Questões de Concurso Público AL-SP 2010 para Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Biblioteconomia
Foram encontradas 56 questões
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
AL-SP
Provas:
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Biblioteconomia
|
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Direito |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Análise de Infraestrutura de Redes |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Direito (Finanças e Orçamento) |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Psicologia |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Gestão de Projetos |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Segurança de Redes |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Admin e Arquitetura de Dados |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Arquitetura |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Economia-Administração-Ciências Contábeis |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - História |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Engenheiro Civil - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Médico do trabalho |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Pedagogia |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Engenharia Elétrica |
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado |
Q58102
Português
Texto associado
Representatividade ética
Costuma-se repetir à exaustão, e com as consequências
características do abuso de frases feitas e lugares-comuns, que
as esferas do poder público são o reflexo direto das melhores
qualidades e dos piores defeitos do povo do país. Na esteira
dessa convicção geral, afirma-se que as casas legislativas brasileiras
espelham fielmente os temperamentos e os interesses
dos eleitores brasileiros. É o caso de se perguntar: mesmo que
seja assim, deve ser assim? Pois uma vez aceita essa correspondência
mecânica, ela acaba se tornando um oportuno álibi
para quem deseja inocentar de plano a classe política, atribuindo
seus deslizes a vocações disseminadas pela nação inteira...
Perguntariam os cínicos se não seria o caso, então, de não
mais delegar o poder apenas a uns poucos, mas buscar repartilo
entre todos, numa grande e festiva anarquia, eliminando-se
os intermediários. O velho e divertido Barão de Itararé já reivindicava,
com a acidez típica de seu humor: "Restaure-se a
moralidade, ou então nos locupletemos todos!".
As casas legislativas, cujos membros são todos eleitos
pelo voto direto, não podem ser vistas como uma síntese
cristalizada da índole de toda uma sociedade, incluindo-se aí as
perversões, os interesses escusos, as distorções de valor. A
chancela da representatividade, que legitima os legisladores,
não os autoriza em hipótese alguma a duplicar os vícios sociais;
de fato, tal representação deve ser considerada, entre outras
coisas, como um compromisso firmado para a eliminação
dessas mazelas. O poder conferido aos legisladores deriva,
obviamente, das postulações positivas e construtivas de uma
determinada ordem social, que se pretende cada vez mais justa
e equilibrada.
Combater a circulação dessas frases feitas e lugarescomuns
que pretendem abonar situações injuriosas é uma
forma de combater a estagnação crítica ? essa oportunista aliada
dos que maliciosamente se agarram ao fatalismo das "fraquezas
humanas" para tentar justificar os desvios de conduta do
homem público. Entre as tarefas do legislador, está a de fazer
acreditar que nenhuma sociedade está condenada a ser uma
comprovação de teses derrotistas.
(Demétrio Saraiva, inédito)
Costuma-se repetir à exaustão, e com as consequências
características do abuso de frases feitas e lugares-comuns, que
as esferas do poder público são o reflexo direto das melhores
qualidades e dos piores defeitos do povo do país. Na esteira
dessa convicção geral, afirma-se que as casas legislativas brasileiras
espelham fielmente os temperamentos e os interesses
dos eleitores brasileiros. É o caso de se perguntar: mesmo que
seja assim, deve ser assim? Pois uma vez aceita essa correspondência
mecânica, ela acaba se tornando um oportuno álibi
para quem deseja inocentar de plano a classe política, atribuindo
seus deslizes a vocações disseminadas pela nação inteira...
Perguntariam os cínicos se não seria o caso, então, de não
mais delegar o poder apenas a uns poucos, mas buscar repartilo
entre todos, numa grande e festiva anarquia, eliminando-se
os intermediários. O velho e divertido Barão de Itararé já reivindicava,
com a acidez típica de seu humor: "Restaure-se a
moralidade, ou então nos locupletemos todos!".
As casas legislativas, cujos membros são todos eleitos
pelo voto direto, não podem ser vistas como uma síntese
cristalizada da índole de toda uma sociedade, incluindo-se aí as
perversões, os interesses escusos, as distorções de valor. A
chancela da representatividade, que legitima os legisladores,
não os autoriza em hipótese alguma a duplicar os vícios sociais;
de fato, tal representação deve ser considerada, entre outras
coisas, como um compromisso firmado para a eliminação
dessas mazelas. O poder conferido aos legisladores deriva,
obviamente, das postulações positivas e construtivas de uma
determinada ordem social, que se pretende cada vez mais justa
e equilibrada.
Combater a circulação dessas frases feitas e lugarescomuns
que pretendem abonar situações injuriosas é uma
forma de combater a estagnação crítica ? essa oportunista aliada
dos que maliciosamente se agarram ao fatalismo das "fraquezas
humanas" para tentar justificar os desvios de conduta do
homem público. Entre as tarefas do legislador, está a de fazer
acreditar que nenhuma sociedade está condenada a ser uma
comprovação de teses derrotistas.
