Questões de Concurso Público Prefeitura de Serrana - SP 2018 para Professor de Educação Básica - Inglês

Foram encontradas 60 questões

Q1043063 Pedagogia
A abordagem do Projeto Político-Pedagógico, como organização do trabalho da escola como um todo, de acordo com a legislação vigente, está fundada nos princípios que deverão nortear a escola democrática, pública e gratuita: igualdade, qualidade, gestão democrática, liberdade e valorização do magistério. Veiga (1996) afirma que liberdade e autonomia fazem parte da ação pedagógica e cita Rios (1982), para quem a autonomia da escola é
Alternativas
Q1043064 Pedagogia
Dowbor (2007) afirma que uma das mudanças mais profundas que estão ocorrendo no país é que o desenvolvimento não se espera, mas se faz. Isso porque tira a atitude de espectadores críticos de um governo sempre insuficiente, ou do pessimismo passivo, e devolve ao cidadão a compreensão de que pode tomar o seu destino em suas mãos, conquanto haja uma dinâmica social local que facilite o processo, gerando sinergia entre diversos esforços. Nessa perspectiva, o autor chama a atenção para o fato de que a educação
Alternativas
Q1043065 Pedagogia
Certa escola municipal, em contato com uma organização social do bairro, planejou, em parceria, atividades de apoio à inclusão dos seus alunos, de modo a prevenir a retenção e a evasão. Juntos, os educadores da organização social e os professores da escola analisaram os resultados que os estudantes obtiveram nas disciplinas, o número de faltas que tiveram e analisaram materiais que produziram. A partir desse diagnóstico, organizaram ações de atendimento aos alunos com dificuldade de aprendizagem, programa de busca ativa de alunos que deixaram de frequentar a escola, atividades diferenciadas no contra-turno e implantaram políticas de encaminhamentos à rede de proteção social do território. Depois de aprovado pelo colegiado da escola e pela direção, o projeto foi desenvolvido, beneficiando muitos alunos. Considerando o que foi relatado à luz das diretrizes educacionais em vigor, é correto afirmar que
Alternativas
Q1043066 Pedagogia
De acordo com Veiga (1996), o Projeto Político-Pedagógico (PPP) constitui-se em processo democrático de decisões e preocupa-se em instaurar uma forma de organização de trabalho pedagógico que supere conflitos, buscando eliminar as relações competitivas, corporativas e autoritárias. Nesse sentido, ele procura
Alternativas
Q1043068 Pedagogia
Ao elaborar o plano anual de trabalho da escola, a equipe de uma Escola Municipal do interior de São Paulo incluiu projeto interdisciplinar na área de ciências da natureza, envolvendo o cuidado com a terra, a preservação do meio ambiente e a história local. Esse projeto, de acordo com a Resolução CNE/CEB nº 07/2010 e a Resolução CNE/CEB nº 04/2010,
Alternativas
Q1043069 Pedagogia
De acordo com Libâneo e Yoschi (2003), com a disseminação das práticas de gestão participativa, foi-se consolidando o entendimento de que o Projeto Político-Pedagógico deveria ser pensado, discutido e formulado coletivamente, também como forma de a escola
Alternativas
Q1043070 Pedagogia
De acordo com Libâneo (2013), o professor tem compromisso social e ético, e o trabalho docente é o seu primeiro compromisso com a sociedade. De acordo com o autor, a ética e o compromisso docente encerram várias perspectivas, que correspondem a uma postura de compromisso ético docente, voltado à transformação da sociedade, tais como:
Alternativas
Q1043071 Pedagogia
De acordo com Rios (2001), o professor tem necessidade de uma formação continuada que
Alternativas
Q1043073 Pedagogia
Os professores de uma escola municipal planejam e têm como trabalho sistematizado fazer sondagem dos conhecimentos prévios que os alunos têm sobre o objeto de ensino, estimulando para que todos falem a respeito do tema, fazendo as intervenções e orientando as discussões. Esse procedimento, de acordo com Mauri (in Coll,1999), é importante porque
Alternativas
Q1048504 Noções de Informática
A partir do Microsoft Windows 7, em sua configuração original, um usuário com permissão de acesso para leitura e gravação em todas as pastas abriu a pasta C:\ARQUIVOS, selecionou o arquivo Projetos.txt e pressionou as teclas CTRL+C. Em seguida, abriu a pasta C:\TEMPORARIO e pressionou as teclas CTRL+V. Finalmente, abriu a pasta C:\PROJETOS e pressionou as teclas CTRL+V novamente. Considerando que as pastas C:\TEMPORARIO e C:\PROJETOS estavam originalmente vazias, assinale a alternativa correta.
Alternativas
Q1095635 Pedagogia
A equipe de docentes e os demais profissionais da Escola Municipal Jardim das Borboletas, inspirados em Ropoli (2010), organizam reuniões sistemáticas nas quais promovem reflexões sobre como construir um ambiente escolar inclusivo, em que todos se sintam acolhidos. Nesse contexto, das alternativas a seguir, assinale aquela que, corretamente, está em conformidade com o pensamento de Ropoli.
Alternativas
Q1095636 Pedagogia
Analise o texto a seguir.
O sapo
O sapo é bom. O sapo come insetos. O sapo é feio. O sapo vive na água e na terra. Ele solta um líquido pela espinha. O sapo é verde.
Trata-se de um texto produzido oral e coletivamente pelos alunos de série inicial, grafado na lousa pela professora. À luz das reflexões de Weizs (2000), o texto produzido pelas crianças
Alternativas
Q1095637 Pedagogia
O currículo do ensino fundamental de que trata a Resolução CNE/CEB nº 07/2010 é constituído pelas experiências escolares que se desdobram em torno do conhecimento, permeadas pelas relações sociais, buscando articular vivências e saberes dos alunos com os conhecimentos historicamente acumulados e contribuindo para construir as identidades dos estudantes.
De acordo com a Resolução CNE/CEB nº 07/2010, as experiências escolares abrangem
Alternativas
Q1095638 Pedagogia
Analise as duas proposições a seguir.
1ª – A Resolução CNE/CEB nº 04/2010 determina, no seu artigo 47, § 4º , que “A avaliação da aprendizagem no Ensino Fundamental e no Ensino Médio, de caráter formativo predominando sobre o quantitativo e classificatório, adota uma estratégia de progresso individual e contínuo que favorece o crescimento do educando, preservando a qualidade necessária para a sua formação escolar, sendo organizada de acordo com regras comuns a essas duas etapas.”

