Questões de Concurso Para fadesp

Foram encontradas 9.203 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

www.qconcursos.com
Q2913999
Inglês Pronomes | Pronouns , Pronome objetivo | Objective pronoun ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2913999 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The pronoun them in “This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message” refers to

Alternativas
Q2913996
Inglês Artigos | Articles , Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2913996 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The underlined word in “Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures”, introduces something that is

Alternativas
Q2913995
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2913995 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The example given in the 4th paragraph supports the idea that successful cross-cultural communication depends on understanding interlocutors’

Alternativas
Q2913992
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2913992 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

The author implies that the referential meaning of speaker’s propositions is signaled by

Alternativas
Q2913987
Inglês Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension ,
Ano: 2012 Banca: FADESP Órgão: Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA Prova: FADESP - 2012 - Prefeitura de Alenquer - PA - Professor - Língua Inglesa |
Q2913987 Inglês

THERE ARE 10 QUESTIONS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE IN YOUR TEST. EACH QUESTION HAS 4 ALTERNATIVES (A, B, C, AND D) FROM WHICH ONLY ONE IS CORRECT. CHECK THE CORRECT ONE.


A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings

Successful communication between human beings, either within a culture or between cultures, requires that the message and meaning intended by the speaker is correctly received and interpreted by the listener. Sustainable error free communication is rare, and in most human interactions there is some degree of miscommunication.
The message sent from speaker to listener contains a wide array of features, such as words, grammar, syntax, idioms, tone of voice, emphasis, speed, emotion, and body language, and the interpretation requires the listener to attend to all of these features, while at the same time constructing an understanding of the speaker's intentions, emotions, politeness, seriousness, character, beliefs, priorities, motivations, and style of communicating. In addition, the listener must also evaluate whether the utterance is a question or a statement and how and to what extent a statement matters to the speaker (Maltz and Borker, 1982).
Each of the components of the communication provides one or more kind of information. Words convey abstract logic, tone of voice conveys attitudes, emotions and emphases, and body language communicates "requests versus commands, the stages of greeting, and turn-taking" (Schneller 1988, p. 154).
Even assuming that words and body language were perfectly understood, there is more information necessary to successfully communicate across cultures. For example, in some countries it is polite to refuse the first few offers of refreshment: "Many foreign guests have gone hungry because their U.S. host or hostess never presented a third offer" (Samovar and Porter 1988, p. 326). In understanding communication, a listener must pay attention not just to what is said and when, but also to how many times something is said, under what circumstances, and by whom. Given all this complexity, the reason human communication can often succeed is because people learn how to communicate and understand through interacting with one another throughout their lives. Therefore, it is no surprise that culture and socialization are critical determinants of communication and interpretation. "The entire inference process, from observation through categorization is a function of one's socialization" Detweiler (1975). Socialization influences how input will be received, and how perceptions will be organized conceptually and associated with memories.

The importance of culture to communication

Some theorists have gone so far as to claim that culture not only influences interpretation, but constitutes interpretation. The interpretation of communicative intent is not predictable on the basis of referential meaning alone. Matters of context, social presuppositions, knowledge of the world, and individual background all play an important role in interpretation (Gumperz, 1978b).
Even knowledgeable translators can have difficulty with cross-cultural translations. There may not be corresponding words or equivalent concepts in both cultures, jokes and implications may be overlooked, and literal translations can present a host of difficulties. Some language pairs are very difficult to translate, while others, usually in more similar languages, are much easier (Sechrest, Fay and Zaidi 1988).
While some of the incremental difficulties can be traced to the underlying linguistic commonalities between the languages, there may be a more elusive cultural and ecological basis for difficulty in translation. It would be interesting to test how much of the variance in communication could be accounted for by the ease with which the languages in question could be translated into one another.
Although it may facilitate cross-cultural translations, similarity of languages and cultures also increases the likelihood that communicators will erroneously assume similarity of meanings. This may make them more likely to misunderstand speech and behavior without being aware that they may have misinterpreted the speaker's message.
In general, cross-cultural miscommunication can be thought to derive from the mistaken belief that emics are etics, that words and deeds mean the same thing across cultures, and this miscalculation is perhaps more likely when cultures are similar in surface attributes but different in important underlying ways. In this case miscommunication may occur instead of non-communication.

