Questões de Vestibular UNIFESP 2010 para Vestibular, Língua Portuguesa, Língua Estrangeira e Redação

Foram encontradas 45 questões

Q215423 Português
Instrução: As questões de números 21 a 24 tomam por base o fragmento seguinte.
 
 As provocações no recreio eram frequentes, oriundas do enfado; irritadiços todos como feridas; os inspetores a cada passo precisavam intervir em conflitos; as importunações andavam em busca das suscetibilidades; as suscetibilidades a procurar a sarna das importunações. Viam de joelhos o Franco, puxavamlhe os cabelos. Viam Rômulo passar, lançavam-lhe o apelido: mestre-cuca!

 Esta provocação era, além de tudo, inverdade. Cozinheiro, Rômulo! Só porque lembrava culinária, com a carnosidade bamba, fofada dos pastelões, ou porque era gordo das enxúndias enganadoras dos fregistas, dissolução mórbida de sardinha e azeite, sob os aspectos de mais volumosa saúde?
(...)
  Rômulo era antipatizado. Para que o não manifestassem excessivamente, fazia-se temer pela brutalidade. Ao mais insignificante gracejo de um pequeno, atirava contra o infeliz toda a corpulência das infiltrações de gordura solta, desmoronava-se em socos. Dos mais fortes vingava-se, resmungando intrepidamente. 
Para desesperá-lo, aproveitavam-se os menores do escuro. Rômulo, no meio, ficava tonto, esbravejando juras de morte, mostrando o punho. Em geral procurava reconhecer algum dos impertinentes e o marcava para a vindita. Vindita inexorável.
 No decorrer enfadonho das últimas semanas, foi Rômulo escolhido, principalmente, para expiatório do desfastio. Mestrecuca! Via-se apregoado por vozes fantásticas, saídas da terra; mestre-cuca! Por vozes do espaço rouquenhas ou esganiçadas. Sentava-se acabrunhado, vendo se se lembrava de haver tratado
panelas algum dia na vida; a unanimidade impressionava. Mais frequentemente, entregava-se a acessos de raiva. Arremetia bufando, espumando, olhos fechados, punhos para trás, contra os grupos. Os rapazes corriam a rir, abrindo caminho, deixando rolar adiante aquela ambulância danada de elefantíase.
(Raul Pompeia. O Ateneu.)

Considere as seguintes afirmações.

I. A alcunha de mestre-cuca, recebida por Rômulo, advinha do fato de ter praticado, anteriormente, a arte culinária.

II. As agressões e humilhações sofridas por Rômulo eram essencialmente motivadas por sua antipatia.

III. As reações de Rômulo às provocações dos colegas variavam conforme as circunstâncias.

De acordo com o texto, está correto o que se afirma apenas em
Alternativas
Q215424 Português
Instrução: As questões de números 21 a 24 tomam por base o fragmento seguinte.
 
 As provocações no recreio eram frequentes, oriundas do enfado; irritadiços todos como feridas; os inspetores a cada passo precisavam intervir em conflitos; as importunações andavam em busca das suscetibilidades; as suscetibilidades a procurar a sarna das importunações. Viam de joelhos o Franco, puxavamlhe os cabelos. Viam Rômulo passar, lançavam-lhe o apelido: mestre-cuca!

 Esta provocação era, além de tudo, inverdade. Cozinheiro, Rômulo! Só porque lembrava culinária, com a carnosidade bamba, fofada dos pastelões, ou porque era gordo das enxúndias enganadoras dos fregistas, dissolução mórbida de sardinha e azeite, sob os aspectos de mais volumosa saúde?
(...)
  Rômulo era antipatizado. Para que o não manifestassem excessivamente, fazia-se temer pela brutalidade. Ao mais insignificante gracejo de um pequeno, atirava contra o infeliz toda a corpulência das infiltrações de gordura solta, desmoronava-se em socos. Dos mais fortes vingava-se, resmungando intrepidamente. 
Para desesperá-lo, aproveitavam-se os menores do escuro. Rômulo, no meio, ficava tonto, esbravejando juras de morte, mostrando o punho. Em geral procurava reconhecer algum dos impertinentes e o marcava para a vindita. Vindita inexorável.
 No decorrer enfadonho das últimas semanas, foi Rômulo escolhido, principalmente, para expiatório do desfastio. Mestrecuca! Via-se apregoado por vozes fantásticas, saídas da terra; mestre-cuca! Por vozes do espaço rouquenhas ou esganiçadas. Sentava-se acabrunhado, vendo se se lembrava de haver tratado
panelas algum dia na vida; a unanimidade impressionava. Mais frequentemente, entregava-se a acessos de raiva. Arremetia bufando, espumando, olhos fechados, punhos para trás, contra os grupos. Os rapazes corriam a rir, abrindo caminho, deixando rolar adiante aquela ambulância danada de elefantíase.
(Raul Pompeia. O Ateneu.)

