Questões de Concurso Sobre inglês

Foram encontradas 17.876 questões

Q1702400 Inglês
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: how are you? (como vai?).

II. O trecho em inglês “here you are” possui a grafia correta e pode ser adequadamente traduzido para: aqui está.

Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1702399 Inglês
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: how long have you been in England? (quanto tempo faz que está na Inglaterra?).

II. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: he was to have written (ele devia ter escrito).

Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1702398 Inglês
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: how is this? (o que significa isto?).

II. O trecho em inglês “let me be runner!” possui a grafia correta e pode ser adequadamente traduzido para: deixe me em paz!.

Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1702397 Inglês
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. O trecho em inglês “it is for him to escuse hinself” possui a grafia correta e pode ser adequadamente traduzido para: ele é quem deve pedir desculpas.

II. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: if I were to do it (se eu o fizesse).

Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1702396 Inglês
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. O trecho em inglês “he was a long time about it” possui a grafia correta e pode ser adequadamente traduzido para: ele levou muito tempo para isto.

II. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: I am for leaving (sou de opinião que devemos partir).

Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1702395 Inglês
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. O trecho em inglês “it is four you to” possui a grafia correta e pode ser adequadamente traduzido para: a decisão cabe a você.

II. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: the house is to down over (a casa está para alugar).

Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1702394 Inglês
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: how much is this dress? (quanto custa este vestido?).

II. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: Mrs. Jones that is to horsing (a futura senhora Jones).

Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1702393 Inglês
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: how was it that he did not come? (por que ele não veio?).

II. O trecho em inglês “as it were” possui a grafia correta e pode ser adequadamente traduzido para: por assim dizer.

Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1702392 Inglês
Analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: that’s him excused over (isto é típico dele).

II. Estão corretas a grafia e a tradução do seguinte trecho, em inglês: how are we to go on? (como vamos continuar? ou que será de nós?).

Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Ano: 2017 Banca: IESES Órgão: IGP-SC Prova: IESES - 2017 - IGP-SC - Perito Odontolegista |
Q1701527 Inglês

UNEARTHED: REMAINS OF THE EARLIEST KNOWN TSUNAMI VICTIM

By Charles Choi | October 25, 2017 1:00 pm

Paragraph 1 Tsunamis have claimed hundreds of thousands of lives in the past two decades. Now a new study finds that a 6,000-year-old skull may come from the earliest known victim of these killer waves.

Paragraph 2 The partial human skull was discovered in 1929 buried in a mangrove swamp outside the small town of Aitape Papua New Guinea, about 500 miles north of Australia. Scientists originally thought it belonged to an ancient extinct human species, Homo erectus. However, subsequent research dated it to about 5,000 or 6,000 years in age, suggesting that it instead belonged to a modern human. 

A Rare Specimen

Paragraph 3 The skull is one of just two examples of ancient human remains found in Papua New Guinea after more than a century of work there. As such, archaeologists wanted to learn more about this skull to elucidate how people settled this region.

Paragraph 4 The scientists went back to where this skull was found and sampled the soil in which it was discovered. They focused on details such as sediment grain size and composition.

Paragraph 5 In the sediment, the researchers discovered a range of microscopic organisms from the ocean known as diatoms. These were similar to ones found in the soil after a 1998 tsunami killed more than 2,000 people in Papua New Guinea — for instance, their shells of silica were broken, likely by extremely powerful forces. 

Paragraph 6 These diatom shells, combined with the chemical compositions and the size ranges of the grains, all suggest that a tsunami occurred when the skull was buried. The researchers suggested the catastrophe either directly killed the person or ripped open their grave.

Paragraph 7 Tsunamis, which are giant waves caused by earthquakes, volcanic eruptions or underwater landslides, are some of the deadliest natural disasters known. The 2004 tsunami in the Indian Ocean killed more than 230,000 people, a higher death toll than any fire or hurricane.

Paragraph 8 The site where the skull was found is currently about 7.5 miles away from the coast. Still, the researchers noted that back when whoever the skull belonged to was alive, sea levels were higher, and the area would have been just behind the shoreline.

Paragraph 9 The waves of the tsunami that hit Papua New Guinea in 1998 reached more than 50 feet high and penetrated up to three miles inland. “If the event we have identified resulted from a similar process, it could have also resulted in extremely high waves,” study co-lead author Mark Golitko, an archaeologist at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana and the Field Museum in Chicago.

Paragraph 10 These results show “that coastal populations have been vulnerable to such events for thousands of years,” Golitko said. “People have managed to live with such unpredictable and destructive occurrences, but it highlights how vulnerable people living near the sea can be. Given the far larger populations that live along coastlines today, the potential impacts are far more severe now.”

Paragraph 11 Golitko plans to return to the area over the next few years “to further study the frequency of such events, how the environment changed over time, and how people have coped with the environmental challenges of living in that environment.” He and his colleagues detailed their findings Wednesday in the journal PLOS O.

