Questões de Concurso Comentadas para analista (superior)

Foram encontradas 9.620 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q2281260 Contabilidade Geral

Julgue o item que se segue, relativo ao conceito, ao objetivo, à periodicidade e à elaboração das principais demonstrações contábeis previstas na legislação societária e nas normas contábeis brasileiras.  


O objetivo das demonstrações contábeis é fornecer informações úteis para a tomada de decisão econômica pelos usuários dessas informações.

Alternativas
Q2281255 Legislação Federal

A respeito da prevenção e da gestão de riscos de compliance, julgue o item subsequente.


Os mecanismos utilizados no processo de lavagem de dinheiro se resumem à colocação dos recursos ilícitos no sistema econômico e à sua ocultação.

Alternativas
Q2281254 Legislação Federal

Julgue o item a seguir, de acordo com a Lei n.º 12.846/2013 (Lei de Anticorrupção Brasileira). 


O processo administrativo para apuração da responsabilidade de pessoa jurídica contra ato lesivo à administração pública deve ser conduzido por comissão composta por pelo menos três servidores estáveis.

Alternativas
Q2281252 Legislação Federal

Julgue o item a seguir, de acordo com a Lei n.º 12.846/2013 (Lei de Anticorrupção Brasileira). 


Obter vantagens indevidas a partir da manipulação do equilíbrio econômico-financeiro dos contratos celebrados com a administração pública constitui ato lesivo ao patrimônio público.  

Alternativas
Q2281251 Legislação Federal

Julgue o item a seguir, de acordo com a Lei n.º 12.846/2013 (Lei de Anticorrupção Brasileira). 


Na aplicação de sanções por atos lesivos contra a administração pública, é levada em consideração a vantagem auferida pelo infrator, e não a sua situação econômica.

Alternativas
Q2281250 Legislação Federal

Julgue o item a seguir, de acordo com a Lei n.º 12.846/2013 (Lei de Anticorrupção Brasileira). 


Os dirigentes de empresas privadas são responsabilizados por atos ilícitos contra a administração pública na medida da sua culpabilidade.

Alternativas
Q2281249 Inglês
Text CB1A2-I

        Oppenheimer’s brief advance into astrophysics began with a 1938 paper about neutron stars, which continued in a 1939 installment that further incorporated the principles of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. He then published a third paper on black holes on September 1st, 1939—but at the time, it was scarcely noticed because this was the very day Germany invaded Poland, launching World War II. Oppenheimer never wrote on the topic again.
        Even if it hadn’t been overshadowed by war, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes “was not understood to be terribly significant at the time,” says Cathryn Carson, a historian of science at the University of California, Berkeley.
        Each paper was written with a different member of the swarm of graduate students that Oppenheimer carefully cultivated. These protégés facilitated his ability to jump between research topics—and ultimately, helped him develop some of his most important contributions to physics.
        Oppenheimer’s climactic third paper, written with his student Hartland Snyder, explores the implications of general relativity on the universe’s most massive stars. Although the physicists needed to include some assumptions to simplify the question, they determined that a large enough star would gravitationally collapse indefinitely—and within a finite amount of time, meaning that the objects we now know as black holes could exist.

Internet: <scientificamerican.com> (adapted)

Based on the vocabulary and linguistic aspects of text CB1A2-I, judge the following item.


Graduate students are people studying for a master’s degree or doctorate.

Alternativas
Q2281248 Inglês
Text CB1A2-I

        Oppenheimer’s brief advance into astrophysics began with a 1938 paper about neutron stars, which continued in a 1939 installment that further incorporated the principles of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. He then published a third paper on black holes on September 1st, 1939—but at the time, it was scarcely noticed because this was the very day Germany invaded Poland, launching World War II. Oppenheimer never wrote on the topic again.
        Even if it hadn’t been overshadowed by war, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes “was not understood to be terribly significant at the time,” says Cathryn Carson, a historian of science at the University of California, Berkeley.
        Each paper was written with a different member of the swarm of graduate students that Oppenheimer carefully cultivated. These protégés facilitated his ability to jump between research topics—and ultimately, helped him develop some of his most important contributions to physics.
        Oppenheimer’s climactic third paper, written with his student Hartland Snyder, explores the implications of general relativity on the universe’s most massive stars. Although the physicists needed to include some assumptions to simplify the question, they determined that a large enough star would gravitationally collapse indefinitely—and within a finite amount of time, meaning that the objects we now know as black holes could exist.

