Questões de Concurso Para professor - inglês

Foram encontradas 18.316 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

www.qconcursos.com
Q2914498
Português Interpretação de Textos ,
Ano: 2008 Banca: ITCO Órgão: CEFET-Cuiabá-MT Provas: ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Matemática | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Administração | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Língua Portuguesa e Inglesa | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Engenharia Civil |
Q2914498 Português

erro de português

Quando o português chegou

Debaixo duma bruta chuva

Vestiu o índio

Que pena!

Fosse uma manhã de sol

O índio tinha despido

O português

Oswald de Andrade


Marque a alternativa incorreta.

Alternativas
Q2914497
Português Interpretação de Textos , Crase ,
Ano: 2008 Banca: ITCO Órgão: CEFET-Cuiabá-MT Provas: ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Matemática | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Administração | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Língua Portuguesa e Inglesa | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Engenharia Civil |
Q2914497 Português

“Diga ___ elas que estejam daqui ___ pouco ___ porta da biblioteca.”

Alternativas
Q2914496
Português Pontuação , Interpretação de Textos , Sintaxe , Análise sintática
Ano: 2008 Banca: ITCO Órgão: CEFET-Cuiabá-MT Provas: ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Matemática | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Administração | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Língua Portuguesa e Inglesa | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Engenharia Civil |
Q2914496 Português

Assinale a alternativa em que a vírgula está empregada incorretamente.

Alternativas
Q2914495
Português Ortografia ,
Ano: 2008 Banca: ITCO Órgão: CEFET-Cuiabá-MT Provas: ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Matemática | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Administração | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Língua Portuguesa e Inglesa | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Engenharia Civil |
Q2914495 Português

Só numa série abaixo todas as palavras estão acentuadas corretamente. Assinale-a.

Alternativas
Q2914494
Português Interpretação de Textos ,
Ano: 2008 Banca: ITCO Órgão: CEFET-Cuiabá-MT Provas: ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Matemática | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Administração | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Língua Portuguesa e Inglesa | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Engenharia Civil |
Q2914494 Português

Assinale a alternativa em que a palavra em negrito é utilizada incorretamente.

Alternativas
Q2914493
Português Interpretação de Textos ,
Ano: 2008 Banca: ITCO Órgão: CEFET-Cuiabá-MT Provas: ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Matemática | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Administração | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Língua Portuguesa e Inglesa | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Engenharia Civil |
Q2914493 Português

Assinale a alternativa que completa corretamente as frases abaixo.


A rua ___ moro é longa.

___ você vai?

A escola ___ estudo é rígida.

Não sei ___ começar a busca.

Não sei ___ ir.

Alternativas
Q2914046
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2914046 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The knowledge the speaker must have to compensate for breakdowns in communication due to limiting conditions in actual communication is labeled by Canale and Swain (1980) as

Alternativas
Q2914043
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2914043 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

According to Oxford (1989, p. 172), “Background knowledge of the new culture often helps learners understand better what is heard or read in the new language.” Such knowledge is usually promoted by learning strategies referred by the author as

Alternativas
Q2914041
Inglês Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects , Pronúncia e Som | Pronunciation and Sound ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2914041 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The {-s} plural morpheme in the underlined word in “Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation” has the same pronunciation of the one in the underlined word in alternative

Alternativas
Q2914022
Inglês Verbos | Verbs , Infinitivo e gerúndio | Infinitive and gerund ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2914022 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The inflectional {-ing} morpheme is found in the underlined word in alternative

Alternativas
Q2914007
Inglês Artigos | Articles ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2914007 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

Check the alternative in which the underlined utterance has the same grammatical function of the underlined one in “Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener”.

