Questões de Concurso Comentadas para fcc

Foram encontradas 59.755 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q2778738 Odontologia

Na dentição temporária, a representação numérica que indica o primeiro molar inferior direito é

Alternativas
Q2778736 Odontologia

Atenção: As questões de números 24 e 25 referem-se ao enunciado a seguir.

Paciente com 39 anos de idade, sexo feminino, apresenta em sua ficha clínica o diagrama contendo os dentes abaixo.

 

17 16 15 14          22 23 24            27
47 46 45 44 42    41     31 32 33 34 35 36 37

O hemiarco dentário em que todos os dentes estão presentes é o

Alternativas
Q2778734 Odontologia

Atenção: As questões de números 24 e 25 referem-se ao enunciado a seguir.

Paciente com 39 anos de idade, sexo feminino, apresenta em sua ficha clínica o diagrama contendo os dentes abaixo.

 

17 16 15 14          22 23 24            27
47 46 45 44 42    41     31 32 33 34 35 36 37

Estão ausentes os dentes:

Alternativas
Q2778731 Odontologia

Os agendamentos de pacientes no consultório odontológico, segundo o padrão convencional, devem ser realizados de acordo com:

I. a divisão de horários a cada 30 minutos.

II. o procedimento a ser realizado.

III. o horário de conveniência do paciente.

IV. o horário de conveniência do THD.

V. o tempo necessário ao tratamento.

São corretas APENAS:

Alternativas
Q2778728 Odontologia

A avaliação da história clínica do paciente é registrada no prontuário odontológico. É correto afirmar que

Alternativas
Q2763688 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder às questões de números 16 a 20, considere o texto abaixo.


House Approves Higher Debt Limit Without Condition

By JONATHAN WEISMAN and ASHLEY PARKER

Feb. 11, 2014


WASHINGTON − Ending three years of brinkmanship in which the threat of a devastating default on the nation’s debt was used to wring conservative concessions from President Obama, the House on Tuesday voted to raise the government’s borrowing limit until March 2015, without any conditions.

The vote − 221 to 201 − relied almost entirely on Democrats in the Republican-controlled House to carry the measure and represented the first debt ceiling increase since 2009 that was not attached to other legislation. Only 28 Republicans voted yes, and only two Democrats voted no.

Simply by holding the vote, Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio effectively ended a three-year Tea Party-inspired era of budget showdowns that had raised the threat of default and government shutdowns, rattled economic confidence and brought serious scrutiny from other nations questioning Washington’s ability to govern. In the process, though, Mr. Boehner also set off a series of reprisals from fellow Republican congressmen and outside groups that showcased the party’s deep internal divisions.

During the October 2013 government shutdown, The Times’s David Leonhardt explained the debt limit and how a failure to raise it could have affected the economy both at home and abroad.

“He gave the president exactly what he wanted, which is exactly what the Republican Party said we did not want,” said a Republican representative, Tim Huelskamp of Kansas, who last year unsuccessfully tried to rally enough support to derail Mr. Boehner’s re-election as speaker. “It’s going to really demoralize the base.”

The vote was a victory for President Obama, Democrats and those Senate Republicans who have argued that spending money for previously incurred obligations was essential for the financial standing of the federal government. “Tonight’s vote is a positive step in moving away from the political brinkmanship that’s a needless drag on our economy,” Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, said in a statement.

“A clean debt ceiling is a complete capitulation on the speaker’s part and demonstrates that he has lost the ability to lead the House of Representatives, let alone his own party,” said Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots. “It is time for him to go.”

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, commended the speaker and promised to pass the bill as soon as possible. “We’re happy to see the House is legislating the way they should have legislated for a long time,” he said.


(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/12/us/politics/ boehner-to-bring-debt-ceiling-to-vote-without-policyattachments. html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_2014021 2&_r=0)

Considere a seguinte definição:


Brinkmanship is the technique of pushing a dangerous situation to the limits of safety in order to secure the greatest advantage.


Em qual dos exemplos abaixo a palavra brinkmanship está empregada de forma incorreta?

Alternativas
Q2763687 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder às questões de números 16 a 20, considere o texto abaixo.


