Questões de Concurso Militar CBM-MG 2013 para Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro
Foram encontradas 50 questões
Ano: 2013
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CBM-MG
Prova:
FUMARC - 2013 - CBM-MG - Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro |
Q535736
Física
Ao se fazer uma medida, do ponto de vista científico, são necessárias regras de tal maneira que, em qualquer
lugar do planeta, essa mesma medida possa ser feita por outras pessoas, dentro dos mesmos critérios.
Dentro desses critérios, uma pessoa deve escrever o resultado da medida com todas as casas métricas que ela
consegue ler no aparelho, mais a primeira casa que ela consegue ainda avaliar.
Por exemplo, ao usar uma régua escolar, que é milimetrada, para fazer uma medida, uma pessoa poderia obter,
do ponto de vista de algarismos significativos (critérios científicos), a medida:
Ano: 2013
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CBM-MG
Prova:
FUMARC - 2013 - CBM-MG - Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro |
Q535737
Física
Força resultante corresponde à soma de todas as forças que atuam em um corpo. Seja um corpo que tenha sido
arremessado verticalmente para cima, atinja uma altura máxima e volte ao local de onde tenha sido arremessado.
Considere que a resistência do ar tenha sido desprezível durante essa movimentação.
Sobre a força resultante que atua no corpo durante a sua movimentação, é CORRETO afirmar que ela é vertical
Ano: 2013
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CBM-MG
Prova:
FUMARC - 2013 - CBM-MG - Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro |
Q535738
Física
Sabemos que o som são ondas que se propagam num meio material. No vácuo, não há sons.
Duas pessoas conversam. A voz de Marina é mais aguda do que a de Francisco.
Em relação às ondas sonoras que cada um deles emite, é CORRETO afirmar que o comprimento de onda dos
sons de Francisco é
Ano: 2013
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CBM-MG
Prova:
FUMARC - 2013 - CBM-MG - Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro |
Q535739
Física
Numa residência, todos os aparelhos elétricos são ligados a uma mesma tensão elétrica. Sabemos que a resistência elétrica de um aparelho elétrico é inversamente proporcional à corrente que por ele passa. Nessa residência, estão ligados um chuveiro de 5.300 watts, uma lâmpada de 60 watts e um ferro elétrico de 1.000 watts.
Em relação a esses três aparelhos, é CORRETO afirmar que
Ano: 2013
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CBM-MG
Prova:
FUMARC - 2013 - CBM-MG - Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro |
Q535740
Física
Três alunos, Paulo, Joana e Rafael, discutiam sobre o experimento de Rutherford e fizeram as seguintes afirmações:
Paulo: Rutherford percebeu que a carga positiva do átomo não poderia estar espalhada por todo o átomo, mas sim concentrada num local muito menor que o próprio átomo. Joana: O experimento permitiu a Rutherford a descoberta do elétron, contrariando a ideia que havia na época de que o átomo fosse indivisível. Rafael: No experimento, Rutherford percebeu que os elétrons só poderiam se mover em determinadas órbitas em torno do núcleo, pois, nessas órbitas, os elétrons não emitiriam energia.Está(ão) CORRETA(S) apenas a(s) afirmação(ões) feita(s) por:
Ano: 2013
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CBM-MG
Prova:
FUMARC - 2013 - CBM-MG - Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro |
Q535741
Inglês
Texto associado
FAT IS BEAUTIFUL?
Americans are fat, they are getting fatter and as soon as they out eat the South Sea Islanders,
they will be the fattest people in the world. This alarming message, from the journalist Greg Critter, has
helped promote the provocative bestseller Fat Land. It reveals that six out of every 10 Americans are
already overweight and that, if they continue to expand at the current rate, by 2050 all of them will be. So
what should they do about it
There is an obvious and a not-so-obvious answer to this question. Greg Critser provides the conventional
solution: they should eat more carefully and do more exercise. He traces the expanding American
waistline to Earl Butz, President Nixon’s foul-mouthed Secretary of Agriculture, who drastically
brought down food prices in the ‘70s by introducing subsidies for farming. The other great architect of
obesity was David Wallerstein, the McDonalds executive who discovered super sizing- offering vast single
portions of food so people eat the equivalent of the double helpings that they were too embarrassed
to ask for.
But the issue has another reaction: not “I’m fat, so what can I do about it?” but “I’m fat, so what?”
This is the line taken by fat activists and size awareness advocates. They believe that there is nothing
wrong with being overweight: negative attitudes towards large people are simply prejudices that need to
be fought.
