Questões de Concurso Para gestor público

Foram encontradas 445 questões

Resolva questões gratuitamente!

Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!

Q513083 Inglês
                                                                                                                Clues to How an Electric Treatment for Parkinson’s Work

In 1998, Dr. Philip A. Starr started putting electrodes in people’s brains. A neurosurgeon at the University of California, San Francisco, Dr. Starr was treating people with Parkinson’s disease, which slowly destroys essential bits of brain tissue, robbing people of control of their bodies. At first, drugs had given his patients some relief, but now they needed more help. After the surgery, Dr. Starr closed up his patients’ skulls and switched on the electrodes, releasing a steady buzz of electric pulses in their brains. For many patients, the effect was immediate. “We have people who, when they’re not taking their meds, can be frozen,” said Dr. Starr. “When we turn on the stimulator, they start walking.” First developed in the early 1990s, deep brain stimulation, or D.B.S., was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating Parkinson’s disease in 2002. Since its invention, about 100,000 people have received implants. While D.B.S. doesn’t halt Parkinson’s, it can turn back the clock a few years for many patients. Yet despite its clear effectiveness, scientists like Dr. Starr have struggled to understand what D.B.S. actually does to the brain. “We do D.B.S. because it works,” said Dr. Starr, “but we don’t really know how.” In a recent experiment, Dr. Starr and his colleagues believe they found a clue. D.B.S. may counter Parkinson’s disease by liberating the brain from a devastating electrical lock-step.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/16/science/ (adapted)

The interrogative form of: “For many patients, the effect was immediate.” is:
Alternativas
Q513082 Inglês
                                                                                                                Clues to How an Electric Treatment for Parkinson’s Work

In 1998, Dr. Philip A. Starr started putting electrodes in people’s brains. A neurosurgeon at the University of California, San Francisco, Dr. Starr was treating people with Parkinson’s disease, which slowly destroys essential bits of brain tissue, robbing people of control of their bodies. At first, drugs had given his patients some relief, but now they needed more help. After the surgery, Dr. Starr closed up his patients’ skulls and switched on the electrodes, releasing a steady buzz of electric pulses in their brains. For many patients, the effect was immediate. “We have people who, when they’re not taking their meds, can be frozen,” said Dr. Starr. “When we turn on the stimulator, they start walking.” First developed in the early 1990s, deep brain stimulation, or D.B.S., was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating Parkinson’s disease in 2002. Since its invention, about 100,000 people have received implants. While D.B.S. doesn’t halt Parkinson’s, it can turn back the clock a few years for many patients. Yet despite its clear effectiveness, scientists like Dr. Starr have struggled to understand what D.B.S. actually does to the brain. “We do D.B.S. because it works,” said Dr. Starr, “but we don’t really know how.” In a recent experiment, Dr. Starr and his colleagues believe they found a clue. D.B.S. may counter Parkinson’s disease by liberating the brain from a devastating electrical lock-step.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/16/science/ (adapted)

The simple past tense form of: “When we turn on the stimulator, they start walking.” is:
Alternativas
Q513081 Inglês
                                                                                                                Clues to How an Electric Treatment for Parkinson’s Work

In 1998, Dr. Philip A. Starr started putting electrodes in people’s brains. A neurosurgeon at the University of California, San Francisco, Dr. Starr was treating people with Parkinson’s disease, which slowly destroys essential bits of brain tissue, robbing people of control of their bodies. At first, drugs had given his patients some relief, but now they needed more help. After the surgery, Dr. Starr closed up his patients’ skulls and switched on the electrodes, releasing a steady buzz of electric pulses in their brains. For many patients, the effect was immediate. “We have people who, when they’re not taking their meds, can be frozen,” said Dr. Starr. “When we turn on the stimulator, they start walking.” First developed in the early 1990s, deep brain stimulation, or D.B.S., was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating Parkinson’s disease in 2002. Since its invention, about 100,000 people have received implants. While D.B.S. doesn’t halt Parkinson’s, it can turn back the clock a few years for many patients. Yet despite its clear effectiveness, scientists like Dr. Starr have struggled to understand what D.B.S. actually does to the brain. “We do D.B.S. because it works,” said Dr. Starr, “but we don’t really know how.” In a recent experiment, Dr. Starr and his colleagues believe they found a clue. D.B.S. may counter Parkinson’s disease by liberating the brain from a devastating electrical lock-step.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/16/science/ (adapted)

According to the text, choose the correct alternative to answer the following question: “Who is Philip A. Starr?”
Alternativas
Q513079 Noções de Informática
Os botões da figura abaixo fazem parte da Guia _______ do Word 2010.

Imagem associada para resolução da questão
Alternativas
Q513078 Português
                                    O Poder da Comunicação

Nós seres humanos passamos tanto tempo preocupados em alcançar aquilo que não temos, que esquecemo-nos de olhar e  valorizar o que temos.
Somos seres extremamente privilegiados, pois nascemos com a capacidade de comunicação.
Talvez as adversidades da vida, não nos permitiram até o momento perceber o quanto esta   capacidade é importante para a  nossa sobrevivência nesta terra.
O que seria de nós se porventura, não pudéssemos nos comunicar com outros seres humanos? Como expressaríamos  todos os nossos desejos e necessidades? Como exprimiríamos os nosso  pensamentos e ideias? Com certeza não  sobreviveríamos muitos dias.
O que muitos de nós, seres humanos, ainda não entendemos é que essa capacidade além de nos ajudar a sobreviver nesta  terra, tem bastante influência no alcance de nossos objetivos. Mas preste atenção, não basta apenas se comunicar, é  preciso saber se comunicar.
Do que adianta saber falar, se não usamos as palavras certas, no momento certo? Já ouvi várias pessoas repetindo a tal  famosa frase: “Eu só sou responsável pelo que eu falo, não pelo o que você entende".
Não só discordo desta frase como também acredito que a mesma é sempre utilizada como escape. Afinal de contas, é bem  mais fácil para o emissor, colocar a responsabilidade da mensagem no receptor, não é mesmo?
Se quisermos ser, bem sucedidos em tudo o que fazemos é preciso aprender a responsabilizar-nos pelas mensagens por  nós transmitidas. Quando realmente temos interesse em transmitir a mensagem de maneira correta, não só  responsabilizamo-nos por aquilo que falamos, mas também por aquilo que o outro entende. A mensagem só é enviada  corretamente, quando emissor e receptor encontram-se na mesma sintonia. Quando um fala e o outro entende.
Precisamos ter bastante cuidado com a mensagem que estamos transmitindo para a nossa liderança. Quando falamos a  mesma língua que a nossa família, nossos colegas de trabalho, amigos e liderança teremos como resultado o nosso  crescimento e o alcance de nossos objetivos. Mas é preciso jamais esquecer qual é a nossa posição. Todo bom líder almeja  uma equipe motivada, unida e que fale a mesma língua, porém é importante deixar claro que o intuito é alcançar os objetivos  da empresa e não destituir o líder.
Caso não aprendamos a passar a mensagem correta, nossos projetos correm grande risco de  terminarem como a Torre de  Babel. Inacabados.
...
Texto adaptado
                                                                                                                                                           Mônica Bastos
                                                                                                            Disponível em: http://www.rhportal.com.br/
A regência verbal está correta na alternativa:
Alternativas
Respostas
371: C
372: B
373: C
374: D
375: A