Questões de Concurso Público Senado Federal 2022 para Advogado

Foram encontradas 100 questões

Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984313 Raciocínio Lógico
Paulo termina seus estudos na faculdade às 16h. Nessa mesma hora, Dora sai de casa para buscá-lo de carro. Ela demora 1 hora para ir até a faculdade e 1 hora para voltar da faculdade à casa, andando sempre à mesma velocidade.
Certo dia, ao final das aulas, Paulo resolveu alugar uma bicicleta e tomar o caminho de casa, para ganhar tempo. Com isso, ele se encontrou com Dora após 35 minutos e os dois voltaram para casa de carro.
Paulo e Dora chegaram em casa no seguinte horário:
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984314 Raciocínio Lógico
Se não é verdade que Daniel fala mandarim ou japonês, avalie as afirmativas a seguir e assinale (V) para a verdadeira e (F) para a falsa.
( ) Pode ser que Daniel fale mandarim e não fale japonês.
( ) Daniel não fala nem mandarim nem japonês.
( ) Pode ser que Daniel fale mandarim e japonês.
As afirmativas são, respectivamente
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984315 Inglês
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.

Text I

The New Rules of Data Privacy

  The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
   For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
   This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
  Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
    […]
   Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.


Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
Based on Text I, mark the statements below as true (T) or false (F).
( ) Advertising firms will be majorly affected by changes in data privacy rules.
( ) Formerly, control over personal data for commercial purposes followed tight guidelines.
( ) Legislators have currently been lax on users’ assent of their data.
The statements are, respectively,
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984316 Inglês
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.

Text I

The New Rules of Data Privacy

  The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
   For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
   This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
  Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
    […]
   Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.


Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
The word “troves” in “troves of customer data” (3rd paragraph) refers to a(n): 
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984317 Inglês
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.

Text I

The New Rules of Data Privacy

  The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
   For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
   This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
  Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
    […]
   Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.


Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
According to the 2nd paragraph, in relation to the industry’s practices, the function of the “digital curtain” was to 
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984318 Inglês
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.

Text I

The New Rules of Data Privacy

  The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
   For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
   This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
  Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
    […]
   Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.


Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
In “Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech” (5th paragraph), it is implied that, in relation to the power of big tech, federal lawmakers aim at
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984319 Inglês
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.

Text I

The New Rules of Data Privacy

  The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
   For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
   This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
  Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
    […]
   Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.


Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
“As” in “Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds” (4th paragraph) signals a 
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984320 Inglês
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.

Text I

The New Rules of Data Privacy

  The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
   For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
   This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
  Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
    […]
   Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.


Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
In the extract “now they struggle” (5th paragraph), the pronoun refers to
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984321 Inglês

Read Text II and answer the question that follow it.


Text II



The gist of this cartoon depends on the reader
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984322 Inglês

Read Text II and answer the question that follow it.