(http://www.dattnerconsulting.com/cross.html )

According to the text A Framework for Understanding Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings, human communication

Alternativas
Q2910361
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho NR 4 - Norma Regulamentadora n° 4 - Serviços Especializados em Eng. de Segurança e em Medicina do Trabalho - SESMT , Normas Regulamentadoras de Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910361 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

De acordo com a NR4, um estabelecimento com grau de risco 3, e que possua 3530 empregados, a SESMT deve ser composta por

Alternativas
Q2910358
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho Medicina do trabalho , Sistema de Saúde Brasileira ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910358 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

Um Programa implantado no Serviço de Medicina do Trabalho de uma empresa realizou um check up de todos os empregados ao completarem 50 anos, durante 5 anos, e teve o seguinte resultado: dos 300 empregados examinados, 60 (20%) tinham lesões eletrocardiográficas sugestivas de infarto do miocárdio. Esta medida realizada refere-se a uma taxa de

Alternativas
Q2910355
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho Medicina do trabalho , Sistema de Saúde Brasileira ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910355 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

A jornada de trabalho para médicos do trabalho e engenheiros do trabalho, respeitado salário mínimo/horário das categorias, corresponde a (ao)

Alternativas
Q2910349
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho NR 18 - Norma Regulamentadora nº 18 - Condições e Meio Ambiente de Trabalho na Indústria da Construção (PCMAT) , Normas Regulamentadoras de Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910349 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

Entende-se por Plataforma de Retenção de Entulho:

Alternativas
Q2910344
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho Doenças do Trabalho e Doenças Profissionais (Dort) , Fundamentos da Saúde Ocupacional ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910344 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

A predisposição às dermatoses ocupacionais relativa ao sexo masculino e feminino mostra que

Alternativas
Q2910337
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho NR 18 - Norma Regulamentadora nº 18 - Condições e Meio Ambiente de Trabalho na Indústria da Construção (PCMAT) , Normas Regulamentadoras de Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910337 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

São obrigatórios a elaboração e o cumprimento do Programa de Condições e Meio Ambiente de Trabalho na Indústria da Construção — PCMAT somente em estabelecimentos com

Alternativas
Q2910335
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho Legislação Trabalhista Brasileira e Internacional , Normas de Higiene ocupacional - NHOs: ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910335 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

O empregado que desenvolve atividades em ambiente de trabalho com nível de ruído contínuo de 90 dB deve ter máxima exposição diária permissível de

Alternativas
Q2910333
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho NR 6 - Norma Regulamentadora n° 6 - Equipamentos de Proteção Individual - EPI , Normas Regulamentadoras de Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910333 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

O estudo, desenvolvimento e implantação de medidas de proteção coletiva deverão obedecer à seguinte hierarquia:

Alternativas
Q2910330
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho Fundamentos da Saúde Ocupacional ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910330 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

Quando se compara o homem com as máquinas, o homem é considerado melhor em

Alternativas
Q2910327
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho NR 17 - Norma Regulamentadora n° 17 - Ergonomia , Normas Regulamentadoras de Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910327 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

De acordo com a NR17, o empregado em jornada de trabalho de 8 horas diárias e que desenvolve atividades de processamento eletrônico de dados, salvo o disposto em convenções e acordos coletivos de trabalho, as horas de trabalho deve corresponder

Alternativas
Q2910319
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho NR 4 - Norma Regulamentadora n° 4 - Serviços Especializados em Eng. de Segurança e em Medicina do Trabalho - SESMT , Normas Regulamentadoras de Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910319 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

A SESMT de uma empresa possui uma equipe composta por

Alternativas
Q2910308
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho Normas de Higiene ocupacional - NHOs: ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910308 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

Os técnicos de raios x, radioterapeutas e os radiologistas são expostos à radiação quando trabalham com os pacientes ou diretamente com os equipamentos. Neste caso, a unidade de medida da dose recebida é a (0)

Alternativas
Q2910300
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho NR 15 - Norma Regulamentadora n° 15 - Atividades e Operações Insalubres (Acústica, Temperatura e IBTG e Ventilação Industrial) , Normas Regulamentadoras de Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910300 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

De acordo com a NR15, o pagamento do adicional ao empregado por motivo de insalubridade

Alternativas
Q2910277
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho Doenças do Trabalho e Doenças Profissionais (Dort) , Fundamentos da Saúde Ocupacional ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910277 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

São considerados agentes mecânicos de doenças profissionais:

Alternativas
Q2910257
Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho Acidente de Trabalho (CAT) , Fundamentos da Saúde Ocupacional ,
Ano: 2010 Banca: FADESP Órgão: SESPA-PA Prova: FADESP - 2010 - SESPA-PA - Engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho |
Q2910257 Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho

Em uma empresa ocorre um acidente do trabalho causado pela falta de conhecimentos e inexperiência do empregado em relação ao trabalho. Neste caso, podemos classificar a causa como

Alternativas
Respostas
861: B
862: C
863: D
864: A
865: C
866: B
867: C
868: C
869: D
870: B
871: D
872: A
873: A
874: D
875: B
876: C
877: B
878: C
879: D
880: B
www.qconcursos.com