Questões de Concurso Público Prefeitura de Niterói - RJ 2018 para Analista de Políticas Públicas e Gestão Governamental - Gestão de Tecnologia

Foram encontradas 80 questões

Q956770 Português
A primeira frase do texto nega
Alternativas
Q956771 Português
O título dado à crônica – Fontes Murmurantes – justifica-se pelo fato de
Alternativas
Q956772 Português

“As fontes em questão são outras, estão atualmente em debate nos meios jornalísticos e legais: o direito de proteger o sigilo das ‘fontes’.”

O mesmo sentido da palavra sublinhada aparece em:

Alternativas
Q956773 Português
Diante do debate sobre o sigilo das fontes jornalísticas, assinale a opção que indica a posição do autor do texto.
Alternativas
Q956774 Português
Depreende-se do texto que, segundo a crônica, a maioria absoluta dos jornalistas defende o sigilo das fontes de informação, para
Alternativas
Q956775 Português

Evidente que fui mais furado do que um ralador de coco.

Nesse segmento do texto, o autor nos informa que

Alternativas
Q956776 Português

“Evidente que fui mais furado do que um ralador de coco. Mas não fiz minha carreira no jornalismo na base de furos, que nunca os dei e nunca os levei a sério, uma vez que a maioria dos furos são, por natureza, furados.”

O segmento do texto destacado acima mostra uma série de conectores argumentativos. Assinale a opção que indica o conector cujo valor semântico é inadequado ao contexto.
Alternativas
Q956777 Português
Assinale a opção que apresenta o segmento do texto em que a conjunção e mostra valor adversativo (e não aditivo).
Alternativas
Q956778 Português
As opções a seguir apresentam os argumentos apresentados pelo autor contra as fontes sigilosas, à exceção de uma. Assinale-a.
Alternativas
Q956779 Português
O texto 1 é visto como uma crônica jornalística. Levando em consideração o texto lido, assinale a característica mais adequada a esse tipo de escrita.
Alternativas
Q956780 Português
Entre os segmentos a seguir, assinale aquele que apresenta intertextualidade com o discurso religioso.
Alternativas
Q956781 Português

Leia o segmento a seguir.

“Não se trata de uma referência às fontes murmurantes cantadas por Ary Barroso em sua ‘Aquarela do Brasil’. As fontes em questão são outras, estão atualmente em debate nos meios jornalísticos e legais: o direito de proteger o sigilo das ‘fontes’. Contrariando a maioria, diria até a unanimidade dos colegas de ofício, sou contra este tipo de sigilo e, sobretudo, contra as fontes em causa.”


No segmento, o termo que funciona como complemento de um termo anterior é:

Alternativas
Q956782 Português

Texto 1 - Fontes murmurantes

Não se trata de uma referência às fontes murmurantes cantadas por Ary Barroso em sua "Aquarela do Brasil". As fontes em questão são outras, estão atualmente em debate nos meios jornalísticos e legais: o direito de proteger o sigilo das "fontes".
Contrariando a maioria, diria até a unanimidade dos colegas de ofício, sou contra este tipo de sigilo e, sobretudo, contra as fontes em causa. Tenho alguns anos de estrada, mais do que pretendia e merecia, e em minha vida profissional nunca levei em consideração qualquer tipo de informação que não fosse assumida pelo informante. 
Evidente que fui mais furado do que um ralador de coco. Mas não fiz minha carreira no jornalismo na base de furos, que nunca os dei e nunca os levei a sério, uma vez que a maioria dos furos são, por natureza, furados. 
O sigilo das fontes beneficia as fontes, e não o jornalista, que geralmente é manipulado na medida em que aceita e divulga as informações obtidas com a garantia do próprio sigilo. São fontes realmente murmurantes, que transmitem os murmúrios, as especulações e as jogadas inconfessáveis dos interessados, que são os próprios informantes. 
Digo "inconfessáveis" por um motivo óbvio: se fossem confessáveis, as fontes não pediriam sigilo, confessariam o que sabem ou supõem, assumindo a responsabilidade pela informação. 
Os defensores do sigilo das fontes se justificam com o dever de informar a sociedade, como se esse dever fosse a tábua da lei, o mandamento supremo acima de qualquer outro mandamento ou lei. No fundo, aquela velha máxima de que o fim justifica os meios, pedra angular em que se baseou a Inquisição medieval e todos os movimentos totalitários que desgraçaram a humanidade.

CONY, Carlos Heitor. Folha de São Paulo. 06/12/2005. 


