Questões de Concurso
Para agente fiscal de tributos estaduais
Foram encontradas 381 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
O ITCMD relativo a bens imóveis compete ao estado de Alagoas sempre que o bem for nele situado, independentemente do local onde se processar o inventário.
No contrato de representação comercial, o representado é sempre uma empresa, geralmente industrial, e o representante comercial, que pode ser pessoa física ou jurídica, se compromete, por meio de contrato de trabalho, a representar o contratante em local diverso da sede ou matriz da empresa.
Acerca dessa situação hipotética, julgue o item
A tardia nomeação de Paulo não gera direito à indenização contra a administração pública, pois o candidato logrou conseguir uma vaga e, além disso, a ação da administração pública foi motivada por equívoco, inexistindo má-fé.
Acerca dessa situação hipotética, julgue o item
Na situação apresentada, ocorreu omissão da administração pública ao classificar Paulo em quinto lugar e não em primeiro, razão pela qual, se houver responsabilidade, esta será na modalidade subjetiva.
Se uma empresa sediada e domiciliada apenas no município de Timon, no estado do Maranhão, for contratada para fazer uma demolição em Teresina, ela deverá pagar ao município de Timon o ISS correspondente a esse serviço prestado.
Uma companhia de teatro que tenha apresentado um espetáculo no município de Teresina está isenta do pagamento de ISS sobre o espetáculo.
Considere que um engenheiro residente em Teresina tenha aberto um escritório de engenharia, pessoa jurídica, em Timon. Nessa situação, em razão de sua residência, ele terá de pagar ao município de Teresina o ISS relativo aos serviços prestados como pessoa jurídica.
Pelo sistema de execução judicial de sentença estrangeira no Brasil, dever-se-á verificar, entre outros requisitos, se a sentença está traduzida por intérprete autorizado.
No caso de um argentino domiciliado no Brasil querer casar-se com uma brasileira aqui domiciliada, aplicar-se-á a legislação argentina referente ao matrimônio.
O título de crédito é documento indispensável ao exercício do direito nele contido. A doutrina o trata como título de apresentação, porque, no momento em que desejar exercer o direito de crédito, o possuidor deve apresentar o título ao devedor ou à pessoa indicada para fins de pagamento.
Os títulos de crédito são, em regra, regidos pelo princípio da concreção, uma vez que são estritamente vinculados ao negócio que originou o título.
Por ser um imposto compartilhado, 25% da receita arrecadada pelo IPVA pertence ao município onde estiver licenciado, inscrito ou matriculado o veículo.
É inconstitucional a instituição de alíquota diferenciada para o IPVA incidente sobre a propriedade de veículo automotor importado.
São contribuintes do IPVA os proprietários de veículos automotores terrestres e aéreos, considerando-se ocorrido o fato gerador sempre em primeiro de janeiro de cada exercício.
Avoidance and evasion compared: The United States example
The use of the terms tax avoidance and tax evasion can vary depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for example, the term "tax evasion" (or, more precisely, "attempted tax evasion") generally consists of criminal conduct, the purpose of which is to avoid the assessment or payment of a tax that is already legally owed at the time of the criminal conduct. (The term "assessment" is here used in the technical sense of a statutory assessment: the formal administrative act of a duly appointed employee of the Internal Revenue Service who records the tax on the books of the United States Treasury after certain administrative prerequisites have been met. In the case of Federal income tax, this act generally occurs after the close of the tax year - and usually after a tax return has been filed.)
By contrast, the term "tax avoidance" is used in the United States to describe lawful conduct, the purpose of which is to avoid the creation of a tax liability. Tax evasion involves breaking the law; tax avoidance is using legal means to avoid owing tax in the first place. An evaded tax remains a tax legally owed. An avoided tax (in the U.S. sense) is a tax liability that has never existed. A simple example of tax avoidance in this sense is the situation where a business considers selling a particular asset at a huge gain but, after consulting with a tax adviser, decides not to [VERB] the sale. ......97...... no sale occurs, no gain is realized. The additional income tax liability that [TO GENERATE] by the inclusion of the gain on the sale in the computation of taxable income is simply not incurred, as there was no sale and no realized gain.
