Questões de Concurso
Para prefeitura de milagres - ce
Foram encontradas 796 questões
Resolva questões gratuitamente!
Junte-se a mais de 4 milhões de concurseiros!
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798473
Inglês
Texto associado
Using authentic material from the real
world to teach English
STEFFANIE ZAZULAK
There are lots of resources available to
English language teachers today: from
textbooks to online teaching tools, they can
all aid and enrich English lessons. Many
teachers also introduce authentic English
material into their lessons to expose learners
to the language as it is spoken in the real
world.
Authentic material is any material written in
English that was not created for intentional
use in the English language classroom. Using
this content to teach the English language
can make the learning process even more
engaging, imaginative and motivating for students. It can also be useful to elicit
genuine responses from learners.
The great thing about using authentic
material is that it is everywhere, which makes
it easy to find, and simple for learners to
practice English in their own time. Remember
that it isn‟t limited to articles from newspapers
and magazines. Songs, TV programs and
films, radio and podcasts, leaflets, menus –
anything written in English constitutes
authentic material.
(…)
Source: https://www.english.com/blog/authenticmaterial/ Accessed on: 18/06/2018.
(Concurso Milagres/2018) The words
using, engaging and motivating, in the
second paragraph, are, respectively:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798472
Inglês
Texto associado
Using authentic material from the real
world to teach English
STEFFANIE ZAZULAK
There are lots of resources available to
English language teachers today: from
textbooks to online teaching tools, they can
all aid and enrich English lessons. Many
teachers also introduce authentic English
material into their lessons to expose learners
to the language as it is spoken in the real
world.
Authentic material is any material written in
English that was not created for intentional
use in the English language classroom. Using
this content to teach the English language
can make the learning process even more
engaging, imaginative and motivating for students. It can also be useful to elicit
genuine responses from learners.
The great thing about using authentic
material is that it is everywhere, which makes
it easy to find, and simple for learners to
practice English in their own time. Remember
that it isn‟t limited to articles from newspapers
and magazines. Songs, TV programs and
films, radio and podcasts, leaflets, menus –
anything written in English constitutes
authentic material.
(…)
Source: https://www.english.com/blog/authenticmaterial/ Accessed on: 18/06/2018.
(Concurso Milagres/2018) The word
spoken, in the 1st paragraph, is the past
participle form of the verb speak. Check
the alternative which contains the
CORRECT correspondence between the
verb and its past participle form.
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798471
Inglês
Texto associado
Using authentic material from the real
world to teach English
STEFFANIE ZAZULAK
There are lots of resources available to
English language teachers today: from
textbooks to online teaching tools, they can
all aid and enrich English lessons. Many
teachers also introduce authentic English
material into their lessons to expose learners
to the language as it is spoken in the real
world.
Authentic material is any material written in
English that was not created for intentional
use in the English language classroom. Using
this content to teach the English language
can make the learning process even more
engaging, imaginative and motivating for students. It can also be useful to elicit
genuine responses from learners.
The great thing about using authentic
material is that it is everywhere, which makes
it easy to find, and simple for learners to
practice English in their own time. Remember
that it isn‟t limited to articles from newspapers
and magazines. Songs, TV programs and
films, radio and podcasts, leaflets, menus –
anything written in English constitutes
authentic material.
(…)
Source: https://www.english.com/blog/authenticmaterial/ Accessed on: 18/06/2018.
(Concurso Milagres/2018) The verbs
aid and enrich, in the 1st paragraph, can
be replaced by:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798470
Inglês
Texto associado
Using authentic material from the real
world to teach English
STEFFANIE ZAZULAK
There are lots of resources available to
English language teachers today: from
textbooks to online teaching tools, they can
all aid and enrich English lessons. Many
teachers also introduce authentic English
material into their lessons to expose learners
to the language as it is spoken in the real
world.
Authentic material is any material written in
English that was not created for intentional
use in the English language classroom. Using
this content to teach the English language
can make the learning process even more
engaging, imaginative and motivating for students. It can also be useful to elicit
genuine responses from learners.
The great thing about using authentic
material is that it is everywhere, which makes
it easy to find, and simple for learners to
practice English in their own time. Remember
that it isn‟t limited to articles from newspapers
and magazines. Songs, TV programs and
films, radio and podcasts, leaflets, menus –
anything written in English constitutes
authentic material.
(…)
Source: https://www.english.com/blog/authenticmaterial/ Accessed on: 18/06/2018.