(Demétrio Saraiva, inédito)
As normas de concordância verbal estão plenamente observadas na frase:
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
AL-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Biblioteconomia |
Q58104
Inglês
Texto associado
When I talk with librarians about thinking of themselves
as designers, sometimes they demur. "Designer? I can't even
draw a stick figure!" But you don't need to. Whether you know it
or not, you're already a designer.
Every time librarians create a bookmark, decide to house
a collection in a new spot, or figure out how a new service
might work, they're making design decisions. This is what I like
to call design by neglect or unintentional design. Whether library
employees wear name tags is a design decision. The length of
loan periods and whether or not you charge fines is a design
decision. Anytime you choose how people will interact with your
library, you're making a design decision. All of these decisions
add up to create an experience, good or bad, for your patrons.
When we are mindful of our roles as library experience
designers, we can make more informed design choices. This
awareness can provide better experiences for our patrons and
demonstrate that we care about them.
Really. People will notice, [CONJUNCTION] not
necessarily consciously, if we [VERB] the time to think about
them when we're developing our services. The secret here is not
to think of library patrons, users, or customers: we need to think
of people. We need to consider their lives and what they're trying
to accomplish. This act, which can only be done by cultivating
the skill of empathy, is the most important ? and perhaps the
most difficult ? part of user experience design.
(Adapted from
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6713142.html?nid=2673
&source=title&rid=1105906703)
as designers, sometimes they demur. "Designer? I can't even
draw a stick figure!" But you don't need to. Whether you know it
or not, you're already a designer.
Every time librarians create a bookmark, decide to house
a collection in a new spot, or figure out how a new service
might work, they're making design decisions. This is what I like
to call design by neglect or unintentional design. Whether library
employees wear name tags is a design decision. The length of
loan periods and whether or not you charge fines is a design
decision. Anytime you choose how people will interact with your
library, you're making a design decision. All of these decisions
add up to create an experience, good or bad, for your patrons.
When we are mindful of our roles as library experience
designers, we can make more informed design choices. This
awareness can provide better experiences for our patrons and
demonstrate that we care about them.
Really. People will notice, [CONJUNCTION] not
necessarily consciously, if we [VERB] the time to think about
them when we're developing our services. The secret here is not
to think of library patrons, users, or customers: we need to think
of people. We need to consider their lives and what they're trying
to accomplish. This act, which can only be done by cultivating
the skill of empathy, is the most important ? and perhaps the
most difficult ? part of user experience design.
(Adapted from
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6713142.html?nid=2673
&source=title&rid=1105906703)
Which is the only conjunction whose meaning does NOT allow it to replace [CONJUNCTION]?
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
AL-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Biblioteconomia |
Q58105
Inglês
Texto associado
When I talk with librarians about thinking of themselves
as designers, sometimes they demur. "Designer? I can't even
draw a stick figure!" But you don't need to. Whether you know it
or not, you're already a designer.
Every time librarians create a bookmark, decide to house
a collection in a new spot, or figure out how a new service
might work, they're making design decisions. This is what I like
to call design by neglect or unintentional design. Whether library
employees wear name tags is a design decision. The length of
loan periods and whether or not you charge fines is a design
decision. Anytime you choose how people will interact with your
library, you're making a design decision. All of these decisions
add up to create an experience, good or bad, for your patrons.
When we are mindful of our roles as library experience
designers, we can make more informed design choices. This
awareness can provide better experiences for our patrons and
demonstrate that we care about them.
Really. People will notice, [CONJUNCTION] not
necessarily consciously, if we [VERB] the time to think about
them when we're developing our services. The secret here is not
to think of library patrons, users, or customers: we need to think
of people. We need to consider their lives and what they're trying
to accomplish. This act, which can only be done by cultivating
the skill of empathy, is the most important ? and perhaps the
most difficult ? part of user experience design.
(Adapted from
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6713142.html?nid=2673
&source=title&rid=1105906703)
as designers, sometimes they demur. "Designer? I can't even
draw a stick figure!" But you don't need to. Whether you know it
or not, you're already a designer.
Every time librarians create a bookmark, decide to house
a collection in a new spot, or figure out how a new service
might work, they're making design decisions. This is what I like
to call design by neglect or unintentional design. Whether library
employees wear name tags is a design decision. The length of
loan periods and whether or not you charge fines is a design
decision. Anytime you choose how people will interact with your
library, you're making a design decision. All of these decisions
add up to create an experience, good or bad, for your patrons.
When we are mindful of our roles as library experience
designers, we can make more informed design choices. This
awareness can provide better experiences for our patrons and
demonstrate that we care about them.
Really. People will notice, [CONJUNCTION] not
necessarily consciously, if we [VERB] the time to think about
them when we're developing our services. The secret here is not
to think of library patrons, users, or customers: we need to think
of people. We need to consider their lives and what they're trying
to accomplish. This act, which can only be done by cultivating
the skill of empathy, is the most important ? and perhaps the
most difficult ? part of user experience design.
(Adapted from
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6713142.html?nid=2673
&source=title&rid=1105906703)
Which is the correct alternative to replace [VERB]?
