Questões de Vestibular UFPR 2016 para Vestibular
Foram encontradas 8 questões
Q814940
Inglês
Texto associado
Six things I learned from riding in a Google self-driving car
1 - Human beings are terrible drivers.
We drink. We doze. We text. In the US, 30,000 people die from automobile accidents every year. Traffic crashes are the primary
cause of death worldwide for people aged 15-24, and during a crash, 40% of drivers never even hit the brakes. We’re flawed
organisms, barreling around at high speeds in vessels covered in glass, metal, distraction, and death. This is one of Google’s
“moonshots” – to remove human error from a job which, for the past hundred years, has been entirely human.
2 - Google self-driving cars are timid.
The car we rode in did not strike me as dangerous. It drove slowly and deliberately, and I got the impression that it’s more likely
to annoy other drivers than to harm them.
In the early versions they tested on closed courses, the vehicles were programmed to be highly aggressive. Apparently during
these tests, which involved obstacle courses full of traffic cones and inflatable crash-test objects, there were a lot of screeching
brakes, roaring engines and terrified interns.
3 - They’re cute.
Google’s new fleet was intentionally designed to look adorable. Our brains are hardwired to treat inanimate (or animate) objects with greater care, caution, and reverence when they resemble a living thing. By turning self-driving cars into an adorable Skynet Marshmallow Bumper Bots, Google hopes to spiritually disarm other drivers. I also suspect the cuteness is used to quell some of the road rage that might emerge from being stuck behind one of these things. They’re intended as moderate-distance couriers, not openroad warriors, so their max speed is 25 miles per hour.
4 - It’s not done and it’s not perfect.
Some of the scenarios autonomous vehicles have the most trouble with are the same human beings have the most trouble with, such as traversing four-way stops or handling a yellow light. The cars use a mixture of 3D laser-mapping, GPS, and radar to analyze and interpret their surroundings, and the latest versions are fully electric with a range of about 100 miles. Despite the advantages over a human being in certain scenarios, however, these cars still aren’t ready for the real world. They can’t drive in the snow or heavy rain, and there’s a variety of complex situations they do not process well, such as passing through a
construction zone. Google is hoping that, eventually, the cars will be able to handle all of this as well (or better) than a human could.
5 - I want this technology to succeed, like… yesterday.
I’m biased. Earlier this year my mom had a stroke. It damaged the visual cortex of her brain, and her vision was impaired to the
point that she’ll probably never drive again. This reduced her from a fully-functional, independent human being with a career and a
buzzing social life into someone who is homebound, disabled, and powerless.
When discussing self-driving cars, people tend to ask many superficial questions. They ignore that 45% of disabled people in
the US still work. They ignore that 95% of a car’s lifetime is spent parked. They ignore how this technology could transform the lives
of the elderly, or eradicate the need for parking lots or garages or gas stations. They dismiss the entire concept because they don’t
think a computer could ever be as good at merging on the freeway as they are. They ignore the great, big, beautiful picture: that this
technology could make our lives so much better.
6 - It wasn’t an exhilarating ride, and that’s a good thing.
Riding in a self-driving car is not the cybernetic thrill ride one might expect. The car drives like a person, and after a few minutes
you forget that you’re being driven autonomously. You forget that a robot is differentiating cars from pedestrians from mopeds from
raccoons. You forget that millions of photons are being fired from a laser and interpreting, processing, and reacting to the hand signals
of a cyclist. You forget that instead of an organic brain, which has had millions of years to evolve the cognitive ability to fumble its way
through a four-way stop, you’re being piloted by an artificial one, which was birthed in less than a decade.
The unfortunate part of something this transformative is the inevitable, ardent stupidity which is going to erupt from the general
public. Even if in a few years self-driving cars are proven to be ten times safer than human-operated cars, all it’s going to take is one
tragic accident and the public is going to lose their minds. There will be outrage. There will be politicizing. There will be hashtags.
I say look at the bigger picture. All the self-driving cars currently on the road learn from one another, and possess 40 years of
driving experience. And this technology is still in its infancy.
(Adapted from: <http://theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car> . 21/08/2016.)