Text II



The character’s speech reveals that the legal department has
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984323 Direito Constitucional
Maria, prefeita do Município Alfa, informou à sua assessoria que almejava encaminhar projeto de lei à Câmara Municipal, estabelecendo balizamentos direcionados à regulamentação e à fiscalização do transporte individual de passageiros, realizado no âmbito do Município por motorista cadastrado em aplicativo.
Ato contínuo, Maria apresentou questionamento a respeito da competência municipal na matéria, sendo-lhe corretamente informado que
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984324 Direito Constitucional
José, advogado, recebeu a incumbência, no escritório em que atua, de identificar alguns aspectos afetos à repercussão geral das questões constitucionais, considerando as relações processuais nas quais o escritório atua. Ao final de suas reflexões, concluiu que
I. em matéria criminal, há presunção iuris et iure de que a repercussão geral está presente.
II. a repercussão geral não é exigida nas causas em que a Fazenda Pública figure como parte.
III. a repercussão geral deve ser demonstrada in abstracto, não sendo necessário que a questão constitucional seja discutida no caso concreto.
Em relação às conclusões de José, à luz da sistemática vigente, é correto afirmar que
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984325 Direito Constitucional
Pedro, ao acessar determinado meio de comunicação social digital, teve acesso à reportagem que descrevia o seu envolvimento com o tráfico ilícito de substâncias entorpecentes. O fato ocorrera há exatos vinte e dois anos e ensejara a sua prisão em flagrante em uma grande operação policial, o que também foi descrito na reportagem.
Como Pedro se tornou uma pessoa de elevado prestígio social na localidade em que reside atualmente, o conhecimento desses fatos por outras pessoas poderia abalar a sua imagem.
Por esta razão, questionou seu advogado sobre a possibilidade de o meio de comunicação digital ser judicialmente compelido a deixar de veicular a referida reportagem, sendo-lhe respondido que
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984326 Direito Constitucional
Helena nasceu no território do país Alfa, no qual a língua portuguesa não é adotada, quando seus pais, brasileiros naturalizados, ali se encontravam a trabalho na embaixada do país Beta.
Helena, apesar de jamais ter ingressado no território nacional, tinha o sonho de seguir a carreira diplomática, representando o Brasil perante outros sujeitos de direito internacional.
Ao completar dezoito anos de idade, Helena consultou um advogado a respeito da compatibilidade do seu sonho com a ordem constitucional brasileira, sendo-lhe corretamente informado que ela
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984327 Direito Constitucional
Após amplas discussões, a Assembleia Legislativa do Estado Delta aprovou o projeto de lei nº XX, que veio a ser sancionado pelo Governador do Estado, dando origem à Lei nº YY.
Esse diploma normativo definiu o dia 20 de junho como o dia estadual dos bancários, sendo, ainda, estatuído que tal dia seria feriado para esses profissionais.
A Lei nº YY foi muito elogiada por alguns setores, mas criticada de forma veemente por outros, sendo que as reflexões sobre a competência legislativa do Estado ocupavam o centro das discussões.
Instado a se manifestar, um destacado constitucionalista observou que, à luz da sistemática constitucional, o Estado Delta
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984328 Direito Constitucional
Uma série de atos administrativos do Estado Alfa, não raro com o concurso de forças de segurança pública, avançou em aspectos afetos à autonomia dos municípios sediados em seu território. Essa situação gerou grande mobilização dos municípios atingidos, que passaram a defender a necessidade de ser decretada intervenção federal no Estado Alfa.
À luz da sistemática constitucional, é correto afirmar que a intervenção alvitrada
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984329 Direito Constitucional
O Tribunal de Contas do Estado Alfa, ao apreciar as despesas de pessoal realizadas no âmbito do Município Delta, entendeu que a Lei municipal nº XX, que concedera uma gratificação aos servidores públicos municipais, era incompatível com a ordem constitucional.
Nesse caso, é correto afirmar que o Tribunal de Contas do Estado Alfa
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984330 Direito Constitucional
No curso de uma demanda ajuizada em face do Município Delta, um Procurador Municipal constatou que era alegada a inconstitucionalidade da Lei municipal nº XX, sendo este o principal fundamento do pedido do autor. Ato contínuo, em uma pesquisa, observou que existiam inúmeras causas nas quais esse fundamento já fora acolhido, inclusive em outras regiões do País, considerando que diversos Municípios possuíam leis com conteúdo similar.
Por perceber que a demanda poderia ter o mesmo desfecho das demais, além de ser provável que outras ações semelhantes viessem a ser julgadas, consultou o Procurador-Geral do Município Delta a respeito da possibilidade de ser requerida, ao Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), a edição de Súmula Vinculante que expressasse a compatibilidade da Lei municipal nº XX com a ordem constitucional.
O Procurador-Geral respondeu corretamente que o Município Delta
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984331 Direito Constitucional
Um grupo de vinte e cinco senadores apresentou proposta de emenda constitucional, em período no qual uma região do país estava sendo atingida por calamidade de grandes proporções na natureza, visando a alterar o Art. 5º da Constituição da República de 1988, de modo a estender um direito ali previsto a pessoas que não eram contempladas.
Apesar de a matéria já ter sido rejeitada, no ano anterior, na mesma legislatura, o grupo de senadores tinha convicção de que o ambiente político era favorável à sua aprovação.
Ao final das discussões, a proposta foi aprovada em cada Casa do Congresso Nacional, em dois turnos de votação, por três quintos dos votos dos respectivos membros, sendo a Emenda Constitucional nº XX promulgada pelas Mesas da Câmara dos Deputados e do Senado Federal, com o respectivo número de ordem.
À luz da sistemática constitucional, sobre o processo legislativo que redundou na Emenda Constitucional nº XX, assinale a afirmativa correta.
Alternativas
Ano: 2022 Banca: FGV Órgão: Senado Federal Prova: FGV - 2022 - Senado Federal - Advogado |
Q1984332 Direito Constitucional
O Presidente da República editou a Medida Provisória nº XX, disciplinando determinadas relações jurídicas de trato continuado.
No curso do processo legislativo, foi aprovado projeto de lei de conversão, que inseriu modificações no texto inicialmente adotado pelo Chefe do Poder Executivo, o que resultou na exclusão de algumas relações jurídicas do alcance da referida Medida Provisória.
Considerando os termos dessa afirmativa, é correto afirmar que a Medida Provisória nº XX 
Alternativas
Respostas
21: C
22: B
23: A
24: E
25: D
26: B
27: E
28: D
29: C
30: B
31: D
32: B
33: A
34: E
35: B
36: D
37: E
38: C
39: A
40: A