ways of communicating digitally to be quite baffling and confronting of our communicative expertise; children do not. Instant messaging systems, such as MSN, AOL, ICQ, for example, provide as natural a medium for communicating to them as telephones did for the baby-boomer generation. It is not fair for the teacher to treat Information and Communication Technologies as auxiliary communication with learners for whom it is mainstream and primary.
Learning spaces are important. Although teachers seldom have much individual say in the layout of teaching spaces, collaborative relationships may help to encourage integrated digitization, where computers are not segregated in laboratories but are interspersed throughout the school environment. In digitally infused curricula, postmodern literacies do not supplant but complement modern literacies, so that access to information is driven by purpose and content rather than by the media available.
Adapted from: LOTHERINGTON, H. From literacy to multiliteracies in ELT. In:
CUMMINS, J.; DAVISON, C. (Eds.) International Handbook of English Language
Teaching. New York: Springer, 2007, p. 820. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226802846_From_Literacy_to_Multiliter
acies_in_ELT
Text I
Nurturing Multimodalism
[…]
New learning collaborations call on the teacher as learner, and the learner as teacher. The teacher is a lifelong learner; this is simply more apparent in the Information Age. In instances of best practice, collaborative learning partnerships are forged between and among teachers for strategic, bottom-up, in-house professional development. This allows teachers to share in reflective, on-going, contextualized learning, tailored to their collective knowledge. This sharing also includes the learner as teacher. ELT typically employs learner-centered activities: these can include learners sharing their knowledge of strategic digital literacies with others in the classrooms.
The digital universe, so threatening to adult notions of socially sanctioned literacies, is intuitive to children, who have been socialized into it, and for whom digital literacies are exploratory play. Adults may find new ways of communicating digitally to be quite baffling and confronting of our communicative expertise; children do not. Instant messaging systems, such as MSN, AOL, ICQ, for example, provide as natural a medium for communicating to them as telephones did for the baby-boomer generation. It is not fair for the teacher to treat Information and Communication Technologies as auxiliary communication with learners for whom it is mainstream and primary.
Learning spaces are important. Although teachers seldom have much individual say in the layout of teaching spaces, collaborative relationships may help to encourage integrated digitization, where computers are not segregated in laboratories but are interspersed throughout the school environment. In digitally infused curricula, postmodern literacies do not supplant but complement modern literacies, so that access to information is driven by purpose and content rather than by the media available.
Adapted from: LOTHERINGTON, H. From literacy to multiliteracies in ELT. In:
CUMMINS, J.; DAVISON, C. (Eds.) International Handbook of English Language
Teaching. New York: Springer, 2007, p. 820. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226802846_From_Literacy_to_Multiliter
acies_in_ELT
Text I
Nurturing Multimodalism
[…]
New learning collaborations call on the teacher as learner, and the learner as teacher. The teacher is a lifelong learner; this is simply more apparent in the Information Age. In instances of best practice, collaborative learning partnerships are forged between and among teachers for strategic, bottom-up, in-house professional development. This allows teachers to share in reflective, on-going, contextualized learning, tailored to their collective knowledge. This sharing also includes the learner as teacher. ELT typically employs learner-centered activities: these can include learners sharing their knowledge of strategic digital literacies with others in the classrooms.
The digital universe, so threatening to adult notions of socially sanctioned literacies, is intuitive to children, who have been socialized into it, and for whom digital literacies are exploratory play. Adults may find new ways of communicating digitally to be quite baffling and confronting of our communicative expertise; children do not. Instant messaging systems, such as MSN, AOL, ICQ, for example, provide as natural a medium for communicating to them as telephones did for the baby-boomer generation. It is not fair for the teacher to treat Information and Communication Technologies as auxiliary communication with learners for whom it is mainstream and primary.
Learning spaces are important. Although teachers seldom have much individual say in the layout of teaching spaces, collaborative relationships may help to encourage integrated digitization, where computers are not segregated in laboratories but are interspersed throughout the school environment. In digitally infused curricula, postmodern literacies do not supplant but complement modern literacies, so that access to information is driven by purpose and content rather than by the media available.
Adapted from: LOTHERINGTON, H. From literacy to multiliteracies in ELT. In:
CUMMINS, J.; DAVISON, C. (Eds.) International Handbook of English Language
Teaching. New York: Springer, 2007, p. 820. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226802846_From_Literacy_to_Multiliter
acies_in_ELT
Text I
Nurturing Multimodalism
[…]
New learning collaborations call on the teacher as learner, and the learner as teacher. The teacher is a lifelong learner; this is simply more apparent in the Information Age. In instances of best practice, collaborative learning partnerships are forged between and among teachers for strategic, bottom-up, in-house professional development. This allows teachers to share in reflective, on-going, contextualized learning, tailored to their collective knowledge. This sharing also includes the learner as teacher. ELT typically employs learner-centered activities: these can include learners sharing their knowledge of strategic digital literacies with others in the classrooms.