Consider the following:
1. Drinking before driving. 2. Sending a written message while driving. 3. Sleeping for a short period of time. 4. Hitting the brakes. 5. Speeding up.
According to the text, some human mistakes that happen before or during a car accident are:
1. Drinking before driving. 2. Sending a written message while driving. 3. Sleeping for a short period of time. 4. Hitting the brakes. 5. Speeding up.
According to the text, some human mistakes that happen before or during a car accident are:
Q814941
Inglês
Texto associado
Six things I learned from riding in a Google self-driving car
1 - Human beings are terrible drivers.
We drink. We doze. We text. In the US, 30,000 people die from automobile accidents every year. Traffic crashes are the primary
cause of death worldwide for people aged 15-24, and during a crash, 40% of drivers never even hit the brakes. We’re flawed
organisms, barreling around at high speeds in vessels covered in glass, metal, distraction, and death. This is one of Google’s
“moonshots” – to remove human error from a job which, for the past hundred years, has been entirely human.
2 - Google self-driving cars are timid.
The car we rode in did not strike me as dangerous. It drove slowly and deliberately, and I got the impression that it’s more likely
to annoy other drivers than to harm them.
In the early versions they tested on closed courses, the vehicles were programmed to be highly aggressive. Apparently during
these tests, which involved obstacle courses full of traffic cones and inflatable crash-test objects, there were a lot of screeching
brakes, roaring engines and terrified interns.
3 - They’re cute.
Google’s new fleet was intentionally designed to look adorable. Our brains are hardwired to treat inanimate (or animate) objects with greater care, caution, and reverence when they resemble a living thing. By turning self-driving cars into an adorable Skynet Marshmallow Bumper Bots, Google hopes to spiritually disarm other drivers. I also suspect the cuteness is used to quell some of the road rage that might emerge from being stuck behind one of these things. They’re intended as moderate-distance couriers, not openroad warriors, so their max speed is 25 miles per hour.
4 - It’s not done and it’s not perfect.
Some of the scenarios autonomous vehicles have the most trouble with are the same human beings have the most trouble with, such as traversing four-way stops or handling a yellow light. The cars use a mixture of 3D laser-mapping, GPS, and radar to analyze and interpret their surroundings, and the latest versions are fully electric with a range of about 100 miles. Despite the advantages over a human being in certain scenarios, however, these cars still aren’t ready for the real world. They can’t drive in the snow or heavy rain, and there’s a variety of complex situations they do not process well, such as passing through a
construction zone. Google is hoping that, eventually, the cars will be able to handle all of this as well (or better) than a human could.
5 - I want this technology to succeed, like… yesterday.
I’m biased. Earlier this year my mom had a stroke. It damaged the visual cortex of her brain, and her vision was impaired to the
point that she’ll probably never drive again. This reduced her from a fully-functional, independent human being with a career and a
buzzing social life into someone who is homebound, disabled, and powerless.
When discussing self-driving cars, people tend to ask many superficial questions. They ignore that 45% of disabled people in
the US still work. They ignore that 95% of a car’s lifetime is spent parked. They ignore how this technology could transform the lives
of the elderly, or eradicate the need for parking lots or garages or gas stations. They dismiss the entire concept because they don’t
think a computer could ever be as good at merging on the freeway as they are. They ignore the great, big, beautiful picture: that this
technology could make our lives so much better.
6 - It wasn’t an exhilarating ride, and that’s a good thing.
Riding in a self-driving car is not the cybernetic thrill ride one might expect. The car drives like a person, and after a few minutes
you forget that you’re being driven autonomously. You forget that a robot is differentiating cars from pedestrians from mopeds from
raccoons. You forget that millions of photons are being fired from a laser and interpreting, processing, and reacting to the hand signals
of a cyclist. You forget that instead of an organic brain, which has had millions of years to evolve the cognitive ability to fumble its way
through a four-way stop, you’re being piloted by an artificial one, which was birthed in less than a decade.
The unfortunate part of something this transformative is the inevitable, ardent stupidity which is going to erupt from the general
public. Even if in a few years self-driving cars are proven to be ten times safer than human-operated cars, all it’s going to take is one
tragic accident and the public is going to lose their minds. There will be outrage. There will be politicizing. There will be hashtags.
