Questões de Concurso Comentadas por alunos sobre aspectos linguísticos | linguistic aspects em inglês
Foram encontradas 537 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2024
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
MMA
Prova:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - MMA - Analista Ambiental |
Q2361121
Inglês
Texto associado
Text CB1A8
The idea of giving rights to animals has long been
contentious, but a deeper look into the reasoning behind the
philosophy reveals ideas that aren’t all that radical. Animal rights
advocates want to distinguish animals from inanimate objects, as
they are so often considered by exploitative industries and the
law. The animal rights movement strives to make the public
aware of the fact that animals are sensitive, emotional, and
intelligent beings who deserve dignity and respect. But first, it’s
important to understand what the term “animal rights” really
means.
Animal rights are moral principles grounded in the belief
that non-human animals deserve the ability to live as they wish,
without being subjected to the desires of human beings. At the
core of animal rights is autonomy, which is another way of
saying choice. In many countries, human rights are enshrined to
protect certain freedoms, such as the right to expression, freedom
from torture, and access to democracy. Of course, these choices
are constrained depending on social locations like race, class, and
gender, but generally speaking, human rights safeguard the basic
tenets of what makes human lives worth living. Animal rights
aim to do something similar, only for non-human animals.
Animal rights come into direct opposition with animal
exploitation, which includes animals used by humans for a
variety of reasons, be it for food, as experimental objects, or even
pets. Animal rights can also be violated when it comes to human
destruction of animal habitats. This negatively impacts the ability
of animals to lead full lives of their choosing.
Internet:<thehumaneleague.org> (adapted).
Considering the ideas and linguistic aspects of the text above, judge the item below.
Lawyers who defend animal rights claim that animals and
inanimate objects are different.
Ano: 2024
Banca:
CESPE / CEBRASPE
Órgão:
MMA
Prova:
CESPE / CEBRASPE - 2024 - MMA - Analista Ambiental |
Q2361120
Inglês
Texto associado
Text CB1A8
The idea of giving rights to animals has long been
contentious, but a deeper look into the reasoning behind the
philosophy reveals ideas that aren’t all that radical. Animal rights
advocates want to distinguish animals from inanimate objects, as
they are so often considered by exploitative industries and the
law. The animal rights movement strives to make the public
aware of the fact that animals are sensitive, emotional, and
intelligent beings who deserve dignity and respect. But first, it’s
important to understand what the term “animal rights” really
means.
Animal rights are moral principles grounded in the belief
that non-human animals deserve the ability to live as they wish,
without being subjected to the desires of human beings. At the
core of animal rights is autonomy, which is another way of
saying choice. In many countries, human rights are enshrined to
protect certain freedoms, such as the right to expression, freedom
from torture, and access to democracy. Of course, these choices
are constrained depending on social locations like race, class, and
gender, but generally speaking, human rights safeguard the basic
tenets of what makes human lives worth living. Animal rights
aim to do something similar, only for non-human animals.
Animal rights come into direct opposition with animal
exploitation, which includes animals used by humans for a
variety of reasons, be it for food, as experimental objects, or even
pets. Animal rights can also be violated when it comes to human
destruction of animal habitats. This negatively impacts the ability
of animals to lead full lives of their choosing.
Internet:<thehumaneleague.org> (adapted).
Considering the ideas and linguistic aspects of the text above, judge the item below.
The discussion about giving rights to animals has been
prevalent lately.
Ano: 2023
Banca:
FUNDATEC
Órgão:
IF-RS
Prova:
FUNDATEC - 2023 - IF-RS - Professor - Portugues - Inglês |
Q2359884
Inglês
Considere o seguinte trecho:
Translanguaging is a theoretical lens that offers a different view of bilingualism and multilingualism (Vogel; Garcia; 2017).
Acerca do construto translanguaging, analise as assertivas a seguir, assinalando V, se verdadeiras, ou F, se falsas.
( ) Ao mencionar que a translanguaging oferece uma visão diferente de bilinguismo e multilinguismo, os autores se referem à ruptura da visão estanque e compartimentalizada de línguas.
( ) A translanguaging implica a concepção de um repertório linguístico único para comunicação.
( ) As visões de translanguaging e code-switching são sinônimas, não havendo, portanto, diferenças epistemológicas entre os termos.
A ordem correta de preenchimento dos parênteses, de cima para baixo, é:
Translanguaging is a theoretical lens that offers a different view of bilingualism and multilingualism (Vogel; Garcia; 2017).
Acerca do construto translanguaging, analise as assertivas a seguir, assinalando V, se verdadeiras, ou F, se falsas.
( ) Ao mencionar que a translanguaging oferece uma visão diferente de bilinguismo e multilinguismo, os autores se referem à ruptura da visão estanque e compartimentalizada de línguas.
( ) A translanguaging implica a concepção de um repertório linguístico único para comunicação.
( ) As visões de translanguaging e code-switching são sinônimas, não havendo, portanto, diferenças epistemológicas entre os termos.
A ordem correta de preenchimento dos parênteses, de cima para baixo, é:
Ano: 2024
Banca:
IPEFAE
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Américo de Campos - SP
Prova:
IPEFAE - 2024 - Prefeitura de Américo de Campos - SP - PEB II - Língua Estrangeira Moderna/Inglês |
Q2350987
Inglês
Choose the sentence that correctly uses inversion for
emphasis:
Ano: 2023
Banca:
FGV
Órgão:
Câmara dos Deputados
Prova:
FGV - 2023 - Câmara dos Deputados - Analista Legislativo - Informática Legislativa - Manhã |
Q2326029
Inglês
Texto associado
Read Text I and answer the question that follow it.
Text I
Generative Art – What’s real?
There is nothing new about the concept and creation of
‘artificial intelligence art’ or ‘generative art’. However, discussion
of its legal and ethical or societal implications (both intended and
unintended) hit the headlines last week.
Boris Eldagsen refused his Sony World Photography Award
2023 prize in the creative open category on the basis that his
entry was the product of artificial intelligence. Mr Eldagsen
himself has sparked the latest debate by claiming that “AI is not
photography” and that the rationale for entering the Awards with
the work in question was “…to find out if the competitions are
prepared for AI images to enter. They are not”.
The reaction of the World Photography Organisation (running
the Sony Awards) has been to acknowledge the need for an
element of human involvement, which is the crux of the debate:
“While elements of AI practices are relevant in artistic contexts of
image-making, the Awards always have been and will continue to
be a platform for championing the excellence and skill of
photographers and artists working in this medium”.
[…]
The conventional (and long assumed) approach has been to
recognise the importance of the human hand to an artwork. The
question then is: to what extent is the human creator or inputter
the ‘artist’ as opposed to the generative system or is the system
merely representing the human creator or inputter’s artistic
idea? Flowing from that question is what that might then mean in
terms of the ownership and value of such works. The debate
looks set to continue in this particular context of imagery creation
and reproduction coinciding with the increasing availability and
use of consumer-grade AI image generation programmes, and
the natural inclination of artists to continue to create.
Adapted from https://www.rosenblatt-law.co.uk/insight/generative-art-whats-real/
The phrase “The crux of the debate” (3rd paragraph) is the same
as the