Questões de Concurso Sobre inglês

Foram encontradas 18.135 questões

Q2744205 Inglês

In the following elements, the ones considered to be the key reversal in the Flipped Classroom are

Alternativas
Q2744204 Inglês

Social and psychological distance between the second or foreign language learner and the target language community is a preeminent factor in the determination of the extent to which the language learner will acquire the target language, without developing pidginization. Which language learner theory is this statement part of?

Alternativas
Q2744203 Inglês

Memorization of vocabulary lists and extensive repetition of drills are typical examples of the procedures in the following language teaching methodologies, respectively, the:

Alternativas
Q2744202 Inglês

Read the text to answer question 50.

Disponível em: <https://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/e/etiquette.asp>. Acesso em: 4 abr. 2016.

In the cartoon, the humorous situation is settled due to the

Alternativas
Q2744201 Inglês

Questions 48 and 49 refer to the following picture:

Disponível em: <http://www.glogster.com/117williams/behaviorism-and-contiguity-kwilliams/g-6lo4klu0ilb5b4qhuceeua0>. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2016.

Image B illustrates the principles in language teaching defended by the

Alternativas
Q2744200 Inglês

Questions 48 and 49 refer to the following picture:

Disponível em: <http://www.glogster.com/117williams/behaviorism-and-contiguity-kwilliams/g-6lo4klu0ilb5b4qhuceeua0>. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2016.

Image A depicts a teaching model which

Alternativas
Q2744199 Inglês

For questions 43 to 47, refer to the following text:

Time for global business to stop profiting from Amazon destruction

by Tica Minami - 13 April, 2016


Huge hydropower dams in the Amazon rainforest aren't just bad for Indigenous communities, biodiversity and the climate – they're bad for the companies involved. Here's why.


The Amazon is the world's largest remaining area of tropical rainforest, but every day it gets a little smaller – while big business profits get a little bigger. Over 750,000 km² of Amazon rainforest (an area larger than all of France) has already been destroyed by industrial agriculture, cattle ranching, illegal logging and infrastructure projects. And new threats keep coming: this time in the Tapajós River basin.

What's happening in the Tapajós?

The Brazilian government is planning a massive hydropower project for the Tapajós basin – over 40 medium or large dams, including one 7.6 km wide mega-dam. This dam alone would flood an area of rainforest the size of New York City, threatening the livelihoods of the Indigenous Munduruku People who have lived along the Tapajós River for centuries. The mega-dam – called São Luiz do Tapajós – doesn't just threaten local communities and ecosystems. It also harms the climate. Building the massive structure produces substantial emissions, as does the decay of flooded rainforest vegetation and soil.


Figure 1


So who would want to help build the São Luiz do Tapajós dam?

It takes huge amounts of capital and technology from companies all over the world to build a hydropower dam. Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project and released a new report on their findings – and on the risky nature of Amazon hydropower – today. So far, Greenpeace Brazil has found that the São Luiz do Tapajós dam is attracting the interest of a number of Brazilian and foreign energy companies. None of these companies have announced their intentions publicly yet, though.

What's at stake for companies who get involved with São Luiz do Tapajós dam?

The banks, insurers, suppliers and contractors that become involved in Amazon hydropower projects face serious financial and reputational risks. Hydropower dams attract international attention for their destruction to the environment and impacts on local communities. Moreover, these dams and other large government infrastructure projects have also recently been tied to corruption. Amazon destruction impacts all of us. People must act globally to stop this global project. Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few. Wherever you are in the world, your voice matters. Add your name to help keep the Tapajos alive!

Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/amazonrainforest-hydropower-tapajos-dam-belo-monte/blog/56142/>. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2016. [Adaptado].

In the sentence “Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few”, dash might be properly replaced by

Alternativas
Q2744198 Inglês

For questions 43 to 47, refer to the following text:

Time for global business to stop profiting from Amazon destruction

by Tica Minami - 13 April, 2016


Huge hydropower dams in the Amazon rainforest aren't just bad for Indigenous communities, biodiversity and the climate – they're bad for the companies involved. Here's why.


The Amazon is the world's largest remaining area of tropical rainforest, but every day it gets a little smaller – while big business profits get a little bigger. Over 750,000 km² of Amazon rainforest (an area larger than all of France) has already been destroyed by industrial agriculture, cattle ranching, illegal logging and infrastructure projects. And new threats keep coming: this time in the Tapajós River basin.

What's happening in the Tapajós?

The Brazilian government is planning a massive hydropower project for the Tapajós basin – over 40 medium or large dams, including one 7.6 km wide mega-dam. This dam alone would flood an area of rainforest the size of New York City, threatening the livelihoods of the Indigenous Munduruku People who have lived along the Tapajós River for centuries. The mega-dam – called São Luiz do Tapajós – doesn't just threaten local communities and ecosystems. It also harms the climate. Building the massive structure produces substantial emissions, as does the decay of flooded rainforest vegetation and soil.


Figure 1


So who would want to help build the São Luiz do Tapajós dam?

It takes huge amounts of capital and technology from companies all over the world to build a hydropower dam. Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project and released a new report on their findings – and on the risky nature of Amazon hydropower – today. So far, Greenpeace Brazil has found that the São Luiz do Tapajós dam is attracting the interest of a number of Brazilian and foreign energy companies. None of these companies have announced their intentions publicly yet, though.

What's at stake for companies who get involved with São Luiz do Tapajós dam?

The banks, insurers, suppliers and contractors that become involved in Amazon hydropower projects face serious financial and reputational risks. Hydropower dams attract international attention for their destruction to the environment and impacts on local communities. Moreover, these dams and other large government infrastructure projects have also recently been tied to corruption. Amazon destruction impacts all of us. People must act globally to stop this global project. Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few. Wherever you are in the world, your voice matters. Add your name to help keep the Tapajos alive!

Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/amazonrainforest-hydropower-tapajos-dam-belo-monte/blog/56142/>. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2016. [Adaptado].

In parsing the following sentence, determine what traditional function each unit in the sentence has, according to this code:

N

Noun

A

adjective

P

preposition

V

Verb

PRN

pronoun

AUX

auxiliar

DET

determiner


“Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project”.

Alternativas
Q2744197 Inglês

For questions 43 to 47, refer to the following text:

Time for global business to stop profiting from Amazon destruction

by Tica Minami - 13 April, 2016


Huge hydropower dams in the Amazon rainforest aren't just bad for Indigenous communities, biodiversity and the climate – they're bad for the companies involved. Here's why.


The Amazon is the world's largest remaining area of tropical rainforest, but every day it gets a little smaller – while big business profits get a little bigger. Over 750,000 km² of Amazon rainforest (an area larger than all of France) has already been destroyed by industrial agriculture, cattle ranching, illegal logging and infrastructure projects. And new threats keep coming: this time in the Tapajós River basin.

What's happening in the Tapajós?

The Brazilian government is planning a massive hydropower project for the Tapajós basin – over 40 medium or large dams, including one 7.6 km wide mega-dam. This dam alone would flood an area of rainforest the size of New York City, threatening the livelihoods of the Indigenous Munduruku People who have lived along the Tapajós River for centuries. The mega-dam – called São Luiz do Tapajós – doesn't just threaten local communities and ecosystems. It also harms the climate. Building the massive structure produces substantial emissions, as does the decay of flooded rainforest vegetation and soil.


Figure 1


So who would want to help build the São Luiz do Tapajós dam?

It takes huge amounts of capital and technology from companies all over the world to build a hydropower dam. Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project and released a new report on their findings – and on the risky nature of Amazon hydropower – today. So far, Greenpeace Brazil has found that the São Luiz do Tapajós dam is attracting the interest of a number of Brazilian and foreign energy companies. None of these companies have announced their intentions publicly yet, though.

What's at stake for companies who get involved with São Luiz do Tapajós dam?

The banks, insurers, suppliers and contractors that become involved in Amazon hydropower projects face serious financial and reputational risks. Hydropower dams attract international attention for their destruction to the environment and impacts on local communities. Moreover, these dams and other large government infrastructure projects have also recently been tied to corruption. Amazon destruction impacts all of us. People must act globally to stop this global project. Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few. Wherever you are in the world, your voice matters. Add your name to help keep the Tapajos alive!

Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/amazonrainforest-hydropower-tapajos-dam-belo-monte/blog/56142/>. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2016. [Adaptado].

On Figure 1, which word play conveys the message written in large font? A

Alternativas
Q2744196 Inglês

For questions 43 to 47, refer to the following text:

Time for global business to stop profiting from Amazon destruction

by Tica Minami - 13 April, 2016


Huge hydropower dams in the Amazon rainforest aren't just bad for Indigenous communities, biodiversity and the climate – they're bad for the companies involved. Here's why.


The Amazon is the world's largest remaining area of tropical rainforest, but every day it gets a little smaller – while big business profits get a little bigger. Over 750,000 km² of Amazon rainforest (an area larger than all of France) has already been destroyed by industrial agriculture, cattle ranching, illegal logging and infrastructure projects. And new threats keep coming: this time in the Tapajós River basin.

What's happening in the Tapajós?

The Brazilian government is planning a massive hydropower project for the Tapajós basin – over 40 medium or large dams, including one 7.6 km wide mega-dam. This dam alone would flood an area of rainforest the size of New York City, threatening the livelihoods of the Indigenous Munduruku People who have lived along the Tapajós River for centuries. The mega-dam – called São Luiz do Tapajós – doesn't just threaten local communities and ecosystems. It also harms the climate. Building the massive structure produces substantial emissions, as does the decay of flooded rainforest vegetation and soil.


Figure 1


So who would want to help build the São Luiz do Tapajós dam?

It takes huge amounts of capital and technology from companies all over the world to build a hydropower dam. Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project and released a new report on their findings – and on the risky nature of Amazon hydropower – today. So far, Greenpeace Brazil has found that the São Luiz do Tapajós dam is attracting the interest of a number of Brazilian and foreign energy companies. None of these companies have announced their intentions publicly yet, though.

What's at stake for companies who get involved with São Luiz do Tapajós dam?

The banks, insurers, suppliers and contractors that become involved in Amazon hydropower projects face serious financial and reputational risks. Hydropower dams attract international attention for their destruction to the environment and impacts on local communities. Moreover, these dams and other large government infrastructure projects have also recently been tied to corruption. Amazon destruction impacts all of us. People must act globally to stop this global project. Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few. Wherever you are in the world, your voice matters. Add your name to help keep the Tapajos alive!

Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/amazonrainforest-hydropower-tapajos-dam-belo-monte/blog/56142/>. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2016. [Adaptado].

Considering the threats to the livelihoods of the indigenous people, the power of weather harm represented by the building of the hydropower project for the Tapajós basin is compared to

Alternativas
Q2744195 Inglês

For questions 43 to 47, refer to the following text:

Time for global business to stop profiting from Amazon destruction

by Tica Minami - 13 April, 2016


Huge hydropower dams in the Amazon rainforest aren't just bad for Indigenous communities, biodiversity and the climate – they're bad for the companies involved. Here's why.


The Amazon is the world's largest remaining area of tropical rainforest, but every day it gets a little smaller – while big business profits get a little bigger. Over 750,000 km² of Amazon rainforest (an area larger than all of France) has already been destroyed by industrial agriculture, cattle ranching, illegal logging and infrastructure projects. And new threats keep coming: this time in the Tapajós River basin.

What's happening in the Tapajós?

The Brazilian government is planning a massive hydropower project for the Tapajós basin – over 40 medium or large dams, including one 7.6 km wide mega-dam. This dam alone would flood an area of rainforest the size of New York City, threatening the livelihoods of the Indigenous Munduruku People who have lived along the Tapajós River for centuries. The mega-dam – called São Luiz do Tapajós – doesn't just threaten local communities and ecosystems. It also harms the climate. Building the massive structure produces substantial emissions, as does the decay of flooded rainforest vegetation and soil.


Figure 1


So who would want to help build the São Luiz do Tapajós dam?

It takes huge amounts of capital and technology from companies all over the world to build a hydropower dam. Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project and released a new report on their findings – and on the risky nature of Amazon hydropower – today. So far, Greenpeace Brazil has found that the São Luiz do Tapajós dam is attracting the interest of a number of Brazilian and foreign energy companies. None of these companies have announced their intentions publicly yet, though.

What's at stake for companies who get involved with São Luiz do Tapajós dam?

The banks, insurers, suppliers and contractors that become involved in Amazon hydropower projects face serious financial and reputational risks. Hydropower dams attract international attention for their destruction to the environment and impacts on local communities. Moreover, these dams and other large government infrastructure projects have also recently been tied to corruption. Amazon destruction impacts all of us. People must act globally to stop this global project. Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few. Wherever you are in the world, your voice matters. Add your name to help keep the Tapajos alive!

Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/amazonrainforest-hydropower-tapajos-dam-belo-monte/blog/56142/>. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2016. [Adaptado].

The text discusses some drawbacks for the companies involved in building up Amazon hydropower dams. One of them is the

Alternativas
Q2744194 Inglês

In the sentence “Oh, dear, you must have heard my mantelpiece story, almost everyone ______”, the appropriate verb form for the ellipsis is

Alternativas
Q2744193 Inglês

Read the following text to answer question 41.

Disponível em: <http://dir.indiamart.com/faridabad/advertisement-designing-services.html>. Acesso em: 2 abr. 2016.

The image shows a motto which contains a deviation from standard English grammar in that it

Alternativas
Q2743709 Inglês

Read the excerpt below and answer the questions 34 to 40.


  1. The transfer of Alaska from Russia to the United States formed one of those unbelievable incidents of
  2. history because by 1867, Russia was nervously eager to get rid of it, while the United States still
  3. recovering from the Civil War and immersed in the impending impeachment of President Johnson,
  4. refused to accept it on any terms.
  5. At this impasse an extraordinary man monopolized center stage. He was not a Russian, a fact which
  6. would become important more than a century later, but a soi-disant baron of dubious background; half
  7. Austrian, half Italian, and a charmer who was picked up in 1841 for temporary duty representing Russia in
  8. the United States and who lingered there till 1868. In that time, Edouard de Stoeckl, parading himself as a
  9. nobleman, although no one could say for sure how or when or even if he had earned his title, became
  10. such an ardent friend of America that he married an American heiress and took upon himself the task of
  11. acting as marriage broker between Russia, which he called homeland, and the United States, his adopted
  12. residence.
  13. He faced a most difficult task, for when the United States showed hesitancy about accepting Alaska,
  14. support for the sale withered in Russia, and later when Russia wanted to sell, half a dozen of the most
  15. influential American politicians led by Secretary of State William Seward of New York looked far into the
  16. future and saw the desirability of acquiring Alaska to serve as America's artic bastion, yet the hard-
  17. headed businessmen in the Senate, the House and the general public opposed the purchase with all the
  18. scorn they could summon. 'Seward's Icebox' and 'Seward's Folly' were two of the gentler jibes. Some
  19. critics accused Seward of being in the pay of the Russians; others accused De Stoeckl of buying votes in
  20. the House. One sharp satirist claimed that Alaska contained nothing but polar bears and Eskimos, and
  21. many protested that America should not accept this useless, frozen domain even if Russia wanted to give
  22. it away.
  23. Many pointed out that Alaska had no wealth of any kind, not even reindeer, which proliferated in other
  24. northern areas, and experts affirmed that an arctic area like this could not possibly have any minerals or
  25. other deposits of value. On and on went the abuse of this unknown and somewhat terrifying land, and the
  26. castigations would have been comical had they not influenced American thinking and behavior and
  27. condemned Alaska to decades of neglect.
  28. But an ingenious man like Baron de Stoeckl was not easily diverted from his main target, and with
  29. Seward's unflinching support and admirable statesmanship, the sale squeaked by with a favorable margin
  30. of one vote. By such a narrow margin did the United States come close to losing one of her potentially
  31. valuable acquisitions, but of course, had one viewed Alaska from the vantage point of frozen Fort Nulato
  32. in 1867, with the thermometer at minus-fifty-seven and about to be attacked by hostile Athapascans, the
  33. purchase at more than $7,000,000 would have seemed a poor bargain.
  34. Now the comedy intensified, became burlesque, for although the U.S Senate had bought the place,
  35. the U.S. House refused to appropriate the money to pay for it, and for many tense months the sale hung
  36. in the balance. When a favorable vote was finally taken, it was almost negated by the discovery that
  37. Baron de Stoeckl had disposed of $125,000 in cash for which he refused to give an accounting. Widely
  38. suspected of having bribed congressmen to vote for land that was obviously worthless, the baron waited
  39. until the sale was completed, then quietly slipped out of the country, his life's ambition having been
  40. achieved.
  41. One congressman with a keen sense of history, economics and geopolitics said of the whole affair:
  42. 'If we were so eager to show Russia our appreciation of the help she gave us during the Civil War, why
  43. didn't we give her the seven million and tell her to keep her damned colony? It'll never be of any use to
  44. us.'

