In …water facilities are old and inefficient and it’s hugel...
Water, Water Everywhere
Approximately 70 percent of our planet is covered in water. In total, that’s approximately 1,260 million trillion liters, which sounds like an enormous amount, but less than one percent of it can easily be used as drinking water. A major amount, 97 percent, is salt water, and two percent is glacier ice. Scientists and politicians are becoming increasingly worried about the amount of water, and predict that there will be wars in the future to control our water supplies.
The world’s population is growing rapidly, and the need for water in industry and agriculture is enormous. Climate change also adds to the problem: droughts restrict access to water even further, and flooding can pollute supplies of drinking water. Furthermore, these threats to our environment are probably only going to get worse. Already 1.2 billion people live in areas with limited access to water, and the UN predicts that, by 2025, this figure will rise to 1.8 billion, or two thirds of the world’s population.
But the problem isn’t only how much water we need, it’s also how we clean and store it. In the US, for example, water facilities are old and inefficient, and it’s hugely expensive to improve them. In China, the government knows it will need to spend $850 billion to improve its water infrastructure. Currently, India can only clean about 30 percent of its wastewater, meaning that people risk disease when they drink from polluted sources. Some countries filter sea water to make their drinking water. But this process is also very expensive, so it isn’t viable in many countries.
We can’t give up on this problem, however, because without water we can’t survive. Thankfully, there are already some excellent water purification products operating on a small scale, which are already helping people whose access to water is limited.
The “Slingshot” is a new water purifier, about the size of a small refrigerator, and is the creation of American inventor Dean Kamen. The purifier works by heating the water, which kills anything harmful. It can purify even the dirtiest water, requires minimal electricity, and can clean up to 1,000 liters a day. The “Slingshot” is already helping communities in several countries, including South Africa and Mexico. It will soon provide a cheap and safe supply of water in many other places where poverty prevents access to clean water.
Dean Kamen believes that every human should
have the right to clean water every day. Hopefully,
with more devices like the “Slingshot”, there will soon
be more water to go around.
- Gabarito Comentado (1)
- Aulas (4)
- Comentários (1)
- Estatísticas
- Cadernos
- Criar anotações
- Notificar Erro
Gabarito comentado
Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores
Vamos analisar a questão proposta. A alternativa correta é a Alternativa D - the water facilities.
Para entender por que essa é a alternativa correta, vamos primeiro observar o contexto do pronome "them" no 3º parágrafo do texto:
“In the US, for example, water facilities are old and inefficient, and it’s hugely expensive to improve them.”
O pronome "them" se refere a algo previamente mencionado. Aqui, a frase principal menciona "water facilities" (instalações de água) que são "old and inefficient" (antigas e ineficientes). Portanto, quando o texto diz "it’s hugely expensive to improve them", está falando das "water facilities".
Agora, vamos comentar as alternativas incorretas para que fique claro por que cada uma delas não está correta:
A - China: Esta alternativa está incorreta porque, embora o texto mencione a China, o trecho específico do parágrafo fala sobre "the US" e suas "water facilities".
B - the US: Embora o parágrafo mencione "the US", o pronome "them" se refere especificamente às "water facilities" e não ao país em si.
C - the problem: Esta alternativa está incorreta porque "the problem" é uma referência muito ampla. O pronome "them" se refere diretamente às "water facilities", e não ao problema geral da água.
E - old and inefficient: Esta alternativa também está incorreta, pois "old and inefficient" são adjetivos que descrevem as "water facilities". O pronome "them" precisa se referir a um substantivo, que neste caso são as "water facilities".
Portanto, a única alternativa que faz sentido gramaticalmente e contextualmente é D - the water facilities.
Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!
Clique para visualizar este gabarito
Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo
Comentários
Veja os comentários dos nossos alunos
d-
water facilities are old and inefficient and it’s hugely expensive to improve them === water facilities are old and inefficient and it’s hugely expensive to improve those water facilities.
Anaphora can take the form of a pronoun to refer back to a noun or phrase. An anaphor is a backwards reference, while a cataphor refers to a later term in the discourse.
Clique para visualizar este comentário
Visualize os comentários desta questão clicando no botão abaixo