Questões de Concurso
Foram encontradas 19.558 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
Q2524543
Banco de Dados
O comando EXPLAIN no sistema PostgreSQL, versão 16,
desempenha um papel crucial na análise e otimização do
desempenho das consultas SQL. Compreender o funcionamento e
a saída desse comando é essencial para otimizar o desempenho do
sistema.
Neste contexto, o comando EXPLAIN
Neste contexto, o comando EXPLAIN
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
Q2524542
Programação
Na programação estruturada, os laços de repetição são
fundamentais para executar uma determinada sequência de
instruções várias vezes, facilitando a automação de tarefas
repetitivas. Dois dos laços mais comuns são os comandos "for" e
"while", cada um com suas características específicas.
Assinale a opção que descreve corretamente as diferenças entre os laços "for" e "while" na programação estruturada.
Assinale a opção que descreve corretamente as diferenças entre os laços "for" e "while" na programação estruturada.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
Q2524540
Governança de TI
Assinale a opção que descreve corretamente um ponto principal
característico de COBIT 2019, ITIL v4 e PMBOK.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
Q2524539
Governança de TI
Assinale a opção que, em uma organização, descreve o objetivo
principal dos controles de segregação das funções nos processos
de definição, implantação e gestão de políticas de TI.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
Q2524538
Governança de TI
Considere as práticas de atribuição de funções de TI na gestão de
responsabilidades sob as perspectivas do COBIT, ITIL e PMBOK.
Na aplicação dessas práticas é correto que se deve
Na aplicação dessas práticas é correto que se deve
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
Q2524537
Governança de TI
Quando uma organização busca implementar um Planejamento
Estratégico de Tecnologia da Informação (PETI), é essencial
considerar o alinhamento estratégico entre a área de TI e os
negócios.
Marque a ação que garante esse alinhamento e apoia a governança de TI.
Marque a ação que garante esse alinhamento e apoia a governança de TI.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
Q2524536
Governança de TI
Uma empresa de TI está considerando a terceirização de algumas
de suas funções de TI para melhorar a eficiência e reduzir custos.
Assinale a opção que descreve corretamente uma etapa crítica que tem que ser abordada antes de implementar a terceirização de TI.
Assinale a opção que descreve corretamente uma etapa crítica que tem que ser abordada antes de implementar a terceirização de TI.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
Q2524535
Governança de TI
Considerando as metodologias de gestão de projetos e de TI,
COBIT, ITIL e PMBOK possuem abordagens distintas para a gestão
de riscos.
Assinale a opção que descreve corretamente a diferença fundamental entre esses três frameworks.
Assinale a opção que descreve corretamente a diferença fundamental entre esses três frameworks.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Prova:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
Q2524493
Administração Pública
Accountability é a responsabilidade e prestação de contas
transparente e ética que as organizações e indivíduos assumem
perante suas ações e resultados, promovendo a confiança e a
credibilidade em suas atividades.
Assinale, dentre as opções a seguir, o tipo de accountability que compreende a fiscalização e controle mútuo dos Três Poderes, através de órgãos legalmente estabelecidos para essa finalidade – um sistema de checks and balances (freios e contrapesos) previsto na Constituição, que inclui Tribunais de Contas, Ministério Público, controladorias e agências fiscalizadoras.
Assinale, dentre as opções a seguir, o tipo de accountability que compreende a fiscalização e controle mútuo dos Três Poderes, através de órgãos legalmente estabelecidos para essa finalidade – um sistema de checks and balances (freios e contrapesos) previsto na Constituição, que inclui Tribunais de Contas, Ministério Público, controladorias e agências fiscalizadoras.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517219
Direito Constitucional
Ao estudar a remuneração, direitos e vantagens no âmbito da
remuneração dos agentes públicos, Helena verificou que o
subsídio é uma espécie remuneratória que tem definição
constitucional, de modo que decidiu aprofundar os estudos acerca
das respectivas peculiaridades.
Nesse contexto, considerando o disposto na CRFB/88 e a orientação do Supremo Tribunal Federal acerca do tema, é correto afirmar que o subsídio
Nesse contexto, considerando o disposto na CRFB/88 e a orientação do Supremo Tribunal Federal acerca do tema, é correto afirmar que o subsídio
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517170
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The text ends in a note of
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517169
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The word “roughly” in “Over the past roughly 50,000 years” (5th
paragraph) indicates a(n)
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517168
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
According to the text, the word that “this extraordinary gift” (5th
paragraph) refers to is our
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517167
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The opposite of “the smartest” (4th paragraph) is
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517166
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
In the second paragraph, “on the flip side” means
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517165
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The expression “such as” in “such as climate change” (2nd
paragraph) can be replaced without significant change in meaning
by
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517164
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The first sentence presents a
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517163
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE
(F):
( ) The author mentions the fact that AGI may supplant human faculties.
( ) Ways in which we can lead meaningful lives are detailed.
( ) AGI has already solved the problems of economic equality.
The statements are, respectively
( ) The author mentions the fact that AGI may supplant human faculties.
( ) Ways in which we can lead meaningful lives are detailed.
( ) AGI has already solved the problems of economic equality.
The statements are, respectively
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517162
Português
Assinale a opção em que a preposição A – sozinha ou combinada -
tem valor semântico diferente dos demais.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517160
Português
As frases a seguir mostram forma negativa.
Assinale a opção em que a modificação para a forma positiva mantém o sentido original.
Assinale a opção em que a modificação para a forma positiva mantém o sentido original.
Conheça nossos planos