Excerpt from: MICHENER, James A. Alaska. Fawcett Books: New York, 1988, p. 369 - 370.

Consider the statements below:


I. The verbs 'claimed' (line 20), 'pointed out' (line 23), and 'affirmed' (line 24) are verbs of saying;

II. The sentence 'Alaska contained nothing' (line 20) can be rewritten as 'Alaska did not contain anything';

III. The sentence 'Baron de Stoeckl had disposed of $125,000 in cash' (lines 37) means that the Baron won that sum of money only after the negotiations were finished.

Alternativas
Q2743708 Inglês

Read the excerpt below and answer the questions 34 to 40.


  1. The transfer of Alaska from Russia to the United States formed one of those unbelievable incidents of
  2. history because by 1867, Russia was nervously eager to get rid of it, while the United States still
  3. recovering from the Civil War and immersed in the impending impeachment of President Johnson,
  4. refused to accept it on any terms.
  5. At this impasse an extraordinary man monopolized center stage. He was not a Russian, a fact which
  6. would become important more than a century later, but a soi-disant baron of dubious background; half
  7. Austrian, half Italian, and a charmer who was picked up in 1841 for temporary duty representing Russia in
  8. the United States and who lingered there till 1868. In that time, Edouard de Stoeckl, parading himself as a
  9. nobleman, although no one could say for sure how or when or even if he had earned his title, became
  10. such an ardent friend of America that he married an American heiress and took upon himself the task of
  11. acting as marriage broker between Russia, which he called homeland, and the United States, his adopted
  12. residence.
  13. He faced a most difficult task, for when the United States showed hesitancy about accepting Alaska,
  14. support for the sale withered in Russia, and later when Russia wanted to sell, half a dozen of the most
  15. influential American politicians led by Secretary of State William Seward of New York looked far into the
  16. future and saw the desirability of acquiring Alaska to serve as America's artic bastion, yet the hard-
  17. headed businessmen in the Senate, the House and the general public opposed the purchase with all the
  18. scorn they could summon. 'Seward's Icebox' and 'Seward's Folly' were two of the gentler jibes. Some
  19. critics accused Seward of being in the pay of the Russians; others accused De Stoeckl of buying votes in
  20. the House. One sharp satirist claimed that Alaska contained nothing but polar bears and Eskimos, and
  21. many protested that America should not accept this useless, frozen domain even if Russia wanted to give
  22. it away.
  23. Many pointed out that Alaska had no wealth of any kind, not even reindeer, which proliferated in other
  24. northern areas, and experts affirmed that an arctic area like this could not possibly have any minerals or
  25. other deposits of value. On and on went the abuse of this unknown and somewhat terrifying land, and the
  26. castigations would have been comical had they not influenced American thinking and behavior and
  27. condemned Alaska to decades of neglect.
  28. But an ingenious man like Baron de Stoeckl was not easily diverted from his main target, and with
  29. Seward's unflinching support and admirable statesmanship, the sale squeaked by with a favorable margin
  30. of one vote. By such a narrow margin did the United States come close to losing one of her potentially
  31. valuable acquisitions, but of course, had one viewed Alaska from the vantage point of frozen Fort Nulato
  32. in 1867, with the thermometer at minus-fifty-seven and about to be attacked by hostile Athapascans, the
  33. purchase at more than $7,000,000 would have seemed a poor bargain.
  34. Now the comedy intensified, became burlesque, for although the U.S Senate had bought the place,
  35. the U.S. House refused to appropriate the money to pay for it, and for many tense months the sale hung
  36. in the balance. When a favorable vote was finally taken, it was almost negated by the discovery that
  37. Baron de Stoeckl had disposed of $125,000 in cash for which he refused to give an accounting. Widely
  38. suspected of having bribed congressmen to vote for land that was obviously worthless, the baron waited
  39. until the sale was completed, then quietly slipped out of the country, his life's ambition having been
  40. achieved.
  41. One congressman with a keen sense of history, economics and geopolitics said of the whole affair:
  42. 'If we were so eager to show Russia our appreciation of the help she gave us during the Civil War, why
  43. didn't we give her the seven million and tell her to keep her damned colony? It'll never be of any use to
  44. us.'