Indique a alternativa em que os fragmentos selecionados exemplificam, respectivamente, a manifestação clara do ponto de vista do narrador e a opinião do grupo, a propósito de Rômulo.
Alternativas
Q215425 Português
Instrução: As questões de números 21 a 24 tomam por base o fragmento seguinte.
 
 As provocações no recreio eram frequentes, oriundas do enfado; irritadiços todos como feridas; os inspetores a cada passo precisavam intervir em conflitos; as importunações andavam em busca das suscetibilidades; as suscetibilidades a procurar a sarna das importunações. Viam de joelhos o Franco, puxavamlhe os cabelos. Viam Rômulo passar, lançavam-lhe o apelido: mestre-cuca!

 Esta provocação era, além de tudo, inverdade. Cozinheiro, Rômulo! Só porque lembrava culinária, com a carnosidade bamba, fofada dos pastelões, ou porque era gordo das enxúndias enganadoras dos fregistas, dissolução mórbida de sardinha e azeite, sob os aspectos de mais volumosa saúde?
(...)
  Rômulo era antipatizado. Para que o não manifestassem excessivamente, fazia-se temer pela brutalidade. Ao mais insignificante gracejo de um pequeno, atirava contra o infeliz toda a corpulência das infiltrações de gordura solta, desmoronava-se em socos. Dos mais fortes vingava-se, resmungando intrepidamente. 
Para desesperá-lo, aproveitavam-se os menores do escuro. Rômulo, no meio, ficava tonto, esbravejando juras de morte, mostrando o punho. Em geral procurava reconhecer algum dos impertinentes e o marcava para a vindita. Vindita inexorável.
 No decorrer enfadonho das últimas semanas, foi Rômulo escolhido, principalmente, para expiatório do desfastio. Mestrecuca! Via-se apregoado por vozes fantásticas, saídas da terra; mestre-cuca! Por vozes do espaço rouquenhas ou esganiçadas. Sentava-se acabrunhado, vendo se se lembrava de haver tratado
panelas algum dia na vida; a unanimidade impressionava. Mais frequentemente, entregava-se a acessos de raiva. Arremetia bufando, espumando, olhos fechados, punhos para trás, contra os grupos. Os rapazes corriam a rir, abrindo caminho, deixando rolar adiante aquela ambulância danada de elefantíase.
(Raul Pompeia. O Ateneu.)

Sobre o texto, é correto afirmar:
Alternativas
Q215426 Português
Instrução: As questões de números 21 a 24 tomam por base o fragmento seguinte.
 
 As provocações no recreio eram frequentes, oriundas do enfado; irritadiços todos como feridas; os inspetores a cada passo precisavam intervir em conflitos; as importunações andavam em busca das suscetibilidades; as suscetibilidades a procurar a sarna das importunações. Viam de joelhos o Franco, puxavamlhe os cabelos. Viam Rômulo passar, lançavam-lhe o apelido: mestre-cuca!

 Esta provocação era, além de tudo, inverdade. Cozinheiro, Rômulo! Só porque lembrava culinária, com a carnosidade bamba, fofada dos pastelões, ou porque era gordo das enxúndias enganadoras dos fregistas, dissolução mórbida de sardinha e azeite, sob os aspectos de mais volumosa saúde?
(...)
  Rômulo era antipatizado. Para que o não manifestassem excessivamente, fazia-se temer pela brutalidade. Ao mais insignificante gracejo de um pequeno, atirava contra o infeliz toda a corpulência das infiltrações de gordura solta, desmoronava-se em socos. Dos mais fortes vingava-se, resmungando intrepidamente. 
Para desesperá-lo, aproveitavam-se os menores do escuro. Rômulo, no meio, ficava tonto, esbravejando juras de morte, mostrando o punho. Em geral procurava reconhecer algum dos impertinentes e o marcava para a vindita. Vindita inexorável.
 No decorrer enfadonho das últimas semanas, foi Rômulo escolhido, principalmente, para expiatório do desfastio. Mestrecuca! Via-se apregoado por vozes fantásticas, saídas da terra; mestre-cuca! Por vozes do espaço rouquenhas ou esganiçadas. Sentava-se acabrunhado, vendo se se lembrava de haver tratado
panelas algum dia na vida; a unanimidade impressionava. Mais frequentemente, entregava-se a acessos de raiva. Arremetia bufando, espumando, olhos fechados, punhos para trás, contra os grupos. Os rapazes corriam a rir, abrindo caminho, deixando rolar adiante aquela ambulância danada de elefantíase.
(Raul Pompeia. O Ateneu.)