2ª – Hoffman (Ideias nº 22) afirma: “O que pretendo introduzir neste texto é a perspectiva da ação avaliativa como uma das mediações pela qual se encorajaria a reorganização do saber. Ação, movimento, provocação, na tentativa de reciprocidade intelectual entre os elementos da ação educativa. Professor e aluno buscando coordenar seus pontos de vista, trocando ideias, reorganizando-as.”
Assinale a alternativa que define, corretamente, a relação entre as duas proposições, no modo de compreender o papel da avaliação.
Alternativas
Q1095639 Inglês
Underlying the traditional linear syllabus is the notion that learning is a process of mastering each item perfectly, one at a time. In metaphorical terms, it was believed that a language develops in the same way as a building is constructed – one (linguistic) brick at a time.
    However, the complexity of the acquisition process revealed by a growing body of second language acquisition research led some syllabus designers to argue that language development is basically an organic process. According to this metaphor, a new language develops in a way comparable to plants growing in a garden rather than a building being constructed. Learners do not acquire each item perfectly, one at a time, but numerous items imperfectly, all at once.

Needs analysis

    With the advent of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in the 1970s, a very different syllabus approach was proposed by a number of linguists. This approach began, not with lists of grammatical, phonological and lexical features, but with an analysis of the communicative needs of the learner. Proponents of CLT argued that it was neither necessary nor possible to include every aspect of the target language in the syllabus. Rather, syllabus content should reflect the communicative purposes and needs of the learners.
    Needs-based course design, particularly when it results in rigidly specified learning outcomes, has been heavily criticized. Widdowson (1983), for example, claims that such courses are exercises in training rather than in education because learners can only do those things for which they have been specifically prepared.