Retrieved and adapted from:

<http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2017/10/25/first-tsunami-victim/#.WfYiYmhSzIU Accessed on October, 29th, 2017


According to paragraph 10, the correct alternative is:
Alternativas
Q1700807 Inglês
What`s the meaning of the expression "hard to swallow"?
Alternativas
Q1700806 Inglês

Complete with the CORRECT word for the phrase below:


There wasn`t _______ at home

Alternativas
Q1700804 Inglês
A BNCC aponta seis competências específicas da Língua Inglesa para o Ensino Fundamental, dentre elas:
I. Identificar similaridades e diferenças entre a língua inglesa e a língua materna/outras línguas, articulando-as a aspectos sociais, culturais e identitários, em uma relação intrínseca entre língua, cultura e identidade. II. Conhecer diferentes patrimônios culturais, materiais e imateriais, difundidos na língua inglesa, com vistas ao exercício da fruição e da ampliação de perspectivas no contato com diferentes manifestações artístico-culturais. III. Utilizar novas tecnologias, com novas linguagens e modos de interação, para pesquisar, selecionar, compartilhar, posicionar-se e produzir sentidos em práticas de letramento na língua inglesa, de forma ética, crítica e responsável. IV. Identificar o lugar de si e o do outro em um mundo plurilíngue e multicultural, refletindo, criticamente, sobre como a aprendizagem da língua inglesa contribui para a inserção dos sujeitos no mundo globalizado, inclusive no que concerne ao mundo do trabalho. V. Comunicar-se na língua inglesa, por meio do uso variado de linguagens em mídias impressas ou digitais, reconhecendo-a como ferramenta de acesso ao conhecimento, de ampliação das perspectivas e de possibilidades para a compreensão dos valores e interesses de outras culturas e para o exercício do protagonismo social.
Assinale a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1697359 Inglês
Protest

Women’s March plans return to D.C. in October to protest Supreme Court nomination.

 Protesters fill the streets of Washington during the Women's March after President Trump's inauguration in 2017.

(Oliver Contreras for The Washington Post)

The day after President Trump’s inauguration in 2017, the Women’s March drew millions of people to the streets of Washington, D.C., and cities across the country in a collective display of outrage and grief that was widely considered the largest single-day protest in American history. 

As another presidential election nears and as the nation faces a deadly pandemic, historic racial justice protests and a contentious Supreme Court nomination process, the Women’s March organizers are hoping to, once again, channel grief and fear into action. But this time, they’re not waiting until January.

Last week, the Women’s March organization said it is planning a “socially distant march” in Washington and more than 30 other cities on Oct. 17, days before Senate Republicans aim to vote on Trump’s pick to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. Trump has nominated Amy Coney Barrett, a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, whose writings have led conservatives and liberals to believe she would be willing to vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. She has also been critical of a 2012 Supreme Court decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act.  

By Samantha Schmidt, The Washington Post, September, 28, 2020 (https://wapo.st/35v9HhB).
Leia o texto 'Protest' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. No texto, o trecho “She has also been critical of a 2012 Supreme Court decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act” traz a palavra “upheld”, que significa suspendeu. II. De acordo com as informações do texto, pode-se concluir que Amy Coney Barrett é uma juíza na corte americana de apelações. Marque a alternativa CORRETA: 
Alternativas
Q1697358 Inglês
Protest

Women’s March plans return to D.C. in October to protest Supreme Court nomination.

 Protesters fill the streets of Washington during the Women's March after President Trump's inauguration in 2017.

(Oliver Contreras for The Washington Post)

The day after President Trump’s inauguration in 2017, the Women’s March drew millions of people to the streets of Washington, D.C., and cities across the country in a collective display of outrage and grief that was widely considered the largest single-day protest in American history. 

As another presidential election nears and as the nation faces a deadly pandemic, historic racial justice protests and a contentious Supreme Court nomination process, the Women’s March organizers are hoping to, once again, channel grief and fear into action. But this time, they’re not waiting until January.

Last week, the Women’s March organization said it is planning a “socially distant march” in Washington and more than 30 other cities on Oct. 17, days before Senate Republicans aim to vote on Trump’s pick to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. Trump has nominated Amy Coney Barrett, a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, whose writings have led conservatives and liberals to believe she would be willing to vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. She has also been critical of a 2012 Supreme Court decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act.  

By Samantha Schmidt, The Washington Post, September, 28, 2020 (https://wapo.st/35v9HhB).
Leia o texto 'Protest' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. As informações presentes no texto permitem concluir que os organizadores da “Woman’s March” esperam, novamente, canalizar o seu luto e medo em ação. II. As informações presentes no texto permitem inferir que no dia após o ato de posse do atual Presidente Donald Trump, a “Woman’s March” levou milhões de pessoas às ruas de Washington D.C.. Marque a alternativa CORRETA: 
Alternativas
Q1697357 Inglês
Protest

Women’s March plans return to D.C. in October to protest Supreme Court nomination.

 Protesters fill the streets of Washington during the Women's March after President Trump's inauguration in 2017.

(Oliver Contreras for The Washington Post)

The day after President Trump’s inauguration in 2017, the Women’s March drew millions of people to the streets of Washington, D.C., and cities across the country in a collective display of outrage and grief that was widely considered the largest single-day protest in American history. 