Tendo em vista a função sintática da palavra grifada no fragmento Para que o não manifestassem excessivamente, fazia- se temer pela brutalidade, assinale a alternativa em que o termo sublinhado exerce a mesma função:
Alternativas
Q215427 Português
Instrução: As questões de números 25 a 27 tomam por base o fragmento.

  [Sem-Pernas] queria alegria, uma mão que o acarinhasse, alguém que com muito amor o fizesse esquecer o defeito físico e os muitos anos (talvez tivessem sido apenas meses ou semanas, mas para ele seriam sempre longos anos) que vivera sozinho nas ruas da cidade, hostilizado pelos homens que passavam, empurrado pelos guardas, surrado pelos moleques maiores. Nunca tivera família. Vivera na casa de um padeiro a quem chamava “meu padrinho” e que o surrava. Fugiu logo que pôde compreender que a fuga o libertaria. Sofreu fome, um dia levaram-no preso. Ele quer um carinho, u’a mão que passe sobre os seus olhos e faça com que ele possa se esquecer daquela noite na cadeia, quando os soldados bêbados o fizeram correr com sua perna coxa em volta de uma saleta. Em cada canto estava um com uma borracha comprida. As marcas que ficaram nas suas costas desapareceram. Mas de dentro dele nunca desapareceu a dor daquela hora. Corria na saleta como um animal perseguido por outros mais fortes. A perna coxa se recusava a ajudá-lo. E a borracha zunia nas suas costas quando o cansaço o fazia parar. A princípio chorou muito, depois, não sabe como, as lágrimas secaram. Certa hora não resistiu mais, abateu-se no chão. Sangrava. Ainda hoje ouve como os soldados riam e como riu aquele homem de colete cinzento que fumava um charuto.

(Jorge Amado. Capitães da areia.)

Considere as afirmações seguintes.

I. O fragmento do romance, ambientado na cidade de Salvador das primeiras décadas do século passado, aborda a vida de uma criança em situação de absoluta exclusão social e violência, o que destoa do projeto literário e ideológico dos escritores brasileiros que compõem a “Geração de 30”.

II. Valendo-se das conquistas do Modernismo, o romance apresenta linguagem fluente e acessível ao grande público, utilizando-se de um português coloquial, simples, próximo a um modo natural de falar, com o largo emprego da frase curta e econômica.

III. Sem-Pernas é uma personagem que, embora encarne um tipo social claramente delimitado, o do menino “pobre, abandonado, aleijado e discriminado”, adquire alguma profundidade psicológica, à medida que seu passado e suas experiências dolorosas vêm à tona.

Conforme o texto, está correto o que se afirma apenas em
Alternativas
Q215428 Português
Instrução: As questões de números 25 a 27 tomam por base o fragmento.

  [Sem-Pernas] queria alegria, uma mão que o acarinhasse, alguém que com muito amor o fizesse esquecer o defeito físico e os muitos anos (talvez tivessem sido apenas meses ou semanas, mas para ele seriam sempre longos anos) que vivera sozinho nas ruas da cidade, hostilizado pelos homens que passavam, empurrado pelos guardas, surrado pelos moleques maiores. Nunca tivera família. Vivera na casa de um padeiro a quem chamava “meu padrinho” e que o surrava. Fugiu logo que pôde compreender que a fuga o libertaria. Sofreu fome, um dia levaram-no preso. Ele quer um carinho, u’a mão que passe sobre os seus olhos e faça com que ele possa se esquecer daquela noite na cadeia, quando os soldados bêbados o fizeram correr com sua perna coxa em volta de uma saleta. Em cada canto estava um com uma borracha comprida. As marcas que ficaram nas suas costas desapareceram. Mas de dentro dele nunca desapareceu a dor daquela hora. Corria na saleta como um animal perseguido por outros mais fortes. A perna coxa se recusava a ajudá-lo. E a borracha zunia nas suas costas quando o cansaço o fazia parar. A princípio chorou muito, depois, não sabe como, as lágrimas secaram. Certa hora não resistiu mais, abateu-se no chão. Sangrava. Ainda hoje ouve como os soldados riam e como riu aquele homem de colete cinzento que fumava um charuto.

