The clauses 'the castigations would have been comical' and '...
Read the excerpt below and answer the questions 34 to 40.
- The transfer of Alaska from Russia to the United States formed one of those unbelievable incidents of
- history because by 1867, Russia was nervously eager to get rid of it, while the United States still
- recovering from the Civil War and immersed in the impending impeachment of President Johnson,
- refused to accept it on any terms.
- At this impasse an extraordinary man monopolized center stage. He was not a Russian, a fact which
- would become important more than a century later, but a soi-disant baron of dubious background; half
- Austrian, half Italian, and a charmer who was picked up in 1841 for temporary duty representing Russia in
- the United States and who lingered there till 1868. In that time, Edouard de Stoeckl, parading himself as a
- nobleman, although no one could say for sure how or when or even if he had earned his title, became
- such an ardent friend of America that he married an American heiress and took upon himself the task of
- acting as marriage broker between Russia, which he called homeland, and the United States, his adopted
- residence.
- He faced a most difficult task, for when the United States showed hesitancy about accepting Alaska,
- support for the sale withered in Russia, and later when Russia wanted to sell, half a dozen of the most
- influential American politicians led by Secretary of State William Seward of New York looked far into the
- future and saw the desirability of acquiring Alaska to serve as America's artic bastion, yet the hard-
- headed businessmen in the Senate, the House and the general public opposed the purchase with all the
- scorn they could summon. 'Seward's Icebox' and 'Seward's Folly' were two of the gentler jibes. Some
- critics accused Seward of being in the pay of the Russians; others accused De Stoeckl of buying votes in
- the House. One sharp satirist claimed that Alaska contained nothing but polar bears and Eskimos, and
- many protested that America should not accept this useless, frozen domain even if Russia wanted to give
- it away.
- Many pointed out that Alaska had no wealth of any kind, not even reindeer, which proliferated in other
- northern areas, and experts affirmed that an arctic area like this could not possibly have any minerals or
- other deposits of value. On and on went the abuse of this unknown and somewhat terrifying land, and the
- castigations would have been comical had they not influenced American thinking and behavior and
- condemned Alaska to decades of neglect.
- But an ingenious man like Baron de Stoeckl was not easily diverted from his main target, and with
- Seward's unflinching support and admirable statesmanship, the sale squeaked by with a favorable margin
- of one vote. By such a narrow margin did the United States come close to losing one of her potentially
- valuable acquisitions, but of course, had one viewed Alaska from the vantage point of frozen Fort Nulato
- in 1867, with the thermometer at minus-fifty-seven and about to be attacked by hostile Athapascans, the
- purchase at more than $7,000,000 would have seemed a poor bargain.
- Now the comedy intensified, became burlesque, for although the U.S Senate had bought the place,
- the U.S. House refused to appropriate the money to pay for it, and for many tense months the sale hung
- in the balance. When a favorable vote was finally taken, it was almost negated by the discovery that
- Baron de Stoeckl had disposed of $125,000 in cash for which he refused to give an accounting. Widely
- suspected of having bribed congressmen to vote for land that was obviously worthless, the baron waited
- until the sale was completed, then quietly slipped out of the country, his life's ambition having been
- achieved.
- One congressman with a keen sense of history, economics and geopolitics said of the whole affair:
- 'If we were so eager to show Russia our appreciation of the help she gave us during the Civil War, why
- didn't we give her the seven million and tell her to keep her damned colony? It'll never be of any use to
- us.'
Excerpt from: MICHENER, James A. Alaska. Fawcett Books: New York, 1988, p. 369 - 370.
The clauses 'the castigations would have been comical' and 'had they not influenced American thinking...' present the same grammatical relation as in:
- Gabarito Comentado (1)
- Aulas (1)
- Comentários (0)
- Estatísticas
- Cadernos
- Criar anotações
- Notificar Erro
Gabarito comentado
Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores
A alternativa correta para a questão é a B. Vamos entender o porquê, explicando a gramática por trás das opções.
O trecho "the castigations would have been comical" e "had they not influenced American thinking" refere-se a uma estrutura condicional do tipo 3, que é usada para situações hipotéticas no passado. Esta estrutura geralmente é formada por uma cláusula condicional iniciada por "if" seguida do past perfect, e uma cláusula principal com "would have" + particípio passado.
Alternativa B: "had one viewed Alaska" e "the purchase (...) would have seemed a poor bargain" também apresenta uma estrutura condicional do tipo 3. Note que aqui a ordem é invertida, começando pela cláusula condicional, mas o significado refere-se igualmente a uma situação hipotética passada. Portanto, é a opção correta.
Vamos analisar por que as outras alternativas estão incorretas:
Alternativa A: "then quietly slipped out of the country" e "his life's ambition having been achieved" não apresentam uma relação condicional. A primeira é uma sequência de ações, e a segunda é uma oração reduzida de particípio, que não expressa condição.
Alternativa C: "one sharp satirist claimed that Alaska" e "and many protested that America" são cláusulas que introduzem discurso relatado, mas não apresentam a relação condicional hipotética do tipo 3.
Alternativa D: "if we were so eager to show Russia our appreciation" e "why didn't we give her the seven million" formam uma estrutura condicional, mas não é do tipo 3, já que esta se refere a uma situação no tempo presente ou futuro, e não ao passado hipotético.
Alternativa E: "although the U.S. Senate had bought the place" e "the U.S. House refused to appropriate the money to pay for it" formam uma estrutura de contraste (uso de "although"), não uma estrutura condicional.
Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!
Clique para visualizar este gabarito
Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo