Questões de Concurso Para segep-ma

Foram encontradas 1.722 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q702332 Matemática
Roberta tem que ler dois processos diferentes e dar, em cada um, parecer favorável ou desfavorável. A probabilidade de Roberta dar parecer favorável ao primeiro processo é de 50%, a de dar parecer favorável ao segundo é de 40%, e a de dar parecer favorável a ambos os processos é de 30%. Sendo assim, a probabilidade de que Roberta dê pareceres desfavoráveis a ambos os processos é igual a
Alternativas
Q702331 Matemática
Jair tem 8 primos, dos quais irá convidar 5 para um jantar em sua casa. Ocorre que 2 dos 8 primos só podem ir ao jantar se forem juntos. O total de escolhas diferentes dos 5 convidados que Jair pode fazer para o jantar é igual a
Alternativas
Q702330 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

    The sole proprietor of a plumbing shop was sentenced to 13 months in prison, three years of supervised release for tax evasion and ordered to pay approximately $130,000 in restitution to the IRS. The business owner willfully attempted to evade paying his federal income taxes by skimming gross receipts of his plumbing business and paying personal expenses from his business accounts and claiming them as business expenses.

    As part of his tax evasion scheme, he instructed several of his employees to solicit checks from clients payable in his name, rather than in the name of the business. He then cashed these checks and did not deposit the monies into his business’ bank account. Since this money was not recorded on the books of the business, nor deposited into the business’ account, he did not include these gross receipts on his income tax return. He also deducted personal expenses as business expenses thereby substantially reducing his tax for tax years 2003 through 2006.

(Adapted from http://www.bizfilings.com/toolkit/sbg/tax-info/fed-taxes/tax-avoidance-and-tax-evasion.aspx)

Segundo o texto, o proprietário em questão
Alternativas
Q702329 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

    The sole proprietor of a plumbing shop was sentenced to 13 months in prison, three years of supervised release for tax evasion and ordered to pay approximately $130,000 in restitution to the IRS. The business owner willfully attempted to evade paying his federal income taxes by skimming gross receipts of his plumbing business and paying personal expenses from his business accounts and claiming them as business expenses.

    As part of his tax evasion scheme, he instructed several of his employees to solicit checks from clients payable in his name, rather than in the name of the business. He then cashed these checks and did not deposit the monies into his business’ bank account. Since this money was not recorded on the books of the business, nor deposited into the business’ account, he did not include these gross receipts on his income tax return. He also deducted personal expenses as business expenses thereby substantially reducing his tax for tax years 2003 through 2006.

(Adapted from http://www.bizfilings.com/toolkit/sbg/tax-info/fed-taxes/tax-avoidance-and-tax-evasion.aspx)

O texto trata
Alternativas
Q702328 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

    The sole proprietor of a plumbing shop was sentenced to 13 months in prison, three years of supervised release for tax evasion and ordered to pay approximately $130,000 in restitution to the IRS. The business owner willfully attempted to evade paying his federal income taxes by skimming gross receipts of his plumbing business and paying personal expenses from his business accounts and claiming them as business expenses.

    As part of his tax evasion scheme, he instructed several of his employees to solicit checks from clients payable in his name, rather than in the name of the business. He then cashed these checks and did not deposit the monies into his business’ bank account. Since this money was not recorded on the books of the business, nor deposited into the business’ account, he did not include these gross receipts on his income tax return. He also deducted personal expenses as business expenses thereby substantially reducing his tax for tax years 2003 through 2006.

(Adapted from http://www.bizfilings.com/toolkit/sbg/tax-info/fed-taxes/tax-avoidance-and-tax-evasion.aspx)

A synonym for ‘rather than’, as used in the text, is
Alternativas
Q702327 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

    The sole proprietor of a plumbing shop was sentenced to 13 months in prison, three years of supervised release for tax evasion and ordered to pay approximately $130,000 in restitution to the IRS. The business owner willfully attempted to evade paying his federal income taxes by skimming gross receipts of his plumbing business and paying personal expenses from his business accounts and claiming them as business expenses.

    As part of his tax evasion scheme, he instructed several of his employees to solicit checks from clients payable in his name, rather than in the name of the business. He then cashed these checks and did not deposit the monies into his business’ bank account. Since this money was not recorded on the books of the business, nor deposited into the business’ account, he did not include these gross receipts on his income tax return. He also deducted personal expenses as business expenses thereby substantially reducing his tax for tax years 2003 through 2006.

