Questões de Concurso
Sobre inglês
Foram encontradas 17.407 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Judge the item from.
In the sentence “Most of these services come with a
caveat – since the vet’s examination of the pet is
limited” (lines 15 and 16) there are two examples of the
verb to be.
Judge the item from.
In the sentence “These days it can be unsafe to leave the
house” (lines 1 and 2), the prefix -un has the same
meaning as in the following words: unusual; undeniable;
and underground.
The best translation for the above sentence is:
(3º§) "As she waited for sniffer dogs to check her bag, she wasn't too concerned about the Russian military build-up on Ukraine's borders."
I.The word "sniffer dogs" could be translated as "cães farejadores".
II.The word "waited" is a verb.
III.The word "concerned" could be replaced by "aid".
Which one(s) is(are) CORRECT?
Which verb tense the sentence above is?
Based on the text above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The study shows that citizens’ perception of disclosed
financial information is essentially shaped by fiscal stress.
Based on the text above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
In “State and local governments regularly disclose financial
information” the verb “disclose” is close in meaning to
make something known publicly.
Based on the text above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The word “Despite” (in the third sentence) is synonymous
with In spite of.
Based on the text above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The study aims at examining citizens’ access to government
financial information.
Based on the text above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The noun “revenues” (at the end of the text) could be
correctly replaced by renewals without any change in the
meaning of the sentence.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
In the second sentence of sixth paragraph, the pronoun
“they” refers to “The Office of Communications”.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The word “liable” (at the end of the first sentence of the
seventh paragraph) could be correctly replaced by liar
without changing the meaning of the text.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The expression “Draft legislation” (second paragraph) means
that the laws are not in their final form.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
Everyone supports the updated version of the bill.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
Ofcom receives money from the government to collect
information from companies.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The new version of the bill includes large amounts of fines if
the company disobeys certain rules.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The expression “bipartisan support” (third paragraph) means
a support by two political parties.
Conheça nossos planos