(David Nunan. Syllabus Design. In: M. Celce-Murcia (ed).
Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, Massachusstes:
Heinle&Heinle. 3rd edition. 2001. Adaptado)
The first paragraph illustrates language teaching and learning within the view of
Alternativas
Q1095640 Inglês
Underlying the traditional linear syllabus is the notion that learning is a process of mastering each item perfectly, one at a time. In metaphorical terms, it was believed that a language develops in the same way as a building is constructed – one (linguistic) brick at a time.
    However, the complexity of the acquisition process revealed by a growing body of second language acquisition research led some syllabus designers to argue that language development is basically an organic process. According to this metaphor, a new language develops in a way comparable to plants growing in a garden rather than a building being constructed. Learners do not acquire each item perfectly, one at a time, but numerous items imperfectly, all at once.

Needs analysis

    With the advent of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in the 1970s, a very different syllabus approach was proposed by a number of linguists. This approach began, not with lists of grammatical, phonological and lexical features, but with an analysis of the communicative needs of the learner. Proponents of CLT argued that it was neither necessary nor possible to include every aspect of the target language in the syllabus. Rather, syllabus content should reflect the communicative purposes and needs of the learners.
    Needs-based course design, particularly when it results in rigidly specified learning outcomes, has been heavily criticized. Widdowson (1983), for example, claims that such courses are exercises in training rather than in education because learners can only do those things for which they have been specifically prepared.

(David Nunan. Syllabus Design. In: M. Celce-Murcia (ed).
Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, Massachusstes:
Heinle&Heinle. 3rd edition. 2001. Adaptado)
A palavra however, que introduz o segundo parágrafo, estabelece entre este e o parágrafo anterior uma relação de
Alternativas
Q1095641 Inglês
Underlying the traditional linear syllabus is the notion that learning is a process of mastering each item perfectly, one at a time. In metaphorical terms, it was believed that a language develops in the same way as a building is constructed – one (linguistic) brick at a time.
    However, the complexity of the acquisition process revealed by a growing body of second language acquisition research led some syllabus designers to argue that language development is basically an organic process. According to this metaphor, a new language develops in a way comparable to plants growing in a garden rather than a building being constructed. Learners do not acquire each item perfectly, one at a time, but numerous items imperfectly, all at once.

Needs analysis

    With the advent of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in the 1970s, a very different syllabus approach was proposed by a number of linguists. This approach began, not with lists of grammatical, phonological and lexical features, but with an analysis of the communicative needs of the learner. Proponents of CLT argued that it was neither necessary nor possible to include every aspect of the target language in the syllabus. Rather, syllabus content should reflect the communicative purposes and needs of the learners.
    Needs-based course design, particularly when it results in rigidly specified learning outcomes, has been heavily criticized. Widdowson (1983), for example, claims that such courses are exercises in training rather than in education because learners can only do those things for which they have been specifically prepared.

(David Nunan. Syllabus Design. In: M. Celce-Murcia (ed).
Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, Massachusstes:
Heinle&Heinle. 3rd edition. 2001. Adaptado)
In the fragment of the second paragraph – According to this metaphor… – the terms in bold refer to
Alternativas
Q1095642 Inglês
Underlying the traditional linear syllabus is the notion that learning is a process of mastering each item perfectly, one at a time. In metaphorical terms, it was believed that a language develops in the same way as a building is constructed – one (linguistic) brick at a time.
    However, the complexity of the acquisition process revealed by a growing body of second language acquisition research led some syllabus designers to argue that language development is basically an organic process. According to this metaphor, a new language develops in a way comparable to plants growing in a garden rather than a building being constructed. Learners do not acquire each item perfectly, one at a time, but numerous items imperfectly, all at once.