House Approves Higher Debt Limit Without Condition

By JONATHAN WEISMAN and ASHLEY PARKER

Feb. 11, 2014


WASHINGTON − Ending three years of brinkmanship in which the threat of a devastating default on the nation’s debt was used to wring conservative concessions from President Obama, the House on Tuesday voted to raise the government’s borrowing limit until March 2015, without any conditions.

The vote − 221 to 201 − relied almost entirely on Democrats in the Republican-controlled House to carry the measure and represented the first debt ceiling increase since 2009 that was not attached to other legislation. Only 28 Republicans voted yes, and only two Democrats voted no.

Simply by holding the vote, Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio effectively ended a three-year Tea Party-inspired era of budget showdowns that had raised the threat of default and government shutdowns, rattled economic confidence and brought serious scrutiny from other nations questioning Washington’s ability to govern. In the process, though, Mr. Boehner also set off a series of reprisals from fellow Republican congressmen and outside groups that showcased the party’s deep internal divisions.

During the October 2013 government shutdown, The Times’s David Leonhardt explained the debt limit and how a failure to raise it could have affected the economy both at home and abroad.

“He gave the president exactly what he wanted, which is exactly what the Republican Party said we did not want,” said a Republican representative, Tim Huelskamp of Kansas, who last year unsuccessfully tried to rally enough support to derail Mr. Boehner’s re-election as speaker. “It’s going to really demoralize the base.”

The vote was a victory for President Obama, Democrats and those Senate Republicans who have argued that spending money for previously incurred obligations was essential for the financial standing of the federal government. “Tonight’s vote is a positive step in moving away from the political brinkmanship that’s a needless drag on our economy,” Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, said in a statement.

“A clean debt ceiling is a complete capitulation on the speaker’s part and demonstrates that he has lost the ability to lead the House of Representatives, let alone his own party,” said Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots. “It is time for him to go.”

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, commended the speaker and promised to pass the bill as soon as possible. “We’re happy to see the House is legislating the way they should have legislated for a long time,” he said.


(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/12/us/politics/ boehner-to-bring-debt-ceiling-to-vote-without-policyattachments. html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_2014021 2&_r=0)

No texto, o pronome sublinhado he refere-se a

Alternativas
Q2763686 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder às questões de números 16 a 20, considere o texto abaixo.


House Approves Higher Debt Limit Without Condition

By JONATHAN WEISMAN and ASHLEY PARKER

Feb. 11, 2014


WASHINGTON − Ending three years of brinkmanship in which the threat of a devastating default on the nation’s debt was used to wring conservative concessions from President Obama, the House on Tuesday voted to raise the government’s borrowing limit until March 2015, without any conditions.

The vote − 221 to 201 − relied almost entirely on Democrats in the Republican-controlled House to carry the measure and represented the first debt ceiling increase since 2009 that was not attached to other legislation. Only 28 Republicans voted yes, and only two Democrats voted no.

Simply by holding the vote, Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio effectively ended a three-year Tea Party-inspired era of budget showdowns that had raised the threat of default and government shutdowns, rattled economic confidence and brought serious scrutiny from other nations questioning Washington’s ability to govern. In the process, though, Mr. Boehner also set off a series of reprisals from fellow Republican congressmen and outside groups that showcased the party’s deep internal divisions.

During the October 2013 government shutdown, The Times’s David Leonhardt explained the debt limit and how a failure to raise it could have affected the economy both at home and abroad.

“He gave the president exactly what he wanted, which is exactly what the Republican Party said we did not want,” said a Republican representative, Tim Huelskamp of Kansas, who last year unsuccessfully tried to rally enough support to derail Mr. Boehner’s re-election as speaker. “It’s going to really demoralize the base.”

The vote was a victory for President Obama, Democrats and those Senate Republicans who have argued that spending money for previously incurred obligations was essential for the financial standing of the federal government. “Tonight’s vote is a positive step in moving away from the political brinkmanship that’s a needless drag on our economy,” Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, said in a statement.

“A clean debt ceiling is a complete capitulation on the speaker’s part and demonstrates that he has lost the ability to lead the House of Representatives, let alone his own party,” said Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots. “It is time for him to go.”

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, commended the speaker and promised to pass the bill as soon as possible. “We’re happy to see the House is legislating the way they should have legislated for a long time,” he said.