(Adapted from Wikipedia: en.w ikipedia.org/w iki/Tax_evasion)
Avoidance and evasion compared: The United States example
The use of the terms tax avoidance and tax evasion can vary depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for example, the term "tax evasion" (or, more precisely, "attempted tax evasion") generally consists of criminal conduct, the purpose of which is to avoid the assessment or payment of a tax that is already legally owed at the time of the criminal conduct. (The term "assessment" is here used in the technical sense of a statutory assessment: the formal administrative act of a duly appointed employee of the Internal Revenue Service who records the tax on the books of the United States Treasury after certain administrative prerequisites have been met. In the case of Federal income tax, this act generally occurs after the close of the tax year - and usually after a tax return has been filed.)
By contrast, the term "tax avoidance" is used in the United States to describe lawful conduct, the purpose of which is to avoid the creation of a tax liability. Tax evasion involves breaking the law; tax avoidance is using legal means to avoid owing tax in the first place. An evaded tax remains a tax legally owed. An avoided tax (in the U.S. sense) is a tax liability that has never existed. A simple example of tax avoidance in this sense is the situation where a business considers selling a particular asset at a huge gain but, after consulting with a tax adviser, decides not to [VERB] the sale. ......97...... no sale occurs, no gain is realized. The additional income tax liability that [TO GENERATE] by the inclusion of the gain on the sale in the computation of taxable income is simply not incurred, as there was no sale and no realized gain.
(Adapted from Wikipedia: en.w ikipedia.org/w iki/Tax_evasion)
Avoidance and evasion compared: The United States example
The use of the terms tax avoidance and tax evasion can vary depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for example, the term "tax evasion" (or, more precisely, "attempted tax evasion") generally consists of criminal conduct, the purpose of which is to avoid the assessment or payment of a tax that is already legally owed at the time of the criminal conduct. (The term "assessment" is here used in the technical sense of a statutory assessment: the formal administrative act of a duly appointed employee of the Internal Revenue Service who records the tax on the books of the United States Treasury after certain administrative prerequisites have been met. In the case of Federal income tax, this act generally occurs after the close of the tax year - and usually after a tax return has been filed.)
By contrast, the term "tax avoidance" is used in the United States to describe lawful conduct, the purpose of which is to avoid the creation of a tax liability. Tax evasion involves breaking the law; tax avoidance is using legal means to avoid owing tax in the first place. An evaded tax remains a tax legally owed. An avoided tax (in the U.S. sense) is a tax liability that has never existed. A simple example of tax avoidance in this sense is the situation where a business considers selling a particular asset at a huge gain but, after consulting with a tax adviser, decides not to [VERB] the sale. ......97...... no sale occurs, no gain is realized. The additional income tax liability that [TO GENERATE] by the inclusion of the gain on the sale in the computation of taxable income is simply not incurred, as there was no sale and no realized gain.
(Adapted from Wikipedia: en.w ikipedia.org/w iki/Tax_evasion)
Avoidance and evasion compared: The United States example
The use of the terms tax avoidance and tax evasion can vary depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for example, the term "tax evasion" (or, more precisely, "attempted tax evasion") generally consists of criminal conduct, the purpose of which is to avoid the assessment or payment of a tax that is already legally owed at the time of the criminal conduct. (The term "assessment" is here used in the technical sense of a statutory assessment: the formal administrative act of a duly appointed employee of the Internal Revenue Service who records the tax on the books of the United States Treasury after certain administrative prerequisites have been met. In the case of Federal income tax, this act generally occurs after the close of the tax year - and usually after a tax return has been filed.)
By contrast, the term "tax avoidance" is used in the United States to describe lawful conduct, the purpose of which is to avoid the creation of a tax liability. Tax evasion involves breaking the law; tax avoidance is using legal means to avoid owing tax in the first place. An evaded tax remains a tax legally owed. An avoided tax (in the U.S. sense) is a tax liability that has never existed. A simple example of tax avoidance in this sense is the situation where a business considers selling a particular asset at a huge gain but, after consulting with a tax adviser, decides not to [VERB] the sale. ......97...... no sale occurs, no gain is realized. The additional income tax liability that [TO GENERATE] by the inclusion of the gain on the sale in the computation of taxable income is simply not incurred, as there was no sale and no realized gain.
(Adapted from Wikipedia: en.w ikipedia.org/w iki/Tax_evasion)
Conheça nossos planos