The digital universe, so threatening to adult notions of socially sanctioned literacies, is intuitive to children, who have been socialized into it, and for whom digital literacies are exploratory play. Adults may find new ways of communicating digitally to be quite baffling and confronting of our communicative expertise; children do not. Instant messaging systems, such as MSN, AOL, ICQ, for example, provide as natural a medium for communicating to them as telephones did for the baby-boomer generation. It is not fair for the teacher to treat Information and Communication Technologies as auxiliary communication with learners for whom it is mainstream and primary.
Learning spaces are important. Although teachers seldom have much individual say in the layout of teaching spaces, collaborative relationships may help to encourage integrated digitization, where computers are not segregated in laboratories but are interspersed throughout the school environment. In digitally infused curricula, postmodern literacies do not supplant but complement modern literacies, so that access to information is driven by purpose and content rather than by the media available.
Adapted from: LOTHERINGTON, H. From literacy to multiliteracies in ELT. In:
CUMMINS, J.; DAVISON, C. (Eds.) International Handbook of English Language
Teaching. New York: Springer, 2007, p. 820. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226802846_From_Literacy_to_Multiliter
acies_in_ELT
Text I
Nurturing Multimodalism
[…]
New learning collaborations call on the teacher as learner, and the learner as teacher. The teacher is a lifelong learner; this is simply more apparent in the Information Age. In instances of best practice, collaborative learning partnerships are forged between and among teachers for strategic, bottom-up, in-house professional development. This allows teachers to share in reflective, on-going, contextualized learning, tailored to their collective knowledge. This sharing also includes the learner as teacher. ELT typically employs learner-centered activities: these can include learners sharing their knowledge of strategic digital literacies with others in the classrooms.
The digital universe, so threatening to adult notions of socially sanctioned literacies, is intuitive to children, who have been socialized into it, and for whom digital literacies are exploratory play. Adults may find new ways of communicating digitally to be quite baffling and confronting of our communicative expertise; children do not. Instant messaging systems, such as MSN, AOL, ICQ, for example, provide as natural a medium for communicating to them as telephones did for the baby-boomer generation. It is not fair for the teacher to treat Information and Communication Technologies as auxiliary communication with learners for whom it is mainstream and primary.
Learning spaces are important. Although teachers seldom have much individual say in the layout of teaching spaces, collaborative relationships may help to encourage integrated digitization, where computers are not segregated in laboratories but are interspersed throughout the school environment. In digitally infused curricula, postmodern literacies do not supplant but complement modern literacies, so that access to information is driven by purpose and content rather than by the media available.
Adapted from: LOTHERINGTON, H. From literacy to multiliteracies in ELT. In:
CUMMINS, J.; DAVISON, C. (Eds.) International Handbook of English Language
Teaching. New York: Springer, 2007, p. 820. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226802846_From_Literacy_to_Multiliter
acies_in_ELT
Text I
Nurturing Multimodalism
[…]
New learning collaborations call on the teacher as learner, and the learner as teacher. The teacher is a lifelong learner; this is simply more apparent in the Information Age. In instances of best practice, collaborative learning partnerships are forged between and among teachers for strategic, bottom-up, in-house professional development. This allows teachers to share in reflective, on-going, contextualized learning, tailored to their collective knowledge. This sharing also includes the learner as teacher. ELT typically employs learner-centered activities: these can include learners sharing their knowledge of strategic digital literacies with others in the classrooms.
The digital universe, so threatening to adult notions of socially sanctioned literacies, is intuitive to children, who have been socialized into it, and for whom digital literacies are exploratory play. Adults may find new ways of communicating digitally to be quite baffling and confronting of our communicative expertise; children do not. Instant messaging systems, such as MSN, AOL, ICQ, for example, provide as natural a medium for communicating to them as telephones did for the baby-boomer generation. It is not fair for the teacher to treat Information and Communication Technologies as auxiliary communication with learners for whom it is mainstream and primary.
Learning spaces are important. Although teachers seldom have much individual say in the layout of teaching spaces, collaborative relationships may help to encourage integrated digitization, where computers are not segregated in laboratories but are interspersed throughout the school environment. In digitally infused curricula, postmodern literacies do not supplant but complement modern literacies, so that access to information is driven by purpose and content rather than by the media available.
Adapted from: LOTHERINGTON, H. From literacy to multiliteracies in ELT. In:
CUMMINS, J.; DAVISON, C. (Eds.) International Handbook of English Language
Teaching. New York: Springer, 2007, p. 820. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226802846_From_Literacy_to_Multiliter
acies_in_ELT
Conheça nossos planos