I say look at the bigger picture. All the self-driving cars currently on the road learn from one another, and possess 40 years of
driving experience. And this technology is still in its infancy.
(Adapted from: <http://theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car> . 21/08/2016.)
According to the author:
Q814942
Inglês
Texto associado
Six things I learned from riding in a Google self-driving car
1 - Human beings are terrible drivers.
We drink. We doze. We text. In the US, 30,000 people die from automobile accidents every year. Traffic crashes are the primary
cause of death worldwide for people aged 15-24, and during a crash, 40% of drivers never even hit the brakes. We’re flawed
organisms, barreling around at high speeds in vessels covered in glass, metal, distraction, and death. This is one of Google’s
“moonshots” – to remove human error from a job which, for the past hundred years, has been entirely human.
2 - Google self-driving cars are timid.
The car we rode in did not strike me as dangerous. It drove slowly and deliberately, and I got the impression that it’s more likely
to annoy other drivers than to harm them.
In the early versions they tested on closed courses, the vehicles were programmed to be highly aggressive. Apparently during
these tests, which involved obstacle courses full of traffic cones and inflatable crash-test objects, there were a lot of screeching
brakes, roaring engines and terrified interns.
3 - They’re cute.
Google’s new fleet was intentionally designed to look adorable. Our brains are hardwired to treat inanimate (or animate) objects with greater care, caution, and reverence when they resemble a living thing. By turning self-driving cars into an adorable Skynet Marshmallow Bumper Bots, Google hopes to spiritually disarm other drivers. I also suspect the cuteness is used to quell some of the road rage that might emerge from being stuck behind one of these things. They’re intended as moderate-distance couriers, not openroad warriors, so their max speed is 25 miles per hour.
4 - It’s not done and it’s not perfect.
Some of the scenarios autonomous vehicles have the most trouble with are the same human beings have the most trouble with, such as traversing four-way stops or handling a yellow light. The cars use a mixture of 3D laser-mapping, GPS, and radar to analyze and interpret their surroundings, and the latest versions are fully electric with a range of about 100 miles. Despite the advantages over a human being in certain scenarios, however, these cars still aren’t ready for the real world. They can’t drive in the snow or heavy rain, and there’s a variety of complex situations they do not process well, such as passing through a
construction zone. Google is hoping that, eventually, the cars will be able to handle all of this as well (or better) than a human could.
5 - I want this technology to succeed, like… yesterday.
I’m biased. Earlier this year my mom had a stroke. It damaged the visual cortex of her brain, and her vision was impaired to the
point that she’ll probably never drive again. This reduced her from a fully-functional, independent human being with a career and a
buzzing social life into someone who is homebound, disabled, and powerless.
When discussing self-driving cars, people tend to ask many superficial questions. They ignore that 45% of disabled people in
the US still work. They ignore that 95% of a car’s lifetime is spent parked. They ignore how this technology could transform the lives
of the elderly, or eradicate the need for parking lots or garages or gas stations. They dismiss the entire concept because they don’t
think a computer could ever be as good at merging on the freeway as they are. They ignore the great, big, beautiful picture: that this
technology could make our lives so much better.
6 - It wasn’t an exhilarating ride, and that’s a good thing.
Riding in a self-driving car is not the cybernetic thrill ride one might expect. The car drives like a person, and after a few minutes
you forget that you’re being driven autonomously. You forget that a robot is differentiating cars from pedestrians from mopeds from
raccoons. You forget that millions of photons are being fired from a laser and interpreting, processing, and reacting to the hand signals
of a cyclist. You forget that instead of an organic brain, which has had millions of years to evolve the cognitive ability to fumble its way
through a four-way stop, you’re being piloted by an artificial one, which was birthed in less than a decade.
The unfortunate part of something this transformative is the inevitable, ardent stupidity which is going to erupt from the general
public. Even if in a few years self-driving cars are proven to be ten times safer than human-operated cars, all it’s going to take is one
tragic accident and the public is going to lose their minds. There will be outrage. There will be politicizing. There will be hashtags.
I say look at the bigger picture. All the self-driving cars currently on the road learn from one another, and possess 40 years of
driving experience. And this technology is still in its infancy.