Internet: <scientificamerican.com> (adapted)

Based on the vocabulary and linguistic aspects of text CB1A2-I, judge the following item.


The word “physicists” means “medical doctors”. 

Alternativas
Q2281247 Inglês
Text CB1A2-I

        Oppenheimer’s brief advance into astrophysics began with a 1938 paper about neutron stars, which continued in a 1939 installment that further incorporated the principles of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. He then published a third paper on black holes on September 1st, 1939—but at the time, it was scarcely noticed because this was the very day Germany invaded Poland, launching World War II. Oppenheimer never wrote on the topic again.
        Even if it hadn’t been overshadowed by war, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes “was not understood to be terribly significant at the time,” says Cathryn Carson, a historian of science at the University of California, Berkeley.
        Each paper was written with a different member of the swarm of graduate students that Oppenheimer carefully cultivated. These protégés facilitated his ability to jump between research topics—and ultimately, helped him develop some of his most important contributions to physics.
        Oppenheimer’s climactic third paper, written with his student Hartland Snyder, explores the implications of general relativity on the universe’s most massive stars. Although the physicists needed to include some assumptions to simplify the question, they determined that a large enough star would gravitationally collapse indefinitely—and within a finite amount of time, meaning that the objects we now know as black holes could exist.

Internet: <scientificamerican.com> (adapted)

Based on the vocabulary and linguistic aspects of text CB1A2-I, judge the following item.


The word “installment” (first sentence of the first paragraph) means, in the context of text CB1A2-I, “to make it ready to use”.

Alternativas
Q2281246 Inglês
Text CB1A2-I

        Oppenheimer’s brief advance into astrophysics began with a 1938 paper about neutron stars, which continued in a 1939 installment that further incorporated the principles of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. He then published a third paper on black holes on September 1st, 1939—but at the time, it was scarcely noticed because this was the very day Germany invaded Poland, launching World War II. Oppenheimer never wrote on the topic again.
        Even if it hadn’t been overshadowed by war, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes “was not understood to be terribly significant at the time,” says Cathryn Carson, a historian of science at the University of California, Berkeley.
        Each paper was written with a different member of the swarm of graduate students that Oppenheimer carefully cultivated. These protégés facilitated his ability to jump between research topics—and ultimately, helped him develop some of his most important contributions to physics.
        Oppenheimer’s climactic third paper, written with his student Hartland Snyder, explores the implications of general relativity on the universe’s most massive stars. Although the physicists needed to include some assumptions to simplify the question, they determined that a large enough star would gravitationally collapse indefinitely—and within a finite amount of time, meaning that the objects we now know as black holes could exist.

Internet: <scientificamerican.com> (adapted)

Based on the vocabulary and linguistic aspects of text CB1A2-I, judge the following item.


The word “overshadowed” (first sentence of the second paragraph) means, in the context of text CB1A2-I, “made less noticeable”. 

Alternativas
Q2281245 Inglês
Text CB1A2-I

        Oppenheimer’s brief advance into astrophysics began with a 1938 paper about neutron stars, which continued in a 1939 installment that further incorporated the principles of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. He then published a third paper on black holes on September 1st, 1939—but at the time, it was scarcely noticed because this was the very day Germany invaded Poland, launching World War II. Oppenheimer never wrote on the topic again.
        Even if it hadn’t been overshadowed by war, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes “was not understood to be terribly significant at the time,” says Cathryn Carson, a historian of science at the University of California, Berkeley.
        Each paper was written with a different member of the swarm of graduate students that Oppenheimer carefully cultivated. These protégés facilitated his ability to jump between research topics—and ultimately, helped him develop some of his most important contributions to physics.
        Oppenheimer’s climactic third paper, written with his student Hartland Snyder, explores the implications of general relativity on the universe’s most massive stars. Although the physicists needed to include some assumptions to simplify the question, they determined that a large enough star would gravitationally collapse indefinitely—and within a finite amount of time, meaning that the objects we now know as black holes could exist.