(Concurso Milagres/2018) From the
information presented in the text, one
can NOT infer that:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798469
Inglês
Texto associado
Using authentic material from the real
world to teach English
STEFFANIE ZAZULAK
There are lots of resources available to
English language teachers today: from
textbooks to online teaching tools, they can
all aid and enrich English lessons. Many
teachers also introduce authentic English
material into their lessons to expose learners
to the language as it is spoken in the real
world.
Authentic material is any material written in
English that was not created for intentional
use in the English language classroom. Using
this content to teach the English language
can make the learning process even more
engaging, imaginative and motivating for students. It can also be useful to elicit
genuine responses from learners.
The great thing about using authentic
material is that it is everywhere, which makes
it easy to find, and simple for learners to
practice English in their own time. Remember
that it isn‟t limited to articles from newspapers
and magazines. Songs, TV programs and
films, radio and podcasts, leaflets, menus –
anything written in English constitutes
authentic material.
(…)
Source: https://www.english.com/blog/authenticmaterial/ Accessed on: 18/06/2018.
(Concurso Milagres/2018)
According to the text, authentic
materials:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798468
Inglês
Texto associado
TEACHING GRAMMAR IN THE POST
COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH ERA
D I A N A B A U D U C C O
Grammar. To teach or not to teach? This
has been the question that language teachers
have asked themselves for ages. It has been
a matter of debate for teachers, linguists and
second language acquisition experts.
Historically, language teaching approaches
and methods have moved from one extreme
of the spectrum to another as regards the
explicit teaching of grammar. Long before our
times, grammar was at the centre of language
teaching, as it was believed that the study of
the grammar of X‟s language was the best
way to its mastery. So, from medieval times
till around the 1970s, the fixation of language
teaching on the study and description of
structures manifested in approaches such as
the Grammar Translation and the Audio
Lingual method, with short interludes of the
other approaches such as the Direct Method,
Total Physical Response and the Silent way
which although claiming to differ still based
their syllabus on grammar points.
From the Grammar-dominated end of the
spectrum, we moved to the Absolutely-noGrammar end. Grammar based approaches
proved inadequate in that students were
unable to communicate outside the
classroom. Based mainly on Hymes‟
“communicative competence” and Krashen‟s
models of language acquisition, the
Communicative Approach emerged as the
meaning-focused alternative to the formfocused approaches of the past. Strong
versions of the approach emphasized the
teaching of functions and absolutely
discouraged the teaching of grammar structures arguing that communication – and
not language description- was the aim of
language teaching.
However, the studies of the last 30 years
have proved that the lack of grammar
instruction has not encouraged language
acquisition. On the contrary, more recent
studies show that grammar instruction and
explicit knowledge of the target language do
have positive effects on language acquisition.
So, how should we approach the teaching of
Grammar in the Post- CommunicativeApproach Era?
Source: https://www.eflmagazine.com/teachinggrammar-post-communicative-approach-era/ Accessed
on 17/06/2018
(Concurso Milagres/2018) In the
clause that language teachers have
asked themselves for ages, the verbal
form is in the:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798467
Inglês
Texto associado
TEACHING GRAMMAR IN THE POST
COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH ERA
D I A N A B A U D U C C O
Grammar. To teach or not to teach? This
has been the question that language teachers
have asked themselves for ages. It has been
a matter of debate for teachers, linguists and
second language acquisition experts.
Historically, language teaching approaches
and methods have moved from one extreme
of the spectrum to another as regards the
explicit teaching of grammar. Long before our
times, grammar was at the centre of language
teaching, as it was believed that the study of
the grammar of X‟s language was the best
way to its mastery. So, from medieval times
till around the 1970s, the fixation of language
teaching on the study and description of
structures manifested in approaches such as
the Grammar Translation and the Audio
Lingual method, with short interludes of the
other approaches such as the Direct Method,
Total Physical Response and the Silent way
which although claiming to differ still based
their syllabus on grammar points.
From the Grammar-dominated end of the
spectrum, we moved to the Absolutely-noGrammar end. Grammar based approaches
proved inadequate in that students were
unable to communicate outside the
classroom. Based mainly on Hymes‟
“communicative competence” and Krashen‟s
models of language acquisition, the
Communicative Approach emerged as the
meaning-focused alternative to the formfocused approaches of the past. Strong
versions of the approach emphasized the
teaching of functions and absolutely
discouraged the teaching of grammar structures arguing that communication – and
not language description- was the aim of
language teaching.
However, the studies of the last 30 years
have proved that the lack of grammar
instruction has not encouraged language
acquisition. On the contrary, more recent
studies show that grammar instruction and
explicit knowledge of the target language do
have positive effects on language acquisition.
So, how should we approach the teaching of
Grammar in the Post- CommunicativeApproach Era?