(Jorge Amado. Capitães da areia.)

O zigue-zague temporal ligado à vida de Sem-Pernas, em- pregado no fragmento para a composição da personagem, é construído de maneira muito precisa, por meio da utilização alternada de diversos tempos verbais. Indique a alternativa em que há, respectivamente, um tempo verbal que expressa fatos ocorridos num tempo anterior a outros fatos do passado e um tempo verbal usado para marcar o caráter hipotético de certas ações ou o desejo de que se realizassem.
Alternativas
Q215429 Português
Instrução: As questões de números 25 a 27 tomam por base o fragmento.

  [Sem-Pernas] queria alegria, uma mão que o acarinhasse, alguém que com muito amor o fizesse esquecer o defeito físico e os muitos anos (talvez tivessem sido apenas meses ou semanas, mas para ele seriam sempre longos anos) que vivera sozinho nas ruas da cidade, hostilizado pelos homens que passavam, empurrado pelos guardas, surrado pelos moleques maiores. Nunca tivera família. Vivera na casa de um padeiro a quem chamava “meu padrinho” e que o surrava. Fugiu logo que pôde compreender que a fuga o libertaria. Sofreu fome, um dia levaram-no preso. Ele quer um carinho, u’a mão que passe sobre os seus olhos e faça com que ele possa se esquecer daquela noite na cadeia, quando os soldados bêbados o fizeram correr com sua perna coxa em volta de uma saleta. Em cada canto estava um com uma borracha comprida. As marcas que ficaram nas suas costas desapareceram. Mas de dentro dele nunca desapareceu a dor daquela hora. Corria na saleta como um animal perseguido por outros mais fortes. A perna coxa se recusava a ajudá-lo. E a borracha zunia nas suas costas quando o cansaço o fazia parar. A princípio chorou muito, depois, não sabe como, as lágrimas secaram. Certa hora não resistiu mais, abateu-se no chão. Sangrava. Ainda hoje ouve como os soldados riam e como riu aquele homem de colete cinzento que fumava um charuto.

(Jorge Amado. Capitães da areia.)

O emprego da figura de linguagem conhecida como “prosopopeia” (ou “personificação”) põe mais em evidência a principal razão pela qual Sem-Pernas é estigmatizado. O trecho que contém essa figura é
Alternativas
Q215430 Português
Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 28 a 30.

 De tudo que é nego torto
Do mangue e do cais do porto
Ela já foi namorada
O seu corpo é dos errantes
Dos cegos, dos retirantes
É de quem não tem mais nada
Dá-se assim desde menina
Na garagem, na cantina
Atrás do tanque, no mato
É a rainha dos detentos
Das loucas, dos lazarentos
Dos moleques do internato
E também vai amiúde
Co’os velhinhos sem saúde
E as viúvas sem porvir
Ela é um poço de bondade
E é por isso que a cidade
Vive sempre a repetir
Joga pedra na Geni
Joga pedra na Geni
Ela é feita pra apanhar
Ela é boa de cuspir
Ela dá pra qualquer um
Maldita Geni

(Chico Buarque. Geni e o zepelim.)

A partir do início do fragmento selecionado, uma série de versos consecutivos vai caracterizando a personagem Geni numa mesma direção semântica e segundo uma mesma lógica, até que um determinado verso provoca uma ruptura significativa nessa trajetória, criando uma intensa oposição de sentido no poema. Esse verso está transcrito em
Alternativas
Q215431 Português
Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 28 a 30.

 De tudo que é nego torto
Do mangue e do cais do porto
Ela já foi namorada
O seu corpo é dos errantes
Dos cegos, dos retirantes
É de quem não tem mais nada
Dá-se assim desde menina
Na garagem, na cantina
Atrás do tanque, no mato
É a rainha dos detentos
Das loucas, dos lazarentos
Dos moleques do internato
E também vai amiúde
Co’os velhinhos sem saúde
E as viúvas sem porvir
Ela é um poço de bondade
E é por isso que a cidade
Vive sempre a repetir
Joga pedra na Geni
Joga pedra na Geni
Ela é feita pra apanhar
Ela é boa de cuspir
Ela dá pra qualquer um
Maldita Geni

(Chico Buarque. Geni e o zepelim.)

Indique a alternativa que identifica corretamente, de modo respectivo, a métrica e a natureza predominante das rimas.
Alternativas
Q215432 Português
Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 28 a 30.