In part perhaps due to fat liberationists, the USA is changing its views on size. The fashion press,
for instance, recently announced that “fat is the new thin.” According to American Vogue the voluptuously
curved Kate Winslet, Jennifer Lopez and Kelly Osbourne are much more attractive than the “stick-thin”
Hollywood stereotypes. There is also a popular backlash against “self-hating” attitudes of an older generation
that was inspired by feminism and sexual liberation to try always be perfect and in control.
In spite of this, one crucial factor seems destined to keep Americans trying to lose weight. Obesity,
as Critser points out, is now - for the first time in the history - the disease of the poor, not the rich.
And, in an aspirational society, if the well-off can see their feet, everyone else will want as well.
Adapted from SPEAKUP n.196, pages 18 to 20.
According to Greg Critser in 2050
Ano: 2013
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CBM-MG
Prova:
FUMARC - 2013 - CBM-MG - Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro |
Q535742
Inglês
Texto associado
FAT IS BEAUTIFUL?
Americans are fat, they are getting fatter and as soon as they out eat the South Sea Islanders,
they will be the fattest people in the world. This alarming message, from the journalist Greg Critter, has
helped promote the provocative bestseller Fat Land. It reveals that six out of every 10 Americans are
already overweight and that, if they continue to expand at the current rate, by 2050 all of them will be. So
what should they do about it
There is an obvious and a not-so-obvious answer to this question. Greg Critser provides the conventional
solution: they should eat more carefully and do more exercise. He traces the expanding American
waistline to Earl Butz, President Nixon’s foul-mouthed Secretary of Agriculture, who drastically
brought down food prices in the ‘70s by introducing subsidies for farming. The other great architect of
obesity was David Wallerstein, the McDonalds executive who discovered super sizing- offering vast single
portions of food so people eat the equivalent of the double helpings that they were too embarrassed
to ask for.
But the issue has another reaction: not “I’m fat, so what can I do about it?” but “I’m fat, so what?”
This is the line taken by fat activists and size awareness advocates. They believe that there is nothing
wrong with being overweight: negative attitudes towards large people are simply prejudices that need to
be fought.
In part perhaps due to fat liberationists, the USA is changing its views on size. The fashion press,
for instance, recently announced that “fat is the new thin.” According to American Vogue the voluptuously
curved Kate Winslet, Jennifer Lopez and Kelly Osbourne are much more attractive than the “stick-thin”
Hollywood stereotypes. There is also a popular backlash against “self-hating” attitudes of an older generation
that was inspired by feminism and sexual liberation to try always be perfect and in control.
In spite of this, one crucial factor seems destined to keep Americans trying to lose weight. Obesity,
as Critser points out, is now - for the first time in the history - the disease of the poor, not the rich.
And, in an aspirational society, if the well-off can see their feet, everyone else will want as well.
Adapted from SPEAKUP n.196, pages 18 to 20.
All the characteristics below prove that U.S.A. is changing its view and size, EXCEPT:
Ano: 2013
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CBM-MG
Prova:
FUMARC - 2013 - CBM-MG - Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro |
Q535743
Inglês
Texto associado
FAT IS BEAUTIFUL?
Americans are fat, they are getting fatter and as soon as they out eat the South Sea Islanders,
they will be the fattest people in the world. This alarming message, from the journalist Greg Critter, has
helped promote the provocative bestseller Fat Land. It reveals that six out of every 10 Americans are
already overweight and that, if they continue to expand at the current rate, by 2050 all of them will be. So
what should they do about it
There is an obvious and a not-so-obvious answer to this question. Greg Critser provides the conventional
solution: they should eat more carefully and do more exercise. He traces the expanding American
waistline to Earl Butz, President Nixon’s foul-mouthed Secretary of Agriculture, who drastically
brought down food prices in the ‘70s by introducing subsidies for farming. The other great architect of
obesity was David Wallerstein, the McDonalds executive who discovered super sizing- offering vast single
portions of food so people eat the equivalent of the double helpings that they were too embarrassed
to ask for.
But the issue has another reaction: not “I’m fat, so what can I do about it?” but “I’m fat, so what?”
This is the line taken by fat activists and size awareness advocates. They believe that there is nothing
wrong with being overweight: negative attitudes towards large people are simply prejudices that need to
be fought.
In part perhaps due to fat liberationists, the USA is changing its views on size. The fashion press,
for instance, recently announced that “fat is the new thin.” According to American Vogue the voluptuously
curved Kate Winslet, Jennifer Lopez and Kelly Osbourne are much more attractive than the “stick-thin”
Hollywood stereotypes. There is also a popular backlash against “self-hating” attitudes of an older generation
that was inspired by feminism and sexual liberation to try always be perfect and in control.
In spite of this, one crucial factor seems destined to keep Americans trying to lose weight. Obesity,
as Critser points out, is now - for the first time in the history - the disease of the poor, not the rich.
