Questões de Concurso

Foram encontradas 20.047 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q2517167 Inglês
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The opposite of “the smartest” (4th paragraph) is
Alternativas
Q2517166 Inglês
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
In the second paragraph, “on the flip side” means
Alternativas
Q2517165 Inglês
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The expression “such as” in “such as climate change” (2nd paragraph) can be replaced without significant change in meaning by
Alternativas
Q2517164 Inglês
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
The first sentence presents a
Alternativas
Q2517163 Inglês
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:


Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity

Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big, really quickly.

The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts: the opportunities for economic productivity, health care, manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations of economic and strategic power.

Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful, fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence supremacy.

As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest entities in the universe.

At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000 years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering, storytelling, art, technology and culture.

If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and intellectual expansion.

Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us by orders of magnitude.

Even if we solve the economic equality questions through something like a universal basic income and replace notions of ‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved to strive and thrive and compete?


Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Based on the text, mark the statements below as TRUE (T) or FALSE (F):

( ) The author mentions the fact that AGI may supplant human faculties.
( ) Ways in which we can lead meaningful lives are detailed.
( ) AGI has already solved the problems of economic equality.

The statements are, respectively
Alternativas
Q2517162 Português
Assinale a opção em que a preposição A – sozinha ou combinada - tem valor semântico diferente dos demais.
Alternativas
Q2517160 Português
As frases a seguir mostram forma negativa.
Assinale a opção em que a modificação para a forma positiva mantém o sentido original.
Alternativas
Q2517159 Português
Todas as frases abaixo estão separadas em dois segmentos.
Assinale a opção em que a relação lógica entre esses segmentos está corretamente indicada. 
Alternativas
Q2517158 Português
Entre todas as frases a seguir, assinale aquela que só pode ser entendida no sentido figurado.
Alternativas
Q2517157 Português
Assinale a opção em que não está presente uma expressão ou termo indicativo de causa.
Alternativas
Q2517155 Português
Todas as frases a seguir mostram termos ligados pela conjunção OU.
Assinale a opção em que essa conjunção mantém o valor de alternativa (e não de adição).:
Alternativas
Q2517154 Português
Nas opções a seguir, assinale aquela em que houve um emprego desaconselhável da expressão “cerca de”. 
Alternativas
Q2517153 Português
Assinale a opção em que houve erro na construção da frase, por troca indevida entre O/LHE. 
Alternativas
Q2517151 Português
Assinale a opção em que ocorre paralelismo sintático. 
Alternativas
Q2517150 Português
Observe o seguinte texto descritivo:

“Observando-se pela janela do lado de fora da casa, a cozinha parecia desorganizada e suja; do lado de dentro, no entanto, a sensação de aconchego estava presente. As xícaras fumegantes sobre a mesa aumentavam o desejo de todos os excursionistas”.

O tipo de descrição realizada nesse texto é o de
Alternativas
Q2517149 Português
Assinale a opção em que a modificação de uma oração reduzida para uma desenvolvida tenha sido feita de forma adequada.
Alternativas
Q2517148 Português
Segundo o gramático Celso Cunha, os adjetivos mostram os seguintes valores: uma qualidade, uma característica, um estado ou uma relação.
Assinale a opção em que o adjetivo sublinhado é classificado como adjetivo de estado.
Alternativas
Q2398008 Direito Administrativo
Otelo, servidor público federal titular de cargo efetivo, foi acusado em processo administrativo disciplinar de utilizar computador do Ministério onde trabalhava para armazenar e difundir vídeos ponográficos envolvendo crianças e adolescentes, acusação que resultou em sua demissão. Dias após a publicação do ato demissional, Otelo cometeu suicídio, sem deixar quaisquer familiares ou dependentes. Cinco anos após a morte de Otelo, lago, seu colega de repartição, também titular de cargo efetivo, encaminha ao Ministro de Estado uma carta em que confessa ter invadido o computador utilizado por Otelo sem o seu conhecimento e que era responsável pela prática da infração atribuída ao colega falecido, apresentando provas documentais da conduta confessada.


Diante da situação acima narrada e à luz da Lei nº 8.112/1990 (Regime Jurídico dos Servidores Públicos Civis da União, das autarquias e das fundações públicas federais) deve-se concluir que
Alternativas
Q2398005 Direito Constitucional
Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere a Constituição Federal de 1988.
A discussão e votação do projeto de lei que disponha sobre a organização da Defensoria Pública da União terá início
Alternativas
Q2398004 Direito Constitucional
Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere a Constituição Federal de 1988.
Laerte exerce seu segundo mandato consecutivo de Prefeito no Município “Y” e deseja, nas próximas eleições Municipais, reeleger-se ao mesmo cargo nesse Município. Laerte
Alternativas
Respostas
1241: C
1242: E
1243: A
1244: D
1245: B
1246: E
1247: B
1248: E
1249: D
1250: B
1251: A
1252: C
1253: D
1254: C
1255: D
1256: B
1257: A
1258: E
1259: D
1260: E