(Adapted from http://www.bizfilings.com/toolkit/sbg/tax-info/fed-taxes/tax-avoidance-and-tax-evasion.aspx)

O significado de willfully no texto é
Alternativas
Q702326 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

    In the United States of America, an income tax audit is the examination of a business or individual tax return by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or state tax authority. The IRS and various state revenue departments use the terms audit, examination, review, and notice to describe various aspects of enforcement and administration of the tax laws.

    The purpose of a tax audit or a return examination is to determine  reports filed with the taxing authorities are correct. The tax agencies identify and resolve taxpayer errors.

    There are several different methods used to select individuals and businesses for examination.

    Employers and financial institutions, among other organizations, are required by law to send documentation (W-2's and 1099's, for example) to the IRS. The IRS uses software to ensure that the numbers on a tax return match the numbers the IRS receives from third parties. If the documentation does not match, the return may be examined.

    When a tax return is filed, the IRS uses computer software called the Discriminant Index Function System (DIF) to analyze the return for oddities and discrepancies. Once the return has been processed through DIF, it is given a score. If the DIF score is high enough (i.e. a large amount of oddities or discrepancies are found), that tax return may be selected for examination. The formulas the IRS use to create the DIF software and analysis are a closely guarded secret.

    Filed tax returns are also subjected to an evaluation called the UIDIF, or the Unreported Income Discriminant Function System. This evaluation involves the analysis of tax returns based on a series of factors to determine a tax return's potential for unreported income. Returns that are found to have a high UIDIF score (i.e. the likelihood of unreported income) and a high DIF score may be selected for examination. The IRS formulas used to calculate UDIF are secret, but it is commonly thought that the IRS uses statistical comparisons between returns to determine UIDIF potential.

    The IRS selects a certain amount of income tax returns to be audited each year through random selection. No errors need to be found for the Enforcement branch to examine a tax return. Random selection exams tend to be more extensive and time-consuming than other forms of review.

    The practice of random selection has been a source of controversy for many years. The practice was suspended for a short time in the early 2000s amid criticism that the audits were too burdensome and intrusive. The IRS revived the practice in the fall of 2006.

(Adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_audit)

De acordo com o texto, nos Estados Unidos a seleção aleatória de declarações a serem examinadas
Alternativas
Q702325 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

    In the United States of America, an income tax audit is the examination of a business or individual tax return by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or state tax authority. The IRS and various state revenue departments use the terms audit, examination, review, and notice to describe various aspects of enforcement and administration of the tax laws.

    The purpose of a tax audit or a return examination is to determine  reports filed with the taxing authorities are correct. The tax agencies identify and resolve taxpayer errors.

    There are several different methods used to select individuals and businesses for examination.

    Employers and financial institutions, among other organizations, are required by law to send documentation (W-2's and 1099's, for example) to the IRS. The IRS uses software to ensure that the numbers on a tax return match the numbers the IRS receives from third parties. If the documentation does not match, the return may be examined.

    When a tax return is filed, the IRS uses computer software called the Discriminant Index Function System (DIF) to analyze the return for oddities and discrepancies. Once the return has been processed through DIF, it is given a score. If the DIF score is high enough (i.e. a large amount of oddities or discrepancies are found), that tax return may be selected for examination. The formulas the IRS use to create the DIF software and analysis are a closely guarded secret.

    Filed tax returns are also subjected to an evaluation called the UIDIF, or the Unreported Income Discriminant Function System. This evaluation involves the analysis of tax returns based on a series of factors to determine a tax return's potential for unreported income. Returns that are found to have a high UIDIF score (i.e. the likelihood of unreported income) and a high DIF score may be selected for examination. The IRS formulas used to calculate UDIF are secret, but it is commonly thought that the IRS uses statistical comparisons between returns to determine UIDIF potential.

    The IRS selects a certain amount of income tax returns to be audited each year through random selection. No errors need to be found for the Enforcement branch to examine a tax return. Random selection exams tend to be more extensive and time-consuming than other forms of review.

    The practice of random selection has been a source of controversy for many years. The practice was suspended for a short time in the early 2000s amid criticism that the audits were too burdensome and intrusive. The IRS revived the practice in the fall of 2006.

(Adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_audit)

Segundo o texto, o objetivo do DIF é
Alternativas
Q702324 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

    In the United States of America, an income tax audit is the examination of a business or individual tax return by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or state tax authority. The IRS and various state revenue departments use the terms audit, examination, review, and notice to describe various aspects of enforcement and administration of the tax laws.

    The purpose of a tax audit or a return examination is to determine  reports filed with the taxing authorities are correct. The tax agencies identify and resolve taxpayer errors.

    There are several different methods used to select individuals and businesses for examination.

    Employers and financial institutions, among other organizations, are required by law to send documentation (W-2's and 1099's, for example) to the IRS. The IRS uses software to ensure that the numbers on a tax return match the numbers the IRS receives from third parties. If the documentation does not match, the return may be examined.

    When a tax return is filed, the IRS uses computer software called the Discriminant Index Function System (DIF) to analyze the return for oddities and discrepancies. Once the return has been processed through DIF, it is given a score. If the DIF score is high enough (i.e. a large amount of oddities or discrepancies are found), that tax return may be selected for examination. The formulas the IRS use to create the DIF software and analysis are a closely guarded secret.

    Filed tax returns are also subjected to an evaluation called the UIDIF, or the Unreported Income Discriminant Function System. This evaluation involves the analysis of tax returns based on a series of factors to determine a tax return's potential for unreported income. Returns that are found to have a high UIDIF score (i.e. the likelihood of unreported income) and a high DIF score may be selected for examination. The IRS formulas used to calculate UDIF are secret, but it is commonly thought that the IRS uses statistical comparisons between returns to determine UIDIF potential.

    The IRS selects a certain amount of income tax returns to be audited each year through random selection. No errors need to be found for the Enforcement branch to examine a tax return. Random selection exams tend to be more extensive and time-consuming than other forms of review.

    The practice of random selection has been a source of controversy for many years. The practice was suspended for a short time in the early 2000s amid criticism that the audits were too burdensome and intrusive. The IRS revived the practice in the fall of 2006.

(Adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_audit)

O significado de likelihood (6º parágrafo), conforme empregado no texto, é
Alternativas
Q702323 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

    In the United States of America, an income tax audit is the examination of a business or individual tax return by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or state tax authority. The IRS and various state revenue departments use the terms audit, examination, review, and notice to describe various aspects of enforcement and administration of the tax laws.

    The purpose of a tax audit or a return examination is to determine  reports filed with the taxing authorities are correct. The tax agencies identify and resolve taxpayer errors.

    There are several different methods used to select individuals and businesses for examination.

    Employers and financial institutions, among other organizations, are required by law to send documentation (W-2's and 1099's, for example) to the IRS. The IRS uses software to ensure that the numbers on a tax return match the numbers the IRS receives from third parties. If the documentation does not match, the return may be examined.

    When a tax return is filed, the IRS uses computer software called the Discriminant Index Function System (DIF) to analyze the return for oddities and discrepancies. Once the return has been processed through DIF, it is given a score. If the DIF score is high enough (i.e. a large amount of oddities or discrepancies are found), that tax return may be selected for examination. The formulas the IRS use to create the DIF software and analysis are a closely guarded secret.

    Filed tax returns are also subjected to an evaluation called the UIDIF, or the Unreported Income Discriminant Function System. This evaluation involves the analysis of tax returns based on a series of factors to determine a tax return's potential for unreported income. Returns that are found to have a high UIDIF score (i.e. the likelihood of unreported income) and a high DIF score may be selected for examination. The IRS formulas used to calculate UDIF are secret, but it is commonly thought that the IRS uses statistical comparisons between returns to determine UIDIF potential.

    The IRS selects a certain amount of income tax returns to be audited each year through random selection. No errors need to be found for the Enforcement branch to examine a tax return. Random selection exams tend to be more extensive and time-consuming than other forms of review.

    The practice of random selection has been a source of controversy for many years. The practice was suspended for a short time in the early 2000s amid criticism that the audits were too burdensome and intrusive. The IRS revived the practice in the fall of 2006.

(Adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_audit)

A palavra que preenche corretamente a lacuna Imagem associada para resolução da questão é
Alternativas
Q702322 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

    In the United States of America, an income tax audit is the examination of a business or individual tax return by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or state tax authority. The IRS and various state revenue departments use the terms audit, examination, review, and notice to describe various aspects of enforcement and administration of the tax laws.

    The purpose of a tax audit or a return examination is to determine  reports filed with the taxing authorities are correct. The tax agencies identify and resolve taxpayer errors.