Source: https://www.eflmagazine.com/teachinggrammar-post-communicative-approach-era/ Accessed
on 17/06/2018
(Concurso Milagres/2018) Check the
alternative which contains the sound of the – ed in the verbs: moved,
emphasized and proved:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798466
Inglês
Texto associado
TEACHING GRAMMAR IN THE POST
COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH ERA
D I A N A B A U D U C C O
Grammar. To teach or not to teach? This
has been the question that language teachers
have asked themselves for ages. It has been
a matter of debate for teachers, linguists and
second language acquisition experts.
Historically, language teaching approaches
and methods have moved from one extreme
of the spectrum to another as regards the
explicit teaching of grammar. Long before our
times, grammar was at the centre of language
teaching, as it was believed that the study of
the grammar of X‟s language was the best
way to its mastery. So, from medieval times
till around the 1970s, the fixation of language
teaching on the study and description of
structures manifested in approaches such as
the Grammar Translation and the Audio
Lingual method, with short interludes of the
other approaches such as the Direct Method,
Total Physical Response and the Silent way
which although claiming to differ still based
their syllabus on grammar points.
From the Grammar-dominated end of the
spectrum, we moved to the Absolutely-noGrammar end. Grammar based approaches
proved inadequate in that students were
unable to communicate outside the
classroom. Based mainly on Hymes‟
“communicative competence” and Krashen‟s
models of language acquisition, the
Communicative Approach emerged as the
meaning-focused alternative to the formfocused approaches of the past. Strong
versions of the approach emphasized the
teaching of functions and absolutely
discouraged the teaching of grammar structures arguing that communication – and
not language description- was the aim of
language teaching.
However, the studies of the last 30 years
have proved that the lack of grammar
instruction has not encouraged language
acquisition. On the contrary, more recent
studies show that grammar instruction and
explicit knowledge of the target language do
have positive effects on language acquisition.
So, how should we approach the teaching of
Grammar in the Post- CommunicativeApproach Era?
Source: https://www.eflmagazine.com/teachinggrammar-post-communicative-approach-era/ Accessed
on 17/06/2018
(Concurso Milagres/2018) The
expression target language refers to:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798465
Inglês
Texto associado
TEACHING GRAMMAR IN THE POST
COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH ERA
D I A N A B A U D U C C O
Grammar. To teach or not to teach? This
has been the question that language teachers
have asked themselves for ages. It has been
a matter of debate for teachers, linguists and
second language acquisition experts.
Historically, language teaching approaches
and methods have moved from one extreme
of the spectrum to another as regards the
explicit teaching of grammar. Long before our
times, grammar was at the centre of language
teaching, as it was believed that the study of
the grammar of X‟s language was the best
way to its mastery. So, from medieval times
till around the 1970s, the fixation of language
teaching on the study and description of
structures manifested in approaches such as
the Grammar Translation and the Audio
Lingual method, with short interludes of the
other approaches such as the Direct Method,
Total Physical Response and the Silent way
which although claiming to differ still based
their syllabus on grammar points.
From the Grammar-dominated end of the
spectrum, we moved to the Absolutely-noGrammar end. Grammar based approaches
proved inadequate in that students were
unable to communicate outside the
classroom. Based mainly on Hymes‟
“communicative competence” and Krashen‟s
models of language acquisition, the
Communicative Approach emerged as the
meaning-focused alternative to the formfocused approaches of the past. Strong
versions of the approach emphasized the
teaching of functions and absolutely
discouraged the teaching of grammar structures arguing that communication – and
not language description- was the aim of
language teaching.
However, the studies of the last 30 years
have proved that the lack of grammar
instruction has not encouraged language
acquisition. On the contrary, more recent
studies show that grammar instruction and
explicit knowledge of the target language do
have positive effects on language acquisition.
So, how should we approach the teaching of
Grammar in the Post- CommunicativeApproach Era?
Source: https://www.eflmagazine.com/teachinggrammar-post-communicative-approach-era/ Accessed
on 17/06/2018
(Concurso Milagres/2018) The word
although expresses an idea of:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798464
Inglês
Texto associado
TEACHING GRAMMAR IN THE POST
COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH ERA
D I A N A B A U D U C C O
Grammar. To teach or not to teach? This
has been the question that language teachers
have asked themselves for ages. It has been
a matter of debate for teachers, linguists and
second language acquisition experts.
