Questões de Concurso Sobre ensino da língua estrangeira inglesa em inglês

Foram encontradas 1.222 questões

Q3297449 Inglês
Which sentence accurately uses a reflexive pronoun?
Alternativas
Q3289555 Inglês
How does interdisciplinary teaching benefit students in technical courses?
Alternativas
Q3289546 Inglês
Which of the following is not a common characteristic of an email written in a formal context?
Alternativas
Q3289543 Inglês
Read the following statements about English as a Lingua Franca:

I. It acknowledges the legitimacy of different English varieties II. It focuses on successful communication rather than native-speaker norms III. It requires speakers to achieve native-like proficiency IV. It promotes linguistic diversity in global contexts

Which combination of statements is correct?
Alternativas
Q3289542 Inglês

Read the passage and select the correct alternative.


“In English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) contexts, the emphasis on __________ prioritizes functional effectiveness rather than rigid conformity to native-speaker norms.” 

Alternativas
Q3289063 Inglês
No ensino de Inglês conforme a BNCC, quais tipos de gêneros textuais devem ser trabalhado?
Alternativas
Q3289062 Inglês
Um dos eixos fundamentais do ensino de Inglês na BNCC é a promoção da interculturalidade. Isso significa: 
Alternativas
Q3289061 Inglês
A BNCC prevê que o ensino de Inglês no Ensino Fundamental esteja focado em quais práticas de linguagem?
Alternativas
Q3289060 Inglês
De acordo com a BNCC, o ensino de Inglês no Ensino Fundamental tem como principal objetivo:
Alternativas
Q3285949 Inglês
De acordo com a BNCC, em articulação com as competências gerais da Educação Básica e as competências específicas da área de Linguagens, o componente curricular de Língua Inglesa deve garantir aos alunos o desenvolvimento de competências específicas, tais como:

I. Identificar o lugar de si e o do outro em um mundo plurilíngue e multicultural, refletindo, criticamente, sobre como a aprendizagem da língua inglesa contribui para a inserção dos sujeitos no mundo globalizado, inclusive no que concerne ao mundo do trabalho.
II. Identificar similaridades e diferenças entre a língua inglesa e a língua materna/outras línguas, articulando-as a aspectos sociais, culturais e identitários, em uma relação intrínseca entre língua, cultura e identidade.
III. Utilizar novas tecnologias, com novas linguagens e modos de interação, para pesquisar, selecionar, compartilhar, posicionar-se e produzir sentidos em práticas de letramento na língua inglesa, de forma ética, crítica e responsável.
IV. Conhecer diferentes patrimônios culturais, materiais e imateriais, difundidos na língua inglesa, com vistas ao exercício da fruição e da ampliação de perspectivas no contato com diferentes manifestações artístico-culturais.

Marque a alternativa CORRETA: 
Alternativas
Q3276448 Inglês
Considering the National Curriculum Parameters (PCNs) for Foreign Language Teaching in Brazil, some methods seem to be good options to develop students' communicative competence by engaging them in meaningful interactions that reflect their real-life situations. Based on this assertion, choose the alternative that definitely CANNOT suit the context mentioned above: 
Alternativas
Q3276444 Inglês

TEXT 2


WHAT IS THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH?


In the Communicative Approach, real communication and interaction is not only the objective in learning, but also the means through which it takes place. This approach started in the 70s and became prominent as it proposed an alternative to the then ubiquitous systems-oriented approaches, such as the Audiolingual method. That means that, instead of focusing on the acquisition of grammar and vocabulary (grammatical/linguistic competence), the Communicative Approach aimed at developing the learner’s competence to communicate in the target language (communicative competence), with an enhanced focus on real-life situations.


Excerpt extracted and adapted from: https://www.whatiselt.com/single-post/2018/08/23/what-is-thecommunicative-approach

According to text 2, how does the Communicative Approach view language learning:
Alternativas
Q3259818 Inglês
Read the following text.

“This approach / method is based on the idea that learning language successfully comes through having to communicate real meaning.
When learners are involved in real communication, their natural strategies for language acquisition will be used, and this will allow them to learn to use the language.
Classroom activities guided by this approach / method are characterised by trying to produce meaningful and real communication, at all levels. As a result there may be more emphasis on skills than systems, lessons are more learnercentred, and there may be use of authentic materials.”
Adapted from: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk

The approach or method referred to in the text is the ...
Alternativas
Q3235091 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    If styles are general characteristics that differentiate one individual from another, then strategies are those specific “attacks” that we make on a given problem, and that vary considerably within each individual. They are the momentby-moment techniques that we employ to solve “problems” posed by second language input and output. Chamot (2005, p. 112) defines strategies quite broadly as “procedures that facilitate a learning task. Strategies are most often conscious and goal driven.”