    There are several different methods used to select individuals and businesses for examination.

    Employers and financial institutions, among other organizations, are required by law to send documentation (W-2's and 1099's, for example) to the IRS. The IRS uses software to ensure that the numbers on a tax return match the numbers the IRS receives from third parties. If the documentation does not match, the return may be examined.

    When a tax return is filed, the IRS uses computer software called the Discriminant Index Function System (DIF) to analyze the return for oddities and discrepancies. Once the return has been processed through DIF, it is given a score. If the DIF score is high enough (i.e. a large amount of oddities or discrepancies are found), that tax return may be selected for examination. The formulas the IRS use to create the DIF software and analysis are a closely guarded secret.

    Filed tax returns are also subjected to an evaluation called the UIDIF, or the Unreported Income Discriminant Function System. This evaluation involves the analysis of tax returns based on a series of factors to determine a tax return's potential for unreported income. Returns that are found to have a high UIDIF score (i.e. the likelihood of unreported income) and a high DIF score may be selected for examination. The IRS formulas used to calculate UDIF are secret, but it is commonly thought that the IRS uses statistical comparisons between returns to determine UIDIF potential.

    The IRS selects a certain amount of income tax returns to be audited each year through random selection. No errors need to be found for the Enforcement branch to examine a tax return. Random selection exams tend to be more extensive and time-consuming than other forms of review.

    The practice of random selection has been a source of controversy for many years. The practice was suspended for a short time in the early 2000s amid criticism that the audits were too burdensome and intrusive. The IRS revived the practice in the fall of 2006.

(Adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_audit)

O texto menciona diversos termos usados para designar vários aspectos da execução e administração de leis tributárias. Dentre os termos abaixo, o que NÃO se relaciona a esse assunto é
Alternativas
Q702321 Inglês

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

    In the United States of America, an income tax audit is the examination of a business or individual tax return by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or state tax authority. The IRS and various state revenue departments use the terms audit, examination, review, and notice to describe various aspects of enforcement and administration of the tax laws.

    The purpose of a tax audit or a return examination is to determine  reports filed with the taxing authorities are correct. The tax agencies identify and resolve taxpayer errors.

    There are several different methods used to select individuals and businesses for examination.

    Employers and financial institutions, among other organizations, are required by law to send documentation (W-2's and 1099's, for example) to the IRS. The IRS uses software to ensure that the numbers on a tax return match the numbers the IRS receives from third parties. If the documentation does not match, the return may be examined.

    When a tax return is filed, the IRS uses computer software called the Discriminant Index Function System (DIF) to analyze the return for oddities and discrepancies. Once the return has been processed through DIF, it is given a score. If the DIF score is high enough (i.e. a large amount of oddities or discrepancies are found), that tax return may be selected for examination. The formulas the IRS use to create the DIF software and analysis are a closely guarded secret.

    Filed tax returns are also subjected to an evaluation called the UIDIF, or the Unreported Income Discriminant Function System. This evaluation involves the analysis of tax returns based on a series of factors to determine a tax return's potential for unreported income. Returns that are found to have a high UIDIF score (i.e. the likelihood of unreported income) and a high DIF score may be selected for examination. The IRS formulas used to calculate UDIF are secret, but it is commonly thought that the IRS uses statistical comparisons between returns to determine UIDIF potential.

    The IRS selects a certain amount of income tax returns to be audited each year through random selection. No errors need to be found for the Enforcement branch to examine a tax return. Random selection exams tend to be more extensive and time-consuming than other forms of review.

    The practice of random selection has been a source of controversy for many years. The practice was suspended for a short time in the early 2000s amid criticism that the audits were too burdensome and intrusive. The IRS revived the practice in the fall of 2006.

(Adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_audit)

A ‘tax return’ in the United States corresponds, in Brazil, to
Alternativas
Q702320 Português

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

Tolerância brasileira?

    A internet vem ajudando a derrubar o mito de que nós, brasileiros, somos tolerantes às diferenças. Expressões preconceituosas predominam em postagens que revelam todo tipo de intransigência em relação ao outro, rejeitado por sua aparência, classe social, deficiência, opção política, idade, raça, religião etc.

    Num primeiro momento, parece que a internet criou uma onda de intolerância. O fato, porém, é que as redes sociais apenas amplificaram discursos existentes no nosso dia a dia. No fundo, as pessoas são as mesmas, nas ruas e nas redes.