TEXTO 2

Na coluna desta semana, o professor Carlos Eduardo Lins da Silva comenta o caso de processos sendo movidos por policiais do Espírito Santo contra o jornal A Gazeta.

No carnaval, o jornal publicou uma charge em que um policial está fantasiado de bandido e um bandido de policial. Os policiais justificam que a charge é ofensiva à categoria, mas o colunista alerta que atitudes como esta ferem a liberdade de expressão e configuram censura prévia. O professor também comenta a relação conturbada entre jornalistas e o Poder Judiciário no Brasil. 




A relação de semelhança entre o texto 1 e o texto 2 está em ambos
Alternativas
Q956783 Português

TEXTO 2


Na coluna desta semana, o professor Carlos Eduardo Lins da Silva comenta o caso de processos sendo movidos por policiais do Espírito Santo contra o jornal A Gazeta.

No carnaval, o jornal publicou uma charge em que um policial está fantasiado de bandido e um bandido de policial. Os policiais justificam que a charge é ofensiva à categoria, mas o colunista alerta que atitudes como esta ferem a liberdade de expressão e configuram censura prévia. O professor também comenta a relação conturbada entre jornalistas e o Poder Judiciário no Brasil.

“No carnaval, o jornal publicou uma charge em que um policial está fantasiado de bandido e um bandido de policial. Os policiais justificam que a charge é ofensiva à categoria. Mas o colunista alerta que atitudes como esta ferem a liberdade de expressão e configuram censura prévia”.

Sobre os componentes desse segmento do texto, assinale a afirmativa correta.

Alternativas
Q969776 Inglês

(Source: http://www.information-age.com/approach-cloud-computingcyber-security-2017-123466624/ Retrieved on January 26th, 2018) 



How to approach cloud computing and cyber security in 2017


The adoption of cloud computing has been on the up since as far back as 2008, when a survey conducted by the Pew Research Institute found that cloud services were used by nearly 69% of Americans. Since then, the industry has experienced hypergrowth and exceeded the already vast predictions of how big it would become. 


IDC predicts that the cloud computing market in 2017 will be worth $107 billion and, according to Gartner, by 2020 a corporate ‘no-cloud’ policy will be as unusual as a ‘no-internet’ policy would be today. Indeed, it would be difficult to imagine an organisation in 2017 that did not use webmail, file sharing and storage, and data backup.


As the use of cloud computing spreads so does awareness of the associated risks. At the time of writing, there have been 456 data breaches worldwide this year according to the Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC). The ITRC also noted a 40% increase in data breaches in 2016 compared to the previous year. Yet, despite the well-documented cases of data breaches, organisations continue to invest in and adopt cloud computing services because the benefits usually outweigh the risks. 


To understand why the growth of cloud computing has continued in the face of high-profile data breaches, look first to what it can offer an organisation.



Cheaper, bigger, better 

Cloud computing is a virtual environment that can adapt to meet user needs. It is not constrained by physical limits, and is easily scalable – making it an obvious choice for start-ups. Cloud computing makes state-of-the-art capability available to anyone with an internet connection and a browser, reducing hardware and IT personnel costs. 


Cloud services and software applications are managed and upgraded off-site by the provider, meaning organisations can access technology they would not have been able to afford to install and manage on their own. The popularity of the cloud essentially comes down to its provision of advanced, nextgeneration IT resources in an environment that is cheaper and more scalable than local networks. 


The risks involved with cloud computing are mostly securitybased. Clouds are often made up of multiple entities, which means that no configuration can be more secure than its weakest link. The link between separate entities means that attacks to multiple sites can occur simultaneously. When cloud providers do not employ adequate cyber security measures, those clouds become a target for cybercriminals. 


Yet, it’s not all bad news. A user survey conducted by one cloud service provider found that concerns about security fell to 25% compared to 29% last year. And as more becomes known about security risks so too does our knowledge around what organisations can do to protect themselves. 

(Source: http://www.information-age.com/approach-cloud-computingcyber-security-2017-123466624/. Retrieved on January 25th, 2018) 

Text I deals with cloud computing and cyber security. In this respect, analyse the following statements:

I. The risks of breaches in cloud computing are minimal.

II. Cloud computing has developed beyond projections.

III. Results of a survey indicate users are becoming more confident about security.

Choose the correct answer:

Alternativas
Q969777 Inglês

(Source: http://www.information-age.com/approach-cloud-computingcyber-security-2017-123466624/ Retrieved on January 26th, 2018) 



How to approach cloud computing and cyber security in 2017


The adoption of cloud computing has been on the up since as far back as 2008, when a survey conducted by the Pew Research Institute found that cloud services were used by nearly 69% of Americans. Since then, the industry has experienced hypergrowth and exceeded the already vast predictions of how big it would become. 