    As our knowledge of second language acquisition increased markedly during the 1970s, teachers and researchers came to realize that no single research finding and no single method of language teaching would usher in an era of universal success in teaching a second language. We saw that certain learners seemed to be successful regardless of methods or techniques of teaching. We began to see the importance of individual variation in language learning. Certain people appeared to be endowed with abilities to succeed; others lacked those abilities. This observation led Rubin (1975) and Stern (1975) to describe “good” language learners in terms of personal traits, styles, and strategies. Rubin (Rubin & Thompson, 1982) later summarized fourteen such characteristics. Among other abilities, good language learners tend to:

1. Find their own way, taking charge of their learning

2. Be creative and develop a “feel” for the language by experimenting with its grammar and words

3. Make their own opportunities for practice in using the language inside and outside the classroom

4. Learn to live with uncertainty by continuing to talk or listen without understanding every word

5. Use linguistic knowledge, including knowledge of their first language, in learning a second language

6. Use contextual cues to help them in comprehension 

7. Learn to make intelligent guesses

8. Learn chunks of language as wholes and formalized routines to help them perform “beyond their competence”

9. Learn different styles of speech and writing and learn to vary their language according to the formality of the situation.


(, H.Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5th ed. Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
 Confidencial até o momento da aplicação.
Um professor do Ensino Fundamental preocupado em desenvolver no aluno a habilidade n.7 citada no texto de Brown, “Learn to make intelligent guesses”, deverá
Alternativas
Q3235090 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


    If styles are general characteristics that differentiate one individual from another, then strategies are those specific “attacks” that we make on a given problem, and that vary considerably within each individual. They are the momentby-moment techniques that we employ to solve “problems” posed by second language input and output. Chamot (2005, p. 112) defines strategies quite broadly as “procedures that facilitate a learning task. Strategies are most often conscious and goal driven.”

    As our knowledge of second language acquisition increased markedly during the 1970s, teachers and researchers came to realize that no single research finding and no single method of language teaching would usher in an era of universal success in teaching a second language. We saw that certain learners seemed to be successful regardless of methods or techniques of teaching. We began to see the importance of individual variation in language learning. Certain people appeared to be endowed with abilities to succeed; others lacked those abilities. This observation led Rubin (1975) and Stern (1975) to describe “good” language learners in terms of personal traits, styles, and strategies. Rubin (Rubin & Thompson, 1982) later summarized fourteen such characteristics. Among other abilities, good language learners tend to:

1. Find their own way, taking charge of their learning

2. Be creative and develop a “feel” for the language by experimenting with its grammar and words

3. Make their own opportunities for practice in using the language inside and outside the classroom

4. Learn to live with uncertainty by continuing to talk or listen without understanding every word

5. Use linguistic knowledge, including knowledge of their first language, in learning a second language

6. Use contextual cues to help them in comprehension 

7. Learn to make intelligent guesses

8. Learn chunks of language as wholes and formalized routines to help them perform “beyond their competence”

9. Learn different styles of speech and writing and learn to vary their language according to the formality of the situation.


(, H.Douglas Brown. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5th ed. Longman, 2000. Adaptado)
 Confidencial até o momento da aplicação.
According to Rubin (Rubin & Thompson, 1982), good language learners “learn chunks of language as wholes and formalized routines to help them perform “beyond their competence”. To help their students develop such an ability, the English teacher may, among other classroom proposals,
Alternativas
Q3235085 Inglês
Leia o texto para responder à questão.


ELF: English as a lingua franca


    The Vienna Oxford International Corpus of English (VOICE), a collection of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) currently under construction, defines lingua franca as an additionally acquired language system that serves as a means of communication for speakers from different speech communities, who use it to communicate with each other but for whom it is not their native language.