(Adapted from: <http://theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car> . 21/08/2016.)
Based on the reading, mark the correct alternative.
Q814943
Inglês
Texto associado
Six things I learned from riding in a Google self-driving car
1 - Human beings are terrible drivers.
We drink. We doze. We text. In the US, 30,000 people die from automobile accidents every year. Traffic crashes are the primary
cause of death worldwide for people aged 15-24, and during a crash, 40% of drivers never even hit the brakes. We’re flawed
organisms, barreling around at high speeds in vessels covered in glass, metal, distraction, and death. This is one of Google’s
“moonshots” – to remove human error from a job which, for the past hundred years, has been entirely human.
2 - Google self-driving cars are timid.
The car we rode in did not strike me as dangerous. It drove slowly and deliberately, and I got the impression that it’s more likely
to annoy other drivers than to harm them.
In the early versions they tested on closed courses, the vehicles were programmed to be highly aggressive. Apparently during
these tests, which involved obstacle courses full of traffic cones and inflatable crash-test objects, there were a lot of screeching
brakes, roaring engines and terrified interns.
3 - They’re cute.
Google’s new fleet was intentionally designed to look adorable. Our brains are hardwired to treat inanimate (or animate) objects with greater care, caution, and reverence when they resemble a living thing. By turning self-driving cars into an adorable Skynet Marshmallow Bumper Bots, Google hopes to spiritually disarm other drivers. I also suspect the cuteness is used to quell some of the road rage that might emerge from being stuck behind one of these things. They’re intended as moderate-distance couriers, not openroad warriors, so their max speed is 25 miles per hour.
4 - It’s not done and it’s not perfect.
Some of the scenarios autonomous vehicles have the most trouble with are the same human beings have the most trouble with, such as traversing four-way stops or handling a yellow light. The cars use a mixture of 3D laser-mapping, GPS, and radar to analyze and interpret their surroundings, and the latest versions are fully electric with a range of about 100 miles. Despite the advantages over a human being in certain scenarios, however, these cars still aren’t ready for the real world. They can’t drive in the snow or heavy rain, and there’s a variety of complex situations they do not process well, such as passing through a
construction zone. Google is hoping that, eventually, the cars will be able to handle all of this as well (or better) than a human could.
5 - I want this technology to succeed, like… yesterday.
I’m biased. Earlier this year my mom had a stroke. It damaged the visual cortex of her brain, and her vision was impaired to the
point that she’ll probably never drive again. This reduced her from a fully-functional, independent human being with a career and a
buzzing social life into someone who is homebound, disabled, and powerless.
When discussing self-driving cars, people tend to ask many superficial questions. They ignore that 45% of disabled people in
the US still work. They ignore that 95% of a car’s lifetime is spent parked. They ignore how this technology could transform the lives
of the elderly, or eradicate the need for parking lots or garages or gas stations. They dismiss the entire concept because they don’t
think a computer could ever be as good at merging on the freeway as they are. They ignore the great, big, beautiful picture: that this
technology could make our lives so much better.
6 - It wasn’t an exhilarating ride, and that’s a good thing.
Riding in a self-driving car is not the cybernetic thrill ride one might expect. The car drives like a person, and after a few minutes
you forget that you’re being driven autonomously. You forget that a robot is differentiating cars from pedestrians from mopeds from
raccoons. You forget that millions of photons are being fired from a laser and interpreting, processing, and reacting to the hand signals
of a cyclist. You forget that instead of an organic brain, which has had millions of years to evolve the cognitive ability to fumble its way
through a four-way stop, you’re being piloted by an artificial one, which was birthed in less than a decade.
The unfortunate part of something this transformative is the inevitable, ardent stupidity which is going to erupt from the general
public. Even if in a few years self-driving cars are proven to be ten times safer than human-operated cars, all it’s going to take is one
tragic accident and the public is going to lose their minds. There will be outrage. There will be politicizing. There will be hashtags.
I say look at the bigger picture. All the self-driving cars currently on the road learn from one another, and possess 40 years of
driving experience. And this technology is still in its infancy.
(Adapted from: <http://theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car> . 21/08/2016.)