Alternativas
Q2913999
Inglês Pronomes | Pronouns , Pronome objetivo | Objective pronoun ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2913999 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The pronoun them in “This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message” refers to

Alternativas
Q2913996
Inglês Artigos | Articles , Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2913996 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The underlined word in “Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures”, introduces something that is

Alternativas
Q2913995
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2913995 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The example given in the 4th paragraph supports the idea that successful cross-cultural communication depends on understanding interlocutors’

Alternativas
Q2913992
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2913992 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The author implies that the referential meaning of speaker’s propositions is signaled by

Alternativas
Q2913987
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2913987 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

According to the text A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings, human communication

Alternativas
Q2913187
Português Interpretação de Textos ,
Ano: 2008 Banca: ITCO Órgão: CEFET-Cuiabá-MT Provas: ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Matemática | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Administração | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Língua Portuguesa e Inglesa | ITCO - 2008 - CEFET-Cuiabá-MT - Professor - Engenharia Civil |
Q2913187 Português

Assinale a alternativa que completa as frases abaixo apropriadamente.


Ela é muito inteligente, __ não é muito aplicada.

Maria sofre de um ___ sem cura.

Lia, que não é tão inteligente, é ___ esforçada.

Fábio é muito ___-caráter.

Samuel e eu discordamos em tudo. A opinião dele sempre vai___ minha.

A opinião dos leitores veio ________ aspirações do senador, que se sentiu feliz por ter suas idéias acolhidas.

Alternativas
Q2877318
Noções de Informática Internet , Windows Explorer - conceitos de organização de pastas e arquivos , Teclas de atalho ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Provas: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Matemática | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Médico ortopedista e traumatologista | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Psicólogo | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Educação Física | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Médico veterinário | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Engenheiro Ambiental | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Contador | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Médico clínico | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Fisioterapeuta | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Ciências - Biologicas | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Artes | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Engenheiro Florestal | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Enfermeiro | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Portuguesa | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Engenheiro Civil | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Administrador | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Agrônomo | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Biólogo | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - História | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Geografia |
Q2877318 Noções de Informática

No Windows Explorer 6, o usuário resolve excluir um arquivo da pasta denominada “concurso”, utilizando para esta ação a tecla “Delete” do teclado padrão ABNT2. Logo após a ação de exclusão do arquivo, o usuário se arrepende. Necessitando recuperar o arquivo excluído acidentalmente da referida pasta, o usuário pressiona as teclas

Alternativas
Q2877317
Noções de Informática Internet , Sítios de busca e pesquisa na Internet ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Provas: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Matemática | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Médico ortopedista e traumatologista | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Psicólogo | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Educação Física | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Médico veterinário | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Engenheiro Ambiental | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Contador | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Médico clínico | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Fisioterapeuta | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Ciências - Biologicas | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Artes | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Engenheiro Florestal | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Enfermeiro | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Portuguesa | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Engenheiro Civil | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Administrador | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Agrônomo | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Biólogo | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - História | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Geografia |
Q2877317 Noções de Informática

Os sistemas que efetuam pesquisas de forma local em sítios específicos, como busca de notícias ou busca de preços de produtos, dentre os quais se destacam os serviços Páginas Amarelas, iLocal e Buscapé, são os conhecidos como

Alternativas
Q2877315
Noções de Informática Software ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Provas: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Matemática | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Médico ortopedista e traumatologista | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Psicólogo | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Educação Física | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Médico veterinário | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Engenheiro Ambiental | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Contador | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Médico clínico | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Fisioterapeuta | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Ciências - Biologicas | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Artes | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Engenheiro Florestal | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Enfermeiro | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Portuguesa | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Engenheiro Civil | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Administrador | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Agrônomo | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Biólogo | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - História | FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Geografia |
Q2877315 Noções de Informática

O software __________ exige por contrato que o usuário pague a licença ao desenvolvedor do programa. O usuário não compra o programa e sim a licença de uso.

- A palavra que completa corretamente a lacuna é

Alternativas
Respostas
621: E
622: D
623: D
624: A
625: B
626: E
627: D
628: B
629: D
630: B
631: C
632: B
633: C
634: D
635: A
636: C
637: C
638: D
639: B
640: A
www.qconcursos.com