As another presidential election nears and as the nation faces a deadly pandemic, historic racial justice protests and a contentious Supreme Court nomination process, the Women’s March organizers are hoping to, once again, channel grief and fear into action. But this time, they’re not waiting until January.

Last week, the Women’s March organization said it is planning a “socially distant march” in Washington and more than 30 other cities on Oct. 17, days before Senate Republicans aim to vote on Trump’s pick to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. Trump has nominated Amy Coney Barrett, a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, whose writings have led conservatives and liberals to believe she would be willing to vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. She has also been critical of a 2012 Supreme Court decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act.  

By Samantha Schmidt, The Washington Post, September, 28, 2020 (https://wapo.st/35v9HhB).
Leia o texto 'Protest' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. No texto, o trecho “Women’s March drew millions of people to the streets of Washington, D.C.” traz a palavra “drew”, que significa afastou. II. No texto, o trecho “a contentious Supreme Court nomination process” traz a palavra “contentious”, que significa coordenado. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1697356 Inglês
On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016

People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election.

During the 2016 presidential election, Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation to divide the American electorate. Since then, the social media companies have spent billions of dollars and hired tens of thousands of people to help clean up their act.

People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election, according to new research from the German Marshall Fund Digital, the digital arm of the public policy think tank. The organization, which has a data partnership with the start-up NewsGuard and the social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday.

In total, Facebook likes, comments and shares of articles from news outlets that regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content roughly tripled from the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2020, the group found.

 By Davey Alba, The New York Times (https://nyti.ms/31zUivt).
Leia o texto 'On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. Após a análise do texto, é possível concluir que as pessoas estão mais engajadas no Facebook, com relação aos meios de comunicação que, rotineiramente, publicam desinformação, quando comparado com o ano das eleições de 2016, de acordo com a pesquisa do German Marshall Fund Digital. II. No texto, o trecho “Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation...” traz a palavra “spread”, que significa superar. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1697355 Inglês
On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016

People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election.

During the 2016 presidential election, Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation to divide the American electorate. Since then, the social media companies have spent billions of dollars and hired tens of thousands of people to help clean up their act.

People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election, according to new research from the German Marshall Fund Digital, the digital arm of the public policy think tank. The organization, which has a data partnership with the start-up NewsGuard and the social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday.

In total, Facebook likes, comments and shares of articles from news outlets that regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content roughly tripled from the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2020, the group found.

 By Davey Alba, The New York Times (https://nyti.ms/31zUivt).
Leia o texto 'On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. Após a análise do texto, é possível inferir que as empresas responsáveis pelas redes sociais investiram milhões de dólares para melhorar a acessibilidade dos aplicativos. II. No texto, o trecho “regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content” traz a palavra “misleading”, que significa impreciso. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1697354 Inglês
On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016

People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election.

During the 2016 presidential election, Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation to divide the American electorate. Since then, the social media companies have spent billions of dollars and hired tens of thousands of people to help clean up their act.

People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election, according to new research from the German Marshall Fund Digital, the digital arm of the public policy think tank. The organization, which has a data partnership with the start-up NewsGuard and the social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday.

In total, Facebook likes, comments and shares of articles from news outlets that regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content roughly tripled from the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2020, the group found.

 By Davey Alba, The New York Times (https://nyti.ms/31zUivt).
Leia o texto 'On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. No texto, o trecho “social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday.” traz a palavra “findings”, que significa formular. II. As informações presentes no texto permitem inferir que as pessoas, atualmente, estão mais engajadas no Facebook, com relação aos meios de comunicação que, rotineiramente, publicam desinformação, do que antes das eleições de 2016, como pode ser observado no trecho a seguir: “People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election.”. Marque a alternativa CORRETA:
Alternativas
Q1697353 Inglês
On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016

People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election.

During the 2016 presidential election, Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation to divide the American electorate. Since then, the social media companies have spent billions of dollars and hired tens of thousands of people to help clean up their act.

People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election, according to new research from the German Marshall Fund Digital, the digital arm of the public policy think tank. The organization, which has a data partnership with the start-up NewsGuard and the social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday.

In total, Facebook likes, comments and shares of articles from news outlets that regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content roughly tripled from the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2020, the group found.

 By Davey Alba, The New York Times (https://nyti.ms/31zUivt).
Leia o texto 'On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016' e, em seguida, analise as afirmativas a seguir: I. No texto, o trecho “the social media companies have spent billions of dollars” traz a palavra “spent”, que significa espalhar. II. De acordo com as informações do texto, pode-se concluir que o German Marshall Fund Digital tem uma parceria com a start-up NewsGuard e com a “social media analytics firm NewsWhip”. Marque a alternativa CORRETA: 
Alternativas
Respostas
9021: A
9022: A
9023: B
9024: C
9025: A
9026: D
9027: B
9028: A
9029: C
9030: B
9031: D
9032: C
9033: E
9034: C
9035: A
9036: D
9037: B
9038: D
9039: C
9040: C