Consider the following characteristics of the new Google self-driving car:
1. It runs on batteries and petrol.
2. It can be used in extreme weather conditions. 3. It has a design which requires further modifications. 4. It can reach the speed of 25 miles per hour.
Mark the correct alternative.
1. It runs on batteries and petrol.
2. It can be used in extreme weather conditions. 3. It has a design which requires further modifications. 4. It can reach the speed of 25 miles per hour.
Mark the correct alternative.
Q814944
Inglês
Texto associado
Six things I learned from riding in a Google self-driving car
1 - Human beings are terrible drivers.
We drink. We doze. We text. In the US, 30,000 people die from automobile accidents every year. Traffic crashes are the primary
cause of death worldwide for people aged 15-24, and during a crash, 40% of drivers never even hit the brakes. We’re flawed
organisms, barreling around at high speeds in vessels covered in glass, metal, distraction, and death. This is one of Google’s
“moonshots” – to remove human error from a job which, for the past hundred years, has been entirely human.
2 - Google self-driving cars are timid.
The car we rode in did not strike me as dangerous. It drove slowly and deliberately, and I got the impression that it’s more likely
to annoy other drivers than to harm them.
In the early versions they tested on closed courses, the vehicles were programmed to be highly aggressive. Apparently during
these tests, which involved obstacle courses full of traffic cones and inflatable crash-test objects, there were a lot of screeching
brakes, roaring engines and terrified interns.
3 - They’re cute.
Google’s new fleet was intentionally designed to look adorable. Our brains are hardwired to treat inanimate (or animate) objects with greater care, caution, and reverence when they resemble a living thing. By turning self-driving cars into an adorable Skynet Marshmallow Bumper Bots, Google hopes to spiritually disarm other drivers. I also suspect the cuteness is used to quell some of the road rage that might emerge from being stuck behind one of these things. They’re intended as moderate-distance couriers, not openroad warriors, so their max speed is 25 miles per hour.
4 - It’s not done and it’s not perfect.
Some of the scenarios autonomous vehicles have the most trouble with are the same human beings have the most trouble with, such as traversing four-way stops or handling a yellow light. The cars use a mixture of 3D laser-mapping, GPS, and radar to analyze and interpret their surroundings, and the latest versions are fully electric with a range of about 100 miles. Despite the advantages over a human being in certain scenarios, however, these cars still aren’t ready for the real world. They can’t drive in the snow or heavy rain, and there’s a variety of complex situations they do not process well, such as passing through a
construction zone. Google is hoping that, eventually, the cars will be able to handle all of this as well (or better) than a human could.
5 - I want this technology to succeed, like… yesterday.
I’m biased. Earlier this year my mom had a stroke. It damaged the visual cortex of her brain, and her vision was impaired to the
point that she’ll probably never drive again. This reduced her from a fully-functional, independent human being with a career and a
buzzing social life into someone who is homebound, disabled, and powerless.
When discussing self-driving cars, people tend to ask many superficial questions. They ignore that 45% of disabled people in
the US still work. They ignore that 95% of a car’s lifetime is spent parked. They ignore how this technology could transform the lives
of the elderly, or eradicate the need for parking lots or garages or gas stations. They dismiss the entire concept because they don’t
think a computer could ever be as good at merging on the freeway as they are. They ignore the great, big, beautiful picture: that this
technology could make our lives so much better.
6 - It wasn’t an exhilarating ride, and that’s a good thing.
Riding in a self-driving car is not the cybernetic thrill ride one might expect. The car drives like a person, and after a few minutes
you forget that you’re being driven autonomously. You forget that a robot is differentiating cars from pedestrians from mopeds from
raccoons. You forget that millions of photons are being fired from a laser and interpreting, processing, and reacting to the hand signals
of a cyclist. You forget that instead of an organic brain, which has had millions of years to evolve the cognitive ability to fumble its way
through a four-way stop, you’re being piloted by an artificial one, which was birthed in less than a decade.
The unfortunate part of something this transformative is the inevitable, ardent stupidity which is going to erupt from the general
public. Even if in a few years self-driving cars are proven to be ten times safer than human-operated cars, all it’s going to take is one
tragic accident and the public is going to lose their minds. There will be outrage. There will be politicizing. There will be hashtags.
