Questões de Concurso Público Prefeitura de Goiânia - GO 2016 para PE II - Inglês
Foram encontradas 30 questões
Read the following text to answer question 41.
Disponível em: <http://dir.indiamart.com/faridabad/advertisement-designing-services.html>. Acesso em: 2 abr. 2016.
The image shows a motto which contains a deviation from standard English grammar in that it
In the sentence “Oh, dear, you must have heard my mantelpiece story, almost everyone ______”, the appropriate verb form for the ellipsis is
For questions 43 to 47, refer to the following text:
Time for global business to stop profiting from Amazon destruction by Tica Minami - 13 April, 2016 Huge hydropower dams in the Amazon rainforest aren't just bad for Indigenous communities, biodiversity and the climate – they're bad for the companies involved. Here's why. The Amazon is the world's largest remaining area of tropical rainforest, but every day it gets a little smaller – while big business profits get a little bigger. Over 750,000 km² of Amazon rainforest (an area larger than all of France) has already been destroyed by industrial agriculture, cattle ranching, illegal logging and infrastructure projects. And new threats keep coming: this time in the Tapajós River basin. What's happening in the Tapajós? The Brazilian government is planning a massive hydropower project for the Tapajós basin – over 40 medium or large dams, including one 7.6 km wide mega-dam. This dam alone would flood an area of rainforest the size of New York City, threatening the livelihoods of the Indigenous Munduruku People who have lived along the Tapajós River for centuries. The mega-dam – called São Luiz do Tapajós – doesn't just threaten local communities and ecosystems. It also harms the climate. Building the massive structure produces substantial emissions, as does the decay of flooded rainforest vegetation and soil. Figure 1 So who would want to help build the São Luiz do Tapajós dam? It takes huge amounts of capital and technology from companies all over the world to build a hydropower dam. Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project and released a new report on their findings – and on the risky nature of Amazon hydropower – today. So far, Greenpeace Brazil has found that the São Luiz do Tapajós dam is attracting the interest of a number of Brazilian and foreign energy companies. None of these companies have announced their intentions publicly yet, though. What's at stake for companies who get involved with São Luiz do Tapajós dam? The banks, insurers, suppliers and contractors that become involved in Amazon hydropower projects face serious financial and reputational risks. Hydropower dams attract international attention for their destruction to the environment and impacts on local communities. Moreover, these dams and other large government infrastructure projects have also recently been tied to corruption. Amazon destruction impacts all of us. People must act globally to stop this global project. Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few. Wherever you are in the world, your voice matters. Add your name to help keep the Tapajos alive! |
Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/amazonrainforest-hydropower-tapajos-dam-belo-monte/blog/56142/>. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2016. [Adaptado].
The text discusses some drawbacks for the companies involved in building up Amazon hydropower dams. One of them is the
For questions 43 to 47, refer to the following text:
Time for global business to stop profiting from Amazon destruction by Tica Minami - 13 April, 2016 Huge hydropower dams in the Amazon rainforest aren't just bad for Indigenous communities, biodiversity and the climate – they're bad for the companies involved. Here's why. The Amazon is the world's largest remaining area of tropical rainforest, but every day it gets a little smaller – while big business profits get a little bigger. Over 750,000 km² of Amazon rainforest (an area larger than all of France) has already been destroyed by industrial agriculture, cattle ranching, illegal logging and infrastructure projects. And new threats keep coming: this time in the Tapajós River basin. What's happening in the Tapajós? The Brazilian government is planning a massive hydropower project for the Tapajós basin – over 40 medium or large dams, including one 7.6 km wide mega-dam. This dam alone would flood an area of rainforest the size of New York City, threatening the livelihoods of the Indigenous Munduruku People who have lived along the Tapajós River for centuries. The mega-dam – called São Luiz do Tapajós – doesn't just threaten local communities and ecosystems. It also harms the climate. Building the massive structure produces substantial emissions, as does the decay of flooded rainforest vegetation and soil. Figure 1 So who would want to help build the São Luiz do Tapajós dam? It takes huge amounts of capital and technology from companies all over the world to build a hydropower dam. Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project and released a new report on their findings – and on the risky nature of Amazon hydropower – today. So far, Greenpeace Brazil has found that the São Luiz do Tapajós dam is attracting the interest of a number of Brazilian and foreign energy companies. None of these companies have announced their intentions publicly yet, though. What's at stake for companies who get involved with São Luiz do Tapajós dam? The banks, insurers, suppliers and contractors that become involved in Amazon hydropower projects face serious financial and reputational risks. Hydropower dams attract international attention for their destruction to the environment and impacts on local communities. Moreover, these dams and other large government infrastructure projects have also recently been tied to corruption. Amazon destruction impacts all of us. People must act globally to stop this global project. Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few. Wherever you are in the world, your voice matters. Add your name to help keep the Tapajos alive! |
Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/amazonrainforest-hydropower-tapajos-dam-belo-monte/blog/56142/>. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2016. [Adaptado].
