Questões de Concurso Comentadas para analista em ciência e tecnologia pleno

Foram encontradas 398 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q2352267 Arquitetura de Software

Julgue o item que se segue, relativo a eMAG e ePING.


De acordo com o índice de maturidade em acessibilidade digital do eMAG, o nível 3 refere-se à validação automática para a verificação do atendimento dos requisitos de acessibilidade de produtos contratados por fornecedores de TI.

Alternativas
Q2352266 Governança de TI

No que se refere à gestão e à fiscalização de contratos de TI, julgue o item que se segue.


Na execução de um serviço de TI, o contratado poderá empregar um agente público que estiver atuando na fiscalização ou na gestão do contrato, desde que o edital de licitação expressamente o permita.

Alternativas
Q2352265 Governança de TI

No que se refere à gestão e à fiscalização de contratos de TI, julgue o item que se segue.


A renovação contratual e o gerenciamento de riscos de uma contratação de TI poderão utilizar como subsídio o histórico de gestão de contrato, artefato que permite documentar os principais acontecimentos positivos ou negativos que ocorrerem durante a execução do contrato.

Alternativas
Q2352261 Inglês
        A lawyer used ChatGPT to prepare a court filing. It went horribly awry.
        A lawyer who relied on ChatGPT to prepare a court filing on behalf of a man suing an airline is now all too familiar with the artificial intelligence (AI) tool’s shortcomings — including its propensity to invent facts.
        Roberto Mata sued Colombian airline Avianca last year, alleging that a metal food and beverage cart injured his knee on a flight to Kennedy International Airport in New York. When Avianca asked a Manhattan judge to dismiss the lawsuit based on the statute of limitations, his lawyer submitted a brief based on research done by ChatGPT.
         While ChatGPT can be useful to professionals in numerous industries, including the legal profession, it has proved itself to be both limited and unreliable. In this case, the AI invented court cases that didn’t exist, and asserted that they were real. The fabrications were revealed when Avianca’s lawyers approached the case’s judge, saying they couldn’t locate the cases cited in Mata’s lawyers’ brief in legal databases.
         “It seemed clear when we didn’t recognize any of the cases in their opposition brief that something was amiss,” said the airline’s lawyer. And soon they figured it was some sort of chatbot of some kind. On the other hand, the passenger’s lawyer said that it was the first time he’d used ChatGPT for work and, therefore, he was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false.

Internet:<www.cbsnews.com> (adapted).

Based on the preceding text, judge the item that follow.


When ChatGPT gave the passenger’s lawyer some court cases, it warned him they could not be factual. 

Alternativas
Q2352260 Inglês
        A lawyer used ChatGPT to prepare a court filing. It went horribly awry.
        A lawyer who relied on ChatGPT to prepare a court filing on behalf of a man suing an airline is now all too familiar with the artificial intelligence (AI) tool’s shortcomings — including its propensity to invent facts.
        Roberto Mata sued Colombian airline Avianca last year, alleging that a metal food and beverage cart injured his knee on a flight to Kennedy International Airport in New York. When Avianca asked a Manhattan judge to dismiss the lawsuit based on the statute of limitations, his lawyer submitted a brief based on research done by ChatGPT.
         While ChatGPT can be useful to professionals in numerous industries, including the legal profession, it has proved itself to be both limited and unreliable. In this case, the AI invented court cases that didn’t exist, and asserted that they were real. The fabrications were revealed when Avianca’s lawyers approached the case’s judge, saying they couldn’t locate the cases cited in Mata’s lawyers’ brief in legal databases.
         “It seemed clear when we didn’t recognize any of the cases in their opposition brief that something was amiss,” said the airline’s lawyer. And soon they figured it was some sort of chatbot of some kind. On the other hand, the passenger’s lawyer said that it was the first time he’d used ChatGPT for work and, therefore, he was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false.

Internet:<www.cbsnews.com> (adapted).

Based on the preceding text, judge the item that follow.


The passenger who sued the airline company because of an incident that happened during his flight is Colombian. 

Alternativas
Respostas
286: E
287: E
288: C
289: E
290: E