I say look at the bigger picture. All the self-driving cars currently on the road learn from one another, and possess 40 years of
driving experience. And this technology is still in its infancy.
(Adapted from: <http://theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car> . 21/08/2016.)
The word “they”, in boldface and underlined, in section 3, refers to:
Q814945
Inglês
Texto associado
Six things I learned from riding in a Google self-driving car
1 - Human beings are terrible drivers.
We drink. We doze. We text. In the US, 30,000 people die from automobile accidents every year. Traffic crashes are the primary
cause of death worldwide for people aged 15-24, and during a crash, 40% of drivers never even hit the brakes. We’re flawed
organisms, barreling around at high speeds in vessels covered in glass, metal, distraction, and death. This is one of Google’s
“moonshots” – to remove human error from a job which, for the past hundred years, has been entirely human.
2 - Google self-driving cars are timid.
The car we rode in did not strike me as dangerous. It drove slowly and deliberately, and I got the impression that it’s more likely
to annoy other drivers than to harm them.
In the early versions they tested on closed courses, the vehicles were programmed to be highly aggressive. Apparently during
these tests, which involved obstacle courses full of traffic cones and inflatable crash-test objects, there were a lot of screeching
brakes, roaring engines and terrified interns.
3 - They’re cute.
Google’s new fleet was intentionally designed to look adorable. Our brains are hardwired to treat inanimate (or animate) objects with greater care, caution, and reverence when they resemble a living thing. By turning self-driving cars into an adorable Skynet Marshmallow Bumper Bots, Google hopes to spiritually disarm other drivers. I also suspect the cuteness is used to quell some of the road rage that might emerge from being stuck behind one of these things. They’re intended as moderate-distance couriers, not openroad warriors, so their max speed is 25 miles per hour.
4 - It’s not done and it’s not perfect.
Some of the scenarios autonomous vehicles have the most trouble with are the same human beings have the most trouble with, such as traversing four-way stops or handling a yellow light. The cars use a mixture of 3D laser-mapping, GPS, and radar to analyze and interpret their surroundings, and the latest versions are fully electric with a range of about 100 miles. Despite the advantages over a human being in certain scenarios, however, these cars still aren’t ready for the real world. They can’t drive in the snow or heavy rain, and there’s a variety of complex situations they do not process well, such as passing through a
construction zone. Google is hoping that, eventually, the cars will be able to handle all of this as well (or better) than a human could.
5 - I want this technology to succeed, like… yesterday.
I’m biased. Earlier this year my mom had a stroke. It damaged the visual cortex of her brain, and her vision was impaired to the
point that she’ll probably never drive again. This reduced her from a fully-functional, independent human being with a career and a
buzzing social life into someone who is homebound, disabled, and powerless.
When discussing self-driving cars, people tend to ask many superficial questions. They ignore that 45% of disabled people in
the US still work. They ignore that 95% of a car’s lifetime is spent parked. They ignore how this technology could transform the lives
of the elderly, or eradicate the need for parking lots or garages or gas stations. They dismiss the entire concept because they don’t
think a computer could ever be as good at merging on the freeway as they are. They ignore the great, big, beautiful picture: that this
technology could make our lives so much better.
6 - It wasn’t an exhilarating ride, and that’s a good thing.
Riding in a self-driving car is not the cybernetic thrill ride one might expect. The car drives like a person, and after a few minutes
you forget that you’re being driven autonomously. You forget that a robot is differentiating cars from pedestrians from mopeds from
raccoons. You forget that millions of photons are being fired from a laser and interpreting, processing, and reacting to the hand signals
of a cyclist. You forget that instead of an organic brain, which has had millions of years to evolve the cognitive ability to fumble its way
through a four-way stop, you’re being piloted by an artificial one, which was birthed in less than a decade.
The unfortunate part of something this transformative is the inevitable, ardent stupidity which is going to erupt from the general
public. Even if in a few years self-driving cars are proven to be ten times safer than human-operated cars, all it’s going to take is one
tragic accident and the public is going to lose their minds. There will be outrage. There will be politicizing. There will be hashtags.
I say look at the bigger picture. All the self-driving cars currently on the road learn from one another, and possess 40 years of
driving experience. And this technology is still in its infancy.