 De tudo que é nego torto
Do mangue e do cais do porto
Ela já foi namorada
O seu corpo é dos errantes
Dos cegos, dos retirantes
É de quem não tem mais nada
Dá-se assim desde menina
Na garagem, na cantina
Atrás do tanque, no mato
É a rainha dos detentos
Das loucas, dos lazarentos
Dos moleques do internato
E também vai amiúde
Co’os velhinhos sem saúde
E as viúvas sem porvir
Ela é um poço de bondade
E é por isso que a cidade
Vive sempre a repetir
Joga pedra na Geni
Joga pedra na Geni
Ela é feita pra apanhar
Ela é boa de cuspir
Ela dá pra qualquer um
Maldita Geni

(Chico Buarque. Geni e o zepelim.)

Indique a alternativa que apresenta a função sintática do verso De tudo que é nego torto.
Alternativas
Q215433 Inglês
 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

The dispute about the first plane to take off and fly
Alternativas
Q215434 Inglês
 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

According to the text, in Brazil people learn that
Alternativas
Q215435 Inglês
 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

Segundo o texto, a aeronave Ipanema
Alternativas
Q215436 Inglês
 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

According to the text, biofuels
Alternativas
Q215437 Inglês
 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

Brazil is characterized as a ‘natural knowledge economy’ because
Alternativas
Q215438 Inglês
 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

O trecho do segundo parágrafo – This time, the world was watching. –
Alternativas
Q215439 Inglês
 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

No trecho do segundo parágrafo – To their advocates, biofuels ... – a expressão their advocates refere-se
Alternativas
Q215440 Inglês
 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

No trecho do terceiro parágrafo – which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops – a palavra as introduz
Alternativas
Q215441 Inglês
 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

An example of the pressing challenges mentioned in last lines of the text – the pressing challenges that confront us all. – is
Alternativas
Q215442 Inglês
Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 40 a 45.

      To Scientists, Laughter Is No Joke - It’s Serious
March 31, 2010.

     So a scientist walks into a shopping mall to watch people laugh. There’s no punchline. Laughter is a serious scientific subject, one that researchers are still trying to figure out. Laughing is primal, our first way of communicating. Apes laugh. So do dogs and rats. Babies laugh long before they speak. No one teaches you how to laugh. You just do. And often you laugh involuntarily, in a specific rhythm and in certain spots in conversation.
    You may laugh at a prank on April Fools’ Day. But surprisingly,  only 10 to 15 percent of laughter is the result of someone making a joke, said Baltimore neuroscientist Robert Provine, who has studied laughter for decades. Laughter is mostly about social responses rather than reaction to a joke. “Laughter above all else is a social thing,’’ Provine said. “The requirement for laughter is another person.’’  
    Over the years, Provine, a professor with the University of Maryland Baltimore County, has boiled laughter down to its basics. “All language groups laugh ‘ha-ha-ha’ basically the same way,’’ he said. “Whether you speak Mandarin, French or English, everyone will understand laughter. ... There’s a pattern generator in our brain that produces this sound.’’
    Each “ha’’ is about one-15th of a second, repeated every fifth of a second, he said. Laugh faster or slower than that and it sounds more like panting or something else. Deaf people laugh without hearing, and people on cell phones laugh without seeing, illustrating that laughter isn’t dependent on a single sense but on social interactions, said Provine, author of the book “Laughter: A Scientific Investigation.’’   
    “It’s joy, it’s positive engagement with life,’’ said Jaak Panksepp, a Bowling Green University psychology professor. “It’s deeply social.’’ And it’s not just a people thing either. Chimps tickle each other and even laugh when another chimp pretends to tickle them. By studying rats, Panksepp and other scientists can figure out what’s going on in the brain during laughter. And it holds promise for human ills.
    Northwestern biomedical engineering professor Jeffrey Burgdorf has found that laughter in rats produces an insulin-like growth factor chemical that acts as an antidepressant and anxietyreducer. He thinks the same thing probably happens in humans, too. This would give doctors a new chemical target in the brain in their effort to develop drugs that fight depression and anxiety in people. Even so, laughter itself hasn’t been proven to be the best medicine, experts said.

 (www.nytimes.com. Adaptado.)


Segundo o texto, a risada
Alternativas
Respostas
21: C
22: D
23: B
24: E
25: E
26: A
27: A
28: D
29: E
30: E
31: B
32: E
33: C
34: A
35: D
36: B
37: A
38: E
39: C
40: E