(Adaptado de: COSTA, Bob Vieira da. Folha de S.Paulo, 3/08/2016)

A oração sublinhada exerce a função de sujeito no seguinte período:
Alternativas
Q702319 Português

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

Tolerância brasileira?

    A internet vem ajudando a derrubar o mito de que nós, brasileiros, somos tolerantes às diferenças. Expressões preconceituosas predominam em postagens que revelam todo tipo de intransigência em relação ao outro, rejeitado por sua aparência, classe social, deficiência, opção política, idade, raça, religião etc.

    Num primeiro momento, parece que a internet criou uma onda de intolerância. O fato, porém, é que as redes sociais apenas amplificaram discursos existentes no nosso dia a dia. No fundo, as pessoas são as mesmas, nas ruas e nas redes.

(Adaptado de: COSTA, Bob Vieira da. Folha de S.Paulo, 3/08/2016)

A seguinte frase tem redação correta e interpreta adequadamente o sentido do segundo parágrafo do texto:
Alternativas
Q702318 Português

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

Tolerância brasileira?

    A internet vem ajudando a derrubar o mito de que nós, brasileiros, somos tolerantes às diferenças. Expressões preconceituosas predominam em postagens que revelam todo tipo de intransigência em relação ao outro, rejeitado por sua aparência, classe social, deficiência, opção política, idade, raça, religião etc.

    Num primeiro momento, parece que a internet criou uma onda de intolerância. O fato, porém, é que as redes sociais apenas amplificaram discursos existentes no nosso dia a dia. No fundo, as pessoas são as mesmas, nas ruas e nas redes.

(Adaptado de: COSTA, Bob Vieira da. Folha de S.Paulo, 3/08/2016)

Atente para as seguintes afirmações: I. A internet vem ajudando a comprovar o fato de que somos menos intolerantes, no confronto das nossas diferenças, do que imaginávamos ser. II. Expressões preconceituosas são reveladoras de uma ampla intolerância, exposta a partir de prevenções de caráter racial, religioso, político etc. III. Os preconceitos generalizados, pelos quais se evidencia a intolerância que só faz crescer entre nós, derivam sobretudo do uso indiscriminado da internet. Em relação ao texto está correto o que se afirma em
Alternativas
Q702317 Português

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

Nostalgias perigosas

    Numa recente e polêmica crônica de jornal, o escritor Contardo Calligaris manifestou preocupação com estes dois traços perigosos de nostalgia que, segundo ele, costumam caracterizar a velhice:

    “1) Uma avareza mesquinha (e generalizada – não só financeira), que consiste em tentar preservar e conservar qualquer coisa, como metáfora da preservação (impossível) da nossa vida que se vai;

    2) Uma idealização fantasiosa de passados que nunca existiram. Os idosos parecem sempre evocar o "tempo feliz" de sua infância, quando os pais eram severos e por isso educavam bem, quando dava para brincar na rua e a escola pública era muito boa.”

    E completou sua crônica acusando o fato de que os idosos costumam se apoiar em lembranças inventadas, em algo que efetivamente não conheceram, mas que gostariam de ter vivido. Resta saber se a imaginação do vivido, para esses velhos, não é em si mesma uma sensação real e necessária, no final da vida.

(Adamastor Linhares, inédito)

Atente para as seguintes construções: I. O cronista critica os velhos, em quem reconhece dois traços perigosos. II. São condenáveis os velhos, cuja avareza mesquinha se funda numa ilusão. III. Ao falar dos velhos, o cronista rejeita suas memórias fantasiosas. A exclusão da vírgula alterará o sentido do que está APENAS em
Alternativas
Q702316 Português

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

Nostalgias perigosas

    Numa recente e polêmica crônica de jornal, o escritor Contardo Calligaris manifestou preocupação com estes dois traços perigosos de nostalgia que, segundo ele, costumam caracterizar a velhice:

    “1) Uma avareza mesquinha (e generalizada – não só financeira), que consiste em tentar preservar e conservar qualquer coisa, como metáfora da preservação (impossível) da nossa vida que se vai;

    2) Uma idealização fantasiosa de passados que nunca existiram. Os idosos parecem sempre evocar o "tempo feliz" de sua infância, quando os pais eram severos e por isso educavam bem, quando dava para brincar na rua e a escola pública era muito boa.”