(Adapted from: <http://theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car> . 21/08/2016.)
The text points out that the design of the self-driving car is deliberately attractive because:
Q814946
Inglês
Texto associado
Six things I learned from riding in a Google self-driving car
1 - Human beings are terrible drivers.
We drink. We doze. We text. In the US, 30,000 people die from automobile accidents every year. Traffic crashes are the primary
cause of death worldwide for people aged 15-24, and during a crash, 40% of drivers never even hit the brakes. We’re flawed
organisms, barreling around at high speeds in vessels covered in glass, metal, distraction, and death. This is one of Google’s
“moonshots” – to remove human error from a job which, for the past hundred years, has been entirely human.
2 - Google self-driving cars are timid.
The car we rode in did not strike me as dangerous. It drove slowly and deliberately, and I got the impression that it’s more likely
to annoy other drivers than to harm them.
In the early versions they tested on closed courses, the vehicles were programmed to be highly aggressive. Apparently during
these tests, which involved obstacle courses full of traffic cones and inflatable crash-test objects, there were a lot of screeching
brakes, roaring engines and terrified interns.
3 - They’re cute.
Google’s new fleet was intentionally designed to look adorable. Our brains are hardwired to treat inanimate (or animate) objects with greater care, caution, and reverence when they resemble a living thing. By turning self-driving cars into an adorable Skynet Marshmallow Bumper Bots, Google hopes to spiritually disarm other drivers. I also suspect the cuteness is used to quell some of the road rage that might emerge from being stuck behind one of these things. They’re intended as moderate-distance couriers, not openroad warriors, so their max speed is 25 miles per hour.
4 - It’s not done and it’s not perfect.
Some of the scenarios autonomous vehicles have the most trouble with are the same human beings have the most trouble with, such as traversing four-way stops or handling a yellow light. The cars use a mixture of 3D laser-mapping, GPS, and radar to analyze and interpret their surroundings, and the latest versions are fully electric with a range of about 100 miles. Despite the advantages over a human being in certain scenarios, however, these cars still aren’t ready for the real world. They can’t drive in the snow or heavy rain, and there’s a variety of complex situations they do not process well, such as passing through a
construction zone. Google is hoping that, eventually, the cars will be able to handle all of this as well (or better) than a human could.
5 - I want this technology to succeed, like… yesterday.
I’m biased. Earlier this year my mom had a stroke. It damaged the visual cortex of her brain, and her vision was impaired to the
point that she’ll probably never drive again. This reduced her from a fully-functional, independent human being with a career and a
buzzing social life into someone who is homebound, disabled, and powerless.
When discussing self-driving cars, people tend to ask many superficial questions. They ignore that 45% of disabled people in
the US still work. They ignore that 95% of a car’s lifetime is spent parked. They ignore how this technology could transform the lives
of the elderly, or eradicate the need for parking lots or garages or gas stations. They dismiss the entire concept because they don’t
think a computer could ever be as good at merging on the freeway as they are. They ignore the great, big, beautiful picture: that this
technology could make our lives so much better.
6 - It wasn’t an exhilarating ride, and that’s a good thing.
Riding in a self-driving car is not the cybernetic thrill ride one might expect. The car drives like a person, and after a few minutes
you forget that you’re being driven autonomously. You forget that a robot is differentiating cars from pedestrians from mopeds from
raccoons. You forget that millions of photons are being fired from a laser and interpreting, processing, and reacting to the hand signals
of a cyclist. You forget that instead of an organic brain, which has had millions of years to evolve the cognitive ability to fumble its way
through a four-way stop, you’re being piloted by an artificial one, which was birthed in less than a decade.
The unfortunate part of something this transformative is the inevitable, ardent stupidity which is going to erupt from the general
public. Even if in a few years self-driving cars are proven to be ten times safer than human-operated cars, all it’s going to take is one
tragic accident and the public is going to lose their minds. There will be outrage. There will be politicizing. There will be hashtags.
I say look at the bigger picture. All the self-driving cars currently on the road learn from one another, and possess 40 years of
driving experience. And this technology is still in its infancy.
(Adapted from: <http://theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car> . 21/08/2016.)
