Questões de Concurso
Comentadas para consultor legislativo
Foram encontradas 1.900 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ao se informar sobre o procedimento a ser seguido na apreciação de suas contas, foi-lhe corretamente informado que o Tribunal de Contas
I. enquanto a emenda constitucional pode ser promulgada a qualquer momento, a revisão constitucional somente pode ser realizada a cada cinco anos;
II. o processo legislativo da revisão constitucional é mais qualificado que o da emenda constitucional, exigindo um quórum de aprovação maior;
III. os limites a serem observados para a aprovação da emenda constitucional não se identificam com os da revisão constitucional.
Em relação às conclusões de João e Maria
O Chefe do Poder Executivo, sensível a essa constatação e com o objetivo de superar alguns problemas enfrentados pela República Federativa do Brasil junto à Organização Mundial do Comércio, solicitou que o referido projeto tramitasse em regime de urgência, a começar pela Casa Legislativa iniciadora.
À luz da sistemática constitucional, é correto afirmar que a Casa Legislativa iniciadora será
Considerando os termos dessa narrativa e à luz da sistemática constitucional vigente, é correto afirmar que
Read Text II and answer the question that follow it.
Text II
From: https://www.glasbergen.com/ngg_tag/legal-department/
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.
Text I
The New Rules of Data Privacy
The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
[…]
Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.
Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy
February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.
Text I
The New Rules of Data Privacy
The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
[…]
Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.
Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy
February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.
Text I
The New Rules of Data Privacy
The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
[…]
Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.
Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy
February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.
Text I
The New Rules of Data Privacy
The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
[…]
Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.
Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy
February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
Read text I and answer the question that follow it.
Text I
The New Rules of Data Privacy
The data harvested from our personal devices, along with our trail of electronic transactions and data from other sources, now provides the foundation for some of the world’s largest companies. […] For the past two decades, the commercial use of personal data has grown in wild-west fashion. But now, because of consumer mistrust, government actions, and competition for customers, those days are quickly coming to an end.
For most of its existence, the data economy was structured around a “digital curtain” designed to obscure the industry’s practices from lawmakers and the public. Data was considered company property and a proprietary secret, even though the data originated from customers’ private behavior. That curtain has since been lifted and a convergence of consumer, government, and market forces are now giving users more control over the data they generate. Instead of serving as a resource that can be freely harvested, countries in every region of the world have begun to treat personal data as an asset owned by individuals and held in trust by firms.
This will be a far better organizing principle for the data economy. Giving individuals more control has the potential to curtail the sector’s worst excesses while generating a new wave of customer-driven innovation, as customers begin to express what sort of personalization and opportunity they want their data to enable. And while Adtech firms in particular will be hardest hit, any firm with substantial troves of customer data will have to make sweeping changes to its practices, particularly large firms such as financial institutions, healthcare firms, utilities, and major manufacturers and retailers.
Leading firms are already adapting to the new reality as it unfolds. The key to this transition — based upon our research on data and trust, and our experience working on this issue with a wide variety of firms— is for companies to reorganize their data operations around the new fundamental rules of consent, insight, and flow.
[…]
Federal lawmakers are moving to curtail the power of big tech. Meanwhile, in 2021 state legislatures proposed or passed at least 27 online privacy bills regulating data markets and protecting personal digital rights. Lawmakers from California to China are implementing legislation that mirrors Europe’s GDPR, while the EU itself has turned its attention to regulating the use of AI. Where once companies were always ahead of regulators, now they struggle to keep up with compliance requirements across multiple jurisdictions.
Adapted from: https://hbr.org/2022/02/the-new-rules-of-data-privacy
February 25, 2022 – Retrieved September 6, 2022
( ) Empresas de publicidade serão fortemente afetadas por mudanças nas regras de privacidade de dados.
( ) Anteriormente, o controle de dados pessoais para fins comerciais seguia diretrizes rígidas.
( ) Atualmente, os legisladores têm sido negligentes com o consentimento dos usuários para seus dados.
As declarações são, respectivamente,
Luciana deseja ir do vértice A ao vértice B da malha abaixo.
Ela pode caminhar em linha reta, indo de baixo para cima ou da esquerda para a direita, ao longo das linhas da malha.
O número de modos diferentes de Luciana realizar o seu trajeto é
igual a
Assinale a opção que mostra simultaneamente polissemia e ambiguidade.
“Senhores pais aqui presentes, meus caros ex-alunos: neste meu discurso vou seguir os conselhos de Millôr Fernandes, que recomendava que discursos de formatura e governos de ditadura, quanto mais curtos, melhor!”
Assinale a opção que apresenta a recomendação do especialista Jorge David Cortés Moreno sobre a maneira de introduzir-se um discurso, que foi seguida pelo patrono da turma.
À luz da sistemática estabelecida pela legislação de regência, é correto afirmar que
A assessoria respondeu corretamente que o instituto da solidariedade
Foi corretamente informado a Maria que a referida proteção
Após alguns debates, os membros da equipe decidiram:
I. iniciar, imediatamente, os pedidos de voto junto aos eleitores na região X; II. exaltar as qualidades pessoais de Inês na região Y, onde tinha pouca penetração; e III. participar de seminários e congressos de natureza intrapartidária para a discussão de políticas públicas.
À luz da sistemática legal vigente, é correto afirmar que
Muitos desses serviços são comunicados por meio de siglas como:
1. OTT 2. CTV 3. SVOD 4. TVOD 5. AVOD
Correlacione-os com as opções a seguir:
( ) vídeos que podem ser acessados pelos assinantes de um serviço específico, permitindo visualizações ilimitadas por uma taxa fixa por mês.
( ) qualquer tipo de conteúdo de mídia de streaming veiculado pela Internet.
( ) vídeo sob demanda, que não exige assinatura ou taxa transacional, pois o conteúdo é viabilizado por anúncios.
( ) vídeo consumido, por exemplo, no modelo Pay-per-view, que permite alugá-lo para um uso único ou de forma repetida.
( ) dispositivo que pode ser conectado a uma TV ou Smart TV e para fornecer conteúdo de streaming de vídeo.
Assinale a opção que indica a correlação correta, na ordem apresentada
Conheça nossos planos