Historically, language teaching approaches
and methods have moved from one extreme
of the spectrum to another as regards the
explicit teaching of grammar. Long before our
times, grammar was at the centre of language
teaching, as it was believed that the study of
the grammar of X‟s language was the best
way to its mastery. So, from medieval times
till around the 1970s, the fixation of language
teaching on the study and description of
structures manifested in approaches such as
the Grammar Translation and the Audio
Lingual method, with short interludes of the
other approaches such as the Direct Method,
Total Physical Response and the Silent way
which although claiming to differ still based
their syllabus on grammar points.
From the Grammar-dominated end of the
spectrum, we moved to the Absolutely-noGrammar end. Grammar based approaches
proved inadequate in that students were
unable to communicate outside the
classroom. Based mainly on Hymes‟
“communicative competence” and Krashen‟s
models of language acquisition, the
Communicative Approach emerged as the
meaning-focused alternative to the formfocused approaches of the past. Strong
versions of the approach emphasized the
teaching of functions and absolutely
discouraged the teaching of grammar structures arguing that communication – and
not language description- was the aim of
language teaching.
However, the studies of the last 30 years
have proved that the lack of grammar
instruction has not encouraged language
acquisition. On the contrary, more recent
studies show that grammar instruction and
explicit knowledge of the target language do
have positive effects on language acquisition.
So, how should we approach the teaching of
Grammar in the Post- CommunicativeApproach Era?
Source: https://www.eflmagazine.com/teachinggrammar-post-communicative-approach-era/ Accessed
on 17/06/2018
(Concurso Milagres/2018) The
expression as regards, in the second
paragraph, can be substituted by all the
terms below, EXCEPT:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798463
Inglês
Texto associado
TEACHING GRAMMAR IN THE POST
COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH ERA
D I A N A B A U D U C C O
Grammar. To teach or not to teach? This
has been the question that language teachers
have asked themselves for ages. It has been
a matter of debate for teachers, linguists and
second language acquisition experts.
Historically, language teaching approaches
and methods have moved from one extreme
of the spectrum to another as regards the
explicit teaching of grammar. Long before our
times, grammar was at the centre of language
teaching, as it was believed that the study of
the grammar of X‟s language was the best
way to its mastery. So, from medieval times
till around the 1970s, the fixation of language
teaching on the study and description of
structures manifested in approaches such as
the Grammar Translation and the Audio
Lingual method, with short interludes of the
other approaches such as the Direct Method,
Total Physical Response and the Silent way
which although claiming to differ still based
their syllabus on grammar points.
From the Grammar-dominated end of the
spectrum, we moved to the Absolutely-noGrammar end. Grammar based approaches
proved inadequate in that students were
unable to communicate outside the
classroom. Based mainly on Hymes‟
“communicative competence” and Krashen‟s
models of language acquisition, the
Communicative Approach emerged as the
meaning-focused alternative to the formfocused approaches of the past. Strong
versions of the approach emphasized the
teaching of functions and absolutely
discouraged the teaching of grammar structures arguing that communication – and
not language description- was the aim of
language teaching.
However, the studies of the last 30 years
have proved that the lack of grammar
instruction has not encouraged language
acquisition. On the contrary, more recent
studies show that grammar instruction and
explicit knowledge of the target language do
have positive effects on language acquisition.
So, how should we approach the teaching of
Grammar in the Post- CommunicativeApproach Era?
Source: https://www.eflmagazine.com/teachinggrammar-post-communicative-approach-era/ Accessed
on 17/06/2018
(Concurso Milagres/2018) The text
suggests that:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798462
Inglês
Texto associado
TEACHING GRAMMAR IN THE POST
COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH ERA
D I A N A B A U D U C C O
Grammar. To teach or not to teach? This
has been the question that language teachers
have asked themselves for ages. It has been
a matter of debate for teachers, linguists and
second language acquisition experts.
Historically, language teaching approaches
and methods have moved from one extreme
of the spectrum to another as regards the
explicit teaching of grammar. Long before our
times, grammar was at the centre of language
teaching, as it was believed that the study of
the grammar of X‟s language was the best
way to its mastery. So, from medieval times
till around the 1970s, the fixation of language
teaching on the study and description of
structures manifested in approaches such as
the Grammar Translation and the Audio
Lingual method, with short interludes of the
other approaches such as the Direct Method,
Total Physical Response and the Silent way
which although claiming to differ still based
their syllabus on grammar points.
From the Grammar-dominated end of the
spectrum, we moved to the Absolutely-noGrammar end. Grammar based approaches
proved inadequate in that students were
unable to communicate outside the
classroom. Based mainly on Hymes‟
“communicative competence” and Krashen‟s
models of language acquisition, the
Communicative Approach emerged as the
meaning-focused alternative to the formfocused approaches of the past. Strong
versions of the approach emphasized the
teaching of functions and absolutely
discouraged the teaching of grammar structures arguing that communication – and
not language description- was the aim of
language teaching.