Considering the threats to the livelihoods of the indigenous people, the power of weather harm represented by the building of the hydropower project for the Tapajós basin is compared to
For questions 43 to 47, refer to the following text:
Time for global business to stop profiting from Amazon destruction by Tica Minami - 13 April, 2016 Huge hydropower dams in the Amazon rainforest aren't just bad for Indigenous communities, biodiversity and the climate – they're bad for the companies involved. Here's why. The Amazon is the world's largest remaining area of tropical rainforest, but every day it gets a little smaller – while big business profits get a little bigger. Over 750,000 km² of Amazon rainforest (an area larger than all of France) has already been destroyed by industrial agriculture, cattle ranching, illegal logging and infrastructure projects. And new threats keep coming: this time in the Tapajós River basin. What's happening in the Tapajós? The Brazilian government is planning a massive hydropower project for the Tapajós basin – over 40 medium or large dams, including one 7.6 km wide mega-dam. This dam alone would flood an area of rainforest the size of New York City, threatening the livelihoods of the Indigenous Munduruku People who have lived along the Tapajós River for centuries. The mega-dam – called São Luiz do Tapajós – doesn't just threaten local communities and ecosystems. It also harms the climate. Building the massive structure produces substantial emissions, as does the decay of flooded rainforest vegetation and soil. Figure 1 So who would want to help build the São Luiz do Tapajós dam? It takes huge amounts of capital and technology from companies all over the world to build a hydropower dam. Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project and released a new report on their findings – and on the risky nature of Amazon hydropower – today. So far, Greenpeace Brazil has found that the São Luiz do Tapajós dam is attracting the interest of a number of Brazilian and foreign energy companies. None of these companies have announced their intentions publicly yet, though. What's at stake for companies who get involved with São Luiz do Tapajós dam? The banks, insurers, suppliers and contractors that become involved in Amazon hydropower projects face serious financial and reputational risks. Hydropower dams attract international attention for their destruction to the environment and impacts on local communities. Moreover, these dams and other large government infrastructure projects have also recently been tied to corruption. Amazon destruction impacts all of us. People must act globally to stop this global project. Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few. Wherever you are in the world, your voice matters. Add your name to help keep the Tapajos alive! |
Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/amazonrainforest-hydropower-tapajos-dam-belo-monte/blog/56142/>. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2016. [Adaptado].
On Figure 1, which word play conveys the message written in large font? A
For questions 43 to 47, refer to the following text:
Time for global business to stop profiting from Amazon destruction by Tica Minami - 13 April, 2016 Huge hydropower dams in the Amazon rainforest aren't just bad for Indigenous communities, biodiversity and the climate – they're bad for the companies involved. Here's why. The Amazon is the world's largest remaining area of tropical rainforest, but every day it gets a little smaller – while big business profits get a little bigger. Over 750,000 km² of Amazon rainforest (an area larger than all of France) has already been destroyed by industrial agriculture, cattle ranching, illegal logging and infrastructure projects. And new threats keep coming: this time in the Tapajós River basin. What's happening in the Tapajós? The Brazilian government is planning a massive hydropower project for the Tapajós basin – over 40 medium or large dams, including one 7.6 km wide mega-dam. This dam alone would flood an area of rainforest the size of New York City, threatening the livelihoods of the Indigenous Munduruku People who have lived along the Tapajós River for centuries. The mega-dam – called São Luiz do Tapajós – doesn't just threaten local communities and ecosystems. It also harms the climate. Building the massive structure produces substantial emissions, as does the decay of flooded rainforest vegetation and soil. Figure 1 So who would want to help build the São Luiz do Tapajós dam? It takes huge amounts of capital and technology from companies all over the world to build a hydropower dam. Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project and released a new report on their findings – and on the risky nature of Amazon hydropower – today. So far, Greenpeace Brazil has found that the São Luiz do Tapajós dam is attracting the interest of a number of Brazilian and foreign energy companies. None of these companies have announced their intentions publicly yet, though. What's at stake for companies who get involved with São Luiz do Tapajós dam? The banks, insurers, suppliers and contractors that become involved in Amazon hydropower projects face serious financial and reputational risks. Hydropower dams attract international attention for their destruction to the environment and impacts on local communities. Moreover, these dams and other large government infrastructure projects have also recently been tied to corruption. Amazon destruction impacts all of us. People must act globally to stop this global project. Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few. Wherever you are in the world, your voice matters. Add your name to help keep the Tapajos alive! |
Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/amazonrainforest-hydropower-tapajos-dam-belo-monte/blog/56142/>. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2016. [Adaptado].
In parsing the following sentence, determine what traditional function each unit in the sentence has, according to this code:
N Noun |
A adjective |
P preposition |
V Verb |
PRN pronoun |
AUX auxiliar |
DET determiner |
“Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project”.