Needs analysis

    With the advent of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in the 1970s, a very different syllabus approach was proposed by a number of linguists. This approach began, not with lists of grammatical, phonological and lexical features, but with an analysis of the communicative needs of the learner. Proponents of CLT argued that it was neither necessary nor possible to include every aspect of the target language in the syllabus. Rather, syllabus content should reflect the communicative purposes and needs of the learners.
    Needs-based course design, particularly when it results in rigidly specified learning outcomes, has been heavily criticized. Widdowson (1983), for example, claims that such courses are exercises in training rather than in education because learners can only do those things for which they have been specifically prepared.

(David Nunan. Syllabus Design. In: M. Celce-Murcia (ed).
Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, Massachusstes:
Heinle&Heinle. 3rd edition. 2001. Adaptado)
One common language practice teachers should abandon if they believe the argument presented in the second paragraph is:
Alternativas
Q1095643 Inglês
Underlying the traditional linear syllabus is the notion that learning is a process of mastering each item perfectly, one at a time. In metaphorical terms, it was believed that a language develops in the same way as a building is constructed – one (linguistic) brick at a time.
    However, the complexity of the acquisition process revealed by a growing body of second language acquisition research led some syllabus designers to argue that language development is basically an organic process. According to this metaphor, a new language develops in a way comparable to plants growing in a garden rather than a building being constructed. Learners do not acquire each item perfectly, one at a time, but numerous items imperfectly, all at once.

Needs analysis

    With the advent of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in the 1970s, a very different syllabus approach was proposed by a number of linguists. This approach began, not with lists of grammatical, phonological and lexical features, but with an analysis of the communicative needs of the learner. Proponents of CLT argued that it was neither necessary nor possible to include every aspect of the target language in the syllabus. Rather, syllabus content should reflect the communicative purposes and needs of the learners.
    Needs-based course design, particularly when it results in rigidly specified learning outcomes, has been heavily criticized. Widdowson (1983), for example, claims that such courses are exercises in training rather than in education because learners can only do those things for which they have been specifically prepared.

(David Nunan. Syllabus Design. In: M. Celce-Murcia (ed).
Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, Massachusstes:
Heinle&Heinle. 3rd edition. 2001. Adaptado)
From the reading of the third and fourth paragraphs, it is correct to say that CLT syllabuses
Alternativas
Q1095644 Inglês
Underlying the traditional linear syllabus is the notion that learning is a process of mastering each item perfectly, one at a time. In metaphorical terms, it was believed that a language develops in the same way as a building is constructed – one (linguistic) brick at a time.
    However, the complexity of the acquisition process revealed by a growing body of second language acquisition research led some syllabus designers to argue that language development is basically an organic process. According to this metaphor, a new language develops in a way comparable to plants growing in a garden rather than a building being constructed. Learners do not acquire each item perfectly, one at a time, but numerous items imperfectly, all at once.

Needs analysis

    With the advent of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in the 1970s, a very different syllabus approach was proposed by a number of linguists. This approach began, not with lists of grammatical, phonological and lexical features, but with an analysis of the communicative needs of the learner. Proponents of CLT argued that it was neither necessary nor possible to include every aspect of the target language in the syllabus. Rather, syllabus content should reflect the communicative purposes and needs of the learners.
    Needs-based course design, particularly when it results in rigidly specified learning outcomes, has been heavily criticized. Widdowson (1983), for example, claims that such courses are exercises in training rather than in education because learners can only do those things for which they have been specifically prepared.

(David Nunan. Syllabus Design. In: M. Celce-Murcia (ed).
Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, Massachusstes:
Heinle&Heinle. 3rd edition. 2001. Adaptado)
The word “features”, in the fragment of the third paragraph – … lists of grammatical, phonological and lexical features… –, means the same as
Alternativas
Respostas
21: E
22: E
23: A
24: A
25: B
26: D
27: E
28: C
29: B
30: D
31: D
32: D
33: E
34: C
35: C
36: E
37: B
38: D
39: B
40: A