And, in an aspirational society, if the well-off can see their feet, everyone else will want as well.
Adapted from SPEAKUP n.196, pages 18 to 20.
In the sentence “[…] they were too embarrassed to ask for […]”, to ask for means:
Ano: 2013
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CBM-MG
Prova:
FUMARC - 2013 - CBM-MG - Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro |
Q535744
Inglês
Texto associado
FAT IS BEAUTIFUL?
Americans are fat, they are getting fatter and as soon as they out eat the South Sea Islanders,
they will be the fattest people in the world. This alarming message, from the journalist Greg Critter, has
helped promote the provocative bestseller Fat Land. It reveals that six out of every 10 Americans are
already overweight and that, if they continue to expand at the current rate, by 2050 all of them will be. So
what should they do about it
There is an obvious and a not-so-obvious answer to this question. Greg Critser provides the conventional
solution: they should eat more carefully and do more exercise. He traces the expanding American
waistline to Earl Butz, President Nixon’s foul-mouthed Secretary of Agriculture, who drastically
brought down food prices in the ‘70s by introducing subsidies for farming. The other great architect of
obesity was David Wallerstein, the McDonalds executive who discovered super sizing- offering vast single
portions of food so people eat the equivalent of the double helpings that they were too embarrassed
to ask for.
But the issue has another reaction: not “I’m fat, so what can I do about it?” but “I’m fat, so what?”
This is the line taken by fat activists and size awareness advocates. They believe that there is nothing
wrong with being overweight: negative attitudes towards large people are simply prejudices that need to
be fought.
In part perhaps due to fat liberationists, the USA is changing its views on size. The fashion press,
for instance, recently announced that “fat is the new thin.” According to American Vogue the voluptuously
curved Kate Winslet, Jennifer Lopez and Kelly Osbourne are much more attractive than the “stick-thin”
Hollywood stereotypes. There is also a popular backlash against “self-hating” attitudes of an older generation
that was inspired by feminism and sexual liberation to try always be perfect and in control.
In spite of this, one crucial factor seems destined to keep Americans trying to lose weight. Obesity,
as Critser points out, is now - for the first time in the history - the disease of the poor, not the rich.
And, in an aspirational society, if the well-off can see their feet, everyone else will want as well.
Adapted from SPEAKUP n.196, pages 18 to 20.
We can say that to Americans who are overweight:
Ano: 2013
Banca:
FUMARC
Órgão:
CBM-MG
Prova:
FUMARC - 2013 - CBM-MG - Aspirante do Corpo de Bombeiro |
Q535745
Inglês
Texto associado
FAT IS BEAUTIFUL?
Americans are fat, they are getting fatter and as soon as they out eat the South Sea Islanders,
they will be the fattest people in the world. This alarming message, from the journalist Greg Critter, has
helped promote the provocative bestseller Fat Land. It reveals that six out of every 10 Americans are
already overweight and that, if they continue to expand at the current rate, by 2050 all of them will be. So
what should they do about it
There is an obvious and a not-so-obvious answer to this question. Greg Critser provides the conventional
solution: they should eat more carefully and do more exercise. He traces the expanding American
waistline to Earl Butz, President Nixon’s foul-mouthed Secretary of Agriculture, who drastically
brought down food prices in the ‘70s by introducing subsidies for farming. The other great architect of
obesity was David Wallerstein, the McDonalds executive who discovered super sizing- offering vast single
portions of food so people eat the equivalent of the double helpings that they were too embarrassed
to ask for.
But the issue has another reaction: not “I’m fat, so what can I do about it?” but “I’m fat, so what?”
This is the line taken by fat activists and size awareness advocates. They believe that there is nothing
wrong with being overweight: negative attitudes towards large people are simply prejudices that need to
be fought.
In part perhaps due to fat liberationists, the USA is changing its views on size. The fashion press,
for instance, recently announced that “fat is the new thin.” According to American Vogue the voluptuously
curved Kate Winslet, Jennifer Lopez and Kelly Osbourne are much more attractive than the “stick-thin”
Hollywood stereotypes. There is also a popular backlash against “self-hating” attitudes of an older generation
that was inspired by feminism and sexual liberation to try always be perfect and in control.
In spite of this, one crucial factor seems destined to keep Americans trying to lose weight. Obesity,
as Critser points out, is now - for the first time in the history - the disease of the poor, not the rich.
And, in an aspirational society, if the well-off can see their feet, everyone else will want as well.
Adapted from SPEAKUP n.196, pages 18 to 20.
The crucial factor that can keep Americans trying to lose weight now is:
Conheça nossos planos