Internet: <scientificamerican.com> (adapted)
Based on the vocabulary and linguistic aspects of text CB1A2-I, judge the following item.
The pronoun “they” (last sentence of the last paragraph) refers to the word “assumptions”.
Alternativas
Q2281244 Inglês
Text CB1A2-I

        Oppenheimer’s brief advance into astrophysics began with a 1938 paper about neutron stars, which continued in a 1939 installment that further incorporated the principles of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. He then published a third paper on black holes on September 1st, 1939—but at the time, it was scarcely noticed because this was the very day Germany invaded Poland, launching World War II. Oppenheimer never wrote on the topic again.
        Even if it hadn’t been overshadowed by war, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes “was not understood to be terribly significant at the time,” says Cathryn Carson, a historian of science at the University of California, Berkeley.
        Each paper was written with a different member of the swarm of graduate students that Oppenheimer carefully cultivated. These protégés facilitated his ability to jump between research topics—and ultimately, helped him develop some of his most important contributions to physics.
        Oppenheimer’s climactic third paper, written with his student Hartland Snyder, explores the implications of general relativity on the universe’s most massive stars. Although the physicists needed to include some assumptions to simplify the question, they determined that a large enough star would gravitationally collapse indefinitely—and within a finite amount of time, meaning that the objects we now know as black holes could exist.

Internet: <scientificamerican.com> (adapted)

Based on text CB1A2-I, judge the following item.


Hartland Snyder helped Oppenheimer write his least relevant paper in physics.

Alternativas
Q2281243 Inglês
Text CB1A2-I

        Oppenheimer’s brief advance into astrophysics began with a 1938 paper about neutron stars, which continued in a 1939 installment that further incorporated the principles of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. He then published a third paper on black holes on September 1st, 1939—but at the time, it was scarcely noticed because this was the very day Germany invaded Poland, launching World War II. Oppenheimer never wrote on the topic again.
        Even if it hadn’t been overshadowed by war, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes “was not understood to be terribly significant at the time,” says Cathryn Carson, a historian of science at the University of California, Berkeley.
        Each paper was written with a different member of the swarm of graduate students that Oppenheimer carefully cultivated. These protégés facilitated his ability to jump between research topics—and ultimately, helped him develop some of his most important contributions to physics.
        Oppenheimer’s climactic third paper, written with his student Hartland Snyder, explores the implications of general relativity on the universe’s most massive stars. Although the physicists needed to include some assumptions to simplify the question, they determined that a large enough star would gravitationally collapse indefinitely—and within a finite amount of time, meaning that the objects we now know as black holes could exist.

Internet: <scientificamerican.com> (adapted)

Based on text CB1A2-I, judge the following item.


The word “war” (first sentence of the second paragraph) refers to any war.

Alternativas
Q2281242 Inglês
Text CB1A2-I

        Oppenheimer’s brief advance into astrophysics began with a 1938 paper about neutron stars, which continued in a 1939 installment that further incorporated the principles of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. He then published a third paper on black holes on September 1st, 1939—but at the time, it was scarcely noticed because this was the very day Germany invaded Poland, launching World War II. Oppenheimer never wrote on the topic again.
        Even if it hadn’t been overshadowed by war, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes “was not understood to be terribly significant at the time,” says Cathryn Carson, a historian of science at the University of California, Berkeley.
        Each paper was written with a different member of the swarm of graduate students that Oppenheimer carefully cultivated. These protégés facilitated his ability to jump between research topics—and ultimately, helped him develop some of his most important contributions to physics.
        Oppenheimer’s climactic third paper, written with his student Hartland Snyder, explores the implications of general relativity on the universe’s most massive stars. Although the physicists needed to include some assumptions to simplify the question, they determined that a large enough star would gravitationally collapse indefinitely—and within a finite amount of time, meaning that the objects we now know as black holes could exist.

Internet: <scientificamerican.com> (adapted)

Based on text CB1A2-I, judge the following item.


With the help of his students, Oppenheimer could easily shift from one research topic to another.

Alternativas
Q2281241 Inglês
Text CB1A2-I

        Oppenheimer’s brief advance into astrophysics began with a 1938 paper about neutron stars, which continued in a 1939 installment that further incorporated the principles of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. He then published a third paper on black holes on September 1st, 1939—but at the time, it was scarcely noticed because this was the very day Germany invaded Poland, launching World War II. Oppenheimer never wrote on the topic again.
        Even if it hadn’t been overshadowed by war, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes “was not understood to be terribly significant at the time,” says Cathryn Carson, a historian of science at the University of California, Berkeley.
        Each paper was written with a different member of the swarm of graduate students that Oppenheimer carefully cultivated. These protégés facilitated his ability to jump between research topics—and ultimately, helped him develop some of his most important contributions to physics.
        Oppenheimer’s climactic third paper, written with his student Hartland Snyder, explores the implications of general relativity on the universe’s most massive stars. Although the physicists needed to include some assumptions to simplify the question, they determined that a large enough star would gravitationally collapse indefinitely—and within a finite amount of time, meaning that the objects we now know as black holes could exist.