IDC predicts that the cloud computing market in 2017 will be worth $107 billion and, according to Gartner, by 2020 a corporate ‘no-cloud’ policy will be as unusual as a ‘no-internet’ policy would be today. Indeed, it would be difficult to imagine an organisation in 2017 that did not use webmail, file sharing and storage, and data backup.


As the use of cloud computing spreads so does awareness of the associated risks. At the time of writing, there have been 456 data breaches worldwide this year according to the Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC). The ITRC also noted a 40% increase in data breaches in 2016 compared to the previous year. Yet, despite the well-documented cases of data breaches, organisations continue to invest in and adopt cloud computing services because the benefits usually outweigh the risks. 


To understand why the growth of cloud computing has continued in the face of high-profile data breaches, look first to what it can offer an organisation.



Cheaper, bigger, better 

Cloud computing is a virtual environment that can adapt to meet user needs. It is not constrained by physical limits, and is easily scalable – making it an obvious choice for start-ups. Cloud computing makes state-of-the-art capability available to anyone with an internet connection and a browser, reducing hardware and IT personnel costs. 


Cloud services and software applications are managed and upgraded off-site by the provider, meaning organisations can access technology they would not have been able to afford to install and manage on their own. The popularity of the cloud essentially comes down to its provision of advanced, nextgeneration IT resources in an environment that is cheaper and more scalable than local networks. 


The risks involved with cloud computing are mostly securitybased. Clouds are often made up of multiple entities, which means that no configuration can be more secure than its weakest link. The link between separate entities means that attacks to multiple sites can occur simultaneously. When cloud providers do not employ adequate cyber security measures, those clouds become a target for cybercriminals. 


Yet, it’s not all bad news. A user survey conducted by one cloud service provider found that concerns about security fell to 25% compared to 29% last year. And as more becomes known about security risks so too does our knowledge around what organisations can do to protect themselves. 

(Source: http://www.information-age.com/approach-cloud-computingcyber-security-2017-123466624/. Retrieved on January 25th, 2018) 

The word “policy” in “corporate ‘no-cloud’ policy” (second paragraph) refers to a(n)
Alternativas
Q969778 Inglês

(Source: http://www.information-age.com/approach-cloud-computingcyber-security-2017-123466624/ Retrieved on January 26th, 2018) 



How to approach cloud computing and cyber security in 2017


The adoption of cloud computing has been on the up since as far back as 2008, when a survey conducted by the Pew Research Institute found that cloud services were used by nearly 69% of Americans. Since then, the industry has experienced hypergrowth and exceeded the already vast predictions of how big it would become. 


IDC predicts that the cloud computing market in 2017 will be worth $107 billion and, according to Gartner, by 2020 a corporate ‘no-cloud’ policy will be as unusual as a ‘no-internet’ policy would be today. Indeed, it would be difficult to imagine an organisation in 2017 that did not use webmail, file sharing and storage, and data backup.


As the use of cloud computing spreads so does awareness of the associated risks. At the time of writing, there have been 456 data breaches worldwide this year according to the Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC). The ITRC also noted a 40% increase in data breaches in 2016 compared to the previous year. Yet, despite the well-documented cases of data breaches, organisations continue to invest in and adopt cloud computing services because the benefits usually outweigh the risks. 


To understand why the growth of cloud computing has continued in the face of high-profile data breaches, look first to what it can offer an organisation.



Cheaper, bigger, better 

Cloud computing is a virtual environment that can adapt to meet user needs. It is not constrained by physical limits, and is easily scalable – making it an obvious choice for start-ups. Cloud computing makes state-of-the-art capability available to anyone with an internet connection and a browser, reducing hardware and IT personnel costs. 


Cloud services and software applications are managed and upgraded off-site by the provider, meaning organisations can access technology they would not have been able to afford to install and manage on their own. The popularity of the cloud essentially comes down to its provision of advanced, nextgeneration IT resources in an environment that is cheaper and more scalable than local networks. 


The risks involved with cloud computing are mostly securitybased. Clouds are often made up of multiple entities, which means that no configuration can be more secure than its weakest link. The link between separate entities means that attacks to multiple sites can occur simultaneously. When cloud providers do not employ adequate cyber security measures, those clouds become a target for cybercriminals. 


Yet, it’s not all bad news. A user survey conducted by one cloud service provider found that concerns about security fell to 25% compared to 29% last year. And as more becomes known about security risks so too does our knowledge around what organisations can do to protect themselves. 