Excerpt from: MICHENER, James A. Alaska. Fawcett Books: New York, 1988, p. 369 - 370.

The word 'pay' may be both a noun, as in 'the pay' (line 19) and a verb, as in 'to pay' (line 35) without having to change its spelling. The same may occur to all the words bellow, EXCEPT for:

Alternativas
Q2743707 Inglês

Read the excerpt below and answer the questions 34 to 40.


  1. The transfer of Alaska from Russia to the United States formed one of those unbelievable incidents of
  2. history because by 1867, Russia was nervously eager to get rid of it, while the United States still
  3. recovering from the Civil War and immersed in the impending impeachment of President Johnson,
  4. refused to accept it on any terms.
  5. At this impasse an extraordinary man monopolized center stage. He was not a Russian, a fact which
  6. would become important more than a century later, but a soi-disant baron of dubious background; half
  7. Austrian, half Italian, and a charmer who was picked up in 1841 for temporary duty representing Russia in
  8. the United States and who lingered there till 1868. In that time, Edouard de Stoeckl, parading himself as a
  9. nobleman, although no one could say for sure how or when or even if he had earned his title, became
  10. such an ardent friend of America that he married an American heiress and took upon himself the task of
  11. acting as marriage broker between Russia, which he called homeland, and the United States, his adopted
  12. residence.
  13. He faced a most difficult task, for when the United States showed hesitancy about accepting Alaska,
  14. support for the sale withered in Russia, and later when Russia wanted to sell, half a dozen of the most
  15. influential American politicians led by Secretary of State William Seward of New York looked far into the
  16. future and saw the desirability of acquiring Alaska to serve as America's artic bastion, yet the hard-
  17. headed businessmen in the Senate, the House and the general public opposed the purchase with all the
  18. scorn they could summon. 'Seward's Icebox' and 'Seward's Folly' were two of the gentler jibes. Some
  19. critics accused Seward of being in the pay of the Russians; others accused De Stoeckl of buying votes in
  20. the House. One sharp satirist claimed that Alaska contained nothing but polar bears and Eskimos, and
  21. many protested that America should not accept this useless, frozen domain even if Russia wanted to give
  22. it away.
  23. Many pointed out that Alaska had no wealth of any kind, not even reindeer, which proliferated in other
  24. northern areas, and experts affirmed that an arctic area like this could not possibly have any minerals or
  25. other deposits of value. On and on went the abuse of this unknown and somewhat terrifying land, and the
  26. castigations would have been comical had they not influenced American thinking and behavior and
  27. condemned Alaska to decades of neglect.
  28. But an ingenious man like Baron de Stoeckl was not easily diverted from his main target, and with
  29. Seward's unflinching support and admirable statesmanship, the sale squeaked by with a favorable margin
  30. of one vote. By such a narrow margin did the United States come close to losing one of her potentially
  31. valuable acquisitions, but of course, had one viewed Alaska from the vantage point of frozen Fort Nulato
  32. in 1867, with the thermometer at minus-fifty-seven and about to be attacked by hostile Athapascans, the
  33. purchase at more than $7,000,000 would have seemed a poor bargain.
  34. Now the comedy intensified, became burlesque, for although the U.S Senate had bought the place,
  35. the U.S. House refused to appropriate the money to pay for it, and for many tense months the sale hung
  36. in the balance. When a favorable vote was finally taken, it was almost negated by the discovery that
  37. Baron de Stoeckl had disposed of $125,000 in cash for which he refused to give an accounting. Widely
  38. suspected of having bribed congressmen to vote for land that was obviously worthless, the baron waited
  39. until the sale was completed, then quietly slipped out of the country, his life's ambition having been
  40. achieved.
  41. One congressman with a keen sense of history, economics and geopolitics said of the whole affair:
  42. 'If we were so eager to show Russia our appreciation of the help she gave us during the Civil War, why
  43. didn't we give her the seven million and tell her to keep her damned colony? It'll never be of any use to
  44. us.'

Excerpt from: MICHENER, James A. Alaska. Fawcett Books: New York, 1988, p. 369 - 370.

The clauses 'the castigations would have been comical' and 'had they not influenced American thinking...' present the same grammatical relation as in:

Alternativas
Q2743706 Inglês

Read the excerpt below and answer the questions 34 to 40.