    Early findings from the VOICE corpus tentatively identify a number of features which point to systematic lexicogrammatical differences between native-speaker English and ELF, for example dropping the third person present tense ‘s’ (e.g. she wear), omitting definite and indefinite articles, insertion of prepositions (e.g. can we discuss about this issue). These features are not a threat to comprehension, as they involve typical errors that most English teachers would correct and remediate. However, Seidlhofer (2004) points out that they appear to be generally unproblematic and do not cause an obstacle to communicative success in ELF. 

    The work of Jenkins (1996, 2000, 2004, 2005) has also been very influential in relation to the teaching of pronunciation for ELF. Her research finds that a number of items common to most native-speaker varieties of English were not necessary in successful ELF interactions; for example, the substitution of voiceless and voiced th with /t/ or /s/ and /d/ or /z/ (e.g. think became sink or tink, and this became dis or zis). Jenkins argues that such features occur regularly in ELF interactions and do not cause intelligibility problems.

    Problems may arise in the (perhaps unfair) equation between a reduced or ‘stripped down’ ELF syllabus and an impoverished experience of the L2. Indeed, it could be argued that learners of any language always end up producing less than the input they are exposed to, and that if that input itself is deliberately restricted, then even less will be the outcome.


(O’KEEFFE, A., MCCARTHY, M. & CARTER, R. From corpus to classroom. Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge, CUP. 2007. Adaptado)
Depreende-se das visões de Seidlhofer (2004) e Jenkins (2005), no segundo e terceiro parágrafos, e das posições da BNCC sobre a aprendizagem de inglês na escola brasileira, que uma frase como “She wear a blue uniform for school”, se pronunciada por um aprendiz brasileiro do ensino fundamental,
Alternativas
Q3221227 Inglês
According to BNCC, English enables students to deepen their understanding of the world, explore new research perspectives, access information, express ideas and values, and handle different opinions and criticism. However, accessing specialized information, which can help spark interest and prepare students for the next step in their studies, might require specific tools. Therefore, English for Specific Purposes (ESP) teaching might be a useful approach. Mark the INCORRECT statement about ESP teaching. 
Alternativas
Q3221226 Inglês
BNCC approaches the use of digital information and communication technologies (TDIC) as a student facilitator to familiarize them with the use of those resources and a learning aid for other contents in a significant and autonomous way. Mark the correct statement about TDIC in English teaching. 
Alternativas
Q3221225 Inglês
The Brazilian Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC) says English is a global language, which allows access to multiple uses and functions in the contemporary times. As one of the possible uses is access to science, it is important to connect the teaching of English with the concept of scientific literacy, addressed by the BNCC as the ability to comprehend, interpret and apply scientific knowledge to make informed decisions and act critically and ethically in society. Analyze the statements below about scientific literacy and mark T, if true, or F, if false.

( ) It involves the ability to evaluate critically scientific information. ( ) It requires advanced knowledge of applied sciences. ( ) It includes understanding the scientific method, such as formulating and testing hypotheses, and analyzing results.

The correct order of filling in the parentheses, from top to bottom, is:
Alternativas
Q3215246 Inglês

Read the text to answer question from. 



    Two concepts – acquisition and learning – play key roles in the study of language. Although there are people who use the two terms interchangeably, in reality they embody two different processes in the development of communicative competence. Language acquisition is an intuitive and subconscious process, similar to that of children when they develop their mother tongue – natural, incidental, and often unconscious. Language learning, by contrast, is a conscious process that involves studying rules and structures.

    Talking about the rules and structures of a language not only implies knowing the grammatical and spelling rules, but also understanding how that language is used in social contexts. For example, to show affection in a personal letter, we can say goodbye with “sending you hugs and kisses”, but not with “I would like to provide you with a hug”. Understanding which words tend to appear together and the level of formality they carry (known as “register”) is part of knowing a language.

    By understanding acquisition and learning, we can improve our performance as learners. Immersing ourselves in an environment where the language we want to learn is used can foster acquisition, as can classes that encourage more communicative ways of learning which replicate situations that could arise in real contexts. Nevertheless, a grammatical explanation will help us to learn the rules of the language. The key is to combine the two approaches.


(Vazquez-Calvo, B. 2023. Adaptado)

In the third paragraph, the author praises “classes that encourage more communicative ways of learning which replicate situations that could arise in real contexts”. This allows us to infer that he supports
Alternativas
Respostas
1: D
2: C
3: B
4: C
5: B
6: C
7: A
8: B
9: B
10: B
11: A
12: B
13: C
14: E
15: E
16: D
17: E
18: E
19: C
20: D