In “They do not believe the orders are constitutional and wi...

Próximas questões
Com base no mesmo assunto
Ano: 2024 Banca: Instituto Access Órgão: INT Provas: Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Pesquisador - Catálise | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Júnior - Engenharia de Manutenção | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Júnior - Engenharia e Segurança do Trabalho | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Júnior - Gestão de Qualidade | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Avaliação de Produtos | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Biocatálise | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Biocorrosão e Biodegradação | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Certificação de Produtos | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Corrosão e Proteção | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Corrosão Sob Tensão | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Corrosão Pelo H2s e Co2 | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Engenharia de Materiais e Simulação Computacional | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Motores e Emissões | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Planejamento Tecnológico | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Química | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Tecnologia de Materiais Poliméricos | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicações | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno - Tecnologia Química Industrial | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno 1 - Engenharia de Avaliações | Instituto Access - 2024 - INT - Tecnologista Pleno 2 - Engenharia de Avaliações |
Q2467196 Inglês
04.08.2024


‘We have reached the limit.’ Clash with Elon Musk prompts calls for social media controls in Brazil


London (CNN) — Brazil’s attorney general has called for social media platforms in the country to be regulated after Elon Musk threatened to disobey a court order banning certain accounts on X and lashed out against “aggressive censorship.”


In a post on X Sunday, Attorney General Jorge Messias wrote: “It is urgent to regulate social networks. We cannot live in a society in which billionaires domiciled abroad have control of social networks and put themselves in a position to violate the rule of law, failing to comply with court orders and threatening our authorities.”


In a statement, Brazil’s Supreme Court described Musk’s defiance as a “flagrant” obstruction of justice and said he should be investigated by the police. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes announced Sunday that he would open an inquiry into the billionaire businessman who owns X.


The standoff is the latest clash between authorities around the world and Musk – a self-declared “free speech absolutist” who has relaxed X’s content moderation policies and reinstated a number of previously blocked accounts after buying the company, formerly known as Twitter, in 2022.


Orlando Silva, a Brazilian lawmaker aligned with the country’s leftwing government, said he would propose a “responsibilities regime for these digital platforms.” “We have reached the limit!” he posted on X, adding that Musk had disrespected the judiciary. On Saturday, X’s global government affairs team posted that it had been “forced by court decisions to block certain popular accounts in Brazil” and threatened with “daily fines” for non-compliance. “We do not know which posts are alleged to violate the law. We are prohibited from saying which court or judge issued the order, or on what grounds,” they wrote. They do not believe the orders are constitutional and will challenge them legally where possible, they added.


The Supreme Court had ordered that the accounts be blocked as part of its ongoing investigation into “digital militias,” which, among other things, is looking into the spread of misinformation and incitement of crime under the government of former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro.


Social media platforms have been widely viewed as a catalyst for riots in Brazil that took place on January 8 last year, when hundreds of protesters broke into federal government buildings in the capital Brasilia, in scenes reminiscent of the January 6, 2021, insurrection in the United States.


Musk suggested that Moraes was behind the ban, writing Sunday on X that the judge had “brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution and people of Brazil. He should resign or be impeached.”


In a separate post Saturday, he called the court’s decision to block the accounts “aggressive censorship” that “appears to violate the law and will of the people of Brazil.” He said X would defy the court’s order and lift all restrictions.


“As a result, we will probably lose all revenue in Brazil and have to shut down our office there. But principles matter more than profit,” he noted.


X has faced criticism for accommodating government censorship demands in the past, with Musk saying the company has no choice but to comply. For example, it blocked some X accounts in Turkey at the behest of the government ahead of the country’s elections last year, while at the same time contesting the orders in court.



(Internet: < https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/08/tech/elon-musk-brazilinvestigation/index.html> )
In “They do not believe the orders are constitutional and will challenge them legally where possible”, the pronoun they and them refers, respectively, to
Alternativas

Gabarito comentado

Confira o gabarito comentado por um dos nossos professores

Alternativa correta: E - X’s global government affairs / orders.

Vamos entender o motivo dessa alternativa ser a correta e analisar as demais alternativas para esclarecer eventuais dúvidas.

A questão aborda o uso de pronomes no contexto de um texto em inglês. Portanto, é crucial identificar os antecedentes dos pronomes "they" e "them" na frase: "They do not believe the orders are constitutional and will challenge them legally where possible."

Analisando a frase:

They: O pronome "they" se refere a um antecedente plural. No texto, o antecedente mais próximo que concorda em número é X’s global government affairs team.

Them: O pronome "them" também se refere a um antecedente plural, que no caso são orders (ordens).

Agora, vamos verificar as alternativas para entender por que as outras são incorretas:

A - X’s content moderation policies / orders

A expressão "X’s content moderation policies" não faz sentido no contexto do pronome "they", pois "they" refere-se às pessoas, a equipe, e não às políticas.

B - X’s content moderation policies / digital platforms

Novamente, "X’s content moderation policies" não se enquadra como antecedente para "they", e "digital platforms" não faz sentido como antecedente para "them" no contexto da frase.

C - Supreme Court / posts

"Supreme Court" é singular e, portanto, não pode ser o antecedente de "they". Além disso, "posts" não é mencionado no contexto da frase fornecida.

D - X’s global government affairs / court decisions

A expressão "court decisions" não é o antecedente correto para "them", pois o texto claramente menciona que são "orders" sendo desafiadas.

Portanto, a alternativa correta é E: "X’s global government affairs" como antecedente de "they" e "orders" como antecedente de "them".

Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!

Clique para visualizar este gabarito

Visualize o gabarito desta questão clicando no botão abaixo

Comentários

Veja os comentários dos nossos alunos

O que essa questão está fazendo no filtro de Pronomes em Português?

Clique para visualizar este comentário

Visualize os comentários desta questão clicando no botão abaixo