  1. The transfer of Alaska from Russia to the United States formed one of those unbelievable incidents of
  2. history because by 1867, Russia was nervously eager to get rid of it, while the United States still
  3. recovering from the Civil War and immersed in the impending impeachment of President Johnson,
  4. refused to accept it on any terms.
  5. At this impasse an extraordinary man monopolized center stage. He was not a Russian, a fact which
  6. would become important more than a century later, but a soi-disant baron of dubious background; half
  7. Austrian, half Italian, and a charmer who was picked up in 1841 for temporary duty representing Russia in
  8. the United States and who lingered there till 1868. In that time, Edouard de Stoeckl, parading himself as a
  9. nobleman, although no one could say for sure how or when or even if he had earned his title, became
  10. such an ardent friend of America that he married an American heiress and took upon himself the task of
  11. acting as marriage broker between Russia, which he called homeland, and the United States, his adopted
  12. residence.
  13. He faced a most difficult task, for when the United States showed hesitancy about accepting Alaska,
  14. support for the sale withered in Russia, and later when Russia wanted to sell, half a dozen of the most
  15. influential American politicians led by Secretary of State William Seward of New York looked far into the
  16. future and saw the desirability of acquiring Alaska to serve as America's artic bastion, yet the hard-
  17. headed businessmen in the Senate, the House and the general public opposed the purchase with all the
  18. scorn they could summon. 'Seward's Icebox' and 'Seward's Folly' were two of the gentler jibes. Some
  19. critics accused Seward of being in the pay of the Russians; others accused De Stoeckl of buying votes in
  20. the House. One sharp satirist claimed that Alaska contained nothing but polar bears and Eskimos, and
  21. many protested that America should not accept this useless, frozen domain even if Russia wanted to give
  22. it away.
  23. Many pointed out that Alaska had no wealth of any kind, not even reindeer, which proliferated in other
  24. northern areas, and experts affirmed that an arctic area like this could not possibly have any minerals or
  25. other deposits of value. On and on went the abuse of this unknown and somewhat terrifying land, and the
  26. castigations would have been comical had they not influenced American thinking and behavior and
  27. condemned Alaska to decades of neglect.
  28. But an ingenious man like Baron de Stoeckl was not easily diverted from his main target, and with
  29. Seward's unflinching support and admirable statesmanship, the sale squeaked by with a favorable margin
  30. of one vote. By such a narrow margin did the United States come close to losing one of her potentially
  31. valuable acquisitions, but of course, had one viewed Alaska from the vantage point of frozen Fort Nulato
  32. in 1867, with the thermometer at minus-fifty-seven and about to be attacked by hostile Athapascans, the
  33. purchase at more than $7,000,000 would have seemed a poor bargain.
  34. Now the comedy intensified, became burlesque, for although the U.S Senate had bought the place,
  35. the U.S. House refused to appropriate the money to pay for it, and for many tense months the sale hung
  36. in the balance. When a favorable vote was finally taken, it was almost negated by the discovery that
  37. Baron de Stoeckl had disposed of $125,000 in cash for which he refused to give an accounting. Widely
  38. suspected of having bribed congressmen to vote for land that was obviously worthless, the baron waited
  39. until the sale was completed, then quietly slipped out of the country, his life's ambition having been
  40. achieved.
  41. One congressman with a keen sense of history, economics and geopolitics said of the whole affair:
  42. 'If we were so eager to show Russia our appreciation of the help she gave us during the Civil War, why
  43. didn't we give her the seven million and tell her to keep her damned colony? It'll never be of any use to
  44. us.'

Excerpt from: MICHENER, James A. Alaska. Fawcett Books: New York, 1988, p. 369 - 370.

The sequence 'was not easily diverted' (line 28) presents the same passive voice structure in all of the following, EXCEPT for:

Alternativas
Q2743705 Inglês

Read the excerpt below and answer the questions 34 to 40.


