In the second paragraph of the text, the word “disincentiviz...

Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Q1901977 Inglês


    During a ransomware hack, attackers infiltrate a target’s computer system and encrypt its data. They then demand a payment before they will release the decryption key to free the system. This type of extortion has existed for decades, but in the 2010s it exploded in popularity, with online gangs holding local governments, infrastructure and even hospitals hostage. Ransomware is a collective problem—and solving it will require collaborative action from companies, the government and international partners.

     As long as victims keep paying, hackers will keep profiting from this type of attack. But cybersecurity experts are divided on whether the government should prohibit the paying of ransoms. Such a ban would disincentivize hackers, but it would also place some organizations in a moral quandary. For, say, a hospital, unlocking the computer systems as quickly as possible could be a matter of life or death for patients, and the fastest option may be to pay up.

     Collective action can help. If all organizations that fall victim to ransomware report their attacks, they will contribute to a trove of valuable data, which can be used to strike back against attackers. For example, certain ransomware gangs may use the exact same type of encryption in all their attacks. “White hat” hackers can and do study these trends, which allows them to retrieve and publish the decryption keys for specific types of ransomware. Many companies, however, remain reluctant to admit they have experienced a breach, wishing to avoid potential bad press. Overcoming that reluctance may require legislation, such as a bill introduced in the Senate last year that would require companies to report having paid a ransom within 24 hours of the transaction.

Internet:<www.scientificamerican.com>(adapted). 

In the second paragraph of the text, 


the word “disincentivize” could be correctly replaced by deter without any change in the meaning of the sentence.  

Alternativas

Gabarito comentado

Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores

Clique para visualizar este gabarito

Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo

Comentários

Veja os comentários dos nossos alunos

QUESTÃO CORRETA

Para acertar a questão é necessário o domínio de alguns vocabulários da língua inglesa.

O examinador pergunta se e possível substituir disincentivize por deter SEM alterar o siginificado, o que è perfeitamente possível.

DISINCENTIVIZE = DESINCENTIVAR

por

DETER = DISSUADIR, DESENCORAJAR.

#PRF 2024, senão deu certo em 2021, sustenta guerreiro que nossa hora vai chegar. Amém.

Falso cognato!

Se comparo:

 

“Such a ban would disincentivize hackers…” “Tal proibição desincentivaria os hackers...”

X

“Such a ban would deter hackers…” “Tal proibição deteria os hackers...”

 

Responderia ERRADO

 

 

Se comparo:

 

 

“Such a ban would disincentivize hackers…” “Tal proibição desincentivaria os hackers...”

X

“Such a ban would deter hackers…” “Tal proibição dissuadiria os hackers...”

 

Responderia CERTO

 

 

Uma coisa é deter e outra é dissuadir.

Este foi meu entendimento.

deter

to prevent someone from doing something or to make someone less enthusiastic about doing something by making it difficult for that person to do it or by threatening bad results if they do it

deter, impedir

These measures are designed to deter an enemy attack.

High prices are deterring many young people from buying houses.

Sinônimo

dissuade

Oposto

encourage

Fonte: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/pt/dicionario/ingles-portugues/deter

Errei, por não fazer a leitura do trecho do texto.

Ambas as palavras são cognatos verdadeiros, de fato possuem significados diferentes. porém neste contexto, é possível fazer a substituição.

Clique para visualizar este comentário

Visualize os comentários desta questão clicando no botão abaixo