However, the studies of the last 30 years
have proved that the lack of grammar
instruction has not encouraged language
acquisition. On the contrary, more recent
studies show that grammar instruction and
explicit knowledge of the target language do
have positive effects on language acquisition.
So, how should we approach the teaching of
Grammar in the Post- CommunicativeApproach Era?
Source: https://www.eflmagazine.com/teachinggrammar-post-communicative-approach-era/ Accessed
on 17/06/2018
(Concurso Milagres/2018) According
to the text, it is correct to say that:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Provas:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor Polivalente
|
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Espanhol |
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Português |
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de História |
Q1798460
Pedagogia
(Concurso Milagres/2018) Marque a
opção correta:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Inglês |
Q1798458
Pedagogia
(Concurso Milagres/2018) Observe as
afirmações e marque a opção correta:
I – A Pedagogia, sendo ciência da e para a educação, estuda a educação, a instrução e o ensino; a Didática é o principal ramo de estudos da Pedagogia. II – Investigar os fundamentos, condições e modos de realização da instrução e do ensino são competências da Didática. III – A Didática, com base em seus vínculos com a Pedagogia, especifica processos, comportamentos, aspectos legais e procedimentos obtidos na investigação das matérias gerais. IV – A Didática está intimamente ligada à Teoria da Educação, à Teoria da Organização Escolar, à Teoria do Conhecimento e à Psicologia da Educação.
I – A Pedagogia, sendo ciência da e para a educação, estuda a educação, a instrução e o ensino; a Didática é o principal ramo de estudos da Pedagogia. II – Investigar os fundamentos, condições e modos de realização da instrução e do ensino são competências da Didática. III – A Didática, com base em seus vínculos com a Pedagogia, especifica processos, comportamentos, aspectos legais e procedimentos obtidos na investigação das matérias gerais. IV – A Didática está intimamente ligada à Teoria da Educação, à Teoria da Organização Escolar, à Teoria do Conhecimento e à Psicologia da Educação.
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Espanhol |
Q1798381
Espanhol
(Concurso Milagres/2018) Complete o
trecho com a forma verbal adequada
“No puedo compreender que no se
adaptara a los horarios, durante los dos
años que ________ en Portugal”.
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Espanhol |
Q1798380
Espanhol
(Concurso Milagres/2018) No quadro
04 da tirinha, o vocábulo “estúpida” é
acentuado, pois é uma palavra
“esdrújula” e todas são acentuadas em
espanhol. Assinale a opção que
apresenta equívoco na acentuação:
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Espanhol |
Q1798379
Espanhol
(Concurso Milagres/2018) Na tira de
Malfada, no segundo quadro, ela utiliza
a forma verbal “sos” que corresponde
ao: 
Disponível em:
https://www.google.com.br/search?q=mafalda+y+libertad
+historietas&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0
ahUKEwjc7_qMzNjbAhVDxpAKHSqUBEwQsAQIJg&biw
=1366&bih=635#imgrc=Yy_3l5h39tb7GM
Disponível em:
https://www.google.com.br/search?q=mafalda+y+libertad
+historietas&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0
ahUKEwjc7_qMzNjbAhVDxpAKHSqUBEwQsAQIJg&biw
=1366&bih=635#imgrc=Yy_3l5h39tb7GM
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Espanhol |
Q1798378
Espanhol
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Espanhol |
Q1798377
Espanhol
(Concurso Milagres/2018) Na tira,
Libertad utiliza a forma de tratamento
“usted”, no último quadro, para falar
com o pai de Mafalda, pois: 
Disponível em: https://www.google.com.br/search?q=mafalda+y+libertad +historietas&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0 ahUKEwjc7_qMzNjbAhVDxpAKHSqUBEwQsAQIJg&biw =1366&bih=635#imgrc=Yy_3l5h39tb7GM
Disponível em: https://www.google.com.br/search?q=mafalda+y+libertad +historietas&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0 ahUKEwjc7_qMzNjbAhVDxpAKHSqUBEwQsAQIJg&biw =1366&bih=635#imgrc=Yy_3l5h39tb7GM
Ano: 2018
Banca:
CEV-URCA
Órgão:
Prefeitura de Milagres - CE
Prova:
CEV-URCA - 2018 - Prefeitura de Milagres - CE - Professor de Espanhol |
Q1798376
Espanhol
(Concurso Milagres/2018) Na oração
“_______ no ser un compuesto químico
estable, nos habrían prohibido
manipularlo”, deve-se inserir a
preposição:
Conheça nossos planos