Questões de Concurso
Comentadas para analista de controle externo
Foram encontradas 1.290 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
In the second sentence of sixth paragraph, the pronoun
“they” refers to “The Office of Communications”.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The word “liable” (at the end of the first sentence of the
seventh paragraph) could be correctly replaced by liar
without changing the meaning of the text.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The expression “Draft legislation” (second paragraph) means
that the laws are not in their final form.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
Everyone supports the updated version of the bill.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
Ofcom receives money from the government to collect
information from companies.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The new version of the bill includes large amounts of fines if
the company disobeys certain rules.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
The expression “bipartisan support” (third paragraph) means
a support by two political parties.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
Lawmakers have always been supportive of the online safety
legislation.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
One of the objectives of the new legislation is to cease social
media operations.
Leaders at tech companies around the world could face up to two years in prison in the United Kingdom if they do not comply with new online safety laws.
Draft legislation aims to crack down on social media and other online entities to ensure safety and privacy for users, particularly children. The laws were drafted to prevent uploading and spreading of harmful content such as racism, bullying, fraud and sexual abuse.
While the legislation has been criticized by Parliament members in the past, the new draft has received bipartisan support.
The bill has to be voted on by British lawmakers.
The legislation has been updated several times since its inception. Among the changes are hefty fines or blockages if networks fail to remove harmful content after being notified of its existence, as well as the labeling of sending unsolicited nudes as a criminal offense.
The fines could be up to 10 percent of the affected company’s annual global income. The Office of Communications (Ofcom), the bill’s regulator, has been granted legal grounds to request information from companies they suspect of not following the bill’s rules.
If Ofcom is able to prove that the companies withheld information or have not responded properly to notifications of inappropriate or illegal content, the executives would be held criminally liable. This part of the law will be enforced two months after the law itself is enacted, meaning companies and websites will have time to crack down on their content before facing legal consequences.
Some U.K. residents have pushed back against the new version of the bill, including memes from the Open Rights Group. The organization claims that, despite good intentions, the regulations could result in a slippery slope that could end up violating free speech.
Internet:
Considering the text presented above and the vocabulary used in it, judge the following item.
New online safety laws in the United Kingdom could send
tech company leaders to jail.
Judge the following item considering the text above and the vocabulary used in it.
The word “Therefore” (in the fourth sentence of the second
paragraph) could be correctly replaced by Henceforth
without any change in the meaning of the text.
Judge the following item considering the text above and the vocabulary used in it.
In the second paragraph, the word “audit” is synonymous
with audition.
Judge the following item considering the text above and the vocabulary used in it.
The word “reliant” (in the second sentence of the first
paragraph) could be correctly replaced by dependent
without any change in the meaning of the text.
Judge the following item considering the text above and the vocabulary used in it.
The word state has the same meaning in the first and in the
second sentences of the first paragraph.
Judge the following item considering the text above and the vocabulary used in it.
It can be inferred from the text that the SAO keeps certain
issues secret to avoid endangering security.
A respeito dos aspectos linguísticos do texto CB1A2-II, julgue o item que se segue.
No trecho “podemos ter quase certeza de que o erro nos
acompanhará para sempre” (terceiro parágrafo), o pronome
“nos” funciona como complemento da forma verbal
“acompanhará”.
A respeito dos aspectos linguísticos do texto CB1A2-II, julgue o item que se segue.
No trecho “Conclusões falsas são tiradas todo o tempo, mas
elas constituem tentativas” (primeiro parágrafo), o teor da
oração introduzida pelo vocábulo “mas” atenua a força
argumentativa do conteúdo da primeira oração.
A respeito dos aspectos linguísticos do texto CB1A2-II, julgue o item que se segue.
A supressão da vírgula presente logo após a palavra “erro”
(segundo período do terceiro parágrafo) prejudicaria a
correção gramatical do texto.
A respeito dos aspectos linguísticos do texto CB1A2-II, julgue o item que se segue.
A oração “de modo a poderem ser refutadas” (quarto período
do primeiro parágrafo) expressa circunstância de finalidade.
A respeito dos aspectos linguísticos do texto CB1A2-II, julgue o item que se segue.
Estaria mantida a correção gramatical do texto caso a forma
verbal “difere” (primeiro período do primeiro parágrafo)
estivesse acompanhada do pronome se — escrevendo-se
difere-se ou se difere.
Conheça nossos planos