Internet: <scientificamerican.com> (adapted)

Based on text CB1A2-I, judge the following item.


According to Cathryn Carson, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes was meaningless at the time it was developed.

Alternativas
Q2281240 Inglês
Text CB1A2-I

        Oppenheimer’s brief advance into astrophysics began with a 1938 paper about neutron stars, which continued in a 1939 installment that further incorporated the principles of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. He then published a third paper on black holes on September 1st, 1939—but at the time, it was scarcely noticed because this was the very day Germany invaded Poland, launching World War II. Oppenheimer never wrote on the topic again.
        Even if it hadn’t been overshadowed by war, Oppenheimer’s work on neutron stars and black holes “was not understood to be terribly significant at the time,” says Cathryn Carson, a historian of science at the University of California, Berkeley.
        Each paper was written with a different member of the swarm of graduate students that Oppenheimer carefully cultivated. These protégés facilitated his ability to jump between research topics—and ultimately, helped him develop some of his most important contributions to physics.
        Oppenheimer’s climactic third paper, written with his student Hartland Snyder, explores the implications of general relativity on the universe’s most massive stars. Although the physicists needed to include some assumptions to simplify the question, they determined that a large enough star would gravitationally collapse indefinitely—and within a finite amount of time, meaning that the objects we now know as black holes could exist.

Internet: <scientificamerican.com> (adapted)

Based on text CB1A2-I, judge the following item.


Oppenheimer’s paper on black holes received little attention at the time it was published.

Alternativas
Q2281239 Português
Texto CB1A1-I

        Os testes econométricos realizados para o estado de São Paulo mostram que a disponibilidade de gás natural teve importância na localização industrial. Tal resultado é corroborado pela avaliação de que seu efeito impacta mais a indústria consumidora intensiva do que a média das indústrias.
        Por outro lado, esta análise também está limitada pelo conjunto de variáveis disponíveis para controle. Embora tenham sido incluídas no modelo variáveis fundamentais no processo de localização, é inevitável que haja um grupo de variáveis omitidas. Citam-se, por exemplo, a relação entre os preços dos energéticos, as questões tributárias, a proximidade com pontos de exportação e com outras fontes de insumos importantes.
        Essa constatação, por sua vez, não diminui a relevância dos testes produzidos. Ao contrário, se se pode provar que a malha de gasodutos do país serve como fator de atração de atividade econômica, pode-se apontar mais uma possibilidade de atuação do setor público no intuito de garantir um processo de desconcentração econômica mais efetiva no país. A construção de uma malha mais eficiente e abrangente surge, portanto, como um importante desafio a ser considerado no planejamento energético nacional.

Edgar Antonio Perlotti et al. Concentração espacial da indústria de São Paulo: evidências sobre o papel da disponibilidade de gás natural. Energia e ambiente. 30 (87), maio-ago./2016 (com adaptações).

Considerando as relações de concordância verbal estabelecidas no texto CB1A1-I, julgue o próximo item.


A forma verbal que inicia o último período do segundo parágrafo está na voz passiva pronominal e sua flexão na terceira pessoa do plural justifica-se pelo fato de o sujeito ser composto.

Alternativas
Q2281238 Português
Texto CB1A1-I

        Os testes econométricos realizados para o estado de São Paulo mostram que a disponibilidade de gás natural teve importância na localização industrial. Tal resultado é corroborado pela avaliação de que seu efeito impacta mais a indústria consumidora intensiva do que a média das indústrias.
        Por outro lado, esta análise também está limitada pelo conjunto de variáveis disponíveis para controle. Embora tenham sido incluídas no modelo variáveis fundamentais no processo de localização, é inevitável que haja um grupo de variáveis omitidas. Citam-se, por exemplo, a relação entre os preços dos energéticos, as questões tributárias, a proximidade com pontos de exportação e com outras fontes de insumos importantes.
        Essa constatação, por sua vez, não diminui a relevância dos testes produzidos. Ao contrário, se se pode provar que a malha de gasodutos do país serve como fator de atração de atividade econômica, pode-se apontar mais uma possibilidade de atuação do setor público no intuito de garantir um processo de desconcentração econômica mais efetiva no país. A construção de uma malha mais eficiente e abrangente surge, portanto, como um importante desafio a ser considerado no planejamento energético nacional.