(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/12/us/politics/ boehner-to-bring-debt-ceiling-to-vote-without-policyattachments. html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_2014021 2&_r=0)

As used in the text, and without any change in meaning, though could be replaced by

Alternativas
Q2763685 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder às questões de números 16 a 20, considere o texto abaixo.


House Approves Higher Debt Limit Without Condition

By JONATHAN WEISMAN and ASHLEY PARKER

Feb. 11, 2014


WASHINGTON − Ending three years of brinkmanship in which the threat of a devastating default on the nation’s debt was used to wring conservative concessions from President Obama, the House on Tuesday voted to raise the government’s borrowing limit until March 2015, without any conditions.

The vote − 221 to 201 − relied almost entirely on Democrats in the Republican-controlled House to carry the measure and represented the first debt ceiling increase since 2009 that was not attached to other legislation. Only 28 Republicans voted yes, and only two Democrats voted no.

Simply by holding the vote, Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio effectively ended a three-year Tea Party-inspired era of budget showdowns that had raised the threat of default and government shutdowns, rattled economic confidence and brought serious scrutiny from other nations questioning Washington’s ability to govern. In the process, though, Mr. Boehner also set off a series of reprisals from fellow Republican congressmen and outside groups that showcased the party’s deep internal divisions.

During the October 2013 government shutdown, The Times’s David Leonhardt explained the debt limit and how a failure to raise it could have affected the economy both at home and abroad.

“He gave the president exactly what he wanted, which is exactly what the Republican Party said we did not want,” said a Republican representative, Tim Huelskamp of Kansas, who last year unsuccessfully tried to rally enough support to derail Mr. Boehner’s re-election as speaker. “It’s going to really demoralize the base.”

The vote was a victory for President Obama, Democrats and those Senate Republicans who have argued that spending money for previously incurred obligations was essential for the financial standing of the federal government. “Tonight’s vote is a positive step in moving away from the political brinkmanship that’s a needless drag on our economy,” Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, said in a statement.

“A clean debt ceiling is a complete capitulation on the speaker’s part and demonstrates that he has lost the ability to lead the House of Representatives, let alone his own party,” said Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots. “It is time for him to go.”

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, commended the speaker and promised to pass the bill as soon as possible. “We’re happy to see the House is legislating the way they should have legislated for a long time,” he said.


(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/12/us/politics/ boehner-to-bring-debt-ceiling-to-vote-without-policyattachments. html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_2014021 2&_r=0)

De acordo com o texto,

Alternativas
Q2763684 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder às questões de números 16 a 20, considere o texto abaixo.


House Approves Higher Debt Limit Without Condition

By JONATHAN WEISMAN and ASHLEY PARKER

Feb. 11, 2014


WASHINGTON − Ending three years of brinkmanship in which the threat of a devastating default on the nation’s debt was used to wring conservative concessions from President Obama, the House on Tuesday voted to raise the government’s borrowing limit until March 2015, without any conditions.

The vote − 221 to 201 − relied almost entirely on Democrats in the Republican-controlled House to carry the measure and represented the first debt ceiling increase since 2009 that was not attached to other legislation. Only 28 Republicans voted yes, and only two Democrats voted no.

Simply by holding the vote, Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio effectively ended a three-year Tea Party-inspired era of budget showdowns that had raised the threat of default and government shutdowns, rattled economic confidence and brought serious scrutiny from other nations questioning Washington’s ability to govern. In the process, though, Mr. Boehner also set off a series of reprisals from fellow Republican congressmen and outside groups that showcased the party’s deep internal divisions.

During the October 2013 government shutdown, The Times’s David Leonhardt explained the debt limit and how a failure to raise it could have affected the economy both at home and abroad.

“He gave the president exactly what he wanted, which is exactly what the Republican Party said we did not want,” said a Republican representative, Tim Huelskamp of Kansas, who last year unsuccessfully tried to rally enough support to derail Mr. Boehner’s re-election as speaker. “It’s going to really demoralize the base.”

The vote was a victory for President Obama, Democrats and those Senate Republicans who have argued that spending money for previously incurred obligations was essential for the financial standing of the federal government. “Tonight’s vote is a positive step in moving away from the political brinkmanship that’s a needless drag on our economy,” Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, said in a statement.