(Source: http://www.information-age.com/approach-cloud-computingcyber-security-2017-123466624/. Retrieved on January 25th, 2018) 

The phrase “so does awareness of the associated risks” (third paragraph) implies that this kind of awareness
Alternativas
Q969779 Inglês

(Source: http://www.information-age.com/approach-cloud-computingcyber-security-2017-123466624/ Retrieved on January 26th, 2018) 



How to approach cloud computing and cyber security in 2017


The adoption of cloud computing has been on the up since as far back as 2008, when a survey conducted by the Pew Research Institute found that cloud services were used by nearly 69% of Americans. Since then, the industry has experienced hypergrowth and exceeded the already vast predictions of how big it would become. 


IDC predicts that the cloud computing market in 2017 will be worth $107 billion and, according to Gartner, by 2020 a corporate ‘no-cloud’ policy will be as unusual as a ‘no-internet’ policy would be today. Indeed, it would be difficult to imagine an organisation in 2017 that did not use webmail, file sharing and storage, and data backup.


As the use of cloud computing spreads so does awareness of the associated risks. At the time of writing, there have been 456 data breaches worldwide this year according to the Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC). The ITRC also noted a 40% increase in data breaches in 2016 compared to the previous year. Yet, despite the well-documented cases of data breaches, organisations continue to invest in and adopt cloud computing services because the benefits usually outweigh the risks. 


To understand why the growth of cloud computing has continued in the face of high-profile data breaches, look first to what it can offer an organisation.



Cheaper, bigger, better 

Cloud computing is a virtual environment that can adapt to meet user needs. It is not constrained by physical limits, and is easily scalable – making it an obvious choice for start-ups. Cloud computing makes state-of-the-art capability available to anyone with an internet connection and a browser, reducing hardware and IT personnel costs. 


Cloud services and software applications are managed and upgraded off-site by the provider, meaning organisations can access technology they would not have been able to afford to install and manage on their own. The popularity of the cloud essentially comes down to its provision of advanced, nextgeneration IT resources in an environment that is cheaper and more scalable than local networks. 


The risks involved with cloud computing are mostly securitybased. Clouds are often made up of multiple entities, which means that no configuration can be more secure than its weakest link. The link between separate entities means that attacks to multiple sites can occur simultaneously. When cloud providers do not employ adequate cyber security measures, those clouds become a target for cybercriminals. 


Yet, it’s not all bad news. A user survey conducted by one cloud service provider found that concerns about security fell to 25% compared to 29% last year. And as more becomes known about security risks so too does our knowledge around what organisations can do to protect themselves. 

(Source: http://www.information-age.com/approach-cloud-computingcyber-security-2017-123466624/. Retrieved on January 25th, 2018) 

The fifth paragraph stresses as an advantage of cloud computing its
Alternativas
Q969780 Inglês

(Source:http://www.revasolutions.com/internet-of-things-newchallenges-and-practices-for-information-governance/. Retrieved on January 26th, 2018) 


Governance Challenges for the Internet of Things


Virgilio A.F. Almeida -Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil

Danilo Doneda - Rio de Janeiro State University

Marília Monteiro - Public Law Institute of Brasília

Published by the IEEE Computer Society

© 2015 


The future will be rich with sensors capable of collecting vast amounts of information. The Internet will be almost fused with the physical world as the Internet of Things (IoT) becomes a reality. Although it’s just beginning, experts estimate that by the end of 2015 there will be around 25 billion “things” connected to the global Internet. By 2025, the estimated number of connected devices should reach 100 billion. These estimates include smartphones, vehicles, appliances, and industrial equipment. Privacy, security, and safety fears grow as the IoT creates conditions for increasing surveillance by governments and corporations. So the question is: Will the IoT be good for the many, or the mighty few? 


While technological aspects of the IoT have been extensively published in the technical literature, few studies have addressed the IoT’s social and political impacts. Two studies have shed light on challenges for the future with the IoT. In 2013, the European Commission (EC) published a study focusing on relevant aspects for possible IoT governance regimes. The EC report identified many challenges for IoT governance — namely privacy, security, ethics, and competition. In 2015, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) published the FTC Staff Report The Internet of Things: Privacy and Security in a Connected World. Although the report emphasizes the various benefits that the IoT will bring to consumers and citizens, it acknowledges that there are many risks associated with deploying IoT-based applications, especially in the realm of privacy and security. 