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
AL-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Biblioteconomia |
Q58106
Inglês
Texto associado
When I talk with librarians about thinking of themselves
as designers, sometimes they demur. "Designer? I can't even
draw a stick figure!" But you don't need to. Whether you know it
or not, you're already a designer.
Every time librarians create a bookmark, decide to house
a collection in a new spot, or figure out how a new service
might work, they're making design decisions. This is what I like
to call design by neglect or unintentional design. Whether library
employees wear name tags is a design decision. The length of
loan periods and whether or not you charge fines is a design
decision. Anytime you choose how people will interact with your
library, you're making a design decision. All of these decisions
add up to create an experience, good or bad, for your patrons.
When we are mindful of our roles as library experience
designers, we can make more informed design choices. This
awareness can provide better experiences for our patrons and
demonstrate that we care about them.
Really. People will notice, [CONJUNCTION] not
necessarily consciously, if we [VERB] the time to think about
them when we're developing our services. The secret here is not
to think of library patrons, users, or customers: we need to think
of people. We need to consider their lives and what they're trying
to accomplish. This act, which can only be done by cultivating
the skill of empathy, is the most important ? and perhaps the
most difficult ? part of user experience design.
(Adapted from
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6713142.html?nid=2673
&source=title&rid=1105906703)
as designers, sometimes they demur. "Designer? I can't even
draw a stick figure!" But you don't need to. Whether you know it
or not, you're already a designer.
Every time librarians create a bookmark, decide to house
a collection in a new spot, or figure out how a new service
might work, they're making design decisions. This is what I like
to call design by neglect or unintentional design. Whether library
employees wear name tags is a design decision. The length of
loan periods and whether or not you charge fines is a design
decision. Anytime you choose how people will interact with your
library, you're making a design decision. All of these decisions
add up to create an experience, good or bad, for your patrons.
When we are mindful of our roles as library experience
designers, we can make more informed design choices. This
awareness can provide better experiences for our patrons and
demonstrate that we care about them.
Really. People will notice, [CONJUNCTION] not
necessarily consciously, if we [VERB] the time to think about
them when we're developing our services. The secret here is not
to think of library patrons, users, or customers: we need to think
of people. We need to consider their lives and what they're trying
to accomplish. This act, which can only be done by cultivating
the skill of empathy, is the most important ? and perhaps the
most difficult ? part of user experience design.
(Adapted from
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6713142.html?nid=2673
&source=title&rid=1105906703)
A synonym for figure out, as it is used in the text, is
Ano: 2010
Banca:
FCC
Órgão:
AL-SP
Prova:
FCC - 2010 - AL-SP - Agente Técnico Legislativo Especializado - Biblioteconomia |
Q58107
Inglês
Texto associado
When I talk with librarians about thinking of themselves
as designers, sometimes they demur. "Designer? I can't even
draw a stick figure!" But you don't need to. Whether you know it
or not, you're already a designer.
Every time librarians create a bookmark, decide to house
a collection in a new spot, or figure out how a new service
might work, they're making design decisions. This is what I like
to call design by neglect or unintentional design. Whether library
employees wear name tags is a design decision. The length of
loan periods and whether or not you charge fines is a design
decision. Anytime you choose how people will interact with your
library, you're making a design decision. All of these decisions
add up to create an experience, good or bad, for your patrons.
When we are mindful of our roles as library experience
designers, we can make more informed design choices. This
awareness can provide better experiences for our patrons and
demonstrate that we care about them.
Really. People will notice, [CONJUNCTION] not
necessarily consciously, if we [VERB] the time to think about
them when we're developing our services. The secret here is not
to think of library patrons, users, or customers: we need to think
of people. We need to consider their lives and what they're trying
to accomplish. This act, which can only be done by cultivating
the skill of empathy, is the most important ? and perhaps the
most difficult ? part of user experience design.
(Adapted from
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6713142.html?nid=2673
&source=title&rid=1105906703)
as designers, sometimes they demur. "Designer? I can't even
draw a stick figure!" But you don't need to. Whether you know it
or not, you're already a designer.
Every time librarians create a bookmark, decide to house
a collection in a new spot, or figure out how a new service
might work, they're making design decisions. This is what I like
to call design by neglect or unintentional design. Whether library
employees wear name tags is a design decision. The length of
loan periods and whether or not you charge fines is a design
decision. Anytime you choose how people will interact with your
library, you're making a design decision. All of these decisions
add up to create an experience, good or bad, for your patrons.
When we are mindful of our roles as library experience
designers, we can make more informed design choices. This
awareness can provide better experiences for our patrons and
demonstrate that we care about them.
Really. People will notice, [CONJUNCTION] not
necessarily consciously, if we [VERB] the time to think about
them when we're developing our services. The secret here is not
to think of library patrons, users, or customers: we need to think
of people. We need to consider their lives and what they're trying
to accomplish. This act, which can only be done by cultivating
the skill of empathy, is the most important ? and perhaps the
most difficult ? part of user experience design.
(Adapted from
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6713142.html?nid=2673
&source=title&rid=1105906703)
According to the author of the text,
Conheça nossos planos