For questions 43 to 47, refer to the following text:
Time for global business to stop profiting from Amazon destruction by Tica Minami - 13 April, 2016 Huge hydropower dams in the Amazon rainforest aren't just bad for Indigenous communities, biodiversity and the climate – they're bad for the companies involved. Here's why. The Amazon is the world's largest remaining area of tropical rainforest, but every day it gets a little smaller – while big business profits get a little bigger. Over 750,000 km² of Amazon rainforest (an area larger than all of France) has already been destroyed by industrial agriculture, cattle ranching, illegal logging and infrastructure projects. And new threats keep coming: this time in the Tapajós River basin. What's happening in the Tapajós? The Brazilian government is planning a massive hydropower project for the Tapajós basin – over 40 medium or large dams, including one 7.6 km wide mega-dam. This dam alone would flood an area of rainforest the size of New York City, threatening the livelihoods of the Indigenous Munduruku People who have lived along the Tapajós River for centuries. The mega-dam – called São Luiz do Tapajós – doesn't just threaten local communities and ecosystems. It also harms the climate. Building the massive structure produces substantial emissions, as does the decay of flooded rainforest vegetation and soil. Figure 1 So who would want to help build the São Luiz do Tapajós dam? It takes huge amounts of capital and technology from companies all over the world to build a hydropower dam. Greenpeace Brazil has been investigating who might want to profit from this destructive project and released a new report on their findings – and on the risky nature of Amazon hydropower – today. So far, Greenpeace Brazil has found that the São Luiz do Tapajós dam is attracting the interest of a number of Brazilian and foreign energy companies. None of these companies have announced their intentions publicly yet, though. What's at stake for companies who get involved with São Luiz do Tapajós dam? The banks, insurers, suppliers and contractors that become involved in Amazon hydropower projects face serious financial and reputational risks. Hydropower dams attract international attention for their destruction to the environment and impacts on local communities. Moreover, these dams and other large government infrastructure projects have also recently been tied to corruption. Amazon destruction impacts all of us. People must act globally to stop this global project. Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few. Wherever you are in the world, your voice matters. Add your name to help keep the Tapajos alive! |
Disponível em: <http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/amazonrainforest-hydropower-tapajos-dam-belo-monte/blog/56142/>. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2016. [Adaptado].
In the sentence “Brazil's dash for Amazon hydropower is destined to fail its people while enriching a few”, dash might be properly replaced by
Questions 48 and 49 refer to the following picture:
Disponível em: <http://www.glogster.com/117williams/behaviorism-and-contiguity-kwilliams/g-6lo4klu0ilb5b4qhuceeua0>. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2016.
Image A depicts a teaching model which
Questions 48 and 49 refer to the following picture:
Disponível em: <http://www.glogster.com/117williams/behaviorism-and-contiguity-kwilliams/g-6lo4klu0ilb5b4qhuceeua0>. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2016.
Image B illustrates the principles in language teaching defended by the
Read the text to answer question 50.
Disponível em: <https://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/e/etiquette.asp>. Acesso em: 4 abr. 2016.
In the cartoon, the humorous situation is settled due to the
Memorization of vocabulary lists and extensive repetition of drills are typical examples of the procedures in the following language teaching methodologies, respectively, the:
Social and psychological distance between the second or foreign language learner and the target language community is a preeminent factor in the determination of the extent to which the language learner will acquire the target language, without developing pidginization. Which language learner theory is this statement part of?
In the following elements, the ones considered to be the key reversal in the Flipped Classroom are
Read the text to answer question 54.
Disponível em: <https://funnytimes.com/cartoon-playground/culture/>. Acesso em: 9 abr. 2016.
Regarding cultural clash, the cartoon illustrates that
Read the text to answer question 55.
Disponível em: <http://www.liberator.net/humor/dilbertCRI.html>. Acesso em: 9 abr. 2016.
The cartoon refers to a sort of thought that is the basis of a trend in modern languages teaching and learning. Which theory is that?
In a chapter entitled 'Planning lessons and courses', Scrivener (2005) suggests that before teaching an actual class, it helps if a teacher is clear about what they want to do. Although one can not ever completely predict how learners will respond to anything in the class, a lot is going to happen and the better prepared a teacher is, the more likely it is that he/she will be ready to cope with whatever happens. In this sense, planning is a
Scrivener (2005, p. 109) also claims that teachers “should be prepared to respond to the learners and adapt what they have planned as they go, even to the extent of throwing the plan away if appropriate.” This claim corresponds to which of the following teachers' approaches to planning?
Ao tratar da questão do método, os PCNs de língua estrangeira (1998) fazem uma breve discussão sobre a recorrente busca por um método ideal, afirmando que, no final da década de 1980, os métodos de ensino-aprendizagem
Segundo os PCNs de língua estrangeira (1998), para que o processo de construção de significados de natureza sociointeracional seja possível, as pessoas utilizam três tipos de conhecimento. Ao chamar a atenção dos alunos para o título do texto a ser lido e solicitar que eles “think about the topic – what do you know about it?”, o professor de língua inglesa está acionando o conhecimento
Ao mencionar uma atividade comum no ensino de leitura, como a solicitação de leitura em voz alta pelos estudantes, os PCNs (1998) argumentam que tal prática