By reading this text we can conclude that

Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Q902052 Inglês

READ THE FOLLOWING TEXT AND CHOOSE THE OPTION WHICH BEST COMPLETES EACH QUESTION ACCORDING TO IT:


                      Technology has created more jobs than it has destroyed


   The battle between men and machines goes back centuries. Are they taking our jobs? Or are they easing our workload? A study by economists at the consultancy Deloitte seeks to shed new light on the relationship between jobs and the rise of technology by searching through census data for England and Wales going back to 1871. 

    Their conclusion is that, rather than destroying jobs, technology has been a “great job-creating machine”. Findings by Deloitte such as rise in bar staff since the 1950s or a surge in the number of hairdressers this century suggest to the authors that technology has increased spending power, therefore creating new demand and new jobs. Their study argues that the debate has been twisted towards the job-destroying effects of technological change, which are more easily observed than its creative aspects. 

      Going back over past  figures paints a more balanced picture, say authors Ian Stewart and Alex Cole. “The dominant trend is of contracting employment in agriculture and manufacturing being more than balanced by rapid growth in the caring, creative, technology and business services sectors,” they write. “Machines will take on more repetitive and laborious tasks, but they seem no closer to eliminating the need for human labor than at any time in the last 150 years.”

   According to the study, hard, dangerous and dull jobs have declined. In some sectors, technology has quite clearly cost jobs, but they question whether they are really jobs we would want to hold on to. Technology directly substitutes human muscle power and, in so doing, raises productivity and shrinks employment. “In the UK the first sector to feel this effect on any scale was agriculture,” says the study.

   The study also found out that ‘caring’ jobs have increased. The report cites a “profound shift”, with labor switching from its historic role, as a source of raw power, to the care, education and provision of services to others. Technological progress has cut the prices of essentials, such as food, and the price of bigger household items such as TVs and kitchen appliances, notes Stewart. That leaves more money to spend on leisure, and creates new demand and new jobs, which may explain the big rise in bar staff, he adds. “_______ the decline in the traditional pub, census data shows that the number of people employed in bars rose fourfold between 1951 and 2011,” the report says.

   The Deloitte economists believe that rising incomes have allowed consumers to spend more on personal services, such as grooming. That in turn has driven employment of hairdressers. So, while in 1871 there was one hairdresser or barber for every 1,793 citizens of England and Wales; today there is one for every 287 people.


                 (Adapted from: https://goo.gl/7V5vuw. Access: 02/02/2018.)

By reading this text we can conclude that
Alternativas

Gabarito comentado

Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores

Vamos analisar a questão e o texto fornecido para entender qual é a melhor opção de resposta. A alternativa correta é B.

O texto aborda como a tecnologia tem influenciado a relação dos seres humanos com o trabalho ao longo dos anos. Os autores do estudo examinam dados históricos e concluem que, embora a tecnologia tenha substituído alguns tipos de empregos, ela também criou novas oportunidades e setores de trabalho.

Vamos justificar cada alternativa:

Alternativa A: "Personal services are not significant to economic studies."
Essa alternativa está incorreta. O texto ressalta a importância dos serviços pessoais, como o aumento no número de cabeleireiros e trabalhadores em bares, destacando que esses serviços são significativos e têm crescido devido a mudanças econômicas e tecnológicas.

Alternativa B: "Technology has been changing the way humans relate to labor."
Essa é a alternativa correta. O texto explica que a tecnologia tem transformado a maneira como os humanos se relacionam com o trabalho, substituindo tarefas repetitivas e perigosas e criando novos tipos de emprego, especialmente nos setores de serviços e cuidados.

Alternativa C: "The battle between men and machines is meaningless."
Essa alternativa está incorreta. O texto reconhece a existência de um "conflito" entre homens e máquinas, mas não diz que essa batalha é insignificante. Pelo contrário, o texto discute as implicações desse conflito ao longo da história.

Alternativa D: "The so called ‘caring jobs’ tend to disappear in the future."
Essa alternativa está incorreta. O texto sugere que os "caring jobs" (empregos de cuidado) têm aumentado e tendem a crescer ainda mais, em vez de desaparecer. A mudança do trabalho humano de atividades físicas para serviços de cuidado é destacada como uma tendência significativa.

Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!

Clique para visualizar este gabarito

Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo

Comentários

Veja os comentários dos nossos alunos

(B)

"Their conclusion is that, rather than destroying jobs, technology has been a “great job-creating machine”. Findings by Deloitte such as rise in bar staff since the 1950s or a surge in the number of hairdressers this century suggest to the authors that technology has increased spending power, therefore creating new demand and new jobs. Their study argues that the debate has been twisted towards the job-destroying effects of technological change, which are more easily observed than its creative aspects."

-A conclusão deles é que, em vez de destruir empregos, a tecnologia tem sido uma "grande máquina de criação de empregos". Achados de Deloitte, como o aumento da equipe de advogados desde a década de 1950 ou um aumento no número de cabeleireiros neste século, sugerem os autores que a tecnologia aumentou o poder de compra, criando, assim, nova demanda e novos empregos. O estudo deles argumenta que o debate foi distorcido em relação aos efeitos destruidores de empregos da mudança tecnológica, que são mais facilmente observados do que seus aspectos criativos.

Technology has been changing the way humans relate to labor.

B

Clique para visualizar este comentário

Visualize os comentários desta questão clicando no botão abaixo