Questões de Inglês para Concurso
Foram encontradas 12.328 questões
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520326
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
Effective text comprehension only occurs if there is
correspondence between the activated knowledge in the
text and the reader's world knowledge.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520325
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
Adverbial phrases in English can be composed exclusively
of an adverb as their central element which does not
modify directly a verb. For example: The weather forecast
predicted rain quite soon.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520324
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
The purpose of teaching is to prioritize the accumulation
of knowledge, valuing a mind filled with information which
is the only possible way to achieve problem solving skills
as it can be observed in classrooms.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520322
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
In the libertarian progressive pedagogy, the teacherstudent relationship is horizontal and non-directive,
promoting self-management and the freedom of students
in their learning.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520321
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
The concept of social skills, currently used in education,
encompasses a set of actions and attitudes of the
teacher in the classroom to promote student motivation,
manage discipline, and make the learning process more
engaging.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520319
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
The pedagogical trend called "traditional liberal"
advocates that teaching content is organized based on
the experiences lived by the student, thus promoting an
education centered on the development of cognitive skills.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520318
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
The relationship between teacher and student in the
classroom is characterized by a complexity that goes
beyond simple didactic interaction or warm human
interaction. Both parties play fundamental roles, where
the actions of one affect those of the other, and the
student is not seen as a mere recipient of knowledge but
as a being capable of thinking, reflecting, and actively
participating in the educational process.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520316
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
Within the Communicative Approach, promoting group
work is a valued strategy for teaching a foreign language.
This methodology emphasizes the importance of allowing
students to interact with each other in small groups,
which can maximize their opportunities for
communicative practice.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520315
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
Verb phrases contain a verb as their central element.
However, sentences that include a modal verb (such as
can, may might etc) can also be considered a verb phrase,
since the modal verb will change the meaning and tone of
the main verb. It is important to note that modal verbs is
the only exception to verb phrases without a verb as its
central element.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520313
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
Contextualizing teaching content is relevant to promote
meaningful learning, as the primary focus should be on
transmitting disciplinary information, regardless of
students' reality.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520309
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
In the Communicative Approach, the initial phase of the
teaching process is dedicated to establishing a conducive
environment for learning. In this phase, the focus is on
building confidence among participants and reducing
potential anxieties.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IGEDUC
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE
Prova:
IGEDUC - 2024 - Prefeitura de Arcoverde - PE - Professor II de Língua Inglesa |
Q2520308
Inglês
Julgue o item a seguir.
Learning to read based on textual genres is more
effective when the student is familiarized with each
form of language inserted in a context and a concrete
situation.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517170
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The text ends in a note of
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517169
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The word “roughly” in “Over the past roughly 50,000 years” (5th
paragraph) indicates a(n)
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517168
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
According to the text, the word that “this extraordinary gift” (5th
paragraph) refers to is our
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517167
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The opposite of “the smartest” (4th paragraph) is
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517166
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
In the second paragraph, “on the flip side” means
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517165
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The expression “such as” in “such as climate change” (2nd
paragraph) can be replaced without significant change in meaning
by
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517164
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The first sentence presents a
Ano: 2024
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
TCE-GO
Provas:
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Ciências Contábeis
|
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Jurídica |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Tecnologia da Informação |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Controle Externo |
FGV - 2024 - TCE-GO - Analista de Controle Externo - Engenharia |
Q2517163
Inglês
Texto associado
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE
(F):
( ) The author mentions the fact that AGI may supplant human faculties.
( ) Ways in which we can lead meaningful lives are detailed.
( ) AGI has already solved the problems of economic equality.
The statements are, respectively
( ) The author mentions the fact that AGI may supplant human faculties.
( ) Ways in which we can lead meaningful lives are detailed.
( ) AGI has already solved the problems of economic equality.
The statements are, respectively
Conheça nossos planos