  1. The transfer of Alaska from Russia to the United States formed one of those unbelievable incidents of
  2. history because by 1867, Russia was nervously eager to get rid of it, while the United States still
  3. recovering from the Civil War and immersed in the impending impeachment of President Johnson,
  4. refused to accept it on any terms.
  5. At this impasse an extraordinary man monopolized center stage. He was not a Russian, a fact which
  6. would become important more than a century later, but a soi-disant baron of dubious background; half
  7. Austrian, half Italian, and a charmer who was picked up in 1841 for temporary duty representing Russia in
  8. the United States and who lingered there till 1868. In that time, Edouard de Stoeckl, parading himself as a
  9. nobleman, although no one could say for sure how or when or even if he had earned his title, became
  10. such an ardent friend of America that he married an American heiress and took upon himself the task of
  11. acting as marriage broker between Russia, which he called homeland, and the United States, his adopted
  12. residence.
  13. He faced a most difficult task, for when the United States showed hesitancy about accepting Alaska,
  14. support for the sale withered in Russia, and later when Russia wanted to sell, half a dozen of the most
  15. influential American politicians led by Secretary of State William Seward of New York looked far into the
  16. future and saw the desirability of acquiring Alaska to serve as America's artic bastion, yet the hard-
  17. headed businessmen in the Senate, the House and the general public opposed the purchase with all the
  18. scorn they could summon. 'Seward's Icebox' and 'Seward's Folly' were two of the gentler jibes. Some
  19. critics accused Seward of being in the pay of the Russians; others accused De Stoeckl of buying votes in
  20. the House. One sharp satirist claimed that Alaska contained nothing but polar bears and Eskimos, and
  21. many protested that America should not accept this useless, frozen domain even if Russia wanted to give
  22. it away.
  23. Many pointed out that Alaska had no wealth of any kind, not even reindeer, which proliferated in other
  24. northern areas, and experts affirmed that an arctic area like this could not possibly have any minerals or
  25. other deposits of value. On and on went the abuse of this unknown and somewhat terrifying land, and the
  26. castigations would have been comical had they not influenced American thinking and behavior and
  27. condemned Alaska to decades of neglect.
  28. But an ingenious man like Baron de Stoeckl was not easily diverted from his main target, and with
  29. Seward's unflinching support and admirable statesmanship, the sale squeaked by with a favorable margin
  30. of one vote. By such a narrow margin did the United States come close to losing one of her potentially
  31. valuable acquisitions, but of course, had one viewed Alaska from the vantage point of frozen Fort Nulato
  32. in 1867, with the thermometer at minus-fifty-seven and about to be attacked by hostile Athapascans, the
  33. purchase at more than $7,000,000 would have seemed a poor bargain.
  34. Now the comedy intensified, became burlesque, for although the U.S Senate had bought the place,
  35. the U.S. House refused to appropriate the money to pay for it, and for many tense months the sale hung
  36. in the balance. When a favorable vote was finally taken, it was almost negated by the discovery that
  37. Baron de Stoeckl had disposed of $125,000 in cash for which he refused to give an accounting. Widely
  38. suspected of having bribed congressmen to vote for land that was obviously worthless, the baron waited
  39. until the sale was completed, then quietly slipped out of the country, his life's ambition having been
  40. achieved.
  41. One congressman with a keen sense of history, economics and geopolitics said of the whole affair:
  42. 'If we were so eager to show Russia our appreciation of the help she gave us during the Civil War, why
  43. didn't we give her the seven million and tell her to keep her damned colony? It'll never be of any use to
  44. us.'

Excerpt from: MICHENER, James A. Alaska. Fawcett Books: New York, 1988, p. 369 - 370.

The feature voiceless for the 'th' sound in the word 'worthless' (line 38), considering their ideal phonological pronunciation, is the same as in the following pair of words:

Alternativas
Q2743704 Inglês

Read the excerpt below and answer the questions 34 to 40.


  1. The transfer of Alaska from Russia to the United States formed one of those unbelievable incidents of
  2. history because by 1867, Russia was nervously eager to get rid of it, while the United States still
  3. recovering from the Civil War and immersed in the impending impeachment of President Johnson,
  4. refused to accept it on any terms.
  5. At this impasse an extraordinary man monopolized center stage. He was not a Russian, a fact which
  6. would become important more than a century later, but a soi-disant baron of dubious background; half
  7. Austrian, half Italian, and a charmer who was picked up in 1841 for temporary duty representing Russia in
  8. the United States and who lingered there till 1868. In that time, Edouard de Stoeckl, parading himself as a
  9. nobleman, although no one could say for sure how or when or even if he had earned his title, became
  10. such an ardent friend of America that he married an American heiress and took upon himself the task of
  11. acting as marriage broker between Russia, which he called homeland, and the United States, his adopted
  12. residence.
  13. He faced a most difficult task, for when the United States showed hesitancy about accepting Alaska,
  14. support for the sale withered in Russia, and later when Russia wanted to sell, half a dozen of the most
  15. influential American politicians led by Secretary of State William Seward of New York looked far into the
  16. future and saw the desirability of acquiring Alaska to serve as America's artic bastion, yet the hard-
  17. headed businessmen in the Senate, the House and the general public opposed the purchase with all the
  18. scorn they could summon. 'Seward's Icebox' and 'Seward's Folly' were two of the gentler jibes. Some
  19. critics accused Seward of being in the pay of the Russians; others accused De Stoeckl of buying votes in
  20. the House. One sharp satirist claimed that Alaska contained nothing but polar bears and Eskimos, and
  21. many protested that America should not accept this useless, frozen domain even if Russia wanted to give
  22. it away.
  23. Many pointed out that Alaska had no wealth of any kind, not even reindeer, which proliferated in other
  24. northern areas, and experts affirmed that an arctic area like this could not possibly have any minerals or
  25. other deposits of value. On and on went the abuse of this unknown and somewhat terrifying land, and the
  26. castigations would have been comical had they not influenced American thinking and behavior and
  27. condemned Alaska to decades of neglect.
  28. But an ingenious man like Baron de Stoeckl was not easily diverted from his main target, and with
  29. Seward's unflinching support and admirable statesmanship, the sale squeaked by with a favorable margin
  30. of one vote. By such a narrow margin did the United States come close to losing one of her potentially
  31. valuable acquisitions, but of course, had one viewed Alaska from the vantage point of frozen Fort Nulato
  32. in 1867, with the thermometer at minus-fifty-seven and about to be attacked by hostile Athapascans, the
  33. purchase at more than $7,000,000 would have seemed a poor bargain.
  34. Now the comedy intensified, became burlesque, for although the U.S Senate had bought the place,
  35. the U.S. House refused to appropriate the money to pay for it, and for many tense months the sale hung
  36. in the balance. When a favorable vote was finally taken, it was almost negated by the discovery that
  37. Baron de Stoeckl had disposed of $125,000 in cash for which he refused to give an accounting. Widely
  38. suspected of having bribed congressmen to vote for land that was obviously worthless, the baron waited
  39. until the sale was completed, then quietly slipped out of the country, his life's ambition having been
  40. achieved.
  41. One congressman with a keen sense of history, economics and geopolitics said of the whole affair:
  42. 'If we were so eager to show Russia our appreciation of the help she gave us during the Civil War, why
  43. didn't we give her the seven million and tell her to keep her damned colony? It'll never be of any use to
  44. us.'