    E completou sua crônica acusando o fato de que os idosos costumam se apoiar em lembranças inventadas, em algo que efetivamente não conheceram, mas que gostariam de ter vivido. Resta saber se a imaginação do vivido, para esses velhos, não é em si mesma uma sensação real e necessária, no final da vida.

(Adamastor Linhares, inédito)

E completou sua crônica acusando o fato de que os idosos costumam se apoiar em lembranças inventadas, em algo que efetivamente não conheceram. A frase acima permanecerá correta caso os segmentos sublinhados sejam substituídos, respectivamente, por:
Alternativas
Q702315 Português

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

Nostalgias perigosas

    Numa recente e polêmica crônica de jornal, o escritor Contardo Calligaris manifestou preocupação com estes dois traços perigosos de nostalgia que, segundo ele, costumam caracterizar a velhice:

    “1) Uma avareza mesquinha (e generalizada – não só financeira), que consiste em tentar preservar e conservar qualquer coisa, como metáfora da preservação (impossível) da nossa vida que se vai;

    2) Uma idealização fantasiosa de passados que nunca existiram. Os idosos parecem sempre evocar o "tempo feliz" de sua infância, quando os pais eram severos e por isso educavam bem, quando dava para brincar na rua e a escola pública era muito boa.”

    E completou sua crônica acusando o fato de que os idosos costumam se apoiar em lembranças inventadas, em algo que efetivamente não conheceram, mas que gostariam de ter vivido. Resta saber se a imaginação do vivido, para esses velhos, não é em si mesma uma sensação real e necessária, no final da vida.

(Adamastor Linhares, inédito)

Disseminam-se no texto expressões de sentido antônimo, tais como:
Alternativas
Q702314 Português

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

Nostalgias perigosas

    Numa recente e polêmica crônica de jornal, o escritor Contardo Calligaris manifestou preocupação com estes dois traços perigosos de nostalgia que, segundo ele, costumam caracterizar a velhice:

    “1) Uma avareza mesquinha (e generalizada – não só financeira), que consiste em tentar preservar e conservar qualquer coisa, como metáfora da preservação (impossível) da nossa vida que se vai;

    2) Uma idealização fantasiosa de passados que nunca existiram. Os idosos parecem sempre evocar o "tempo feliz" de sua infância, quando os pais eram severos e por isso educavam bem, quando dava para brincar na rua e a escola pública era muito boa.”

    E completou sua crônica acusando o fato de que os idosos costumam se apoiar em lembranças inventadas, em algo que efetivamente não conheceram, mas que gostariam de ter vivido. Resta saber se a imaginação do vivido, para esses velhos, não é em si mesma uma sensação real e necessária, no final da vida.

(Adamastor Linhares, inédito)

Ao afirmar que a crônica citada de Contardo Calligaris é polêmica, o autor do texto considera a possibilidade de uma posição contrária à do cronista. Essa posição contrária manifesta-se quando, ao final do texto, levanta-se a hipótese de que, para os velhos,
Alternativas
Q702313 Português

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo.

Nostalgias perigosas

    Numa recente e polêmica crônica de jornal, o escritor Contardo Calligaris manifestou preocupação com estes dois traços perigosos de nostalgia que, segundo ele, costumam caracterizar a velhice:

    “1) Uma avareza mesquinha (e generalizada – não só financeira), que consiste em tentar preservar e conservar qualquer coisa, como metáfora da preservação (impossível) da nossa vida que se vai;

    2) Uma idealização fantasiosa de passados que nunca existiram. Os idosos parecem sempre evocar o "tempo feliz" de sua infância, quando os pais eram severos e por isso educavam bem, quando dava para brincar na rua e a escola pública era muito boa.”

    E completou sua crônica acusando o fato de que os idosos costumam se apoiar em lembranças inventadas, em algo que efetivamente não conheceram, mas que gostariam de ter vivido. Resta saber se a imaginação do vivido, para esses velhos, não é em si mesma uma sensação real e necessária, no final da vida.

(Adamastor Linhares, inédito)

Os dois traços perigosos, que o cronista Contardo Calligaris vê como características frequentes da velhice, podem ser assim resumidos:
Alternativas
Respostas
1301: B
1302: D
1303: E
1304: D
1305: C
1306: A
1307: E
1308: D
1309: A
1310: B
1311: E
1312: C
1313: A
1314: B
1315: E
1316: D
1317: C
1318: B
1319: A
1320: E