[…] 


The nature of privacy and security problems frequently associated with the IoT indicates that further research, analysis, and discussion are needed to identify possible solutions. First, the introduction of security and privacy elements in the very design of sensors, implementing Privacy by Design, must be taken into account for outcomes such as the homologation process of sensors by competent authorities. Even if the privacy governance of IoT can oversee the control centers for collected data, we must develop concrete means to set limits on the amount or nature of the personal data collected. 


Other critical issues regard notification and consent. If, from one side, it’s true that several sensors are already collecting as much personal data as possible, something must be done to increase citizens’ awareness of these data collection processes. Citizens must have means to take measures to protect their rights whenever necessary. If future scenarios indicate the inadequacy of a mere notice-and-consent approach, alternatives must be presented so that the individual’s autonomy isn’t eroded. 


As with other technologies that aim to change human life, the IoT must be in all respects designed with people as its central focus. Privacy and ethics aren’t natural aspects to be considered in technology’s agenda. However, these features are essential to build the necessary trust in an IoT ecosystem, making it compatible with human rights and ensuring that it’s drafted at the measure, and not at the expense, of people. 


(Source: https://cyber.harvard.edu/~valmeida/pdf/IoT-governance.pdf Retrieved on January 23rd, 2018)  

Mark the statements below as true (T) or false (F) according to Text II:


( ) There are already many studies on the social and political effects of the IoT.

( ) Research studies on security and privacy still need to be carried out.

( ) The report from the US Federal Trade Commission supported the unrestricted use of the IoT.

Alternativas
Q969781 Inglês

(Source:http://www.revasolutions.com/internet-of-things-newchallenges-and-practices-for-information-governance/. Retrieved on January 26th, 2018) 


Governance Challenges for the Internet of Things


Virgilio A.F. Almeida -Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil

Danilo Doneda - Rio de Janeiro State University

Marília Monteiro - Public Law Institute of Brasília

Published by the IEEE Computer Society

© 2015 


The future will be rich with sensors capable of collecting vast amounts of information. The Internet will be almost fused with the physical world as the Internet of Things (IoT) becomes a reality. Although it’s just beginning, experts estimate that by the end of 2015 there will be around 25 billion “things” connected to the global Internet. By 2025, the estimated number of connected devices should reach 100 billion. These estimates include smartphones, vehicles, appliances, and industrial equipment. Privacy, security, and safety fears grow as the IoT creates conditions for increasing surveillance by governments and corporations. So the question is: Will the IoT be good for the many, or the mighty few? 


While technological aspects of the IoT have been extensively published in the technical literature, few studies have addressed the IoT’s social and political impacts. Two studies have shed light on challenges for the future with the IoT. In 2013, the European Commission (EC) published a study focusing on relevant aspects for possible IoT governance regimes. The EC report identified many challenges for IoT governance — namely privacy, security, ethics, and competition. In 2015, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) published the FTC Staff Report The Internet of Things: Privacy and Security in a Connected World. Although the report emphasizes the various benefits that the IoT will bring to consumers and citizens, it acknowledges that there are many risks associated with deploying IoT-based applications, especially in the realm of privacy and security. 

[…] 


The nature of privacy and security problems frequently associated with the IoT indicates that further research, analysis, and discussion are needed to identify possible solutions. First, the introduction of security and privacy elements in the very design of sensors, implementing Privacy by Design, must be taken into account for outcomes such as the homologation process of sensors by competent authorities. Even if the privacy governance of IoT can oversee the control centers for collected data, we must develop concrete means to set limits on the amount or nature of the personal data collected. 


Other critical issues regard notification and consent. If, from one side, it’s true that several sensors are already collecting as much personal data as possible, something must be done to increase citizens’ awareness of these data collection processes. Citizens must have means to take measures to protect their rights whenever necessary. If future scenarios indicate the inadequacy of a mere notice-and-consent approach, alternatives must be presented so that the individual’s autonomy isn’t eroded. 


As with other technologies that aim to change human life, the IoT must be in all respects designed with people as its central focus. Privacy and ethics aren’t natural aspects to be considered in technology’s agenda. However, these features are essential to build the necessary trust in an IoT ecosystem, making it compatible with human rights and ensuring that it’s drafted at the measure, and not at the expense, of people. 


(Source: https://cyber.harvard.edu/~valmeida/pdf/IoT-governance.pdf Retrieved on January 23rd, 2018)  

The first paragraph opens and ends, in this order, with
Alternativas
Respostas
1: A
2: E
3: A
4: B
5: B
6: C
7: E
8: D
9: B
10: A
11: A
12: A
13: D
14: E
15: E
16: B
17: D
18: A
19: A
20: B