Excerpt from: MICHENER, James A. Alaska. Fawcett Books: New York, 1988, p. 369 - 370.

The sentence 'But an ingenious man like Baron de Stoeckl was not easily diverted from his main target' (line 28) could be paraphrased only by the following sentence:

Alternativas
Q2743703 Inglês

Read the excerpt below and answer the questions 34 to 40.


  1. The transfer of Alaska from Russia to the United States formed one of those unbelievable incidents of
  2. history because by 1867, Russia was nervously eager to get rid of it, while the United States still
  3. recovering from the Civil War and immersed in the impending impeachment of President Johnson,
  4. refused to accept it on any terms.
  5. At this impasse an extraordinary man monopolized center stage. He was not a Russian, a fact which
  6. would become important more than a century later, but a soi-disant baron of dubious background; half
  7. Austrian, half Italian, and a charmer who was picked up in 1841 for temporary duty representing Russia in
  8. the United States and who lingered there till 1868. In that time, Edouard de Stoeckl, parading himself as a
  9. nobleman, although no one could say for sure how or when or even if he had earned his title, became
  10. such an ardent friend of America that he married an American heiress and took upon himself the task of
  11. acting as marriage broker between Russia, which he called homeland, and the United States, his adopted
  12. residence.
  13. He faced a most difficult task, for when the United States showed hesitancy about accepting Alaska,
  14. support for the sale withered in Russia, and later when Russia wanted to sell, half a dozen of the most
  15. influential American politicians led by Secretary of State William Seward of New York looked far into the
  16. future and saw the desirability of acquiring Alaska to serve as America's artic bastion, yet the hard-
  17. headed businessmen in the Senate, the House and the general public opposed the purchase with all the
  18. scorn they could summon. 'Seward's Icebox' and 'Seward's Folly' were two of the gentler jibes. Some
  19. critics accused Seward of being in the pay of the Russians; others accused De Stoeckl of buying votes in
  20. the House. One sharp satirist claimed that Alaska contained nothing but polar bears and Eskimos, and
  21. many protested that America should not accept this useless, frozen domain even if Russia wanted to give
  22. it away.
  23. Many pointed out that Alaska had no wealth of any kind, not even reindeer, which proliferated in other
  24. northern areas, and experts affirmed that an arctic area like this could not possibly have any minerals or
  25. other deposits of value. On and on went the abuse of this unknown and somewhat terrifying land, and the
  26. castigations would have been comical had they not influenced American thinking and behavior and
  27. condemned Alaska to decades of neglect.
  28. But an ingenious man like Baron de Stoeckl was not easily diverted from his main target, and with
  29. Seward's unflinching support and admirable statesmanship, the sale squeaked by with a favorable margin
  30. of one vote. By such a narrow margin did the United States come close to losing one of her potentially
  31. valuable acquisitions, but of course, had one viewed Alaska from the vantage point of frozen Fort Nulato
  32. in 1867, with the thermometer at minus-fifty-seven and about to be attacked by hostile Athapascans, the
  33. purchase at more than $7,000,000 would have seemed a poor bargain.
  34. Now the comedy intensified, became burlesque, for although the U.S Senate had bought the place,
  35. the U.S. House refused to appropriate the money to pay for it, and for many tense months the sale hung
  36. in the balance. When a favorable vote was finally taken, it was almost negated by the discovery that
  37. Baron de Stoeckl had disposed of $125,000 in cash for which he refused to give an accounting. Widely
  38. suspected of having bribed congressmen to vote for land that was obviously worthless, the baron waited
  39. until the sale was completed, then quietly slipped out of the country, his life's ambition having been
  40. achieved.
  41. One congressman with a keen sense of history, economics and geopolitics said of the whole affair:
  42. 'If we were so eager to show Russia our appreciation of the help she gave us during the Civil War, why
  43. didn't we give her the seven million and tell her to keep her damned colony? It'll never be of any use to
  44. us.'

Excerpt from: MICHENER, James A. Alaska. Fawcett Books: New York, 1988, p. 369 - 370.

Considering the whole excerpt, it is possible to say that:


I. the author depicts the historical facts, but shows his opinion by using irony;

II. the author describes the process by which the USA bought the Alaska territory, which belonged to Russia.

III. the statements ‘One sharp satirist' (line 20) and 'One congressman' (line 41) express the author’s own opinions and the ideas of historical characters whose names were not worth mentioning respectively.

Alternativas
Respostas
2681: C
2682: B
2683: D
2684: A
2685: B
2686: B
2687: C
2688: C
2689: B
2690: A
2691: B
2692: C
2693: C
2694: D
2695: C
2696: B
2697: E
2698: A
2699: D
2700: A