“A clean debt ceiling is a complete capitulation on the speaker’s part and demonstrates that he has lost the ability to lead the House of Representatives, let alone his own party,” said Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots. “It is time for him to go.”

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, commended the speaker and promised to pass the bill as soon as possible. “We’re happy to see the House is legislating the way they should have legislated for a long time,” he said.


(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/12/us/politics/ boehner-to-bring-debt-ceiling-to-vote-without-policyattachments. html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_2014021 2&_r=0)

Segundo o texto,

Alternativas
Q2762417 Legislação de Trânsito

Considere a seguinte sentença: 


Nas vias internas pertencentes a condomínios constituídos por unidades autônomas, a sinalização de regulamentação da via será implantada e mantida às expensas do... I ... após aprovação dos projetos pela (o) ... II ... .



Preenchem as lacunas I e II, correta e respectivamente,

Alternativas
Q2762402 Segurança e Transporte
De acordo com a Norma Regulamentadora-23, que estabelece medidas de prevenção contra incêndios nos ambientes de trabalho, as organizações devem providenciar, para todos os trabalhadores, informações EXCETO sobre
Alternativas
Q2762401 Segurança e Transporte
Nos casos de acidentes de trânsito, além dos prejuízos patrimoniais resultantes, pode haver pessoas feridas e/ou riscos e perigos na cena. A cartilha Noções de Primeiros Socorros no Trânsito (DENATRAN 2005) traz orientações para que as pessoas presentes no cenário do acidente possam minimizar as consequências do acidente e aumentar as chances de recuperação de eventuais vítimas. Considere:

I. Em caso de chuva, neblina ou fumaça, as distâncias para o início da sinalização do acidente deverão ser aplicadas em dobro.

II. Em acidentes que envolvam motociclista(s), para uma adequada avaliação da(s) vítima(s), deve-se remover o(s) capacete(s) da(s) mesma(s) assim que possível.

III. Em um acidente veicular, caso a(s) vitima(s) esteja(m) utilizando o cinto de segurança, esse equipamento deverá ser solto se verificado que esteja dificultando a respiração da(s) mesma(s).


De acordo com a Cartilha mencionada, está correto o que se afirma em
Alternativas
Q2762400 Segurança e Transporte
De acordo com a cartilha Noções de Primeiros Socorros no Trânsito (DENATRAN 2005): Primeiros Socorros são as primeiras providências tomadas no local do acidente. É o atendimento inicial e temporário até a chegada de um socorro profissional. Esse manual orienta as ações de primeiros socorros a serem implementadas por qualquer pessoa que se encontre no local do acidente. NÃO é uma ação prevista nessas orientações:
Alternativas
Q2762399 Segurança e Transporte
Paulo (governador) e José (senador) discutem e são apartados por seguranças


A briga ocorreu quando Paulo chegava para uma visita ao Departamento de Operações de Trânsito do Estado.

Os políticos Paulo e José discutiram, quase se agrediram fisicamente e tiveram de ser separados por seguranças. 

Paulo foi abordado por José, que levava consigo um megafone.

José, que estava acompanhado de um amigo, disse ter sido chamado ao local por agentes de trânsito descontentes com a reforma da previdência estadual e com o reajuste concedido à categoria por Paulo.

Vídeos que circulam nas redes sociais mostram José indo em direção a Paulo. Os dois discutem e José chama Paulo de “medroso”, “mole“ e “preguiçoso”. Não é possível identificar o que Paulo responde, mas grita com o dedo em riste em direção a José.

O senador então é retirado do local por seguranças do governador.

Em nota divulgada depois da briga, José disse que Paulo “falou impropérios” a ele.

Já Paulo acusou José de desrespeitá-lo.

O Sindicato dos Agentes de trânsito do Estado afirmou que a escolta de Paulo promoveu “agressões” a José, que estava presente para se manifestar democraticamente, quando foi agredido e retirado à força do local pela escolta, poucos momentos após a chegada de Paulo.
Com referência à atividade de segurança de dignitários, o dano identificado
Alternativas
Q2762398 Segurança e Transporte
Paulo (governador) e José (senador) discutem e são apartados por seguranças


A briga ocorreu quando Paulo chegava para uma visita ao Departamento de Operações de Trânsito do Estado.