In the sentence “They dismiss the entire concept because they don’t think a computer…”, the underlined word can be
substituted, without losing its meaning, by:
Q814947
Inglês
Texto associado
Six things I learned from riding in a Google self-driving car
1 - Human beings are terrible drivers.
We drink. We doze. We text. In the US, 30,000 people die from automobile accidents every year. Traffic crashes are the primary
cause of death worldwide for people aged 15-24, and during a crash, 40% of drivers never even hit the brakes. We’re flawed
organisms, barreling around at high speeds in vessels covered in glass, metal, distraction, and death. This is one of Google’s
“moonshots” – to remove human error from a job which, for the past hundred years, has been entirely human.
2 - Google self-driving cars are timid.
The car we rode in did not strike me as dangerous. It drove slowly and deliberately, and I got the impression that it’s more likely
to annoy other drivers than to harm them.
In the early versions they tested on closed courses, the vehicles were programmed to be highly aggressive. Apparently during
these tests, which involved obstacle courses full of traffic cones and inflatable crash-test objects, there were a lot of screeching
brakes, roaring engines and terrified interns.
3 - They’re cute.
Google’s new fleet was intentionally designed to look adorable. Our brains are hardwired to treat inanimate (or animate) objects with greater care, caution, and reverence when they resemble a living thing. By turning self-driving cars into an adorable Skynet Marshmallow Bumper Bots, Google hopes to spiritually disarm other drivers. I also suspect the cuteness is used to quell some of the road rage that might emerge from being stuck behind one of these things. They’re intended as moderate-distance couriers, not openroad warriors, so their max speed is 25 miles per hour.
4 - It’s not done and it’s not perfect.
Some of the scenarios autonomous vehicles have the most trouble with are the same human beings have the most trouble with, such as traversing four-way stops or handling a yellow light. The cars use a mixture of 3D laser-mapping, GPS, and radar to analyze and interpret their surroundings, and the latest versions are fully electric with a range of about 100 miles. Despite the advantages over a human being in certain scenarios, however, these cars still aren’t ready for the real world. They can’t drive in the snow or heavy rain, and there’s a variety of complex situations they do not process well, such as passing through a
construction zone. Google is hoping that, eventually, the cars will be able to handle all of this as well (or better) than a human could.
5 - I want this technology to succeed, like… yesterday.
I’m biased. Earlier this year my mom had a stroke. It damaged the visual cortex of her brain, and her vision was impaired to the
point that she’ll probably never drive again. This reduced her from a fully-functional, independent human being with a career and a
buzzing social life into someone who is homebound, disabled, and powerless.
When discussing self-driving cars, people tend to ask many superficial questions. They ignore that 45% of disabled people in
the US still work. They ignore that 95% of a car’s lifetime is spent parked. They ignore how this technology could transform the lives
of the elderly, or eradicate the need for parking lots or garages or gas stations. They dismiss the entire concept because they don’t
think a computer could ever be as good at merging on the freeway as they are. They ignore the great, big, beautiful picture: that this
technology could make our lives so much better.
6 - It wasn’t an exhilarating ride, and that’s a good thing.
Riding in a self-driving car is not the cybernetic thrill ride one might expect. The car drives like a person, and after a few minutes
you forget that you’re being driven autonomously. You forget that a robot is differentiating cars from pedestrians from mopeds from
raccoons. You forget that millions of photons are being fired from a laser and interpreting, processing, and reacting to the hand signals
of a cyclist. You forget that instead of an organic brain, which has had millions of years to evolve the cognitive ability to fumble its way
through a four-way stop, you’re being piloted by an artificial one, which was birthed in less than a decade.
The unfortunate part of something this transformative is the inevitable, ardent stupidity which is going to erupt from the general
public. Even if in a few years self-driving cars are proven to be ten times safer than human-operated cars, all it’s going to take is one
tragic accident and the public is going to lose their minds. There will be outrage. There will be politicizing. There will be hashtags.
I say look at the bigger picture. All the self-driving cars currently on the road learn from one another, and possess 40 years of
driving experience. And this technology is still in its infancy.
(Adapted from: <http://theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car> . 21/08/2016.)
Based on the text, it is correct to affirm that the author:
Conheça nossos planos