Analisando-se os aspectos linguísticos da língua inglesa pre...

Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Ano: 2021 Banca: UEG Órgão: UEG Prova: UEG - 2021 - UEG - Processo Seletivo UEG |
Q1783275 Inglês
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão.

Water on the Moon could sustain a lunar base

    Having dropped tantalizing hints days ago about an "exciting new discovery about the Moon", the US space agency has revealed conclusive evidence of water on our only natural satellite. And this "unambiguous detection of molecular water" will boost Nasa's hopes of establishing a lunar base.
    The aim is to sustain that base by tapping into the Moon's natural resources. The findings have been published as two papers in the journal Nature Astronomy. Unlike previous detections of water in permanently shadowed parts of lunar craters, scientists have now detected the molecule in sunlit regions of the Moon's surface.
    Speaking during a virtual teleconference, co-author Casey Honniball, postdoctoral fellow at Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, said: "The amount of water is roughly equivalent to a 12-ounce bottle of water in a cubic metre of lunar soil." Her Nasa colleague Jacob Bleacher, from the agency's human exploration directorate, said researchers still needed to understand the nature of the watery deposits. This would help them determine how accessible they would be for future lunar explorers to use.
    And while there have previously been signs of water on the lunar surface, these new discoveries suggest it is more abundant than previously thought. "It gives us more options for potential water sources on the Moon," said Hannah Sargeant, a planetary scientist from the Open University in Milton Keynes, on BBC News.
    The first of these new discoveries was made from an airborne infrared telescope known as Sofia. This observatory, on board a modified Boeing 747, flies above much of Earth's atmosphere, giving a largely unobstructed view of the Solar System.
    Using this infrared telescope, researchers picked up the "signature" colour of water molecules. The researchers think it is stored in bubbles of lunar glass or between grains on the surface that protect it from the harsh environment. In the other study, scientists looked for permanently shadowed areas - known as cold traps - where water could be captured and remain permanently. They found these cold traps at both poles and concluded that approximately 40,000 kilometres squared of the lunar surface has the capacity to trap water.
    What does this discovery mean? According to Dr Sargeant this discovery mean that this could broaden the list of places where we might want to build a lunar base. There are quite a few one-off missions to the Moon's polar regions coming up in the next few years. In the longer term, there are plans to build a permanent habitation on the lunar surface.
    “We were going to go to the Moon anyway”, said the Open University researcher. This study gives Nasa some time to do some investigation, but it doesn't give it much time because and the US space agency is already working on Moon base ideas and where they are going to go and it is promising.
    Experts say that water-ice could form the basis of a future lunar economy, once we've figured out how to extract it. Definitely, it would be much cheaper to make rocket fuel on the Moon than send it from Earth. So when future lunar explorers want to return to Earth, or travel on to other destinations, they could turn the water into the hydrogen and oxygen commonly used to power space vehicles.
     Re-fuelling at the Moon could therefore bring down the cost of space travel and make a lunar base more affordable and a potential lunar settlement is on the way to become into a reality.

Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-54666328. Acesso em: 27 out. 2020.
Analisando-se os aspectos linguísticos da língua inglesa presentes no texto, constata-se que
Alternativas

Gabarito comentado

Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores

Alternativa correta: E

Vamos entender por que a alternativa E é a correta e analisar as demais alternativas para esclarecer eventuais dúvidas.

Análise da alternativa correta (E):

A sentença original é: "They found these cold traps at both poles". Para transformá-la na voz passiva, precisamos identificar o objeto direto da frase e trazê-lo para a posição de sujeito. A estrutura da voz passiva para tempos verbais simples no inglês é composta pelo verbo "to be" no tempo correspondente seguido pelo particípio passado do verbo principal.

Portanto, a forma passiva correta da frase é: "These cold traps were found at both poles".

Assim, a alternativa E está correta.

Análise das alternativas incorretas:

A - "scientists didn’t looked for permanently shadowed area"

Essa alternativa está incorreta devido ao uso indevido da forma negativa do passado simples. Na forma negativa, o verbo auxiliar "didn't" já indica o passado, portanto o verbo principal deve estar na forma base. A forma correta seria: "scientists didn't look for permanently shadowed areas".

B - "there aren’t any plans to build a permanent habitation"

Essa alternativa está incorreta porque não transforma a frase original em sua forma interrogativa. Na verdade, transforma a frase em uma forma negativa. A forma interrogativa correta da frase original "there are plans to build a permanent habitation" seria: "Are there plans to build a permanent habitation?".

C - "might" pode ser substituído por "must", sem alteração de sentido"

Esta alternativa está incorreta porque "might" e "must" têm significados diferentes em inglês. "Might" indica possibilidade, enquanto "must" indica obrigação ou alta probabilidade. Portanto, substituir "might" por "must" altera o sentido da frase.

D - "still" pode ser substituído por "also", sem provocar alteração de sentido"

Esta alternativa está incorreta porque "still" e "also" têm significados distintos. "Still" indica continuidade de uma ação, enquanto "also" indica adição de informações. Trocar "still" por "also" altera o sentido da frase original.

Espero que esta explicação tenha ajudado a esclarecer suas dúvidas sobre os aspectos linguísticos abordados na questão. Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!

Clique para visualizar este gabarito

Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo

Comentários

Veja os comentários dos nossos alunos

GABARITO: Letra E

a) ERRADO. O correto seria "Scientists didn't look for permanently shadowed area". Não se usa o "did + verbo no passado"

b) ERRADO. O correto seria "Are there plans to build a permanent habitation?"

c) ERRADO. Might é possibilidade, enquanto must é obrigatoriedade. Logo, há alteração de sentido.

d) ERRADO. Still seria "ainda", enquanto "also" seria "além de". Há clara mudança de sentido.

e) CERTO. Perfeita a sentença.

não seria founded?

Clique para visualizar este comentário

Visualize os comentários desta questão clicando no botão abaixo