Os políticos Paulo e José discutiram, quase se agrediram fisicamente e tiveram de ser separados por seguranças. 

Paulo foi abordado por José, que levava consigo um megafone.

José, que estava acompanhado de um amigo, disse ter sido chamado ao local por agentes de trânsito descontentes com a reforma da previdência estadual e com o reajuste concedido à categoria por Paulo.

Vídeos que circulam nas redes sociais mostram José indo em direção a Paulo. Os dois discutem e José chama Paulo de “medroso”, “mole“ e “preguiçoso”. Não é possível identificar o que Paulo responde, mas grita com o dedo em riste em direção a José.

O senador então é retirado do local por seguranças do governador.

Em nota divulgada depois da briga, José disse que Paulo “falou impropérios” a ele.

Já Paulo acusou José de desrespeitá-lo.

O Sindicato dos Agentes de trânsito do Estado afirmou que a escolta de Paulo promoveu “agressões” a José, que estava presente para se manifestar democraticamente, quando foi agredido e retirado à força do local pela escolta, poucos momentos após a chegada de Paulo.
A ação de segurança de dignitários descrita, refere-se à equipe...I... . Caso o corpo de segurança de Paulo tivesse optado por alocar agentes para comparecer ao evento momentos antes, a fim de identificar presença hostil no local do evento, talvez evitando o evento indesejado, utilizaria uma equipe ...II.... O levantamento anterior de informações sobre os convidados ao evento, que também poderia fornecer subsídios sobre fontes hostilizantes e eventuais riscos para a integridade física e moral do dignitário, seria realizado pela equipe ...III... .

As lacunas I, II e III são, correta e respectivamente, preenchidas por:
Alternativas
Q2762397 Segurança e Transporte
Paulo (governador) e José (senador) discutem e são apartados por seguranças


A briga ocorreu quando Paulo chegava para uma visita ao Departamento de Operações de Trânsito do Estado.

Os políticos Paulo e José discutiram, quase se agrediram fisicamente e tiveram de ser separados por seguranças. 

Paulo foi abordado por José, que levava consigo um megafone.

José, que estava acompanhado de um amigo, disse ter sido chamado ao local por agentes de trânsito descontentes com a reforma da previdência estadual e com o reajuste concedido à categoria por Paulo.

Vídeos que circulam nas redes sociais mostram José indo em direção a Paulo. Os dois discutem e José chama Paulo de “medroso”, “mole“ e “preguiçoso”. Não é possível identificar o que Paulo responde, mas grita com o dedo em riste em direção a José.

O senador então é retirado do local por seguranças do governador.

Em nota divulgada depois da briga, José disse que Paulo “falou impropérios” a ele.

Já Paulo acusou José de desrespeitá-lo.

O Sindicato dos Agentes de trânsito do Estado afirmou que a escolta de Paulo promoveu “agressões” a José, que estava presente para se manifestar democraticamente, quando foi agredido e retirado à força do local pela escolta, poucos momentos após a chegada de Paulo.
A ação da equipe de segurança do Governador Paulo, ao retirar do local o Senador José, a quem dirigiu agressões verbais, segundo a doutrina de segurança de dignitários:
Alternativas
Q2762396 Segurança e Transporte
São funcionalidades de controle de acesso:

I. Impede duas entradas pelo mesmo usuário. II. Obriga duas leituras de acesso. III. Abertura de segunda porta mediante fechamento da primeira.

Relacionam-se com as funcionalidades acima, respectivamente:
Alternativas
Q2762395 Segurança e Transporte
Os controles de acesso ... I ... restringem o acesso de pessoas, coisas e instrumentais quando... II ... . Um exemplo desse controle são os ... III ... .

Preenchem, correta e respectivamente, as lacunas I, II e III:
Alternativas
Q2762394 Segurança e Transporte
Sobre segurança física:
Alternativas
Respostas
1181: d
1182: d
1183: b
1184: e
1185: a
1186: D
1187: A
1188: B
1189: D
1190: B
1191: D
1192: B
1193: E
1194: A
1195: D
1196: B
1197: B
1198: A
1199: C
1200: C