Edgar Antonio Perlotti et al. Concentração espacial da indústria de São Paulo: evidências sobre o papel da disponibilidade de gás natural. Energia e ambiente. 30 (87), maio-ago./2016 (com adaptações).

Considerando as relações de concordância verbal estabelecidas no texto CB1A1-I, julgue o próximo item.


Estaria mantida a correção gramatical do texto caso a forma verbal “serve” (segundo período do último parágrafo) fosse flexionada na terceira pessoa do plural — servem —, dada a possibilidade de concordância verbal com o termo mais próximo, “gasodutos”.

Alternativas
Q2281237 Português
Texto CB1A1-I

        Os testes econométricos realizados para o estado de São Paulo mostram que a disponibilidade de gás natural teve importância na localização industrial. Tal resultado é corroborado pela avaliação de que seu efeito impacta mais a indústria consumidora intensiva do que a média das indústrias.
        Por outro lado, esta análise também está limitada pelo conjunto de variáveis disponíveis para controle. Embora tenham sido incluídas no modelo variáveis fundamentais no processo de localização, é inevitável que haja um grupo de variáveis omitidas. Citam-se, por exemplo, a relação entre os preços dos energéticos, as questões tributárias, a proximidade com pontos de exportação e com outras fontes de insumos importantes.
        Essa constatação, por sua vez, não diminui a relevância dos testes produzidos. Ao contrário, se se pode provar que a malha de gasodutos do país serve como fator de atração de atividade econômica, pode-se apontar mais uma possibilidade de atuação do setor público no intuito de garantir um processo de desconcentração econômica mais efetiva no país. A construção de uma malha mais eficiente e abrangente surge, portanto, como um importante desafio a ser considerado no planejamento energético nacional.

Edgar Antonio Perlotti et al. Concentração espacial da indústria de São Paulo: evidências sobre o papel da disponibilidade de gás natural. Energia e ambiente. 30 (87), maio-ago./2016 (com adaptações).

Considerando as relações de concordância verbal estabelecidas no texto CB1A1-I, julgue o próximo item.


No segundo período do segundo parágrafo, a supressão do segmento “um grupo de” ensejaria que a forma verbal “haja” fosse flexionada no plural — hajam —, para a adequada concordância com o termo “variáveis”. 

Alternativas
Q2281236 Português
Texto CB1A1-I

        Os testes econométricos realizados para o estado de São Paulo mostram que a disponibilidade de gás natural teve importância na localização industrial. Tal resultado é corroborado pela avaliação de que seu efeito impacta mais a indústria consumidora intensiva do que a média das indústrias.
        Por outro lado, esta análise também está limitada pelo conjunto de variáveis disponíveis para controle. Embora tenham sido incluídas no modelo variáveis fundamentais no processo de localização, é inevitável que haja um grupo de variáveis omitidas. Citam-se, por exemplo, a relação entre os preços dos energéticos, as questões tributárias, a proximidade com pontos de exportação e com outras fontes de insumos importantes.
        Essa constatação, por sua vez, não diminui a relevância dos testes produzidos. Ao contrário, se se pode provar que a malha de gasodutos do país serve como fator de atração de atividade econômica, pode-se apontar mais uma possibilidade de atuação do setor público no intuito de garantir um processo de desconcentração econômica mais efetiva no país. A construção de uma malha mais eficiente e abrangente surge, portanto, como um importante desafio a ser considerado no planejamento energético nacional.

Edgar Antonio Perlotti et al. Concentração espacial da indústria de São Paulo: evidências sobre o papel da disponibilidade de gás natural. Energia e ambiente. 30 (87), maio-ago./2016 (com adaptações).

A respeito das relações de subordinação presentes no texto CB1A1-I, julgue o item subsequente. 


No segundo período do segundo parágrafo, o vocábulo “Embora” introduz oração que se classifica como adverbial consecutiva.

Alternativas
Respostas
3241: C
3242: E
3243: E
3244: C
3245: E
3246: C
3247: C
3248: E
3249: E
3250: C
3251: E
3252: E
3253: E
3254: C
3255: E
3256: C
3257: C
3258: E
3259: E
3260: E